Intestinal Ultrasound Is Accurate to Determine Endoscopic Response and Remission in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is noninvasive, cost-effective, and accurate to determine disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). In this study, we prospectively evaluated IUS for treatment response in a longitudinal cohort by using endoscopy and histology as gold standards. METHODS: Consecutive patients with moderate to severe UC (endoscopic Mayo score [EMS] ≥2) starting tofacitinib treatment were included. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 8 weeks of tofacitinib induction by means of clinical, biochemical, endoscopic (EMS and UC endoscopic index for severity), histologic (Robarts Histopathologic Index) and IUS assessments. Readers of IUS, endoscopy, and histology were blinded for all other outcomes. The primary outcome was difference in bowel wall thickness (BWT) for endoscopic improvement vs no endoscopic improvement. Endoscopic remission was defined as EMS = 0, improvement as EMS ≤1, and response as a decrease of EMS ≥1. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included, with 27 patients completing follow-up. BWT correlated with EMS (ρ = 0.68, P < .0001), UC endoscopic index for severity (ρ = 0.73, P < .0001) and Robarts Histopathologic Index (ρ = 0.49, P = .002) at both time points. BWT in the sigmoid was lower in patients with endoscopic remission (1.4 mm vs 4.0 mm, P = .016), endoscopic improvement (1.8 mm vs 4.5 mm, P < .0001) and decrease in BWT was more pronounced in patients with endoscopic response (-58.1% vs -13.4%, P = .018). The most accurate cutoff values for BWT were 2.8 mm (area under the curve [AUC] 0.87) for endoscopic remission, 3.9 mm (AUC 0.92) for improvement, and decrease of 32% (AUC 0.87) for response. The submucosa was the most responsive wall layer. CONCLUSION: IUS, importantly BWT as the single most important parameter, is highly accurate to detect treatment response when evaluated against endoscopic outcomes.

Impaired Quality of Working Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Work-related aspects are important determinants of health for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. AIMS: We aimed to describe quality of working life (QWL) in IBD patients and to assess variables that are associated with QWL. METHODS: Employed IBD patients of two tertiary and two secondary referral hospitals were included. QWL (range 0-100) was measured using the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire (QWLQ). Work productivity (WP), fatigue, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, and Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, respectively. Active disease was defined as a score > 4 for the patient-reported Harvey-Bradshaw index in Crohn's disease (CD) or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index in ulcerative colitis patients. RESULTS: In total, 510 IBD patients were included (59% female, 53% CD, mean age 43 (SD 12) years). The mean QWLQ score was 78 (SD 11). The lowest subscore (54 (SD 26)) was observed for "problems due to the health situation": 63% reported fatigue-related problems at work, 48% agreed being hampered at work, 46% had limited confidence in their body, and 48% felt insecure about the future due to their health situation. Intermediate/strong associations were found between QWL and fatigue (r = - 0.543, p < 0.001), HRQL (r = 0.527, p < 0.001), WP loss (r = - 0.453, p < 0.001) and disease activity (r = - 0.331, p < 0.001). Independent predictors of impaired QWL in hierarchical regression analyses were fatigue (B = - 0.204, p < 0.001), WP loss (B = - 0.070, p < 0.001), and impaired HRQL (B = 0.248, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IBD-related problems at work negatively influence QWL. Fatigue, reduced HRQL, and WP loss were independent predictors of impaired QWL in IBD.

The Simple Cholestatic Complaints Score is a valid and quick patient-reported outcome measure in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Measuring symptoms and disease burden in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is increasingly important for daily practice and clinical trials. The Simple Cholestatic Complaints Score (SCCS) is a four-item questionnaire, that measures cholestatic symptoms (pruritus, fatigue, RUQ abdominal pain and fever) in PSC patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate reliability and validity of SCCS in a Dutch population. METHODS: The study population consisted of 212 patients from the Dutch prospective PSC registry. Data were collected via digital surveys. Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency and reproducibility. Construct-, criterion- and discriminant validity were determined. The ability to detect clinical change with SCCS was evaluated in patients who underwent endoscopic intervention. Simple Cholestatic Complaints Score collected by email and by a mobile application were compared. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients completed the questionnaire. Internal consistency was moderate and increased to 0.71 after removal of the fever item. Test-re-test reproducibility was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96). Criterion validity was good (all > 0.82). Construct validity was in line with a priori hypothesized correlations in 80%. SCCS was able to differentiate between clinically different groups. There was no difference between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and non-IBD patients. Simple Cholestatic Complaints Score was responsive to change after endoscopic intervention in successfully treated patients. Simple Cholestatic Complaints Score measurement by digital questionnaire and a mobile application was comparable. CONCLUSION: The SCCS is a valid instrument to measure cholestatic symptoms in PSC patients. Because of its quick and easy to use properties it is suitable for frequent monitoring of symptoms in clinical trials and daily practice.

Histological Outcomes And Jak-Stat Signalling In Ulcerative Colitis Patients Treated With Tofacitinib.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Histological outcomes and JAK-STAT signaling were assessed in a prospective ulcerative colitis (UC) patient cohort after 8 weeks treatment with tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. METHODS: Forty UC patients received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Treatment response was defined as histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI). Histological remission was defined as a Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) ≤3 points and histological response as 50% decrease in RHI. Mucosal expression of JAK1-3, Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) and total signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1-6 were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: At baseline, the median RHI was 14 (interquartile range (IQR) 10-19). Twenty-six of 40 (65%) patients had severe endoscopic disease (endoscopic Mayo score 3) and 31/40 (78%) failed prior anti-TNF treatment. At week 8, 15 patients (38%) had HEMI, 23 patients (58%) histological remission and 34 (85%) histological response. RHI decreased by a median of 14 points (IQR 9-21) in responders (p<0.001) and by 6 points (IQR 0-13) in non-responders (p=0.002). STAT1, STAT3 and STAT5 expression levels decreased significantly in the whole cohort. Responders had lower week 8 STAT1 expression levels compared to non-responders (0.2%, IQR 0.1-2.8 vs 4.3%, IQR 1.2-11.9, p=0.001), suggesting more profound STAT1 blockade. A trend of higher baseline JAK2 expression was observed in tofacitinib non-responders (2.7%, IQR 0.1-7.7) compared to responders (0.4%, IQR 0.1-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib treatment resulted in histological improvement in the majority of UC patients and a substantial decrease of STAT1, STAT3 and STAT5 expression. HEMI was associated with more profound suppression of STAT1.

Peripheral blood DNA methylation signatures and response to tofacitinib in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Predictive biomarkers for treatment efficacy of ulcerative colitis (UC) treatments are lacking. Here, we performed a longitudinal study investigating the association and potential predictive power of genome-wide peripheral blood (PB) DNA methylation signatures and response to tofacitinib treatment in UC. METHODS: We recruited moderate-to-severe UC patients starting tofacitinib treatment and measured PB DNA methylation profiles at baseline (T1), after 8 weeks (T2), and in a subset (n=8), after a median of 20 weeks (T3) using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC BeadChip. After 8 weeks, we categorized responders (R) from non-responders (NR) based on a centrally read endoscopic response (decrease in endoscopic mayo score ≥1 or UCEIS ≥2) combined with corticosteroid-free clinical- and/or biochemical response. T1 PB samples were used for biomarker identification, while T2 and publicly available intra-class correlation (ICC) data were used for stability analyses. RNA-sequencing was performed to understand the downstream effects of the predictor CpG loci. RESULTS: In total, 16 R and 15 NR patients with a median disease duration of 7 (4-12) years and overall comparable patient characteristics at baseline were analyzed. We identified a panel of 53 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) associated with response to tofacitinib (AUROC 0.74). Most DMPs (77%) demonstrated both short- and long-term hyper stability (ICC ≥0.90), irrespective of inflammatory status. Gene expression analysis showed lower FGFR2 (pBH=0.011) and LRPAP1 (pBH=0.020), and higher OR2L13 (pBH=0.016) expression at T1 in R compared to NR. CONCLUSION: Our observations demonstrate the utility of genome-wide PB DNA methylation signatures to predict response to tofacitinib.

Mercaptopurine for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Scepticism about the efficacy of thiopurines for ulcerative colitis [UC] is rising. This study aimed to evaluate mercaptopurine treatment for UC. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with active UC, despite treatment with 5-aminosalicylates [5-ASA], were randomized for therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM]-guided mercaptopurine treatment or placebo for 52 weeks. Corticosteroids were given in the first 8 weeks and 5-ASA was continued. Proactive metabolite-based mercaptopurine and placebo dose adjustments were applied from week 6 onwards by unblinded clinicians. The primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic improvement [total Mayo score ≤2 points and no item >1] at week 52 in an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Between December 2016 and April 2021, 70 patients were screened and 59 were randomized at six centres. In the mercaptopurine group, 16/29 [55.2%] patients completed the 52-week study, compared to 13/30 [43.3%] on placebo. The primary endpoint was achieved by 14/29 [48.3%] patients on mercaptopurine and 3/30 [10%] receiving placebo (Δ = 38.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1-59.4, p = 0.002). Adverse events occurred more frequently with mercaptopurine [808.8 per 100 patient-years] compared to placebo [501.4 per 100 patient-years]. Five serious adverse events occurred, four on mercaptopurine and one on placebo. TDM-based dose adjustments were executed in 22/29 [75.9%] patients, leading to lower mercaptopurine doses at week 52 compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Optimized mercaptopurine treatment was superior to placebo in achieving clinical, endoscopic and histological outcomes at 1 year following corticosteroid induction treatment in UC patients. More adverse events occurred in the mercaptopurine group.

