Pelvic insufficiency fractures and pelvic bone metastases after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) are a late complication of radiotherapy for pelvic malignancies. We evaluated the incidence, radiologic findings, clinical course, and outcome of PIFs in patients treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT) for rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer from a large teaching hospital treated from 2002 to 2012 were extracted from the Dutch Cancer Registry. All hospital records were reviewed for the diagnosis of PIFs or pelvic bone metastases. An expert radiologist reassessed all imaging procedures of the lower back, abdomen, and pelvis. RESULTS: A total of 513 rectal cancer patients were identified of whom 300 patients (58.5%) were treated with neoadjuvant (C)RT (long- vs. short-course radiotherapy: 91 patients [17.7%] vs. 209 [40.7%], respectively). Twelve PIFs were diagnosed initially according to hospital records and imaging reports of all 513 patients. These 12 patients were treated with neoadjuvant (C)RT. After reassessment of all pelvic imaging procedures done in this patient group (432 patients (84.2%)), 20 additional PIFs were detected in patients treated with neoadjuvant (C)RT, resulting in a 10.7% PIF rate in irradiated patients. One PIF was detected in the group of patients not treated with neoadjuvant (C)RT for rectal cancer. This patient had palliative radiotherapy for prostate cancer and is left out of the analysis. Median follow-up time of 32 PIF patients was 49 months. Median time between start of neoadjuvant (C)RT and diagnosis of PIF was 17 months (IQR 9-28). Overall median survival for patients with PIF was 63.5 months (IQR 44-120). CONCLUSION: PIFs are a relatively common late complication of neoadjuvant (C)RT for rectal cancer but are often missed or misdiagnosed as pelvic bone metastases. The differentiation of PIFs from pelvic bone metastases is important because of a different treatment and disease outcome.

Preoperative frailty and outcome in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of preoperative frailty screening in predicting postoperative severe complications and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort single-centre study in patients undergoing RC from September 2016 to December 2017. Preoperative frailty screening was implemented as standard care and was used to guide shared decision-making during multidisciplinary team meetings. Frailty screening consisted of validated tools to assess physical, mental and social frailty. Patients were considered frail when having two or more frailty characteristics. The primary endpoint was the composite of a severe complication (Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V) within 30 days and 1-year all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints included any complication (Clavien-Dindo II-V), length of stay, readmission within 30 days, and all-cause mortality. Logistic regression analysis and the concordance statistic (c-statistic) were used to describe the association and predictive value of preoperative frailty screening. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were included; 39 (61.9%) were considered frail. Preoperative frailty was associated with a seven-fold increased risk of a severe complication or death 1 year after RC [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 7.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-31.8; 22 patients]. Compared to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and Charlson Comorbidity Index, frailty showed the best model performance (Nagelkerke R2 0.20) and discriminative ability(c-statistic 0.72, P < 0.01) for the primary endpoint. After adding frailty to the conventional ASA risk score, the c-statistic improved by 11% (P < 0.01). Overall survival was significantly worse in frail patients (23.2 months, 95% CI 18.7-30.1) vs non-frail patients (32.9 months, 95% CI 30.0-35.9; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients undergoing RC are at high risk of postoperative adverse outcomes including death. Preoperative frailty screening improves preoperative risk stratification and may be used to guide patient selection for RC.

Frailty and health related quality of life three months after non-metastatic colorectal cancer diagnosis in older patients: A multi-centre prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Health related quality of life (HRQL) is an important outcome measure in geriatric oncology. Surgery is the main treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) but has been associated with a loss of HRQL in older patients. This study aimed to identify determinants for a decreased HRQL at three months after CRC diagnosis. METHOD: This multi-centre observational cohort study (NCT04443816) included 273 patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed with non-metastatic CRC. A multi-domain frailty screening was performed in each patient. A decreased HRQL was defined as a mean difference ≥ 10 on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire between baseline and three months after CRC diagnosis. Determinants of a decreased HRQL were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A decrease in HRQL occurred in 63 patients (23.1%). Non-surgical patients had the highest risk of decreased HRQL three months after diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 6.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-19.8)). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (aOR 2.3 (95% (CI) 1.2-4.2)), the American Association of Anesthesiologists class (aOR 2.6 (95%CI 1.4-4.9)), impaired daily functioning (aOR 2.7 (95%CI 1.3-5.6)) and dependent living (aOR 1.9 (95%CI 1.1-4.5)) were associated with a decreased HRQL, mainly caused by non-surgical patients. In surgical patients, a major postoperative complication was a strong determinant of decreased HRQL and was associated with preoperative comorbidity and cognitive impairment (aOR 4.0 (95%CI 1.9-8.8)). CONCLUSION: Frailty characteristics are highly prevalent in older patients at time of CRC diagnosis but not strongly associated with a decreased HRQL after three months. Non-surgical patients and patients with major postoperative complications had the highest risk of decreased HRQL. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov trial number: NCT04443816.

