Optimization of the betamethasone and dexamethasone dosing regimen during pregnancy: a combined placenta perfusion and pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal betamethasone and dexamethasone are prescribed to women who are at high risk of premature birth to prevent neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The current treatment regimens, effective to prevent neonatal RDS, may be suboptimal. Recently, concerns have been raised regarding possible adverse long-term neurological outcomes due to high fetal drug exposures. Data from nonhuman primates and sheep suggest maintaining a fetal plasma concentration above 1 ng/mL for 48 hours to retain efficacy, while avoiding undesirable high fetal plasma levels. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to re-evaluate the current betamethasone and dexamethasone dosing strategies to assess estimated fetal exposure and provide new dosing proposals that meet the efficacy target but avoid excessive peak exposures. STUDY DESIGN: A pregnancy physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was used to predict fetal drug exposures. To allow prediction of the extent of betamethasone and dexamethasone exposure in the fetus, placenta perfusion experiments were conducted to determine placental transfer. Placental transfer rates were integrated in the PBPK model to predict fetal exposure and model performance was verified using published maternal and fetal pharmacokinetic data. The verified pregnancy PBPK models were then used to simulate alternative dosing regimens to establish a model-informed dose. RESULTS: Ex vivo data showed that both drugs extensively cross the placenta. For betamethasone 15.7±1.7% and for dexamethasone 14.4±1.5%, the initial maternal perfusate concentration reached the fetal circulations at the end of the 3-hour perfusion period. Pregnancy PBPK models that include these ex vivo-derived placental transfer rates accurately predicted maternal and fetal exposures resulting from current dosing regimens. The dose simulations suggest that for betamethasone intramuscular, a dose reduction from 2 dosages 11.4 mg, 24 hours apart, to 4 dosages 1.425 mg, 12 hours apart would avoid excessive peak exposures and still meet the fetal response threshold. For dexamethasone, the dose may be reduced from 4 times 6 mg every 12 hours to 8 times 1.5 mg every 6 hours. CONCLUSION: A combined placenta perfusion and pregnancy PBPK modeling approach adequately predicted both maternal and fetal drug exposures of 2 antenatal corticosteroids (ACSs). Strikingly, our PBPK simulations suggest that drug doses might be reduced drastically to still meet earlier proposed efficacy targets and minimize peak exposures. We propose the provided model-informed dosing regimens are used to support further discussion on an updated ACS scheme and design of clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness and safety of lower doses.

Toxicity of anticancer drugs in human placental tissue explants and trophoblast cell lines.

The application of anticancer drugs during pregnancy is associated with placenta-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, it is important to study placental toxicity of anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to compare effects on viability and steroidogenesis in placental tissue explants and trophoblast cell lines. Third trimester placental tissue explants were exposed for 72 h (culture day 4-7) to a concentration range of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, cisplatin, carboplatin, crizotinib, gefitinib, imatinib, or sunitinib. JEG-3, undifferentiated BeWo, and syncytialised BeWo cells were exposed for 48 h to the same drugs and concentrations. After exposure, tissue and cell viability were assessed and progesterone and estrone levels were quantified in culture medium. Apart from paclitaxel, all compounds affected both cell and tissue viability at clinically relevant concentrations. Paclitaxel affected explant viability moderately, while it reduced cell viability by 50% or more in all cell lines, at 3-10 nM. Doxorubicin (1 µM) reduced viability in explants to 83 ± 7% of control values, whereas it fully inhibited viability in all cell types. Interference with steroid release in explants was difficult to study due to large variability in measurements, but syncytialised BeWo cells proved suitable for this purpose. We found that 1 µM sunitinib reduced progesterone release to 76 ± 6% of control values, without affecting cell viability. While we observed differences between the models for paclitaxel and doxorubicin, most anticancer drugs affected viability significantly in both placental explants and trophoblast cell lines. Taken together, the placenta should be recognized as a potential target organ for toxicity of anticancer drugs.

Placental transfer of tofacitinib in the ex vivo dual-side human placenta perfusion model.

Tofacitinib is a small molecule Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, introduced to the European market in 2017, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis. In the treatment of women with autoimmune diseases, pregnancy is a relevant issue, as such diseases typically affect women in their reproductive years. Currently, there is limited data on the use of tofacitinib during pregnancy. To estimate the extent of placental transfer in the absence of clinical data, we conducted ex vivo dual-side perfused human placental cotyledon perfusions. Term placentas were perfused for 180 min with tofacitinib (100 nM, added to the maternal circuit) in a closed-closed configuration. At the end of the perfusions, drug concentrations in the maternal and fetal reservoirs were near equilibrium, at 35.6 ± 5.5 and 24.8 ± 4.7 nM, respectively. Transfer of tofacitinib was similar to that observed for the passive diffusion marker antipyrine (100 µg/mL, added to the maternal reservoir). Final antipyrine maternal and fetal concentrations amounted to 36.9 ± 3.0 and 36.7 ± 1.3 µg/mL, respectively. In conclusion, in the ex vivo perfused placenta tofacitinib traverses the placental barrier rapidly and extensively. This suggests that substantial fetal tofacitinib exposure will take place after maternal drug dosing.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling to Predict the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid in Adults and Children with Tuberculous Meningitis.

