Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Scand J Public Health ; 52(3): 379-390, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346923

RESUMO

This article presents the design of a seven-country study focusing on childhood vaccines, Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe (VAX-TRUST), developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consists of (a) situation analysis of vaccine hesitancy (examination of individual, socio-demographic and macro-level factors of vaccine hesitancy and analysis of media coverage on vaccines and vaccination and (b) participant observation and in-depth interviews of healthcare professionals and vaccine-hesitant parents. These analyses were used to design interventions aimed at increasing awareness on the complexity of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals involved in discussing childhood vaccines with parents. We present the selection of countries and regions, the conceptual basis of the study, details of the data collection and the process of designing and evaluating the interventions, as well as the potential impact of the study. Laying out our research design serves as an example of how to translate complex public health issues into social scientific study and methods.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Confiança , Hesitação Vacinal , Humanos , Europa (Continente) , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Hesitação Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pais/psicologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Criança
2.
Health Serv Insights ; 14: 11786329211057351, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34898988

RESUMO

The aim of this research is to identify the main determinants of patients' complaints and potential mediators and moderators in this regard. This research shows that complaints can result from a complex set of processes involving direct, mediating, and moderating effects. Interventions aimed at reducing patients' complaints should consider specific patient groups and experiences.

3.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(2): 391-403, 2020 Jan 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31999247

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The predictors of patient satisfaction in emergency medicine (EM) have been widely studied and discussed in the scientific literature; the results vary depending on the specific EM attributes, cultural aspects, researchers' preferences, and approaches. However, it is not clear whether the same predictors of patient satisfaction can contribute to a better-perceived quality of healthcare or whether patients' perceptions form a different attitude toward satisfaction and perceived quality of healthcare. The goal of this study was to identify the key predictors of patient satisfaction and perceived quality of healthcare in the framework of an emergency department (ED). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients seen at an ED between January -December 2016. Data collection took place in the public hospital in Lisbon, Portugal, between May - November 2017. The total sample size included 382 patients. The sample distribution had a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence interval. Data for this research, using a questionnaire, was collected by mail or e-mail according to the respondent's preference. RESULTS: A detailed analysis showed that three out of the 18 predictors had a statistically significant relationship with satisfaction: overall satisfaction with doctors, with a positive correlation (r = 0.14, p ≤ 0.01); qualitative perceived waiting time for triage, with a positive correlation (r = 0.08, p ≤ 0.05); and meeting expectations, with a positive correlation (r = 0.53, p ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, a detailed analysis showed that only two out of the 18 predictors had a statistically significant relationship with the perceived quality of healthcare (PQHC): overall satisfaction with doctors, with a positive correlation (r = 0.43, p ≤ 0.01) and meeting expectations, with a positive correlation (r = 0.26, p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: The main predictors of satisfaction and perceived quality of healthcare were overall satisfaction with doctors and meeting expectations. We should note that "meeting expectations" plays the most important role in terms of satisfaction; however, in terms of PQHC the predictor "overall satisfaction with doctors" plays the most important role due to its stronger correlation. In addition, the qualitative perceived waiting time for triage could be considered as another predictor, influencing satisfaction only, thus emphasizing similarities and differences between satisfaction and the PQHC in an ED context.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Portugal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Triagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA