Whole body hyperthermia cytokine induction: a review, and unifying hypothesis for myeloprotection in the setting of cytotoxic therapy.

Whole Body Hyperthermia (WBH) enhancement of chemotherapy and/or radiation without a concomitant increase in myelosuppression has been documented in clinical trials. We propose that the biological basis for this phenomena relates in part to the previously reported induction of peripheral cytokines by WBH, that is, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and the regulatory cytokine IL-10. To further explain this myeloprotection and the additional clinical observation that WBH promotes early engraftment of bone marrow (when used as part of an allogenic bone marrow transplant preconditioning regimen) we developed a hypothesis: WBH increases peripheral IL-1 beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha resulting in a secondary induction of IL-3 and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the bone marrow, for which supportive data also exists. Taken collectively, these data provide an increased understanding of the biological sequelae of fever, as well as a testable unifying hypothesis, for future antineoplastic treatment strategies.

Ifosfamide and carboplatin combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia in patients with refractory sarcoma and malignant teratoma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, biological interactions, and toxicities of ifosfamide and carboplatin combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 1 h in a pilot clinical study. Nineteen patients with refractory sarcoma or malignant teratoma were treated. To obtain baseline pharmacokinetic data for ifosfamide, the first chemotherapy course was given without WBH in six patients. This enabled comparison of systemic toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the drug combination with and without WBH (+/- WBH). All other patients received three thermochemotherapy treatments every 3 weeks. Ifosfamide was escalated from 5 to 10 g/m2 with a fixed carboplatin dose of 480 mg/m2. WBH was induced by extracorporally heated blood (in a hemodialysis apparatus) with general anesthesia. The drugs were given at target temperature. A total of 49 thermochemotherapy treatments was administered. The use of the hemodialysis device resulted in an approximate one-third reduction of blood concentrations of 4-hydroxyifosfamide, one activated intermediate metabolite of ifosfamide and carboplatin, but in an increase of chloroacetaldehyde, the other main ifosfamide metabolite. The WBC counts and the platelet nadirs (up to WBH grade 4) were not significantly different +/- WBH. Of 19 evaluable patients, 7 partial remissions, 8 disease stabilizations (average duration, 3 months), and 4 patients with progressive disease were observed. There was no WBH-related mortality. Toxicities observed included mild (anasarca, diarrhea, pressure sores, and perioral herpes simplex) and severe (reversible neuropathy, cardiopulmonary distress, and severe renal dysfunction). No hepatic or central nervous system toxicity occurred. Nephropathy was the dose-limiting toxicity. In conclusion, ifosfamide and carboplatin can be administered with extracorporally induced WBH with acceptable toxicity. Results obtained are consistent with continued evaluation of this combined modality approach.

Phase I clinical trial of carboplatin and 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biologic interactions and toxicities of carboplatin combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 60 minutes in a phase I clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty assessable patients with cancer refractory to conventional therapy were treated. During induction therapy, patients received WBH alone in week 1, WBH plus carboplatin in week 2, and carboplatin alone in week 5. Carboplatin dose was escalated (three patients per group) as follows: 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 480, and 575 mg/m2; three additional patients were entered at 480 mg/m2. Carboplatin was administered at target temperature. RESULTS: Comparisons of the mean/median WBC and platelet nadirs for carboplatin alone and carboplatin plus WBH demonstrated no enhancing effect by WBH. Toxicities including nausea and/or vomiting, as well as myelosuppression, were within acceptable limits, allowing for escalation to a dose of 575 mg/m2; three of three patients at this dose level experienced grade 4 myelosuppression with no associated infection or bleeding. No renal toxicity was observed. Analysis of platinum in plasma ultrafiltrate and urine showed only slight effects of WBH on the pharmacokinetics and renal excretion of platinum. Responses included the following: lung--minor response (200 mg/m2); gastrointestinal neuroendocrine--complete response (CR) (400 mg/m2); pancreatic--partial response (PR) (480 mg/m2); small bowel--PR (575 mg/m2); ovarian--CR, two patients (575 mg/m2), with marker data suggesting WBH enhancement of carboplatin cytotoxicity. Another three patients experienced clinical improvement after WBH plus carboplatin, but progression with carboplatin alone (lung, 400 mg/m2; gastrointestinal neuroendocrine, 480 mg/m2; melanoma, 480 mg/m2). CONCLUSION: We conclude that carboplatin with WBH is well tolerated even at conventional carboplatin doses. Clinical results are consistent with preclinical predictions of an increased therapeutic index for this combination, which encourages future clinical studies.

Phase I clinical trial of melphalan and 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biologic interactions and toxicities of melphalan (L-PAM) combined with 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 60 minutes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with refractory cancer were treated (May 1992 to May 1995) with WBH alone during week 1) thereafter patients were randomized to receive either L-PAM alone on week 2 and L-PAM plus WBH on week 5, or the reverse sequence. Patients who demonstrated clinical improvement received WBH plus L-PAM monthly. Dose levels of L-PAM were 10 mg/m2 (n = 3), 15 mg/m2 (n = 3), 17.5 mg/m2 (n = 6), and 20 mg/m2 (n = 4). L-PAM was administered at target temperature; WBH was administered with an Aquatherm radiant-heat device (patent pending; Cancer Research Institute, New York, NY). RESULTS: Comparisons of mean WBC count and platelet nadirs for L-PAM alone and L-PAM plus WBH demonstrated that the addition of WBH resulted in nadir counts that were, on average, 25% lower. There were no instances of febrile neutropenia or bleeding. Toxicities allowed for escalation of L-PAM to 20 mg/m2; all four patients at this level experienced grade 4 myelosuppression. No significant myelosuppression was observed at 10 and 15 mg/m2. Grade 3 myelosuppression was observed in two of six patients at 17.5 mg/m2. Responses included complete remission (CR) of pancreatic cancer (10 mg/m2), partial remission (PR) of malignant melanoma in two patients (20 mg/m2), and transient clinical and/or serologic improvement in five patients. The pharmacokinetics of L-PAM were not altered by WBH. Observed cytokine induction by WBH is also discussed in detail. CONCLUSION: We conclude that L-PAM with 41.8 degrees C WBH is well tolerated. Clinical results are consistent with preclinical predictions and provide a foundation for second-generation trials now in progress.

Cytokine induction by 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia.

The potential for 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia (WBH) to enhance ionizing irradiation and cytotoxic chemotherapy without a commensurate increase in normal tissue toxicity is currently receiving renewed clinical interest. Additionally, WBH may have other biological sequela which may be clinically exploited. In this paper, data are summarized revealing the ability of WBH to induce elevated plasma levels of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) within hours of WBH. Data regarding TNF-alpha shows induction in only a proportion of patients. No induction of C-reactive protein (CRP) or the following cytokines was observed: granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-7 (IL-7), interleukin-11 (IL-11), interleukin-12 (IL-12), macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha). Data regarding interleukin-3 (IL-3) and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) were variable and inconclusive. The implications of these results to past and future clinical trials are discussed.

Cytotoxic interactions of tumor necrosis factor, melphalan and 41.8 degrees C hyperthermia.

Experience with limb perfusion-hyperthermia, TNF, and L-PAM suggests dramatic clinical responses in sarcoma and malignant melanoma. To extrapolate these results to clinical 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) and systemic therapy, we studied the cytotoxic interactions of TNF, L-PAM and hyperthermia in L929 cells. The optimal sequence was TNF preceding 41.8 degrees C hyperthermia by 48 h, and L-PAM given simultaneously with heat. Trimodality synergism between TNF, hyperthermia and L-PAM was demonstrated. Non-cytotoxic doses of TNF had a super-additive interaction with L-PAM/heat. Conversely, non-cytotoxic doses of L-PAM had super-additive interactions with TNF followed by hyperthermia. Relative to therapeutic index, we studied WBH, L-PAM and TNF in non-tumor bearing mice. The optimal trimodality sequence did not result in increased normal tissue toxicity compared to L-PAM alone. The concentrations and sequencing of TNF and L-PAM studied are consistent with clinical application to WBH.

