Survival from breast cancer: an analysis of Australian data by surgeon case load, treatment centre location, and health insurance status.

OBJECTIVE: Early invasive breast cancer data from the Australian National Breast Cancer Audit were used to compare case fatality by surgeon case load, treatment centre location and health insurance status. METHOD: Deaths were traced to 31 December 2007, for cancers diagnosed in 1998-2005. Risk of breast cancer death was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: When adjustment was made for age and clinical risk factors: (i) the relative risk of breast cancer death (95% confidence limit) was lower when surgeons' annual case loads exceeded 20 cases, at 0.87 (0.76, 0.995) for 21-100 cases and 0.83 (0.72, 0.97) for higher case loads. These relative risks were not statistically significant when also adjusting for treatment centre location (P ≥ 0.15); and (ii) compared with major city centres, inner regional centres had a relative risk of 1.32 (1.18, 1.48), but the risk was not elevated for more remote sites at 0.95 (0.74, 1.22). Risk of death was not related to private insurance status. CONCLUSION: Higher breast cancer mortality in patients treated in inner regional than major city centres and in those treated by surgeons with lower case loads requires further study.

Initial axillary surgery: results from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish the preference and reasons for initial axillary surgery performed on women with invasive breast cancer in Australia and New Zealand using data from the Breast Surgeon's Society of Australia and New Zealand Quality Audit (BQA) according to whether sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or no axillary surgery was used. METHODS: Patient data from 1999 to 2011 were categorized according to primary tumour size (≤3 cm or >3 cm) and analysed by year of diagnosis, type of initial axillary surgery and frequency of second axillary surgery following SLN biopsy. Patient age at diagnosis, health insurance status, surgeon caseload and hospital location were also examined as factors affecting the likelihood of performing different types of axillary surgery. RESULTS: Seventy thousand six hundred and eighty-eight episodes of early breast cancer with axillary surgery data were reported to the BQA in the study period. The proportion of patients undergoing SLN biopsy as the first operation increased over this period in both tumour size groups with a concomitant decline in the use of ALND as the first operation over the same interval. Elderly women (>70 years old) were four times less likely to undergo axillary surgery for their initial management when compared with women aged 41-70 years old (P < 0.001). Factors favouring ALND as the initial surgery over SLN biopsy included larger tumour size, elderly age, uninsured status and having surgery in a regional centre. CONCLUSIONS: From 1999 to 2011, SLN biopsy as the initial axillary surgery has been widely adopted by surgeons reporting to the BQA. Future evaluation of the BQA data in the following 3-5 years will be performed to monitor this progression.

The clinical impact of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z-0011 trial--results from the BreastSurgANZ National Breast Cancer Audit.

INTRODUCTION: The publication of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z-0011 Trial concluded that axillary lymph node clearance is no longer necessary for women having breast conserving treatment with 1-2 positive axillary sentinel lymph glands. The current study was designed to investigate the clinical impact of the Z-0011 Trial in breast surgical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The BreastSurgANZ National Breast Cancer Audit database was interrogated for women treated between 2005 and 2010 who would have met the entry criteria for the Z-0011 Trial. This group was then calculated as a proportion of the total breast cancer episodes treated during this period. RESULTS: A total of 64,883 cases of breast cancer were eligible for analysis. 22,731 underwent breast conserving surgery and sentinel node biopsy for invasive breast cancer. A total of 4482 cases (6.9%) fulfilled the criteria for Z-11 Trial. CONCLUSION: Although the ACOSOG Z-0011 Trial has important implications for sentinel node positive cases undergoing breast conserving treatment, the overall impact of the Trial in breast clinical practice is small. It cannot be described as "practice changing". Women who fulfil the entry criteria for the Z-0011 Trial should be informed of the clinical relevance of the trial and be permitted to participate in informed discussions with members of the multidisciplinary team regarding their treatment options.

Subsequent axillary surgery after sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit 2006-2010.

OBJECTIVES: To use data from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA) to examine the patterns of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in women treated for early breast cancer in Australia and New Zealand and to compare it to the Australian and New Zealand guidelines in cases of both positive and negative SLN results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were sub grouped as having primary tumours ≤3 cm and >3 cm and further analysed according to year of surgery, SLN status and final nodal status where cALND was recorded. Multivariate analysis was performed examining tumour size, grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), HER2 and oestrogen receptor status, patient age and number of positive sentinel nodes as predictors for subsequent axillary surgery. RESULTS: 14879 patients were identified from 2006 to 2010. 79.8% of patients with a positive SLN result underwent cALND. Age >70 years and a greater number of involved SLN predicted no cALND among SLN positive patients. 10.3% of patients who had a negative SLN result underwent cALND. Younger age, higher grade, lymphovascular invasion and tumour size >3 cm predicted cALND among SLN negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: According to the BQA from 2006 to 2010 the Australian and New Zealand guideline recommendations for SLN positive patients to have cALND and SLN negative patients not to have cALND were adhered to in 79.8% and 89.7% of cases respectively.

