Survival of patients with deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer in the pre-immunotherapy era.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR mCRC) benefit from immunotherapy. Interpretation of the single-arm immunotherapy trials is complicated by insignificant survival data during systemic non-immunotherapy. We present survival data on a large, comprehensive cohort of dMMR mCRC patients, treated with or without systemic non-immunotherapy. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-one dMMR mCRC patients (n = 54 from three prospective Phase 3 CAIRO trials; n = 227 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry). Overall survival was analysed from diagnosis of mCRC (OS), from initiation of first-line (OS1) and second-line (OS2) systemic treatment. Cox regression analysis examined prognostic factors. As comparison for OS 2746 MMR proficient mCRC patients were identified. RESULTS: Of 281 dMMR patients, 62% received first-line and 26% second-line treatment. Median OS was 16.0 months (13.8-19.6) with antitumour therapy and 2.5 months (1.8-3.5) in untreated patients. OS1 was 12.8 months (10.7-15.2) and OS2 6.2 months (5.4-8.9) in treated dMMR patients. Treated dMMR patients had a 7.6-month shorter median OS than pMMR patients. CONCLUSION: Available data from immunotherapy trials lack a control arm with standard systemic treatment. Given the poor outcome compared to the immunotherapy results, our data strongly suggest a survival benefit of immunotherapy in dMMR mCRC patients.

A randomised, phase II study of repeated rhenium-188-HEDP combined with docetaxel and prednisone versus docetaxel and prednisone alone in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) metastatic to bone; the Taxium II trial.

BACKGROUND: Rhenium-188-HEDP is a beta-emitting radiopharmaceutical used for palliation of metastatic bone pain. We investigated whether the addition of rhenium-188-HEDP to docetaxel/prednisone improved efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with CRPC. METHODS: Patients with progressive CRPC and osteoblastic bone metastases were randomised for first-line docetaxel 75 mg/m2 3-weekly plus prednisone with or without 2 injections of rhenium-188-HEDP after the third (40 MBq/kg) and after the sixth (20 MBq/kg) cycle of docetaxel. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as either PSA, radiographic or clinical progression. Patients were stratified by extent of bone metastases and hospital. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were randomised for standard treatment and 46 patients for combination therapy. Median number of cycles of docetaxel was 9 in the control group and 8 in the experimental group. Median follow-up was 18.4 months. Two patients from the experimental group did not start treatment after randomisation. In the intention to treat analysis no differences in PFS, survival and PSA became apparent between the two groups. In an exploratory per-protocol analysis median overall survival was significantly longer in the experimental group (33.8 months (95%CI 31.75-35.85)) than in the control group (21.0 months (95%CI 13.61-28.39); p 0.012). Also median PFS in patients with a baseline phosphatase >220U/L was significantly better with combination treatment (9.0 months (95%CI 3.92-14.08) versus 6.2 months (95%CI 3.08-9.32); log rank p 0.005). As expected, thrombocytopenia (grade I/II) was reported more frequently in the experimental group (25% versus 0%). CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with rhenium-188-HEDP and docetaxel did not prolong PFS in patients with CRPC. The observed survival benefit in the per-protocol analysis warrants further studies in the combined treatment of chemotherapy and radiopharmaceuticals.

Evaluation of the safety and immunological effects of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in combination with checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized therapy of advanced and metastatic cancers. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors or develop resistance. Therefore, novel therapies or combinations of therapies that may act synergistically are needed. It has been suggested that induction of trained immunity may increase the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, through reprogramming myeloid cells toward an antitumor phenotype. On the other hand, activation of the immune system also carries the risk of potentially sustaining tumorgenicity and increasing immune- related toxicity. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 37-year-old Dutch male suffering from gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma with liver metastases and high risk for an unfavorable outcome, who was treated with a combination of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor nivolumab and the trained immunity-inducer Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine as a salvage therapy. Three doses of BCG vaccine were administered at 3-month intervals, in conjunction with the immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen. At a certain point, radiation therapy was added to the treatment regimen. During the combination of these therapies, the patient developed immune-mediated colitis, which necessitated discontinuation of all treatments. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination induced a trained immune response with elevated monocyte-derived interleukin-6 and interleukin-1ß production capacity. From the first vaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin until 3 months after the last vaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, the patient displayed only mild progression of the primary tumor and no progression of the metastases. CONCLUSION: In this study, we show the feasibility to combine checkpoint inhibitor therapy with inducers of trained immunity in a patient with an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor. Autoimmune side effects are common under programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapy, which was considered the most likely cause of colitis, although an additive effect of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination or radiotherapy cannot be excluded. The patient displayed only mild progression during the combination therapy, but larger studies are warranted to fully explore the potential benefit of trained immunity inducers as an adjuvant to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Clinical judgment of the need for professional mental health care in patients with cancer: a qualitative study among oncologists and nurses.