Real-world clinical and endoscopic outcomes after one year tofacitinib treatment in ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated clinical and endoscopic efficacy, safety and drug survival of tofacitinib up to one year in a real-world cohort. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 36 UC patients were included who received tofacitinib. The primary outcome was combined with steroid-free clinical remission [Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) ≤2] and endoscopic improvement (Mayo score ≤1) at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included clinical (SCCAI drop ≥3) and endoscopic response (Mayo score drop ≥1), biochemical remission [fecal calprotectin (FC) ≤150 mg/kg and C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L), safety and drug survival. RESULTS: Median disease duration was 7 (3-14) years and 89 and 42% of patients failed prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and vedolizumab treatment, respectively. Combined corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic improvement were observed in 8/36 patients (22%), 6/35 (17%) and 12/31 (39%), at 16, 36 and 52 weeks, respectively. Corresponding combined clinical and endoscopic response rates were 15/36 (42%), 12/35 (34%), 15/31 (48%) and biochemical remission rates were 11/33 (33%), 10/32 (31%) and 10/29 (34%). Nine infections (two herpes zoster) led to dose reduction or (temporary) drug withdrawal. Permanent withdrawal occurred in 14/36 patients (33%) after a median duration of 9 (5-30) weeks. Drug survival at 1 year was 60%. Patients that failed anti-TNF were less likely to discontinue tofacitinib treatment early compared to patients without prior anti-TNF use (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.65). CONCLUSION: In a refractory UC population, combined steroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic improvement were found in 39% of patients at 1 year.

Work productivity loss is determined by fatigue and reduced quality of life in employed inflammatory bowel disease patients: a prospective multicentre cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients experience problems at work resulting in work productivity loss driving indirect healthcare costs. We aimed to find determinants for work productivity loss in employed IBD patients while correcting for disease severity according to prior and active maintenance treatment. METHODS: In this longitudinal multicentre cohort study, 510 employed IBD patients completed online questionnaires during 18 months follow-up. Work productivity, fatigue and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (score 20-100) and Short-Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (score 10-70). Linear mixed model analyses including random, repeated and fixed effects were performed. RESULTS: Fatigue (ß 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.32) and reduced HRQL (ß -1.15; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.95) were the strongest determinants for work productivity loss in employed IBD patients. Clinical disease activity (ß 9.50, 95% CI 6.48-12.51) and corticosteroid use (ß 10.09, 95% CI 5.25-15.84) were associated with work productivity loss in the total IBD group and ulcerative colitis subgroup, but not in Crohn's disease patients. History of IBD-related surgery (ß 9.41; 95% CI, 2.62-16.20) and vedolizumab use (ß 12.74; 95% CI, 3.63-21.86) were significantly associated with work productivity loss in the ulcerative colitis subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue and reduced HRQL were the strongest determinants for work productivity loss in employed IBD patients while correcting for disease severity and activity. These results underline the importance of monitoring fatigue and HRQL in routine care to reduce work productivity loss and indirect costs.

High Disease Burden Drives Indirect Costs in Employed Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: The WORK-IBD Study.