Use of trastuzumab in Australia and New Zealand: results from the National Breast Cancer Audit.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab increases disease-free and overall survival in HER-2-positive, early breast cancer. In 2007, the National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre recommended that patients with HER-2 positive cancers (node positive or node negative tumours >1 cm) be offered adjuvant trastuzumab with chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate recent trends in trastuzumab therapy in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: Following data were obtained from the National Breast Cancer Audit for patients treated between 2006 and 2008: tumour size, number of cases recorded per surgeon per year, location of hospital, HER-2 receptor status, age, lymph node status, chemotherapy and trastuzumab treatment. RESULTS: Data were available from 23,290 patients. During the study period, the percentage of breast cancers tested for HER-2 rose from 77% to 91%. Patients over 70 had fewer HER-2 tests than their younger counterparts. Fourteen percent of tumours were HER-2 positive; the proportion treated with trastuzumab in 2006, 2007 and 2008 was 50%, 66% and 74%, respectively. Significantly more node-positive patients (77%) were given trastuzumab than node-negative patients (52%). All the patients prescribed trastuzumab also received chemotherapy. Patients under 70 years, patients treated in Australia and patients treated by higher caseload surgeons were more likely to be prescribed trastuzumab than those over 70, patients in New Zealand and patients treated by lower caseload surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab-prescribing trends conform to the published guidelines. However, older patients and those with HER-2 positive, node-negative tumours >1 cm may be undertreated in some cases.

National Breast Cancer Audit: overview of invasive breast cancer in New Zealand.

INTRODUCTION: The National Breast Cancer Audit collects data on the care of early breast cancer patients in Australia and New Zealand. An overview of invasive breast cancer in New Zealand is presented with emphasis on comparing the screened population with symptomatic referrals. METHODS: All New Zealand data in the National Breast Cancer Audit with a diagnosis date of 2008 have been included in the report. Data was analysed with an aim to compare the presenting features and management of screen detected invasive cancer with symptomatic referrals in New Zealand. RESULTS: There were 2371 cases of breast cancer, 52% of which were symptomatic referrals, 37% of which were BreastScreen Aotearoa referrals. Higher breast conservation rates were reported in the screening population. 3% of patients had involved margins after surgery. Almost two-thirds (62%) of BreastScreen patients underwent a sentinel node biopsy without further axillary surgery. 72% of screening patients and 86% of symptomatic patients who were high risk did not receive post mastectomy radiotherapy. A larger proportion of symptomatic patients received chemotherapy. Endocrine therapy was prescribed to 81% of hormone receptor positive patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with early invasive breast cancer in New Zealand were managed appropriately according to audit performance indicators and clinical guidelines. The numbers of high risk patients not receiving post mastectomy radiotherapy and the lack of endocrine treatment in some patients with hormone receptor positive tumours may warrant further investigation.

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ according to Van Nuys Prognostic Index in Australia and New Zealand.

INTRODUCTION: Clinicians often use the Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) to determine management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The VNPI uses age, extent of DCIS, pathological grade and resection margins to stratify patients into three groups pertaining to risk of local recurrence: low-risk (where breast-conserving surgery - BCS - alone appears adequate), intermediate-risk (where BCS plus radiotherapy is recommended) and high-risk (where mastectomy may be the safest option). The purpose of this study was to determine patterns of management of DCIS in Australia and New Zealand according to the VNPI. METHODS: Using the National Breast Cancer Audit for the period 2004-2009, 4578 cases of DCIS were identified where complete data were available. Patterns of management according to the VNPI were determined. The chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In VNPI group 1, 77% of patients were treated with BCS compared with 63% in group 2 and 32% in group 3. Of patients in group 1 who underwent BCS, 58% also received adjuvant radiotherapy, compared with 80% in group 2. In group 3, 68% were treated with mastectomy, and of those who underwent BCS, 86% received radiotherapy. Overall, 23% of DCIS cases did not conform to best practice according to individual VNPI prognostic groupings. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in the management of DCIS according to VNPI groups were observed. The results suggest the possibility that some patients in the low-risk group were over-treated, while a proportion of patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups were under-treated.

Age effects on survival from early breast cancer in clinical settings in Australia.

