Vascularized Bone Autograft for the Treatment of Chondroblastoma of the Talus at Imminent Risk of Joint Breakdown: Three Case Reports.

Surgical treatment options in a chondroblastoma of the talus breaching the subchondral layer with imminent risk of talar collapse in the weightbearing area are limited. A joint-preserving surgery should be advocated. Because current treatment options such as curettage, cryosurgery, or radiofrequency ablation may not be able to prevent a talar dome breakdown in large defects, nonvascularized bone grafting has been advocated to fill the void. To overcome the lack of vitality, a vascularized bone autograft might be an attractive alternative. We present 3 cases where a large talar defect owing to a chondroblastoma was treated with a vascularized bone autograft. In 1 of the cases, a free microvascular iliac crest bone graft was used, whereas in the other 2 cases, a vascularized graft was harvested from the medial femoral condyle. Computed tomographic scans demonstrated a stable incorporation of the graft in all cases. All patients were highly satisfied with the obtained results and showed a clinical functional outcome similar to the contralateral foot after 36, 60, and 72 months. At the latest radiographic follow-up, no evidence of recurrence was observed. In conclusion, a free vascularized bone autograft can be used to treat a large talar defect owing to chondroblastoma in young patients.

Subtalar joint alignment in ankle osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Although it has been proposed that in mid-stage ankle osteoarthritis, the subtalar joint can compensate for deformities above the ankle joint, the evidence is weak. We thus investigated subtalar joint alignment in different stages of ankle osteoarthritis using weightbearing computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: The subtalar joint of 88 patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle joint and a control group of 27 healthy volunteers were assessed. Subgroups were performed according to the ankle deformity (varus and valgus) and stage of ankle joint osteoarthritis. Subtalar joint alignment was assessed on weightbearing CT scans. RESULTS: A more valgus subtalar joint alignment was found in patients with varus ankle osteoarthritis. No significant difference of the subtalar joint alignment was evident when comparing different stages of ankle osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Varus ankles compensate in the subtalar joint for deformities above the ankle joint. Compensation does not correlate with the stage of ankle osteoarthritis.

Long-term survival of the cemented Müller CDH stem: a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty in patients with altered anatomy of the hip and femur, such as in congenital dysplasia of the hip, is challenging and often requires specially designed stems. Müller straight stems have shown excellent long-term results; however, long-term data on the analogous cemented Müller CDH stem are still missing. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term survival, identify potential risk factors for aseptic loosening, and analyze radiological outcome of the cemented Müller CDH stems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 01/1985 and 06/2005, 95 Müller CDH stems (Zimmer, Winterthur, Switzerland) made up of 3 different materials were cemented using 2 different bone cements: 38 of stainless steel/high-viscosity cement, 31 of a cobalt-chrome-based alloy (CoCr)/low-viscosity cement, and 26 of a titanium-based alloy (Ti)/low-viscosity cement. All patients had a prospective clinical and radiological follow-up according to the standards of our institution. The cumulative incidence for revision of the stem was calculated using a competing risk model. To identify demographic and implant-related risk factors for aseptic loosening of the stem, a multivariate regression model for competing risks was performed. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of revision at 15 years was 12.5% (95% CI 6.6-20.5%) for aseptic loosening of the stem as endpoint, with marked differences for the various stem materials used: stainless steel 2.7% (0.2-12.3%), CoCr 12.9% (4.0-27.3%), and Ti 24.5% (9.6-43.1%). Regression modeling revealed that Ti stems in combination with low-viscosity cement (HR 10.2) and implantation with an axis deviation greater than 3° (HR 3.8) are risk factors for aseptic loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival of the cemented Müller CDH stem is comparable to other Müller-type straight stems and uncemented implants. Similar to the original Ti Müller straight stem, the Ti Müller CDH stem also showed an increased risk for aseptic loosening and should, therefore, no longer be used.

Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component.

