Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results of MONARCH 3.

BACKGROUND: In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy. In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- ABC significantly improved PFS. Here, we present the prespecified final OS results for MONARCH 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, phase III study of abemaciclib plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) versus placebo plus NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a gated secondary endpoint, and chemotherapy-free survival was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 493 women were randomized 2 : 1 to receive abemaciclib plus NSAI (n = 328) or placebo plus NSAI (n = 165). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there were 198 OS events (60.4%) in the abemaciclib arm and 116 (70.3%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.804; 95% confidence interval 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant). Median OS was 66.8 versus 53.7 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. In the subgroup with visceral disease, there were 113 OS events (65.3%) in the abemaciclib arm and 65 (72.2%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% confidence interval 0.558-1.030; P = 0.0757, non-significant). Median OS was 63.7 months versus 48.8 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. The previously demonstrated PFS benefit was sustained, and chemotherapy-free survival numerically improved with the addition of abemaciclib. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Abemaciclib combined with an NSAI resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (intent-to-treat population: 13.1 months; subgroup with visceral disease: 14.9 months) in patients with HR+ HER2- ABC; however, statistical significance was not reached.

Coverage determinants of breast cancer screening in Flanders: an evaluation of the past decade.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women in the developed world. In order to find developing cancers in an early stage, BC screening is commonly used. In Flanders, screening is performed in and outside an organized breast cancer screening program (BCSP). However, the determinants of BC screening coverage for both screening strategies are yet unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the determinants of BC screening coverage in Flanders. METHODS: Reimbursement data were used to attribute a screening status to each woman in the target population for the years 2008-2016. Yearly coverage data were categorized as screening inside or outside BCSP or no screening. Data were clustered by municipality level. A generalized linear equation model was used to assess the determinants of screening type. RESULTS: Over all years and municipalities, the median screening coverage rate inside and outside BCSP was 48.40% (IQR: 41.50-54.40%) and 14.10% (IQR: 9.80-19.80%) respectively. A higher coverage rate outside BSCP was statistically significantly (P < 0.001) associated with more crowded households (OR: 3.797, 95% CI: 3.199-4.508), younger age, higher population densities (OR: 2.528, 95% CI: 2.455-2.606), a lower proportion of unemployed job seekers (OR: 0.641, 95% CI: 0.624-0.658) and lower use of dental care (OR: 0.969, 95% CI: 0.967-0.972). CONCLUSION: Coverage rate of BC screening is not optimal in Flanders. Women with low SES that are characterized by younger age, living in a high population density area, living in crowded households, or having low dental care are less likely to be screened for BC in Flanders. If screened, they are more likely to be screened outside the BCSP.

An exploration of attitudes towards breast cancer screening in orthodox Jewish women in Antwerp--Belgium.

OBJECTIVE: To explore determinants of participation in breast cancer screening in orthodox Jewish women living in Antwerp, Belgium, and to uncover their opinions and attitudes towards screening, and thereby to detect ways to optimize participation. STUDY DESIGN: Focus group discussions were performed during the last months of 2011 and the first half of 2012 to explore motivation to participate or not in breast cancer screening. Groups consisted of five to seven women. Inclusion criteria were: being female, considering oneself as orthodox Jewish, aged between 50 and 69 years. RESULTS: Three focus group discussions with in a total of 20 women had taken place. All participants in the focus group discussions had a screening mammography taken on a regular base. All participants agreed that the social cohesion between Jewish orthodox women and the importance that is given to healthcare within the Jewish tradition are important contributors to their participation in a breast cancer screening program. Pain, lack of information during the exam, lack of confidence in the quality of the exam, perceived problems when the examining doctor/technician is male, and fear of the results are mentioned as barriers. The participants, however, state that these were not important enough to result in non-participation. Barriers could be diminished by information sessions specifically aimed at orthodox Jewish women. CONCLUSION: This qualitative research demonstrates a generally positive attitude of orthodox Jewish women living in Antwerp, Belgium, towards mammographic breast cancer screening. Increased and repeated structured information sessions are likely to improve breast cancer awareness in this population.