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to determine whether age is an independent risk factor for survival from early invasive breast cancer in contemporary Australian clinical settings. METHODS: The study included 31 493 breast cancers diagnosed in 1998-2005. Risk of death from breast cancer was compared by age, without and with adjustment for clinical risk factors, using Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Risk of breast cancer death was elevated for cancers of larger size, higher grade, positive nodal status, oestrogen receptor negative status, vascular invasion and multiple foci. Ductal lesions presented a higher risk than other lesions. Adjusting for these factors, the relative risk of breast cancer death (95% confidence limits) was lower for 40-49-year-olds at 0.80 (0.66, 0.96) than for the reference category under 40 years, but higher for 70-79-year-olds at 1.64 (1.36, 1.98) and women aged 80 years or more at 2.19 (1.79, 2.69). The risk for 50-69-year-olds and women under 40 years was similar. Risk-factor adjustment reduced the difference in risk between the reference category under 40 years and 40-49-year-olds, largely eliminated the lower relative risk for 50-69-year-olds, and increased the relative risks for women aged 70-79 years and older. DISCUSSION: Survivals in women under 40 and over 70 years of age are poorer than for 40-69-year-olds. Research is needed into the best treatment modalities for younger women and older women with co-morbidity.

Survival from synchronous bilateral breast cancer: the experience of surgeons participating in the breast audit of the Society of Breast Surgeons of Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies generally indicate that synchronous bilateral breast cancers (SBBC) have an equivalent or moderately poorer survival compared with unilateral cases. The prognostic characteristics of SBBC would be relevant when planning adjuvant therapies and follow-up medical surveillance. The frequency of SBBC among early breast cancers in clinical settings in Australia and New Zealand were investigated, plus their prognostic significance, using the Breast Cancer Audit Database of the Society of Breast Surgeons of Australia and New Zealand, which covered an estimated 60% of early invasive lesions in those countries. DESIGN: Rate ratios (95% confidence limits) of SBBC were investigated among 35,370 female breast cancer cases by age of woman, histology type, grade, tumour diameter, nodal status, lymphatic/vascular invasion and oestrogen receptor status. Univariate and multivariable disease-specific survival analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: 2.3% of cases were found to be SBBC (i.e., diagnoses occurring within 3 months). The figure increased from 1.4% in women less than 40 years to 4.1% in those aged 80 years or more. Disease-specific survivals did not vary by SBBC status (p=0.206). After adjusting for age, histology type, diameter, grade, nodal status, lymphatic/vascular invasion, and oestrogen receptor status, the relative risk of breast cancer death for SBBC was 1.17 (95% CL: 0.91, 1.51). After adjusting for favourable prognostic factors more common in SBBC cases (i.e., histology type, grade, lymphatic/ vascular invasion, and oestrogen receptor status), the relative risk of breast cancer death for SBBC was 1.42 (95% CL: 1.10, 1.82). After adjusting for unfavourable prognostic factors more common in SBBC cases (i.e., older age and large tumour diameter), the relative risk of breast cancer death for SBBC was 0.98 (95% CL: 0.76, 1.26). CONCLUSIONS: Results confirm previous findings of an equivalent or moderately poorer survival for SBBC but indicate that SBBC status is likely to be an important prognostic indicator for some cases.

Adherence to recommended treatments for early invasive breast cancer: decisions of women attending surgeons in the breast cancer audit of Australia and New Zealand.

AIM: The study aim was to determine the frequency with which women decline clinicians' treatment recommendations and variations in this frequency by age, cancer and service descriptors. DESIGN: The study included 36,775 women diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer in 1998-2005 and attending Australian and New Zealand breast surgeons. Rate ratios for declining treatment were examined by descriptor, using bilateral and multiple logistic regression analyses. Proportional hazards regression was used in exploratory analyses of associations with breast cancer death. RESULTS: 3.4% of women declined a recommended treatment of some type, ranging from 2.6% for women under 40 years to 5.8% for those aged 80 years or more, and with parallel increases by age presenting for declining radiotherapy (p<0.001) and axillary surgery (p=0.006). Multiple regression confirmed that common predictors of declining various treatments included low surgeon case load, treatment outside major city centres, and older age. Histological features suggesting a favourable prognosis were often predictive of declining various treatments, although reverse findings also applied with women with positive nodal status being more likely to decline a mastectomy and those with larger tumours more likely to decline chemotherapy. While survival analyses lacked statistical power due to small numbers, higher risks of breast cancer death were suggested, after adjusting for age and conventional clinical risk factors, (1) for women not receiving breast surgery for unstated reasons (RR=2.29; p<0.001); and (2) although not approaching statistical significance p≥ 0.200), for women declining radiotherapy (RR=1.22), a systemic therapy (RR1.11), and more specifically, chemotherapy (RR=1.41). CONCLUSIONS: Women have the right to choose their treatments but reasons for declining recommendations require further study to ensure that choices are well informed and clinical outcomes are optimized.