RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to validate the DCIS-upstage model, a previously developed model to predict the risk of upstaging to invasive breast cancer in patients with biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in a more recent cohort and to assess the model's clinical utility. METHODS: The model was validated in a registry cohort (n = 2269) and in an institution cohort (n = 302). A calibration plot was made, followed by a decision curve analysis (DCA). The model's area under the curve (AUC) was compared with the AUC of another published model and with the AUCs of new models using the risk factors of the DCIS-upstage model and additional risk factors. RESULTS: The DCIS-upstage model had an AUC of 0.67 at development; in the validation, the AUC was 0.65 in the registry cohort and 0.73 in the institution cohort. The DCA showed that the model has clinical utility. The other published model had an AUC of 0.66 in the institution cohort. Adding risk factors to the DCIS-upstage model slightly increased the AUC. CONCLUSIONS: The DCIS-upstage prediction model is valid in other cohorts. The model has clinical utility and may be used to select patients with biopsy-proven DCIS for sentinel lymph node biopsy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Microsurgical reconstruction of upper extremity injuries is often challenging, and the resulting impact on the quality of life (QoL) may be significant. However, there is a lack of knowledge on long-term patient-reported QoL. METHODS: In a retrospective long-term follow-up study, all consecutive patients with an upper extremity injury who had undergone a free flap reconstruction were identified and categorized into three groups based on the type of injury. Patient-reported upper extremity function and QoL were assessed using three validated questionnaires: the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were identified, of whom 10% had undergone a free flap reconstruction for soft tissue loss only, 62% for an injury accompanied by a fracture, and 28% for a (sub) total amputation. Twenty-one (44%) patients responded to the questionnaires, with a mean follow-up time of 9.7 ± 6.2 years. Patients, on average, reported poorer SF-36 "physical component score" and "role limitations due to physical health" scores compared with Dutch norms. Also, they reported poorer mean DASH scores compared with the general population, indicating worse upper extremity function. Mean MQH scores were lower for the injured side compared with the noninjured side. Pain correlated negatively with the total scores of DASH, MHQ, and SF-36. CONCLUSION: Free flap upper extremity reconstruction is challenging. At 10 years of follow-up, the injury and its treatment continued to have a significant impact on the upper extremity function and daily QoL, with chronic pain being an important factor negatively affecting these outcomes.
Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Microcirurgia/métodos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Extremidade Superior/lesões , Extremidade Superior/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosAssuntos
Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante , Humanos , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Biópsia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo SentinelaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previously published studies report up to 30% recurrence rates after DCIS, so it would be desirable to identify those women at risk for recurrence and adapt adjuvant management. This study aimed to identify the locoregional recurrence rate after breast conserving surgery (BCS) for DCIS, and to evaluate the possible role of immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in predicting the risk of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent BCS for pure DCIS were identified. Data on well-established clinical-pathological risk factors and development of locoregional recurrence was gathered from patient files. In addition, IHC stains of ER, PR, HER2, p53, and ki67 were performed on original tumor samples. Univariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify possible risk factors for locoregional recurrence. RESULTS: 190 patients were included. At a median follow-up time of 12.8 years fifteen (8%) patients developed locoregional recurrence: 7 invasive cancer and 8 DCIS. These recurrences were diagnosed within a range of 1.7 to 19.6 years after the initial diagnosis. Univariable Cox regression analysis did only show a significant association between p53 and locoregional recurrence. Our re-excision rate to obtain free margins was 30.5%, and 90% received radiotherapy. Endocrine treatment was not used. CONCLUSIONS: At 12.8 years follow-up, patients with DCIS treated with BCS have a very low locoregional recurrence of 8%. Although we could demonstrate that increased p53 expression is a risk factor for locoregional recurrence, we think this is of little clinical value in our population with such a low recurrence rate. MICROABSTRACT: With a published recurrence rate up to 30% after DCIS, it would be desirable to identify those at risk to adapt treatment and follow-up. We aimed to evaluate the role of immunohistochemical staining to determine the risk of locoregional recurrence, in addition to established clinical and pathological risk factors. At a median follow-up of 12.8 years, we found a locoregional recurrence rate of 8%. Increased expression of p53 is associated with an increased risk of locoregional recurrence.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante , Humanos , Feminino , Mastectomia Segmentar , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53 , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To establish the breast reconstruction rate in a large Dutch teaching hospital, and to gain insight into the motives of women to opt for or reject post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. METHODS: In a retrospective, cross-sectional study, all consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy for invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were identified and categorized into two groups based on subsequent breast reconstruction or not. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed with the validated Breast-Q and a short survey about the decision-making process in breast reconstruction. These outcomes were compared between the two groups using univariable analyses, multivariable logistic regression, and multiple linear regression analyses. The Breast-Q scores were also compared to Dutch normative values. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were identified of whom 68% had no breast reconstruction. Of the 102 patients with breast reconstruction, the majority (93%) received immediate, instead of delayed breast reconstruction. The survey was completed by 155 (49%) patients. The non-reconstruction group, on average, reported significantly poorer psychosocial well-being, compared to the reconstruction group as well as compared to the normative data. However, the majority of the non-reconstruction group (83%) stated that they had no desire for breast reconstruction. In both groups, most patients stated that the provided information was sufficient. CONCLUSION: Patients have personal motives to opt for or reject breast reconstruction. It seemed that patients differ in their rating of values that affect their decision since the same arguments were used to opt for or reject reconstruction. Notably, patients were well-informed in their decision making.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Mastectomia/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Gastric metastasis of breast cancer is a known mimicker of primary gastric cancer. This paper demonstrates that in patients with a history of breast cancer, gastric metastasis and primary gastric cancer are equally likely.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the short-term and the long-term breast cancer rate in patients with benign histopathologic results after a vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy (VASB) for calcifications. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, all consecutive patients who had a benign diagnosis after VASB to analyze breast calcifications. Data of breast cancer development at short-term (four years) and long-term follow-up was gathered. Breast cancer rates in our cohort were compared to the breast cancer incidence in the general population. RESULTS: Of 1376 patients who underwent VASB to analyze breast calcifications, 823 had a benign histopathologic diagnosis. During short-term follow-up, eight patients developed breast cancer. During the mean long-term follow-up period of 9.3 ± 3.1 years, 22 patients were diagnosed with ipsilateral breast cancer. The incidence rate of breast cancer after benign biopsy was comparable to the rate in the general population. CONCLUSION: In patients with VASB-confirmed benign calcifications of the breast, we found no excess incidence of ipsilateral breast cancer during ten years follow-up. Therefore, in patients with an increased risk of breast cancer (due to a history of breast cancer or familial risk) annual mammography should be sufficient. Patients with a population-based risk may be monitored via biennial mammography by the national screening program. More frequent screening would provide no benefit.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Biópsia , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Mamografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Técnicas EstereotáxicasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Persistent neuropathic pain severely impacts physical functioning and quality of life (QoL). However, optimal surgical management of persistent neuropathic pain remains unclear. Extensive neurolysis with subsequent free muscle flap coverage, a new surgical procedure for neuropathic pain in the upper extremity, can be performed as a final option to establish pain reduction. METHODS: All consecutive patients who received extensive microsurgical neurolysis with subsequent free muscle flap for persistent neuropathic pain in the upper extremity between 2007 and 2014 were identified. Patient-reported upper extremity function and QoL were assessed using three questionnaires (36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head questionnaire, and the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire). RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified; 80% had neuropathic pain in the upper extremity due to nerve injury and a median of 3.0 previous surgeries (range 1-6). Sixty-seven percent developed some kind of complication, flap loss occurred in 22%, and all received a new free flap (one failed again). At last follow-up, pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores significantly differed (pâ¯=â¯0.002), and the median VAS at last follow-up was 1.5. Ten patients (67%) responded to the questionnaires after a median follow-up of 5.7 year (range 2.6-7.3 years). Patients on average reported poorer SF-36 "Physical Component Score" (PCS) and "Bodily Pain" compared to Dutch norms. Forty percent of patients reported still having always (very) severe pain. However, 64% had a postoperative decrease of at least 3.0 on VAS. CONCLUSION: Extensive neurolysis with free muscle flap coverage for persistent neuropathic pain in the upper extremity showed a positive effect on pain reduction on short-term follow-up, and also at five-year follow-up. The impact of pain on functional outcomes remained. Nevertheless, 60% of the patients still experience sufficient pain reduction.
Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/transplante , Músculo Grácil/transplante , Neuralgia/cirurgia , Extremidade Superior/cirurgia , Adulto , Dor Crônica/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 20-25% of patients with biopsy-proven DCIS underestimation occurs. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is offered to patients with biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and a high risk of occult invasive cancer. However, assessment of high risk is controversial. We aimed to improve selection of patients for SLNB with preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, MRI was offered to all subsequent patients with a biopsy-proven DCIS admitted to a large Dutch teaching hospital between April 2012 and March 2017. MRI images were analysed for signs of invasive cancer and the results were compared with the pathologic results after surgical treatment. The diagnostic accuracy of additional MRI in detecting occult invasive cancer was determined. RESULTS: Of 211 patients eligible for additional MRI analysis, 149 underwent breast MRI. The majority (67%) received breast-conserving therapy, and the underestimation rate was 20%. Subsequent to MRI analysis, 20 additional invasive diagnostic procedures were performed. Occult invasive cancer was suspected on MRI in 46 patients (31%) and was confirmed in 18 (12%). In this study, breast MRI had a sensitivity of 67%, a specificity of 77%, and a true negative rate of 91%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative breast MRI cannot reliably predict the presence of invasive cancer in patients with biopsy proven DCIS. Therefore, it cannot be used to in the selection of patients for a SLNB.