Factors contributing to the low participation rate of Turkish women to a breast cancer screening program in Antwerp, Belgium.

OBJECTIVES: To explore possible factors explaining a low participation rate to breast cancer screening for Turkish women living in Antwerp, Belgium, and to develop ways to increase participation rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors used focus group discussions with Turkish women to explore their reasons to participate or not to participate in breast cancer screening. Groups consisted of four to six women. Inclusion criteria were: being female, having a Turkish origin, and age between 50 and 69 years. For each focus group, one Turkish women was invited and asked to invite five other women meeting the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Three focus group discussions with in total 17 women have taken place. Six women had participated to all consecutive invitations for breast cancer screening. One woman had participated once, but not the next time she was invited. Ten women had never participated to screening mammography, although some of them had undergone diagnostic mammography. In all three focus groups, insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language, the unavailability of a professional interpreter, being careless about healthcare, and a negative influence of the husband, were the main reasons not to participate in breast cancer screening. Invitation letters are not read because they are in a language the woman does not understand. Less frequently mentioned obstacles were being on a holiday or being sick on the day of the scheduled mammography, fear of pain, considering an examination useless when not having any symptoms, being anxious for a positive result, and the physical distance to the screening center. Receiving an invitation in Turkish and knowing that a person speaking Turkish will be available at the screening center were proposed as possible measures to improve participation. CONCLUSION: The single most important reason why Turkish women living in Antwerp, Belgium, do not participate in breast cancer screening was a language problem; other reasons were a lack of knowledge concerning breast cancer screening and not worrying about breast cancer. The language barrier in this population of older women can possible be overcome by Turkish speaking personnel at the screening centers.

Quantifying independent risk factors for failing to rescreen in a breast cancer screening program in Flanders, Belgium.

BACKGROUND: Mammographic screening may reduce breast cancer mortality by about 20%, provided participation is high and women screen regularly. We quantified independent risk factors for failing to rescreen and built a model to predict how rescreening rates change if these risk factors would be modified. METHODS: Multivariate analysis was used to analyze data from a prospective study which included a self-administered questionnaire and rescreening status 30months after a t0 mammogram, using a random sample of women 50-67years (Belgium 2010-2013). RESULTS: A false positive result at the most recent past mammogram (Odds Ratio=5.0, 95% Confidence Interval 3.6-6.8), an interval until new invitation greater than 25months (Odds Ratio=4.8 for >29months, 95% Confidence Interval 2.9-8.1), waiting times in the mammography unit >1h (Odds Ratio=2.1, 95% Confidence Interval 1.2-3.7) and difficulties in reaching the unit (Odds Ratio=2.5, 95% Confidence Interval 1.4-4.4) were the strongest independent predictors for failing to rescreen. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.705 for the model development stage and 0.717 for the validation stage and goodness-of-fit was good. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining an invitation cycle of maximum 25months, limiting waiting time in the mammography unit and lowering the number of false positives could increase breast cancer screening compliance.

Illicit substance use among university students from seven European countries: a comparison of personal and perceived peer use and attitudes towards illicit substance use.

OBJECTIVE: To compare European students' personal use and approval of illicit substance use with their perceptions of peer behaviours and attitudes, and investigate whether perceptions of peer norms are associated with personal use of illicit substances and attitudes. METHOD: This study used baseline data from the Social Norms Intervention for the prevention of Polydrug usE (SNIPE) project involving 4482 students from seven European countries in 2012. Students completed an online survey which included questions on personal and perceived peer illicit substance use and personal and perceived peer attitude towards illicit substances. RESULTS: 8.3% of students reported having used illicit substances at least once in their life. 49.7% of students perceived that the majority of their peers have used illicit substances more frequently than themselves. The perception was significantly associated with higher odds for personal illicit substance use (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.53-2.54). The perception that the majority of peers approve illicit substance use was significantly associated with higher odds for personal approval of illicit substance use (OR: 3.47, 95% CI: 2.73-4.41). CONCLUSION: Students commonly perceived that their peers used illicit subtances more often than themselves. We found an association between the perceived peer norms/attitudes and reported individual behaviour/attitudes.