PURPOSE: In daily practice, oncologists and nurses frequently need to decide whether or not to refer a patient for professional mental health care. We explored the indicators oncologists and nurses use to judge the need for professional mental health care in patients with cancer. METHODS: In a qualitative study, oncologists (n = 8) and nurses (n = 6) were each asked to select patients who were or were not referred for professional mental health care (total n = 75). During a semi-structured interview, they reflected on their decision concerning the possible referral of the patient. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Respondents reported using a strategy when judging whether professional mental health care was needed. They allowed patients time to adjust, while monitoring patients' psychological well-being, especially if patients exhibited specific risk factors. Risk and protective factors for emotional problems included personal, social, and disease- and treatment-related factors. Respondents considered referral for professional mental health care when they noted specific indicators of emotional problems. These indicators included lingering or increasing emotions, a disproportionate intensity of emotions, and emotions with a negative impact on a patient's daily life or treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the strategy, risk and protective factors, and the indicators of emotional problems used by oncologists and nurses when judging the need for professional mental health care in patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Oncologists and nurses can play an important role in the identification of patients in need of professional mental health care.

Physical Activity Is Associated with Improved Overall Survival among Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Regular physical activity (PA) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This association is less defined in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). We therefore conducted a study in mCRC patients participating in the Prospective Dutch Colorectal Cancer cohort. PA was assessed with the validated SQUASH questionnaire, filled-in within a maximum of 60 days after diagnosis of mCRC. PA was quantified by calculating Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) hours per week. American College of Sports and Medicine (ACSM) PA guideline adherence, tertiles of moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), and sport and leisure time MVPA (MVPA-SL) were assessed as well. Vital status was obtained from the municipal population registry. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to study the association between PA determinants and all-cause mortality adjusted for prognostic patient and treatment-related factors. In total, 293 mCRC patients (mean age 62.9 ± 10.6 years, 67% male) were included in the analysis. Compared to low levels, moderate and high levels of MET-hours were significantly associated with longer OS (fully adjusted hazard ratios: 0.491, (95% CI 0.299-0.807, p value = 0.005) and 0.485 (95% CI 0.303-0.778, p value = 0.003), respectively), as were high levels of MVPA (0.476 (95% CI 0.278-0.816, p value = 0.007)) and MVPA-SL (0.389 (95% CI 0.224-0.677, p value < 0.001)), and adherence to ACSM PA guidelines compared to non-adherence (0.629 (95% CI 0.412-0.961, p value = 0.032)). The present study provides evidence that higher PA levels at diagnosis of mCRC are associated with longer OS.

A phase I study of combined docetaxel and repeated high activity 186Re-HEDP in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) metastatic to bone (the TAXIUM trial).

PURPOSE: Bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals have palliative benefit in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) metastatic to bone. Recent studies have shown improvement of survival and quality of life when radiopharmaceuticals were given repeatedly or in combination with chemotherapy. We designed a phase I study combining docetaxel and (186)Re-labelled hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) in men with CRPC and bone metastases to evaluate toxicity. METHODS: A dose escalation schedule was designed consisting of four dose levels with a standard dosage of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) 3-weekly). (186)Re-HEDP was given in increasing activities (1,250 MBq up to 2,500 MBq) after the third and sixth cycle of docetaxel. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 4 toxicity lasting more than 7 days or any grade 3 toxicity that did not recover within 10 days. Three patients were planned for each dose level expanding to six if a DLT occurred. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were recruited with a median age of 64.6 years. One DLT, grade 3 thrombocytopenia lasting >10 days, occurred at dose level 3 leading to expansion of this group to six. One of these patients had an episode of acute renal failure which resolved. Because of production problems of (186)Re-HEDP dose level 4 was not started. CONCLUSION: Combined therapy with docetaxel and (186)Re-HEDP is generally well tolerated in patients with CRPC metastatic to bone. We will conduct a randomized phase II study using three cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) 3-weekly followed by (188)Re-HEDP 40 MBq/kg body weight, followed by another three cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), followed by (188)Re-HEDP 20 MBq/kg body weight.

A Phase 1 Trial of Cabazitaxel Combined With 188Re-Hydroxyethylidene Diphosphonate in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Progressed on or After a Docetaxel-Containing Treatment: The ReCab Trial.