Survival of surgical and non-surgical older patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer: A population-based study in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the primary treatment for non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) but is omitted in a proportion of older patients. Characteristics and prognosis of non-surgical patients are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics and survival of surgical and non-surgical older patients with non-metastatic CRC in the Netherlands. METHODS: All patients aged ≥70 years and diagnosed with non-metastatic CRC between 2014 and 2018 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were divided based on whether they underwent surgery or not. Three-year overall survival (OS) and relative survival (RS) were calculated for both groups separately. Relative survival and relative excess risks (RER) of death were used as measures for cancer-related survival. RESULTS: In total, 987/20.423 (5%) colon cancer patients and 1.459/7.335 (20%) rectal cancer patients did not undergo surgery. Non-surgical treatment increased over time from 3.7% in 2014 to 4.8% in 2018 in colon cancer patients (P = 0.01) and from 17.1% to 20.2% in rectal cancer patients (P = 0.03). 3 year RS was 91% and 9% for surgical and non-surgical patients with colon cancer, respectively. For rectal cancer patients this was 93% and 37%, respectively. In surgical patients, advanced age (≥80 years) did not decrease RS (colon; RER 0.9 (0.7-1.0), rectum; RER 0.9 (0.7-1.1)). In non-surgical rectal cancer patients, higher survival rates were observed in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (OS 56%, RS 65%), or radiotherapy (OS 19%, RS 27%), compared to no treatment (OS 9%, RS 10%). CONCLUSION: Non-surgical treatment in older Dutch CRC patients has increased over time. Because survival of patients with colon cancer is very poor in the absence of surgery, this treatment decision must be carefully weighed. (Chemo-)radiotherapy may be a good alternative for rectal cancer surgery in older frail patients.

Implementation of a preoperative multidisciplinary team approach for frail colorectal cancer patients: Influence on patient selection, prehabilitation and outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of a preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation for frail older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) on preoperative decision making and postoperative outcomes. BACKGROUND: Surgery is the main treatment for CRC. Older patients are at increased risk for adverse outcomes. For complex surgical cases, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach has been suggested to improve postoperative outcome. Evidence is lacking. METHODS: Historical cohort study from 2015 to 2018 in surgical patients ≥70 years with CRC. Frailty screening was used to appraise the somatic, functional and psychosocial health status. An MDT weighed the risk of surgery versus the expected gain in survival to guide preoperative decision making and initiate a prehabilitation program. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of a Clavien-Dindo (CD) Grade III-V complication. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of any complication (CD II-V), length of hospital stay, discharge destination, readmission rate and overall survival. RESULTS: 466 patients were included and 146 (31.3%) patients were referred for MDT evaluation. MDT patients were more often too frail for surgery compared to non-MDT patients (10.3% vs 2.2%, P = .01). Frailty was associated with overall mortality (aOR 2.6 95% CI 1.1-6.1). Prehabilitation was more often performed in MDT patients (74.8% vs 23.4% in non-MDT patients). Despite an increased risk, MDT patients did not suffer more postoperative complications (CD III-V) than non-MDT patients (14.9% vs 12.4%; P = .48). Overall survival was worse in MDT patients (35 (32-37) vs 48 (47-50) months in non-MDT patients; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of preoperative MDT evaluation for frail patients with CRC improves risk stratification and prehabilitation, resulting in comparable postoperative outcomes compared to non-frail patients. However, frail patients are at increased risk for worse overall survival.

Tolerability, Safety, and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Capecitabine for Patients Aged ≥ 70 Years With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In studies of colorectal cancer, the elderly have been frequently underrepresented because comorbid conditions and functional status often lead to study exclusion. For elderly patients with an indication for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), physicians usually decide using clinical factors whether nCRT should be offered. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the tolerability of nCRT with capecitabine and the surgical outcomes in patients aged ≥ 70 years with locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 1372 rectal cancer patients diagnosed from 2002 to 2012 at 4 Dutch hospitals were used. Patients aged ≥ 70 years were included if they had received nCRT, and their data were analyzed for treatment deviations, postoperative complications, mortality, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The data were stratified into 3 age groups (ie, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years). RESULTS: We identified 447 patients aged ≥ 70 years. Of these patients, 42 had received nCRT, and 37 (88%) had completed nCRT. Radiation dermatitis, fatigue, and diarrhea were reported in 62%, 57%, and 43% of the 42 patients, respectively. Of the 42 patients, 40 (95%) underwent surgery, 1 patient refused resection, and 1 patient died during nCRT of severe mucositis due to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. The postoperative complication rate was 30%, and the 30-day mortality rate was 0%. A pathologic complete response was found in 7.5%. The 2- and 5-year DFS and OS rates were 58.5% and 40.7% and 81.0% and 58.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of the present multicenter study have shown that if selected on clinical factors, nCRT with capecitabine is safe and well tolerated in elderly patients. No negative effect on surgical outcome was measured, and the beneficial effect (pathologic complete response, DFS, and OS) seemed comparable to that for younger age groups. We believe that elderly patients should not be excluded from nCRT on the basis of age only.