Knowledge of and attitude towards human papillomavirus infection and vaccines among nurses at a tertiary hospital in South Africa.

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine factors contributing to recommending vaccination to patients, using a self-administered anonymous questionnaire given to 345 nurses working at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. The average age of the participants was 37.2 years. About three-quarters (73.3%) of the nurses were aware of HPV and among them, 38.3% knew that HPV is the most common sexually transmitted virus. Nurses had poor knowledge regarding HPV infection and the HPV vaccine. The majority (90.9%) of the nurses intended to recommend the vaccine to their patients. The nurses who mentioned that adolescents and young adults would accept HPV vaccination were more likely to recommend HPV vaccination to their patients (OR = 57.78, p = 0.031). Nurses had a low level of knowledge regarding HPV infection and vaccines but they were willing to recommend the vaccines to their patients. Nurses need to be educated before implementing HPV vaccinations nationwide.

Social motives for drinking in students should not be neglected in efforts to decrease problematic drinking.

High heavy drinking prevalence persists in students. Recently, drinking motivation received a lot of attention as an important determinant. Enhancement and coping motives are mostly positively related and conformity motives are mostly negatively related with heavy drinking. Relations are less clear for social motives. This study aimed at gaining more insight in the role of drinking motives in heavy drinking students. Overall, 15 897 Belgian university and college students (mean age: 20.7, SD = 2.6) anonymously participated in an online survey. Logistic regressions tested relationships between motives and problematic drinking (>weekly drinking, ≥monthly binge drinking and being at risk for problematic drinking by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT]). Social motives had the highest prevalence, followed by enhancement, coping and conformity motives. Men engaged more in problematic drinking and reported more motives, except for coping. Enhancement, coping and social-motivated students have higher chances for problematic drinking, while the opposite is true for conformity-motivated students. Although this study found a similar ranking of motives as in other studies, a relationship between problematic drinking and all motives, including social motives, was revealed. This might indicate the different functions of social motives in heavy drinking in different cultures/sub-populations and countries. This finding is relevant for the development of interventions.

[Opinions and attitudes of Flemish pharmacists and general practitioners towards INN prescribing. A survery in Antwerp and East Flanders]. / Avis et attitudes des pharmaciens et des médecins généralistes vis-à-vis de la prescription en DCI. Enquête réalisée à Anvers et en Flandre Orientate.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2002 in Belgium, physicians are allowed to prescribe by International Non-proprietary Name (INN). In 2005, the conditions for this decree were set. Examples from other countries have shown that INN prescribing can significantly contribute to controlling pharmaceutical expenditures. The share of INN prescriptions remains low in Belgium (7% in 2011). OBJECTIVE: To formulate an answer to the question: what are the opinions and attitudes of pharmacists and general practitioners [GP's] with regards to INN prescribing? METHOD: In the winter of 2011-2012, a questionnaire with closed-ended questions was send to pharmacists and GP's in the provinces of Antwerp and East-Flanders, through training days and personal visits. Pharmacists and GP's scored a list of statements with a 5-point Likert scale. The themes of the statements related to: delivering INN prescriptions, legislation, impact on expenditures, choices regarding patient concerns and interprofessional relations. RESULTS: In total, 353 questionnaires were completed and returned of which 228 165%1 were by pharmacists and 125 (35%1 by GP's. Although both declared to be sufficiently up to date with regulations to prescribe (84%) or to deliver (95%] a INN prescription, only 13% of the pharmacists said all prescription they receive contain the correct information. Less GP's [36%) than pharmacists (82%] feel aided by their software program when prescribing or delivering an INN prescription. GP's rely mostly on NIHDI (National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance) as the main source for information on INN prescribing, pharmacists rely on the [Local) pharmacists association. The pharmacists and GP's in the study who relied on NIHDI as main information source, were less aware of legislation concerning INN [N2, p<0,05] than those who rely on the local professional association [N2, p<0,0001]. All pharmacists in the study said to consider the patients medication history when delivering an INN prescription for chronic treatment. However, 57% of the GP's preferred not to prescribe by INN for the reason that they are not sure whether the pharmacist will always consider the patients medication history in case of an INN prescription. Although the GP's showed certain motivation to prescribe by INN, it was no greater than for generic prescribing. And INN prescribing has no added value compared to generic prescribing, according to the GP's. For the pharmacists, INN prescribing does contain an opportunity. With the increase in numbers of dosages and sorts of packaging of generic products, it becomes more and more difficult for pharmacists to manage their stock. In case of an INN prescription, the pharmacist can choose between the different packages in his stock. This offers opportunities especially for acute conditions. CONCLUSION: INN prescribing is a good example of where the collaboration between pharmacists and GP's still contains a lot of opportunities, as well for the two professions, as the government and the patient in terms of controlling the pharmaceutical expenditures. Also the education for pharmacist or GP can further contribute to the sensitization of INN prescribing. In practice, there remain a number of issues and differences in opinions between pharmacists and general practitioners regarding INN prescribing. GP's feel few motivation to prescribe by INN and the government has put no imperative demands towards prescribers. Further evaluation of the practicaL feasibility of the current conditions for prescribing and delivering INN prescriptions is needed.

