Increased risk of cancer other than melanoma in CDKN2A founder mutation (p16-Leiden)-positive melanoma families.

PURPOSE: We report the largest study to date analyzing the risk of cancers other than melanoma in melanoma families positive for the same CDKN2A mutation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We studied family members of 22 families positive for the p16-Leiden founder mutation who had attended a surveillance clinic or were their close relatives. Within this cohort, observed and expected rates of cancer were computed by mutation status consisting of 221 (proven plus obligate) carriers, 639 (proven plus obligate) noncarriers, and 668 first-degree relatives whose carrier risk was estimated from the relationship to known carriers and the age and melanoma status of that person and their relatives. RESULTS: Our analysis shows a relative risk (RR) of cancer other than melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer of 4.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 3.3-5.6], predominantly attributable to the increased risk for pancreatic cancer (RR, 46.6; 95% CI, 24.7-76.4), but also for other cancers. We provide substantial proof for pancreatic cancer being a key component of the p16-Leiden phenotype. Inclusion of this cancer in a penetrance analysis leads to an estimated RR of pancreatic cancer for mutation carriers of 47.8 (95% CI, 28.4-74.7). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows clear evidence of increased risk of cancers other than melanoma in CDKN2A families carrying the p16-Leiden mutation. Further research is necessary to determine if similar risks apply to families with CDKN2A mutations other than p16-Leiden.

Genetic testing in familial melanoma: uptake and implications.

OBJECTIVE: We report on the uptake and psychological impact of p16-Leiden genetic testing to contribute to a greater understanding of counseling melanoma families. METHODS: Within a defined research setting, genetic counseling and testing were offered to members of p16-Leiden-positive melanoma pedigrees, at risk of carrying a gene defect associated with an increased risk of melanoma and pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four individuals sought counseling, of which 141 (77%) opted for genetic testing. Uptake of genetic counseling and testing, and psychological motivation was evaluated in 94 (57%) individuals. Higher pre-test risk of carrying the mutation and older age proved significantly predictive for counseling uptake. Age was predictive for test acceptance, whereas fearful test expectancies predicted test decline. Counselees had lower distress levels than those reported in other oncogenetic testing settings. CONCLUSION: We are the first to report on genetic testing for familial melanoma. Following the first counseling session, we found a relatively high uptake rate for p16-Leiden testing and no clinically worrisome levels of distress.

From sporadic atypical nevi to familial melanoma: risk analysis for melanoma in sporadic atypical nevus patients.

BACKGROUND: Atypical nevi (AN), present in either a familial or a sporadic setting, are strong indicators of increased melanoma risk. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the extent of this risk and the extent of reclassification of sporadic to familial cases during follow-up. METHODS: We studied 167 sporadic patients with AN (>or=5). At the end of follow-up we updated the family history regarding melanoma and performed germline mutation analysis of the known melanoma susceptibility genes. RESULTS: We found a relative risk for melanoma of 46.1 (95% confidence interval 21.0-87.5). Six of 167 patients were carriers of a CDKN2A mutation. At the end of follow-up, 10 of 136 patients with sporadic AN reported being a member of a melanoma family. LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted in an area with a founder mutation in many of its melanoma families; therefore the results may not be applicable to other populations. CONCLUSION: We report a high relative risk of 46.1 of melanoma development in patients with sporadic AN. A significant proportion of this Dutch cohort reported additional cases in their families over time.

A mutation hotspot at the p14ARF splice site.

Germline mutations of CDKN2A that affect the p16INK4a transcript have been identified in numerous melanoma pedigrees worldwide. In the UK, over 50% of pedigrees with three or more cases of melanoma have been found to carry mutations of CDKN2A. Mutations that affect p14ARF exon 1beta exclusively are very rare. This has led to the suggestion that it is p16INK4a and not p14ARF that plays the critical role in melanoma predisposition. We report the identification of a cluster of five different germline mutations at the p14ARF exon 1beta splice donor site in melanoma pedigrees. All the five splice site variants showed evidence of being causal mutations. Three of the variants were demonstrated to result in aberrant splicing of the p14ARF mRNA, confirming their role in melanoma predisposition. No other point mutations were identified in the coding region of p14ARF. The p14ARF transcript of CDKN2A is clearly important in disease predisposition in a subset of melanoma pedigrees. Curiously, the only mutations so far reported to affect p14ARF exon 1beta exclusively have been knockout mutations. Further investigation into the spectrum of mutations observed in this gene may help clarify the exact role of p14ARF in melanoma predisposition.