INTRODUCTION: In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the cancellous bone is normally completely removed out of the femoral canal during stem extraction. This situation is comparable to primary THA following the shape-closed concept, with some authors advocating to remove the metaphyseal cancellous bone to enhance press-fit stability ("French paradox"). The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome, regarding survival and radiological results, of a cemented straight stem when used for revision THA and to compare these results to the results of the same stem in primary THA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 178 stem revisions performed between 01/1994 and 08/2008 using the Virtec straight stem were included. The cumulative incidence for re-revision was calculated using a competing risk model. Risk factors for re-revision of the stem were analyzed using an absolute risk regression model. Radiographs analyzed for osteolysis, debonding and subsidence had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence for re-revision due to aseptic loosening of the stem was 5.5% (95% CI, 2.9-10.2%) at 10 years. Aseptic loosening was associated with younger age, larger defect size and larger stem size. After a minimum 10-year follow-up, osteolysis was seen in 39 of 80 revision THA. Compared to the results in primary THA, the survival in revision THA with the same implant was inferior. CONCLUSIONS: Cemented straight stems used for revision THA showed excellent long-term results regarding survivorship and radiological outcome. This stem therefore offers a valuable and cost-effective option in revision THA.

Excellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary cup revision.

Background and purpose - The original Müller acetabular reinforcement ring (ARR) was developed to be used for acetabular revisions with small cavitary and/or segmental defects or poor acetabular bone quality. Long-term data for this device are scarce. We therefore investigated long-term survival and radiographic outcome for revision total hip arthroplasty using the ARR. Patients and methods - Between October 1984 and December 2005, 259 primary acetabular revisions using an ARR were performed in 245 patients (259 hips). The mean follow-up time was 10 (0-27) years; 8 hips were lost to follow-up. The cumulative incidence for revision was calculated using a competing risk model. Radiographic assessment was performed for 90 hips with minimum 10 years' follow-up. It included evaluation of osteolysis, migration and loosening. Results - 16 ARRs were re-revised: 8 for aseptic loosening, 6 for infection, 1 for suspected infection, and 1 due to malpositioning of the cup. The cumulative re-revision rate for aseptic loosening of the ARR at 20 years was 3.7% (95% CI 1.7-6.8%). Assuming all patients lost to follow-up were revised for aseptic loosening, the re-revision rate at 20 years was 6.9% (95% CI 4.1-11%). The overall re-revision rate of the ARR for any reason at 20 years was 7.0% (95% CI 4.1-11%). 21 (23%) of the 90 radiographically examined ARR had radiographic changes: 12 showed isolated signs of osteolysis but were not loose; 9 were determined loose on follow-up, of which 5 were revised. Interpretation - Our data suggest that the long-term survival and radiographic results of the ARR in primary acetabular revision are excellent.

Prospective two-year subsidence analysis of 100 cemented polished straight stems - a short-term clinical and radiological observation.

BACKGROUND: Cemented stems show good long-term results and the survival of new implants can be predicted by their early subsidence. With EBRA-FCA (Femoral Component Analysis using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse) early subsidence as an early indicator for later aseptic loosening can be analysed. For the cemented TwinSys stem mid- and long-term data is only avalible from the New Zeeland Arthroplasty register, thus close monitoring of this implant system is still mandatory. METHODS: We conducted a 2 year follow up of 100 consecutive hybrid THA (Total hip arthroplasty) of a series of 285 primary THA operated between Jan 2009 und Oct 2010. These 100 received a polished, cemented collarless straight stem (twinSys®, Mathys AG® Bettlach, Switzerland) with an uncemented monobloc pressfit cup (RM pressfit®, Mathys AG® Bettlach, Switzerland). The other patients were treated with the uncemented version of this stem and the same cup. Clinical (Harris Hip Score) and radiological (ap and axial x-rays, cementing quality according to Barrack, alignment) outcomes besides an EBRA-FCA subsidence analysis were performed. RESULTS: Median age at operation was 78 (68 to 93) years. 5 patients died in the course of follow-up unrelated to surgery. The KM (Kaplan-Meier) survival at 2 years for the endpoint reoperation for any reason was 94.9 (95 % confidence interval 90.6-100 %). Survival for the endpoint aseptic loosening at 2 years was 100 %. The HHS (Harris Hip Score) improved from 56 (14-86) preoperatively to 95 (60-100) 2 years after the operation. Cementing results were judged 47 % Grade A, 45 % Grade B and 7 % Grade C. Osteolysis was found in 2 stems without clinical symptoms or correlation to subsidence or cementing quality. The EBRA-FCA analysis showed an average subsidence of -0.30 mm (95 % CI -0.5 mm to -0.1 mm). 11 patients showed a subsidence of more than 1 mm. In this group one patient showed a subsidence of 1.5 mm and one of 3.1 mm without further radiological changes. CONCLUSIONS: The twinSys stem showed excellent clinical and radiologic short term results at 2 years follow-up and seems to be a reliable implant.