A retrospective analysis of the histology of resected polyps and colonoscopy quality parameters in Belgium.

Background and aims: adenoma detection rate is a well known quality parameter for colonoscopy. However recently other quality parameters have emerged. We wanted to evaluate the histology of the resected polyps, different quality indicators of colonoscopy and post colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) in Belgium and analyzed data about colonoscopies performed between 2008-2015. Methods: Reimbursement data on colorectal related medical procedures from the Intermutualistic Agency were linked with data on clinical and pathological staging of colorectal cancer and with histologic data of resected polyps available at the Belgian Cancer Registry over a period covering 8 years (2008-2015). Results: 298,246 polyps were resected in 294,923 colonoscopies, of which 275,182 were adenomas (92 %) and 13,616 were SSLs (4%). There was a significant but small correlation between the different quality parameters and PCCRC. Post colonoscopy colorectal cancer rate after 3 years was 7.29 %. There were marked geographic differences in Belgium concerning adenoma detection rate, sessile adenoma detection rate and post colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Conclusion: Most resected polyps were adenomas, only a small percentage involved sessile serrated lesions. There was a significant correlation between adenoma detection rate and other quality parameters, and a small but significant correlation between PCCRC and the different quality parameters. The lowest post colonoscopy colorectal cancer rate was reached with an ADR of 31.4 % and a SSL-DR of 1.2 %.

A pivotal role for the general practitioner in a mixed mammographic screening model.

BACKGROUND: A mixed mammographic screening model presents a country or region with a complex problem. Promoting a significant shift within the target population from opportunistic breast cancer screening to participation in an organised screening programme offers many advantages. The objective was to explore the role of GPs as potential mediators by assessing their specific knowledge, attitudes, and experience on breast cancer and mammographic screening. METHODS: A detailed questionnaire was mailed in 2007 to 1500 GPs randomly sampled from the GP population in the province of Antwerp, Belgium. Levels of knowledge on epidemiology and screening, opinions and attitudes on systematic mammographic screening, and experience with breast cancer and mammography were evaluated. RESULTS: We received 317 completed questionnaires, 21.1% of the contacted GPs. General knowledge on basic concepts of mammographic screening was average, while the response to an open question on the differences between screening and opportunistic mammography was very limited. More than half of the participants had a positive or realistic attitude towards many aspects of systematic screening, and had satisfactory experience with breast cancer patients in their daily practice (about 82% saw one to four new cases a year). Many (72%) were favourably disposed towards systematic screening organised by the government. CONCLUSION: The answers of the GPs suggest a promising potential with regard to the official breast cancer screening programme. Many participants presented qualifications, which could contribute to a change from the mixed model in favour of the official screening system. A number of gaps, however, need to be filled and there is a continuing need to educate physicians on principles and risks and benefits of systematic screening of the target group.