BACKGROUND: Work productivity (WP) loss includes absence from work (absenteeism) and productivity loss while working (presenteeism), which leads to high indirect costs in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Prior health economic analyses predominantly focused on absenteeism. Here we focus on presenteeism and assess predictors of WP loss, fatigue, and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS: Employed IBD patients completed the following surveys: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, and Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire. Predictors were assessed using uni- and multivariable regression analyses. Annual costs were calculated using percentages of WP loss, hourly wages, and contract hours. RESULTS: Out of 1590 invited patients, 768 (48%) responded and 510 (32%) were included. Absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall WP loss were reported by 94 (18%), 257 (50%), and 269 (53%) patients, respectively, resulting in mean (SD) annual costs of €1738 (5505), €5478 (8629), and €6597 (9987), respectively. Disease activity and active perianal disease were predictors of WP loss (odds ratio [OR] = 6.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-12.1); OR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5-8.7). Disease activity and arthralgia were associated with fatigue (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.9-6.8; OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.3)) and reduced HRQL (OR = 10.3; 95% CI, 5.9-17.9; OR = 2.3; 95 % CI, 1.4-3.8). Fatigue was the main reason for absenteeism (56%) and presenteeism (70%). Fatigue and reduced HRQL led to increased costs compared with absence of fatigue and normal HRQL (mean difference = €6630; 95% CI, €4977-€8283, P < 0.01; mean difference = €9575; 95% CI, €7767-€11,384, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Disease activity and disease burden lead to WP loss in approximately half of the employed IBD population, driving indirect costs. Fatigue is the most important reason for WP loss.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: risk factors for thiopurine-induced leukopenia in IBD.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurine-induced leukopenia, a frequently observed and potentially life-threatening adverse event, complicates the clinical management of IBD patients. AIM: To assess risk factors for thiopurine-induced leukopenia in IBD. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and Cochrane library were searched for studies reporting at least one risk factor for thiopurine-induced leukopenia. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated for each potential risk factor using a random effects model. Studies that were not eligible for meta-analysis were described qualitatively. RESULTS: Seventy articles were included, 34 (11 229 patients) were included in meta-analyses. A significantly higher thiopurine-induced leukopenia risk was found for TPMT (OR 3.9, 95% [CI] 2.5-6.1) and for NUDT15 R139C (OR 6.9, 95% CI 5.2-9.1), G52A (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3-7.9) and 36_37ins/delGGAGTC variant carriers (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.8-11.4). A potential association between high 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) or 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) levels and leukopenia was observed, since most studies reported higher metabolite levels in leukopenic patients (6-TGN: 204-308 (Lennard method) and 397 (Dervieux method), 6-MMP: 4020-10 450 pmol/8 x 108 RBC) compared to controls (6-TGN: 170-212 (Lennard method) and 269 (Dervieux method), 6-MMP: 1025-4550 pmol/8 x 108 RBC). CONCLUSIONS: TPMT and NUDT15 variants predict thiopurine-induced leukopenia. High 6-TGN and 6-MMP levels might induce leukopenia, although exact cut-off values remain unclear. Potential preventive measures to reduce the risk of thiopurine-induced leukopenia include pre-treatment TPMT and NUDT15 genotyping. Routine thiopurine metabolite measurement might be efficient, yet cut-off levels must be validated in advance.

Thiopurine Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis: A Critical Review of the Evidence for Current Clinical Practice.

Background: Due to toxicity problems and controversial evidence, thiopurine use in ulcerative colitis (UC) has faced a lot of criticism. We present a critical review of the literature on efficacy of thiopurines in UC. Methods: Studies evaluating therapeutic efficacy of thiopurine remission induction and/or maintenance treatment in UC were identified using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Results: Out of 5 randomized trials on thiopurine induction treatment, 3 demonstrated a significant effect of thiopurine treatment vs mesalamine or placebo in steroid-dependent UC patients: (1) lower endoscopic activity scores, (2) higher clinical remission rates, and (3) more patients who discontinued steroids. Two found no significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission of azathioprine compared with sulfasalazine or placebo in patients with active UC. Out of 7 randomized trials on thiopurine maintenance treatment, 4 demonstrated significant higher clinical and endoscopic remission rates in thiopurine-treated patients compared with placebo or mesalamine. Three found no significant difference in clinical and endoscopic remission of thiopurine maintenance treatment compared with sulfasalazine or placebo. Conclusions: All studies that investigated thiopurine treatment in UC had shortcomings, such as lack of sufficient power, no use of blinding, allowed concomitant treatment with steroids, and no endoscopy to confirm active disease at study entry or to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. Hence, current clinical practice of thiopurine treatment in UC is based on minimal and controversial evidence. This underscores the need for clinical studies with sufficient power and objective end points in order to determine efficacy of thiopurines in UC.

Comparison of health-related quality of life and disability in ulcerative colitis patients following restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis versus anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) and disability were compared in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy versus patients who received treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: UC patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy or started anti-TNF treatment between January 2010 and January 2015 were included at two tertiary referral centers. A matched cohort was created using propensity score matching for the covariates disease duration, Montreal classification, age, and sex. HRQL and disability were assessed using the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index (IBD-DI), EuroQol-5D-3L, and Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires. RESULTS: In total, 297 patients were included, of whom 205 (69%) patients responded. Fifty-nine pouch patients were matched to 59 anti-TNF-treated patients. Pouch patients reported better general health scores (P=0.042) compared with the anti-TNF group (SF-36). No differences were found for the EuroQol-5D-3L and IBD-DI between the two groups. Pouch patients had significantly higher COREFO scores compared with anti-TNF-treated patients for 'stool frequency' (P<0.001), 'antidiarrheal medication use' (P<0.001), and 'stool-related aspects' (P=0.004), of which the latter was because of a higher perianal skin irritation frequency (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: UC patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy reported a higher bowel movement frequency and more perianal skin irritation compared with anti-TNF-treated patients, but this did not affect overall disease-specific disability outcomes. Patients in the surgery group reported better outcomes for generic health compared with those in the anti-TNF group.