One-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty: outcome of 39 consecutive hips.

PURPOSE: There are various options for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Two-stage exchange has traditionally been the gold standard. However, if the appropriate surgical intervention is chosen according to a rational algorithm, the outcome is similar when using all types of interventions. In an observational cohort study, the outcome of patients with PJI after hip replacement treated with one-stage revision was analysed. METHODS: All patients fulfilling all criteria for one-stage exchange according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines and six without preoperative identification of a microorganism were included. Implant removal, debridement and cemented or uncemented reimplantations were performed in a single intervention. If a cemented device was implanted, commercially available gentamicin cement was used in all cases. Antibiotic treatment was administered intravenously for at least 2 weeks, followed by oral therapy for a total duration of 3 months. Patients had standardised clinical and radiological follow-up visits. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2011, 38 patients (39 hips) were treated with a one-stage procedure and followed for at least 2 years. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most frequent pathogens, and polymicrobial infection was observed in five cases. In 25 hips, an uncemented revision stem was implanted, and 37 hips received an acetabular reinforcement ring. The mean follow-up was 6.6 (2.0-15.1) years. No patient had persistent, recurrent or new infection. There were four stem revisions for aseptic loosening. The mean Harris Hip Score was 81 points (26-99) at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent cure rate and function seen in our study suggest that one-stage exchange is a safe procedure, even without local antibiotic treatment, provided that the patient has no sinus tract or severe soft tissue damage, no major bone grafting is required and the microorganism is susceptible to orally administered agents with high bioavailability.

Eradication of infection, survival, and radiological results of uncemented revision stems in infected total hip arthroplasties.

Background and purpose - The use of uncemented revision stems is an established option in 2-stage procedures in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, in 1-stage procedures, they are still rarely used. There are still no detailed data on radiological outcome after uncemented 1-stage revisions. We assessed (1) the clinical outcome, including reoperation due to persistent infection and any other reoperation, and (2) the radiological outcome after 1- and 2-stage revision, using an uncemented stem. Patients and methods - Between January 1993 and December 2012, an uncemented revision stem was used in 81 THAs revised for PJI. Patients were treated with 1- or 2-stage procedures according to a well-defined algorithm (1-stage: n = 28; 2-stage: n = 53). All hips had a clinical and radiological follow-up. Outcome parameters were eradication of infection, re-revision of the stem, and radiological changes. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Radiographs were analyzed for bone restoration and signs of loosening. The mean clinical follow-up time was 7 (2-15) years. Results - The 7-year infection-free survival was 96% (95% CI: 92-100), 100% for 1-stage revision and 94% for 2-stage revision (95% CI: 87-100) (p = 0.2). The 7-year survival for aseptic loosening of the stem was 97% (95% CI: 93-100), 97% for 1-stage revision (95% CI: 90-100) and 97% for 2-stage revision (95% CI: 92-100) (p = 0.3). No further infection or aseptic loosening occurred later than 7 years postoperatively. The radiographic results were similar for 1- and 2-stage procedures. Interpretation - Surgical management of PJI with stratification to 1- or 2-stage exchange according to a well-defined algorithm combined with antibiotic treatment allows the safe use of uncemented revision stems. Eradication of infection can be achieved in most cases, and medium- and long-term results appear to be comparable to those for revisions for aseptic loosening.