Irregular screening participation increases advanced stage breast cancer at diagnosis: A population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of irregular screening behaviour on the risk of advanced stage breast cancer at diagnosis in Flanders. METHODS: All women aged 50-69 who were invited to the organized breast cancer screening and diagnosed with breast cancer before age 72 from 2001 to 2018 were included. All prevalent screen and interval cancers within 2 years of a prevalent screen were excluded. Screening behaviour was categorized based on the number of invitations and performed screenings. Four groups were defined: regular, irregular, only-once, and never attenders. Advanced stage cancer was defined as a stage III + breast cancer. The association between screening regularity and breast cancer stage at diagnosis was evaluated in multivariable logistic regression models, taking age of diagnosis and socio-economic status into account. RESULTS: In total 13.5% of the 38,005 breast cancer cases were diagnosed at the advanced stage. Compared to the regular attenders, the risk of advanced stage breast cancer for the irregular attenders, women who participated only-once, and never attenders was significantly higher with ORadjusted:1.17 (95%CI:1.06-1.29) and ORadjusted:2.18 (95%CI:1.94-2.45), and ORadjusted:5.95 (95%CI:5.33-6.65), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, never attenders were nearly six times more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage breast cancer than regular attenders, which was much higher than the estimates published thus far. An explanation for this is that the ever screened women is a heterogeneous group regarding the participation profiles which also includes irregular and only-once attenders. The benefit of regular screening should be informed to all women invited for screening.

Depressive symptoms in higher education students during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. An examination of the association with various social risk factors across multiple high- and middle-income countries.

Higher-education students face substantial risks for developing depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic or experiencing exacerbated pre-existing depressive symptoms. This study uses data from the COVID-19 International Student Well-Being Study, which collected data through a non-representative convenience sample in 125 higher-education institutions (HEI) across 26 high- and middle-income countries (N: 20,103) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. It describes the prevalence of depressive symptoms in higher-education students. We find substantial cross-national variation in depressive symptoms, with lowest mean levels established in the Nordic countries and France, while highest mean levels of depressive symptoms were found in Turkey, South Africa, Spain and the USA. Elevated risk for depressive symptoms was found in female students, students with fewer social support resources and in a more disadvantaged socioeconomic position, and students with a migrant background. COVID-19 related stressors, such as reduced social contact, increased financial insecurity, and academic stress explained a relatively larger proportion of the variance in depressive symptoms compared to non-COVID-19 related stressors. This finding shows that not the pandemic itself, but rather the secondary effects of the pandemic relate to students' mental health. Our results enable HEIs to be better equipped to target groups that are particularly at risk during a pandemic.

Parameters influencing the quality of colonoscopy in Belgium : a critical evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In relation to recent implementation of colorectal cancer screening programs at the regional level, quality assessment of colonoscopy gains more interest in Belgium. In order to evaluate quality indicators of colonoscopies in Belgium, we retrospectively analysed data about colonoscopies performed between 2002-2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Coded data concerning number of medical procedures and polypectomy were provided by the Intermutualistic Agency (IMA). This database was used to calculate different quality indicators such as polyp detection rate (PDR), use of sedation, amount of procedures and time interval according to physician and center type. RESULTS: Considerable differences in polyp detection rate (PDR) exist between different physicians and centers. Mean PDR significantly correlated with the number of colonoscopies performed each year. A minimum of 106 colonoscopies per year was identified to maintain competence. Recuperation rate for polyps was low, and time intervals between colonoscopies were generally too short in comparison to European and international guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: In absence of a central colonoscopy registry in Belgium, our results were based on reimbursement data. Other quality parameters, although accuracy is questionable (eg. bowel cleansing and withdrawal time) are not systematically registered. Despite these difficulties, we were able to demonstrate that a minimum amount of 106 colonoscopies per year is necessary to maintain competence. The results from this large database can be used as a foundation to work out a quality colonoscopy bundle.

A comparison between wastewater-based drug data and an illicit drug use survey in a selected community.