Linezolid is used off-label for treatment of central nervous system infections. However, its pharmacokinetics and target attainment in cranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in tuberculous meningitis patients is unknown. This study aimed to predict linezolid cranial CSF concentrations and assess attainment of pharmacodynamic (PD) thresholds (AUC:MIC of >119) in plasma and cranial CSF of adults and children with tuberculous meningitis. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to predict linezolid cranial CSF profiles based on reported plasma concentrations. Simulated steady-state PK curves in plasma and cranial CSF after linezolid doses of 300 mg BID, 600 mg BID, and 1200 mg QD in adults resulted in geometric mean AUC:MIC ratios in plasma of 118, 281, and 262 and mean cranial CSF AUC:MIC ratios of 74, 181, and 166, respectively. In children using ~10 mg/kg BID linezolid, AUC:MIC values at steady-state in plasma and cranial CSF were 202 and 135, respectively. Our model predicts that 1200 mg per day in adults, either 600 mg BID or 1200 mg QD, results in reasonable (87%) target attainment in cranial CSF. Target attainment in our simulated paediatric population was moderate (56% in cranial CSF). Our PBPK model can support linezolid dose optimization efforts by simulating target attainment close to the site of TBM disease.

Non-clinical considerations for supporting accelerated inclusion of pregnant women in pre-licensure clinical trials with anti-HIV agents.

INTRODUCTION: To allow the continued participation of women enrolled in pre-licensure clinical trials who become pregnant, and to potentially enrol pregnant women in clinical trials, non-clinical developmental and reproductive toxicology studies (DART) are essential. Generally during pharmaceutical development, DART studies are conducted late during clinical development, leading to the exclusion of pregnant women from enrolment and withdrawal of women becoming pregnant during pre-licensure trials. DISCUSSION: Completing all DART studies prior to or early during the conduct of phase 3 trials (i.e. earlier than current common practice) can accelerate and facilitate the inclusion of women who become pregnant during pre-licensure trials to remain on study drug and to potentially enrol pregnant women more rapidly. Promoting complementary strategies, such as alternative combinations of DART study designs and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling, could better inform drug dosing and safety in pregnancy at an earlier stage in drug development. The interpretation of the results of non-clinical DART studies is often complex. Institutional review boards/ethics committees should have access to relevant expertise for interpretation and application of results of non-clinical developmental and reproductive toxicity studies. Clear communication and thorough understanding of non-clinical findings and the overall benefit-risk profile of the product are critical to review protocols and determine if women who become pregnant during a clinical trial could continue on study drug and/or to enrol pregnant women in the trial. The informed consent document should be well written so that participants can make an informed decision to stay on study drug or participate in a trial during pregnancy. Ultimately, the decision to allow women who become pregnant during pre-licensure trials to remain on study will depend on the totality of the evidence and benefit-risk considerations. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that industry completes non-clinical reproductive toxicity studies prior to or early during the conduct of phase 3 trials in HIV drug development, especially for priority agents, and potentially uses alternative DART study design strategies to achieve this goal.

Predicting fetal exposure of crizotinib during pregnancy: Combining human ex vivo placenta perfusion data with physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Commercially available physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling platforms increasingly allow estimations of fetal exposure to xenobiotics. We aimed to explore a physiology-based approach in which literature data from ex vivo placenta perfusion studies are used to parameterize Simcyp's pregnancy-PBPK (p-PBPK) model, taking crizotinib as an example. First, a physiologically-based semi-mechanistic placenta (PBMP) model was developed in MATLAB to analyze placenta perfusion data of crizotinib. Mixed-effects modeling was performed to derive intrinsic unbound clearance values across the maternal-placental barrier and fetal-placental barrier. Values were then used for parameterization of the p-PBPK model. The PBMP model adequately described the perfusion data. Clearance was estimated to be 71 mL/min and 535 mL/min for the maternal placental uptake and efflux, and 8 mL/min and 163 mL/min for fetal placental uptake and efflux, respectively. For oral dosing of 250 mg twice daily, p-PBPK modeling predicted a Cmax and AUC0-τ of 0.08 mg/L and 0.78 mg/L*h in the umbilical vein at steady-state, respectively. In placental tissue, a Cmax of 5.04 mg/L was predicted. In conclusion, PBMP model-based data analysis and the associated p-PBPK modeling approach illustrate how ex vivo placenta perfusion data may be used for fetal exposure predictions.

Determination of cytotoxicity following oxidative treatment of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater.