Metal backed fixed-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasties using minimal invasive surgery: a promising outcome analysis of 132 cases.

BACKGROUND: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a well-established treatment for isolated osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial knee compartment. Aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcomes of a consecutive series of patients treated with medial metal backed fixed-bearing UKA. Furthermore, the influence of the component orientation on the outcome was analyzed. METHODS: From 09/2006 to 11/2010 106 patients (132 knees; 69 ± 9 years) were treated using a metal backed fixed-bearing UKA with a MIS approach. All patients underwent a standardized clinical and radiological follow-up at 6 weeks, 1, 2 and 5 years. Mean follow-up was 3.4 ± 1.0 years. Two patients (three UKAs) deceased and two patients (two UKAs) were lost to follow-up. Three different survival analyses were performed using three different endpoints defining failure: (a) revision with exchange of any UKA component (b) aseptic loosening and (c), a worst case scenario, where it was assumed that all progressive radiolucencies would lead to aseptic loosening and thus these were additionally counted. Clinical outcome was assessed using the American knee society score (AKS) and the Oxford knee score (OKS). Radiographic analysis was done according to the American Knee Society Evaluation and Scoring System adapted for UKA and correlated with the AKS and OKS. RESULTS: Five UKAs (3.8 %) were revised to total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) after a median of 25 (10-33) months. Five year survival was 95.2, 97.5 and 87.7% for the aforementioned endpoints. At final follow-up the median AKS knee score was 99 (50-100) points and the median AKS function score was 100 (60-100) points. The median OKS was 43 (8-48) points. Clinical outcome was independent of the component orientation. CONCLUSION: Fixed-bearing UKA showed excellent clinical and radiological results at up to 5 years follow-up. Outcome was independent of component orientation.

The effect of foot type on the Achilles tendon moment arm and biomechanics.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to calculate the Achilles tendon moment arm in different degrees of plantarflexion for pes planus, pes cavus and normal arched feet. METHODS: 99 patients (99 radiographs; 40 males, 59 females; mean age 49 years, SD 15) with a healthy ankle joint and a preoperative weightbearing lateral radiograph of the foot were included. Three groups (pes planus, pes cavus and normal-arched feet) with equal sample sizes (n=33) were formed. On radiographs, the angle formed between a horizontal line and the line connecting the insertion of the Achilles tendon with the center of rotation of the ankle, was measured. The interrater reliabilities (ICC) of the angle alpha were compared on radiographs and on MRIs. Using the angle alpha, the Achilles tendon moment arm was calculated in different plantarflexion positions. RESULTS: The ICC of alpha was higher on radiographs (0.84, [0.73-0.91]) than on MRIs (0.61, [0.27-0.81]). The average alpha was statistically significantly different (normal arched foot 31 degrees (°), pes planus 24°, pes cavus 36°, p=0.021), resulting in a significant shorter Achilles tendon moment arm for pes cavus than for pes planus (p<0.0001) and normal arched feet (p=0.006) in neutral position. CONCLUSION: The data suggests that it is feasible to use radiographs to measure the Achilles tendon moment arm. The maximum Achilles tendon moment arm is reached at different angles of ankle flexion for pes cavus, pes planus and normal-arched feet. This has to be taken into consideration when planning surgeries.

Combined Subtalar and Naviculocuneiform Fusion for Treating Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity With Medial Arch Collapse at the Level of the Naviculocuneiform Joint.