BACKGROUND: Estimations of drug use are mostly based on population surveys that can suffer from response biases. The current study evaluates using wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) for assessing illicit drug use by comparing wastewater data with that from a population survey. METHODS: Introductory letters (29,083) were sent to inhabitants of Lier, Belgium, asking them to participate in an online survey study. Participants were asked to indicate their drug use in the past week for a 12-week period (September-November 2014). Concomitant wastewater samples were collected from the associated wastewater treatment plant in four bi-weekly periods. Samples were analyzed using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: On average, 263 (1%) inhabitants filled out the questionnaire each week. According to the survey results, cannabis was the most used drug, followed by amphetamine, cocaine and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). Wastewater data corroborated these results. Cocaine, amphetamine and MDMA showed a significant difference between days of the week. The four sampling periods differed significantly from each other for cocaine, amphetamine and methadone. CONCLUSION: Observed drug consumption patterns from survey and wastewater data match national and international data. Wastewater analyses confirm that WBE can be reliably used to confirm patterns and trends in drug use. Future studies should focus on identifying the most opportune sampling period giving the most reliable estimates of drug use and use smaller, contained communities such as festivals or prisons if methodology allows.

Investigation of agreement between wastewater-based epidemiology and survey data on alcohol and nicotine use in a community.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Alcohol and nicotine are the two most used substances world-wide and associated with increased burden of disease. Since surveys on substance use may be difficult due to response biases, wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) was developed as a more objective measure of nicotine and alcohol use. This study compares estimates of nicotine and alcohol use from a wastewater sampling campaign in a medium-sized Belgian city with a concurrently executed population survey. METHODS: 29,083 letters about participation in an online survey study on weekly alcohol and tobacco use were sent to the inhabitants of Lier, Belgium. Wastewater samples were collected from the associated treatment plant in four bi-weekly periods. Samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Ethylsulfate was used as alcohol biomarker and cotinine and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine as nicotine biomarker. RESULTS: 263 (1%) surveys were filled out on average per week. According to survey data, alcohol and nicotine were used less than in the rest of Belgium and this was matched by the wastewater data. Nicotine use, but not alcohol use, showed a significant variation over the sampling periods. Both nicotine and alcohol showed increase use during the weekend while only alcohol showed a different use pattern throughout the week. CONCLUSION: No correlation between WBE and survey data could be demonstrated, possibly due to small sample sizes. However, this study shows that weekly trends in alcohol and nicotine use can be quickly detected from wastewater analysis and the occurrence of major events such as festivals can be identified.

Personal and perceived peer use and attitudes towards the use of nonmedical prescription stimulants to improve academic performance among university students in seven European countries.

BACKGROUND: Overestimations of non-prescribed stimulant use of peers are well documented in the USA and have also been identified as predictive of personal stimulant consumption. This study aimed to examine whether overestimations of peer use and approval of the use are associated with personal use and attitude towards the use of non-prescribed stimulants among European university students. METHOD: The EU funded 'Social Norms Intervention for the prevention of Polydrug usE (SNIPE)' study was conducted in seven European countries. In a web-based questionnaire, 4482 students were asked about their personal use and their attitude towards non-prescribed stimulant use, as well as the perceived peer use and peer attitude. RESULTS: 59% of students thought that the majority of their peers used non-prescribed stimulants more frequently than themselves, and only 4% thought that the use of the majority was lower than their personal use. The perception that the majority of peers had used non-prescribed stimulants at least once was significantly associated with higher odds for personal use of non-prescribed stimulants (OR: 3.30, 95% CI: 2.32-4.71). In addition, the perception that the majority of peers approved of the non-prescribed use of stimulants was associated with a 4.03 (95% CI: 3.35-4.84) times higher likelihood for personal approval. DISCUSSION: European university students generally perceived the non-prescribed use of stimulants of peers to be higher than their personal use. This perception, as well as a perception of higher approval in the peer group, was associated with a higher likelihood of personal non-prescribed stimulant medication use and approval.

