Organisation of the State, model of health system and COVID-19 health outcomes in six European countries, during the first months of the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020.

The time and type of the States' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic varied with the severity of the epidemiological situation, the perceived risk, the political organisation and the model of health system of the country. We discuss the response of Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Portugal and the United Kingdom during the first months of the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020, considering the political organisation of the country and its health system model. We analyse public health measures implemented to contain or mitigate the pandemic, as well as those related to governance, resources and reorganisation of services, financing mechanisms, response of the health system itself and health outcomes. To measure the burden of COVID-19, we use several indicators. The adoption of measures, to contain and mitigate epidemic varied in degree and time of adoption. All countries reorganised their governance structure and the provision of care, despite the differences in political models and health systems (ranging from a more unitary and centralised political organisational model-France and Portugal; to a decentralised matrix-Germany, Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom). Rather than the differences in political models and health systems, the explanation for the success in tackling the epidemic seems to lay in other social determinants of health.

The effect of commissioning on Portuguese Primary Health Care units' performance: A four-year national analysis.

BACKGROUND: Portugal underwent a paradigmatic Primary Health Care (PHC) reform in 2005. The reform implemented better health information systems, goal-oriented management, pay-for-performance schemes, functional autonomy for the front-line units, and the general adoption of commissioning processes. Since the implementation of the reform, the same set of indicators have been monitored nationally every year. However, from 2014-2016, the five Regional Health Administrations could individually select part of set of indicators to be commissioned. As the same some indicators were used commissioned in some regions, but not in others, a natural experimental setting to observe the impact of commissioning on the results by comparing the performance of commissioned versus non-commissioned indicators emerged and the effects of commissioning on PHC performance could be evaluated. AIM: Our article aims to clarify the effect of commissioning on the results achieved by PHC units in Portugal following the implementation of the reform. RESULTS: In general, the indicator values improved with time in the three types of units that existed after the reform. However, Model B Family Health Units ('Unidades de Saúde Familiar' or USFs that use pay-for-performance and are more mature) obtained the highest absolute indicator values, followed by Model A USFs (newer units with a fixed salary) and Personalised Health Care Units ('Unidades de Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados' that were created under the model before the reform and offer a fixed salary), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results show a general increase in indicators in all PHC units. However, the indicators used in the commissioning processes exhibited a greater increase. There was no evidence that the better results exhibited by the commissioned indicators were achieved at the expense of a detrimental effect on non-commissioned indicators.