BACKGROUND:: A challenge in treating acquired flatfoot deformities is the collapse of the medial arch at the level of the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. Triple fusions, being a treatment option, may lead to problems such as increased foot stiffness. We thus established a method that combines subtalar (ST) fusion with NC fusion while preserving the Chopart joint. We analyzed the radiographic correction, fusion rate, and patient satisfaction with this procedure. METHODS:: 34 feet in 31 patients (female, 23; male, 8; age 67 [45-81] years) were treated with a ST and NC joint fusion. In 15 cases, a medial sliding-osteotomy was additionally necessary to fully correct hindfoot valgus. The following radiographic parameters were measured on weightbearing radiographs preoperatively and at 2 years: talo-first metatarsal angle, talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, talonavicular coverage angle and calcaneal offset. Fusion was radiologically confirmed. RESULTS:: All parameters, except the calcaneal pitch, showed a significant improvement. Fusion was observed after 1 year in all but 2 cases (94.1%). One nonunion each occurred at the ST and NC joint without needing any subsequent treatment. One patient developed avascular necrosis of the lateral talus with need for total ankle replacement after 1 year. All patients were satisfied with the obtained results. CONCLUSION:: Our data suggest that a combined fusion of the ST and NC joint was effective and safe when treating adult acquired flatfoot with collapse of the medial arch at the level of the NC joint. Although the talonavicular joint was not fused, its subluxation was significantly reduced. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level IV, case series.

Extraarticular Supramalleolar Osteotomy in Asymmetric Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, supramalleolar osteotomy has become a valuable alternative for treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the preoperative stage of ankle osteoarthritis or tilt of the talus in the ankle mortise impacts radiologic and clinical outcomes following a supramalleolar osteotomy. METHODS: Forty-four patients who underwent a supramalleolar osteotomy for posttraumatic asymmetric varus ankle osteoarthritis were included. Subgroups were formed according to the preoperative stage of ankle osteoarthritis and the tilt of the talus in the ankle mortise. The radiographic and clinical outcomes of each subgroup were compared, and survival rates calculated. RESULTS: Ankles with a preoperative Takakura stage of 2 and 3a showed a significant higher survival rate at 5 years (88% [95% CI, 67-100] and 93% [95% CI, 80-100]) compared with ankles with a preoperative Takakura stage of 3b (47% [95% CI, 26-86]; P = .044). The 5-year survival rate for patients with a preoperative tilt of the talus in the ankle mortise of 4-10 degrees was 85% (95% CI, 68-100), while patients with a preoperative tilt of >10 degrees showed a 5-year survival rate of 65% (95% CI, 46-93; P = .117). CONCLUSION: Supramalleolar osteotomy was a valuable treatment option for early to mid-stage posttraumatic asymmetric varus ankle osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Secondary Subtalar Joint Osteoarthritis Following Total Ankle Replacement.

BACKGROUND: An advantage of total ankle replacement (TAR) compared to ankle fusion is that by maintaining motion, the occurrence of hypermobility of adjacent joints may be prevented. This could affect the development of symptomatic subtalar joint osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of subtalar joint fusion and the progression of subtalar joint OA following TAR. METHODS: Secondary subtalar joint fusion rate was determined from a cohort of 941 patients receiving primary TAR between 2000 and 2016. The indication for fusion, the time interval from primary TAR to fusion, and the union rate were evaluated. To assess the progression of subtalar joint OA, degenerative changes of the subtalar joint were classified in 671 patients using the Kellgren-Lawrence score (KLS) prior to TAR and at latest follow-up. RESULTS: In 4% (37) of the patients, a secondary subtalar joint fusion was necessary. The indication for fusion was symptomatic OA in 51% (19), hindfoot instability in 27% (10), osteonecrosis of the talus in 19% (7), and cystic changes of the talus in 3% (1) of the patients. Time from primary TAR to subtalar joint fusion due to progressive OA was 5.0 (range, 0.3-10) years and for other reasons 1.6 (range, 0.2-11.6) years (P = .3). In 68% (456) of the patients, no progression of subtalar joint OA was observed. CONCLUSION: The incidence of secondary subtalar joint fusion was low. The most common reason for subtalar joint fusion following TAR was symptomatic OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Imaging of the subtalar joint: A novel approach to an old problem.