First results of the Flemish colorectal cancer screening program : start-up- period late 2013.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Investigation of the first participation rate and follow-up results of the Flemish colorectal cancer screening program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2013 five age cohorts with an even age between 66 and 74 year old (n=243 335) were invited by mail to return a completed iFOBT. Participants who tested positive (≥75ng/ml) were referred to a follow-up colonoscopy. RESULTS: Participation rate was 48.4% (n=117 774). Overall positivity rate was 10.1%, and 78.1% of those tested positive underwent a colonoscopy. The positive predictive value of colonoscopy for CRC was 8.2%, for advanced adenoma 16.9% and for non-advanced adenoma 36.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the EU-guidelines 35% was expected as participation for a first screening round, thus a participation rate of 48.4% is more than acceptable for a first screening year. The high positivity rate can partly be explained by including only the older ages in the start-up-period and by the first year of mass screening in Flanders. (Acta gastroenterol. belg., 2016, 79, 421-428).

Cervical cancer screening in the Flemish region (Belgium): measurement of the attendance rate by telephone interview.

In November and December 1995 a computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) was organized in order to measure the rate of participation in cervical cancer screening among a sample of 1,477 women between 18 and 69 years old, residing in the Flemish Region and selected by random digit dialling. Associations between screening status and a set of explanatory variables (demographic, socioeconomic determinants and exposition to primary risk factors for cervical cancer) were studied by logistic regression modelling. The screening coverage meaning the percentage of women screened less than 3 years ago, increases sharply up to 25 years and remains higher than 85% up to 40 years; from then it decreases progressively. Socioeconomically deprived groups and single women are less likely to have a smear taken. Notable regional differences exist. Over-screening (interval between Papanicolaou smears less than 3 years) is an important phenomenon among screened women especially within the younger age groups. The prevalence of risk factors (sexual intercourse at young age, multiple sex partners, contraceptive pill use, smoking) has increased over time but women at higher risk are generally better screened. This survey provides useful baseline information necessary to monitor the achievement of some main objectives, formulated by the Europe Against Cancer programme and also included in Flemish public health policy.

Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?

BACKGROUND: The implementation of organized breast cancer screening in Flanders was prepared by means of pilot projects within a multicenter study. In the semi-rural district of Kontich (Province of Antwerp, Flanders) a pilot project was performed using a mobile screening unit. Compared to international standards, the attendance rate for this pilot project (i.e. 34%) was low. Non-organized screening, which already exists in Flanders, at least partly explains this low attendance rate for the organized screening. The main purpose of our study was to investigate the experience of the pilot target group with respect to the organized breast cancer screening in the district of Kontich, in order to maximize the conditions for a high attendance rate in the organized breast cancer screening programme throughout Flanders. METHODS: With a random numbers procedure, performed by the computer, 500 women were selected among those who were invited to the first screening round of the breast cancer screening programme in the district of Kontich (n = 6,897). These 500 randomly selected women were asked to cooperate with a face-to-face interview. The questionnaire used dealt with the different aspects of the organized mammographic screening which were expected to influence the decision to attend. RESULTS: There were 348 women who responded to the questionnaire (69.6%): 138 of them were attenders and 210 were non-attenders at the organized breast cancer screening. Attenders and non-attenders at the organized breast cancer screening in the district of Kontich had different views about various aspects of the screening programme. The percentages of those who thought that an item was important or very important to them, were for the 138 attenders and the 210 non-attenders respectively: "to receive a personal invitation letter": 90.6 vs. 48.1% (p < 0.05); "a preliminary visit to the GP": 9.4 vs. 34.3% (p < 0.05); "possibility of examination outside business hours": 15.9 vs. 30.0% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the putting into action of a mobile unit in the semi-rural area of the district of Kontich was productive, the attendance rate was still too low compared to international standards. To increase the attendance rate, the following interventions should be considered: devising the personal invitation letter in a more attractive way, activating and stimulating the important motivational role of the GP in persuading women to attend the organized screening programme and offering the invited population the possibility to have a mammographic examination performed outside business hours. Appropriate measures are being explored.