A pilot study of melphalan, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibilitv of sequencing (based on preclinical modeling) tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF) at two dose levels with melphalan (L-PAM) and 41.8 C whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) for 60 min. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with refractory cancer were treated from October 1995 to June 1997. The study encompassed a total of 20 trimodality treatment courses. Three patients were treated at TNF dose level I (50 microg/m2) and six patients were treated at TNF dose level II (100 microg/m2). TNF was delivered as a 24-h intravenous infusion, 48 h prior to the combination of L-PAM and WBH; L-PAM was given over 10 min at target temperature at a dose of 17.5 mg/ m2 based on a previous phase I WBH/L-PAM trial. WBH was administered with an Aquatherm radiant heat device. RESULTS: Myelosuppression was the major toxicity associated with therapy, but there were no instances of bleeding or neutropenic fevers. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen with 15% of treatments. Regarding absolute neutrophil count, 15% of treatments were associated with grade 3 toxicity, and 45% with grade 4 toxicity, and regarding white blood cell count, 50% of treatments were associated with grade 3 toxicity and 10% with grade 4 toxicity. The myelosuppression observed was equivalent to that seen in our earlier phase I study of WBH and L-PAM (without TNF). Only mild toxicities (grade 1 or 2) were associated with TNF; these were seen with <25% of treatments and included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fevers, and headache. There were no instances of hypotension. There was no relationship between toxicities observed and the two TNF dose levels. Mild WBH toxicities were seen with less than 15% of treatments; these included nausea, vomiting, and herpes simplex I. Responses included two complete remissions (malignant melanoma, TNF dose level I; breast cancer, TNF dose level II), and two disease stabilizations (both malignant melanoma, TNF dose level I). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of TNF, L-PAM, and WBH is well tolerated at the dose levels studied. The clinical results justify further clinical investigation for this trimodality treatment approach.

Step down heating and melphalan: cytotoxic interactions and clinical implications.

Step down heating from 41.8 degrees C (10, 15 and 20 min) to 40.5 degrees C (55, 50 and 45 min respectively) was studied in vitro in L929 sarcoma cells in the presence and absence of increasing doses of melphalan. Results for heat killing alone demonstrated that step down heating for 20 min (but not 10 or 15 min) at 41.8 degrees C was equivalent to 41.8 degrees C x 65 min. Heat enhancement of melphalan, however, was observed at 10, 15 and 20 min with thermal enhancement ratios of 8.3, 10.3 and 8.5 respectively (p < or = 0.01), consistent with the enhancement of 41.8 degrees C x 65 min. The relevance of these data to hyperthermic limb perfusions for the treatment of malignant melanoma and sarcoma are discussed.

Rationale and clinical status of 41.8 degrees C systemic hyperthermia tumor necrosis factor, and melphalan for neoplastic disease.

Dramatic clinical results have been obtained in malignant melanoma and sarcoma using hyperthermic limb perfusion in combination with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and melphalan (L-PAM). In order to extrapolate these results to systemic treatment, a preclinical research program was initiated to study the interactions of hyperthermia, TNF, and L-PAM. Based on these results, a Phase I clinical trial of whole body hyperthermia (WBH) and L-PAM was initiated and completed. Clinical results obtained were consistent with initiating two second generation studies: a) a Phase II study of WBH and L-PAM for malignant melanoma; b) a Phase I study of WBH, TNF and L-PAM. Both of these studies are currently active at the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center. The following review summarizes the laboratory and clinical data obtained to date regarding this systemic multi-modality treatment approach.

Systemic hyperthermia and ICE chemotherapy for sarcoma patients: rationale and clinical status.

Preclinical studies are consistent with the concept that 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia (WBH) can enhance the therapeutic index of specific chemotherapeutic agents. These laboratory investigations resulted in 2 phase I clinical studies, which also support this hypothesis. These trials were extended to 2 sequential phase II investigations of WBH plus ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) for refractory sarcoma patients. The first study (involving 12 patients) using extra-corporeal WBH was prematurely closed to adopt a less toxic WBH technology, i.e., the radiant heat Aquatherm. To date, 12 patients have been accrued to the Aquatherm trial. Projections regarding reduced morbidity were correct. The response rate for ICE/WBH is currently 63%. The review to follow will summarize the results of these trials, as well as the laboratory and clinical data which serve to explicate the dramatic clinical results observed to date.