Evaluation of the subtalar joint using conventional radiographs is difficult. The purpose of this study was to assess how the posterior facet of the subtalar joint is projected on eight standard radiographic views of the foot and ankle. Weightbearing computed tomography (CT) scans of 27 volunteers without ankle pathology were performed. Eight standard views of the foot and ankle (antero-posterior [AP] view, mortise view, subtalar view, four different Broden views) were reconstructed using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). The appearance of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint was assessed for each view. In addition, the position of the joint line was projected onto three-dimensional (3-D) models of the calcaneus. We found (i) on the AP view of the ankle joint, the posterior part of the posterior facet is visualized and appears convex (calcaneal side); (ii) on the mortise view of the ankle joint, a slightly more anterior part (compared to the AP view) is visualized and appears either convex or flat; (iii) on the subtalar view, the anterior part of the posterior facet is visualized and appears either convex, flat or concave; and (iv) using the Broden views, the posterior and anterior part of the posterior facet can be visualized. This study clarifies which parts of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint are visualized on eight standard views of the foot and ankle. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

Mid-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented modular femoral component.

INTRODUCTION: During revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the surgeon commonly faces deficient proximal femoral bone. In this situation, distal fixation of the prosthesis is required. The aim of the current retrospective study is to assess the clinical and radiographic mid-term outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular uncemented, tapered, grit-blasted, distal straight stem system. METHODS: This retrospective study included 70 femoral revisions that were performed in 67 patients using the device of interest. All patients were operated on via an extended trochanteric osteotomy. 60 revisions were performed as 1-stage (12 infected) and 10 as 2-stage (all infected) revisions. At 3 months postoperatively and at final follow-up, patients were assessed radiographically for the presence of osteolysis and for distal integration. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 4.3 (2.0-7.6) years. 4 patients had a removal of at least 1 prosthetic component. Stem survival for any reason was 92% after 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). With aseptic loosening of the stem as the endpoint of interest, survival after 5 years was 96% (95% CI, 88%-100%). A postoperative subsidence rate of 14.7% was found. No perioperative femoral fractures were found in the current patient series. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed excellent mid-term survival and good clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who had undergone revision THA with a modular uncemented, tapered, straight design.

Supramalleolar Osteotomy for Tibial Component Malposition in Total Ankle Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Persistent pain despite a total ankle replacement is not uncommon. A main source of pain may be an insufficiently balanced ankle. An alternative to the revision of the existing arthroplasty is the use of a corrective osteotomy of the distal tibia, above the stable implant. This strictly extraarticular procedure preserves the integrity of the replaced joint. The aim of this study was to review a series of patients in whom a corrective supramalleolar osteotomy was performed to realign a varus misaligned tibial component in total ankle replacement. We hypothesized that the supramalleolar osteotomy would correct the malpositioned tibial component, resulting in pain relief and improvement of function. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (9 male, 13 female; mean age, 62.6 years; range, 44.7-80) were treated with a supramalleolar osteotomy to correct a painful ankle with a varus malpositioned tibial component. Prospectively recorded radiologic and clinical outcome data as well as complications and reoperations were analyzed. RESULTS: The tibial anterior surface angle significantly changed from 85.2 ± 2.5 degrees preoperatively to 91.4 ± 2.9 degrees postoperatively ( P < .0001), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot score significantly increased from 46 ± 14 to 66 ± 16 points ( P < .0001) and the patient's pain score measured with the visual analog scale significantly decreased from 5.8 ± 1.9 to 3.3 ± 2.4 ( P < .001). No statistical difference was found in the tibial lateral surface angle and the range of motion of the ankle when comparing the preoperative to the postoperative measurements. The osteotomy healed in all but 3 patients on first attempt. Fifteen patients (68%) were (very) satisfied, 4 moderately satisfied, and 3 patients were not satisfied with the result. CONCLUSION: The supramalleolar osteotomy was found to be a reliable treatment option for correcting the varus misaligned tibial component in a painful replaced ankle. However, nonunion (14%) should be mentioned as a possible complication of this surgery. Nonetheless, as a strictly extraarticular procedure, it did not compromise function of the previously replaced ankle, and it was shown to relieve pain without having to have revised a well-fixed ankle arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

The Use of Supramalleolar Osteotomies in Posttraumatic Deformity and Arthritis of the Ankle.