Pharmaceutical residues are released in the aquatic environment due to incomplete removal from wastewater. With the presence of multiple chemicals in sewage waters, contaminants may adversely affect the effectiveness of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In certain cases, discharged metabolites are transformed back into their pristine structure and become bioactive again. Other compounds are persistent and can withstand conventional wastewater treatment. When WWTP effluents are released in surface waters, pristine and persistent chemicals can affect the aquatic environment. To complement WWTPs and circumvent incomplete removal of unwanted chemicals or pharmaceuticals, on-site wastewater treatment can contribute to their removal. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are very powerful techniques for the abatement of pharmaceuticals, however, under certain circumstances reactive toxic by-products can be produced. We studied the application of on-site AOPs in a laboratory setting. It is expected that treatment at the contamination source can eliminate the worst polluters. Thermal plasma and UV/H2O2 oxidation were applied on simulation matrices, Milli-Q and synthetic sewage water spiked with 10 different pharmaceuticals in a range of 0.1 up to 2400 µg/L. In addition, untreated end-of-pipe hospital effluent was also subjected to oxidative treatment. The matrices were activated for 180 min and added to cultured HeLa cells. The cells were 24 h and 48 h exposed at 37 °C and subsequently markers for oxidative stress and viability were measured. During the UV/H2O2 treatment periods no toxicity was observed. After thermal plasma activation of Milli-Q water (150 and 180 min) toxicity was observed. Direct application of thermal plasma treatment in hospital sewage water caused elimination of toxic substances. The low cytotoxicity of treated pharmaceutical residues is likely to become negligible if plasma pre-treated on-site wastewater is further diluted with other sewage water streams, before reaching the WWTP. Our study suggests that AOPs may be promising technologies to remove a substantial portion of pharmaceutical components by degradation at the source. Further studies will have to be performed to verify the feasibility of upscaling this technology from the benchtop to practice.

Completing the Enalaprilat Excretion Pathway-Renal Handling by the Proximal Tubule.

BACKGROUND: Enalapril is often used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Clinical data suggest that the urinary excretion of enalaprilat, the active metabolite of enalapril, is mediated by renal transporters. We aimed to identify enalaprilat specificity for renal proximal tubular transporters. METHODS: Baculovirus-transduced HEK293 cells overexpressing proximal tubular transporters were used to study enalaprilat cellular uptake. Uptake into cells overexpressing the basolateral transporters OCT2, OAT1, OAT2, or OAT3 and apical transporters OAT4, PEPT1, PEPT2, OCTN1, OCTN2, MATE1, MATE2k, and URAT1 was compared with mock-transduced control cells. Transport by renal efflux transporters MRP2, MPR4, P-gp, and BCRP was tested using a vesicular assay. Enalaprilat concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Uptake of enalaprilat into cells expressing OAT3 as well as OAT4 was significantly higher compared to control cells. The enalaprilat affinity for OAT3 was 640 (95% CI: 520-770) µM. For OAT4, no reliable affinity constant could be determined using concentrations up to 3 mM. No transport was observed for other transporters. CONCLUSION: The affinity of enalaprilat for OAT3 and OAT4 was notably low compared to other substrates. Taking this affinity and clinically relevant plasma concentrations of enalaprilat and other OAT3 substrates into account, we believe that drug-drug interactions on a transporter level do not have a therapeutic consequence and will not require dose adjustments of enalaprilat itself or other OAT3 substrates.

Assessment of Placental Disposition of Infliximab and Etanercept in Women With Autoimmune Diseases and in the Ex Vivo Perfused Placenta.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are increasingly applied during pregnancy without clear knowledge of the impact on placenta and fetus. We assessed placental transfer and exposure to infliximab (n = 3) and etanercept (n = 3) in women with autoimmune diseases. Furthermore, we perfused healthy term placentas for 6 hours with 100 µg/mL infliximab (n = 4) or etanercept (n = 5). In pregnant women, infliximab transferred into cord blood but also entered the placenta (cord-to-maternal ratio of 1.6 ± 0.4, placenta-to-maternal ratio of 0.3 ± 0.1, n = 3). For etanercept, a cord-to-maternal ratio of 0.04 and placenta-to-maternal ratio of 0.03 was observed in one patient only. In ex vivo placenta perfusions, the extent of placental transfer did not differ between the drugs. Final concentrations in the fetal compartment for infliximab and etanercept were 0.3 ± 0.3 and 0.2 ± 0.2 µg/mL, respectively. However, in placental tissue, infliximab levels exceeded those of etanercept (19 ± 6 vs. 1 ± 3 µg/g, P < 0.001). In conclusion, tissue exposure to infliximab is higher than that of etanercept both in vivo as well as in ex vivo perfused placentas. However, initial placental transfer, as observed ex vivo, does not differ between infliximab and etanercept when administered in equal amounts. The difference in placental tissue exposure to infliximab and etanercept may be of clinical relevance and warrants further investigation. More specifically, we suggest that future studies should look into the occurrence of placental TNF inhibition and possible consequences thereof.