Hematological effects of radiant heat-induced whole body hyperthermia on dogs.

The effects on hematological parameters of radiant heat-induced whole body hyperthermia (WBH) at 40.5 degrees C and 41.8 degrees C were determined in 6 normal dogs. Complete blood counts determined prior to WBH, immediately post WBH plateau, and at 1, 2, 7, and 14 days posttreatment did not change significantly following WBH at 40.5 degrees C or 41.8 degrees C. Similarly, no significant changes were detected in platelet counts measured following 40.5 degrees C WBH. In contrast, platelet counts 11 days following 41.8 degrees C WBH increased significantly (P < 0.05) consistent with the hypothesis of induction of putative WBH-induced platelet stimulating factors.

Canine bone marrow as a potential thermal sanctuary during the plateau phase of 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia.

Whole body hyperthermia (WBH) is currently being evaluated as an adjunct to various forms of antineoplastic therapy. In this regard, the uniformity of temperature in an individual subject, induced by any given WBH system, is a significant factor. Preliminary animal investigations suggested that the bone marrow temperature may differ from core temperature during 41.8 degrees C WBH. To quantitatively evaluate this possible phenomena, dogs were utilized in conjunction with a radiant heat WBH system. It was found that mean bone marrow temperature was significantly less than core (i.e. rectal) temperature (p < 0.001), i.e. 0.27 degree C for the ilium 0.40 degree C for the humerus and 0.95 degree C for the tibia. The implications of these results to current clinical trials are discussed.

Synovial sarcoma of childhood and adolescence. Report of the German CWS-81 study.

BACKGROUND: Synovial sarcoma is the third most common pediatric soft tissue tumor. It requires an aggressive approach to achieve a cure. However, optimal treatment modalities adapted to disease extension and histologic variants have not been determined because there is little information about prospectively treated patients. METHODS: A multicenter trial for soft tissue sarcomas (Protocol CWS 81) was conducted in West Germany between 1981-1985, and 31 patients with synovial sarcoma were registered. Treatment included multiagent chemotherapy and irradiation after initial tumor excision or biopsy. The male-female ratio in this group was 1:1.6 with a median age of 14 years (range, 1-19 years). The median follow-up time after diagnosis was 101 months (range, 77-131 months). RESULTS: The overall event-free survival (EFS) for patients with synovial sarcoma was 74.2% at 5 years. Group I-II tumors had a significantly better prognosis than those in Group III-IV (EFS at 5 years 84.4% and 58.3%, respectively; P = 0.024). Small tumors (< 5 cm) responded better than larger tumors (> or = 5 cm; EFS, 93% versus 58%; P = 0.029). Synovial sarcoma involved the extremities in 28 patients who had a better outcome compared with those with extremity rhabdomyosarcoma in this study (EFS for Group I-IV was 82% versus 24%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results appeared superior to previous experience using radical surgery alone and suggested that after initial, nonmutilating surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and irradiation contributed to the improved long-term survival.

Lack of thermal enhancement for taxanes in vitro.

The taxanes represent a new class of clinical chemotherapeutic agents. A series of in vitro studies were independently of each other initiated in two different institutes (Amsterdam and Madison) to test the hypothesis that hyperthermia might enhance the cytotoxicity of taxanes. Clonogenic capacity experiments (Amsterdam) included the exposure of R1- and SW 1573-cells to 1, 4, or 24 h of paclitaxel with heat 43 degrees C x 60 min in the last hour of drug treatment or at 24, 48 as well as 72 h post drug treatment. Survival assay experiments (Madison) included the exposure of L-929-cells to paclitaxel and docetaxel for 24 h with heat 41.8 degrees C x 60 min the first or last hour of drug treatment as well as 24 and 48 h post treatment. No thermal enhancement of cytotoxicity for the taxanes was observed in these human and murine cell lines, with congruent data in both institutes. In addition, high performance liquid chromatography studies at 41.8 degrees C and 43 degrees C demonstrated paclitaxel and docetaxel were heat stable.