PURPOSE: In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals, such as Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP), are effective for pain palliation and have a marked antitumor effect. Cabazitaxel is the standard second-line chemotherapy for mCRPC patients. We performed a phase 1 study investigating the safety and feasibility of the combined treatment with Re-HEDP and cabazitaxel in mCRPC patients. METHODS: Patients with mCRPC and documented disease progression on or after docetaxel were eligible for inclusion. In both dose levels, cabazitaxel (4 cycles of cabazitaxel 25 mg/m + 2 cycles of cabazitaxel 20 mg/m in level 1, and 6 cycles of cabazitaxel 25 mg/m in level 2) were combined with 2 cycles of Re-HEDP 40 MBq/kg (1.1 mCi/kg) (after the second and fourth cabazitaxel cycles). Three patients were planned for each dose level, expanding to 6 patients in case of a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). A DLT is defined as any grade 4 toxicity, or grade 3 toxicity delaying the next treatment cycle. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included, of whom 3 had progressive disease before the third cycle of cabazitaxel. In total, 1 DLT occurred (dose level 1) after treatment cycle 6 (Re-HEDP) (thrombopenia grade 3 delaying the next treatment cycle). The cohort was expanded to 6 patients, with no further DLTs. No DLT occurred in dose level 2. The most important adverse events were of hematologic origin, followed by mild fatigue and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with cabazitaxel and Re-HEDP is feasible and generally well tolerated with similar hematologic toxicity compared with cabazitaxel monotherapy.

Benefits of Using Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Metachronous Oligometastases of Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Detected by [18F]fluoromethylcholine PET/CT.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with oligometastatic recurrence of prostate cancer (PC), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) represents an attractive treatment option, as it is safe without major side effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SBRT in delaying the start of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients treated with SBRT for oligometastatic recurrence (< 5 metastases) of hormone-sensitive PC, defined with [18F]fluoromethylcholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography were included. As a control group, 20 patients with oligometastatic disease not treated with SBRT were identified from another hospital. Data were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: A post-SBRT prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was seen in 29 (67.4%) of 43 patients. Median ADT-free survival (ADT-FS) was 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.7-19.5) for the whole group, and 25.7 months (95% CI, 9.0-42.4) for patients with a PSA response. Seven patients were treated with a second course of SBRT because of oligometastatic disease recurrence; the ADT-FS in this group was 32.1 months (95% CI, 7.8-56.5). Compared with the control group, the ADT-FS from first diagnosis of metastasis was significantly longer, with 17.3 (95% CI, 13.7-20.9) months versus 4.19 months (95% CI, 0.0-9.0), P < .001. Also, time between diagnosis of the metastasis until progression of disease during ADT use (castration resistance) was longer for the SBRT-treated patients (mean 66.6, 95% CI, 53.5-79.8, vs. 36.41, 95% CI, 26.0-46.8 months, P = .020). There were no grade III or IV adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: SBRT can safely and effectively be used to postpone ADT in appropriately selected patients with oligometastatic recurrence of PC.

Improved efficacy of mitoxantrone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer after vaccination with GM-CSF-transduced allogeneic prostate cancer cells.

Previous vaccination studies in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) showed improved survival without prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS). This might be explained by enhanced efficacy of subsequent therapies because of heightened immune status. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of chemotherapy in CRPC patients after immunotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who were treated with ipilimumab and GVAX, an allogeneic vaccine, and 21 patients who were randomized to GVAX or no vaccination. To study whether immune status was related to the efficacy of chemotherapy, frequencies of myeloid and lymphocyte subsets were determined. Of 28 patients treated with GVAX and ipilimumab, 23 patients received docetaxel and 13 patients mitoxantrone. Median PFS after docetaxel was 6.4 mo (range 0.8-11.2), while median PFS after mitoxantrone was markedly longer than expected (4.8 mo; range 1.4-13.7). High CD8+ICOS+ Tcell/Treg and pDC/mMDSC ratios were associated with relatively long PFS after mitoxantrone, suggesting a correlation between activated immune status and benefit of mitoxantrone. Analysis of 21 patients, randomized to GVAX or not, revealed a median PFS after docetaxel of 9.9 mo for vaccinated patients and 7.1 mo for unvaccinated patients. Interestingly, PFS after mitoxantrone (n = 14) was significantly longer in vaccinated patients as compared to controls (5.9 vs. 1.6 mo, p = 0.0048). In conclusion, mitoxantrone seems more effective in CRPC patients after immunotherapy, which may be related to the immune-stimulating effect of mitoxantrone in patients with heightened antitumor immunity. As this was a retrospective study with limited sample size, prospective studies are warranted to definitively show proof of principle.

New Treatment Options for Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer: What Is The Optimal Sequence?

Systemic treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer is rapidly evolving. Androgen deprivation therapy remains the first-line treatment for advanced disease and the backbone of sequential strategies. For patients with extensive metastatic disease the addition of docetaxel markedly improves survival. In case patients develop castration-resistant prostate cancer, several new therapeutic strategies are available. Large trials have shown a survival benefit for patients treated with sipuleucel-T, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or radium-223. Along with these new available treatment options, the sequence of applying them has become a serious matter of debate. In this review we provide an overview of current systemic treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer and propose considerations to optimally sequence registered new therapies. In addition, we hypothesize on improvement of outcome with potential combination strategies.