Osteoarthritis of the ankle is a debilitating musculoskeletal disease that affects approximately 1% of adults worldwide. The most common etiology of ankle osteoarthritis is trauma. In general, patients with ankle osteoarthritis are 12 to 15 years younger than patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. More than 50% of all patients with ankle osteoarthritis exhibit a substantial concomitant hindfoot deformity on the supramalleolar and/or inframalleolar level. Different treatment options for ankle osteoarthritis, including joint-preserving and non-joint-preserving surgical procedures, have been described in the current literature. Supramalleolar osteotomy is a joint-preserving option that can be considered in patients who have asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis, a partially preserved ankle joint, and a concomitant supramalleolar deformity. The primary goal of the supramalleolar osteotomy is to realign the hindfoot and, specifically, the spatial relationship between the talus and the tibia in order to restore normal ankle biomechanics and normalize load distribution within the ankle joint. Different surgical techniques of supramalleolar osteotomy that are based on the underlying deformity, e.g., varus versus valgus, are described. The major steps of the procedure, which are demonstrated in this video article, include (1) exposure of the distal end of the tibia, (2) determination of the osteotomy site, (3) performance of the supramalleolar osteotomy, (4) mobilization of the osteotomized distal end of the tibia, (5) internal fixation of the osteotomy site, (6) additional balancing, and (7) step-by-step wound closure. In some instances, additional procedures are required to balance the ankle joint, e.g., inframalleolar osteotomies, arthrodeses, ligament reconstructions, and tendon transfers. The postoperative rehabilitation requires non-weight-bearing activity for 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. Intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative complications can occur and are discussed in this article.

Mid- to Long-term Results of Supramalleolar Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Good clinical and radiographic short-term results have been reported for patients who underwent realignment surgery of the hindfoot for treatment of early- and mid-stage ankle osteoarthrosis (OA). However, no mid- to long-term results have been reported. The aim of this study was to gain a better insight into the indications and contraindications for realignment surgery. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-four patients (298 ankles) underwent realignment surgery between December 1999 and June 2013. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with total ankle replacement and arthrodesis of the ankle joint as endpoints. A Cox proportional hazards model was performed to identify risk factors for failure. The mean time to follow-up was 5.0 ± 3.7 years. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 88%. Thirty-eight patients (12.9%) underwent either secondary total ankle replacement or ankle arthrodesis (30 total ankle replacements, 8 ankle arthrodesis). Risk factors for failure following realignment surgery were age at the time of surgery and a Takakura score of 3b preoperatively. CONCLUSION: Realignment surgery of the hindfoot was an excellent treatment option for young and physically active patients with early to mid-stage ankle OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective observational study.

Chronic Ankle Instability (Medial and Lateral).

Ankle ligament injuries are among the most frequent reasons for emergency consultations of athletes. A majority of these can be treated conservatively; however, up to 40% develop chronic ankle instability requiring surgical reconstruction to restore functionality.

Medial approach to the subtalar joint: anatomy, indications, technique tips.

The medial approach to the subtalar joint allows good visualization of the articular surfaces. Compared with the lateral approach, advantages are found particularly in flatfoot correction, in which the single-incision technique can be used for corrective fusions of rigid flatfoot deformity. Union rates are comparable with the traditional lateral approach; however, wound healing problems occur less frequently. Avascular necrosis of the talus is a rare but serious complication, although frequency seems to be independent of the approach chosen. Clinical studies showed no increased morbidity when comparing the medial to the lateral approach.