Diagnosis, treatment and long-term outcome of autoimmune pancreatitis in Sweden.

INTRODUCTION: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic inflammatory process characterized by a strong inflammatory cell infiltration and two histopathologically distinct subtypes: type 1 and type 2. Diagnosis is often challenging and requires a combination of clinical, laboratory and imaging data. AIP can mimic pancreatic tumours leading to unnecessary resections if not correctly diagnosed. Short- and long-term outcomes of AIP have been poorly investigated so far and no large series have been previously reported from Sweden. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with histologically confirmed or highly probable diagnosis of AIP according to ICDC criteria. Demographic, clinical and radiological characteristics, type of treatment and its outcomes were collected and analysed. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients with AIP (87% with type 1), were evaluated at Karolinska University Hospital between 2004 and 2018; 49% males, mean age 49 years (range 44-53). Among them, 28% were histologically confirmed, 35% presented with jaundice, 22% with acute pancreatitis, 39% had non-specific symptoms such as weight loss or abdominal pain, 84% showed other organ involvement (OOI). Radiologically, 76% showed a focal pancreatic enlargement, 27% diffuse enlargement, 27% signs of acute pancreatitis and 10% of chronic pancreatitis. Overall, 58 patients (81%) underwent treatment with different medications: 46 (79%) cortisone, 7 (12%) azathioprine, 5 (8%) other immunosuppressive drugs. Twenty-six (36%) underwent biliary stenting and 12 (16%) were given surgery. In total, 47% of patients developed pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), of whom 76% had a severe form (faecal elastase-1 < 100 µg/g) and 21% of patients developed diabetes mellitus (pancreatic endocrine insufficiency), of whom 73% required insulin. CONCLUSIONS: AIP is a challenging disease for diagnosis and treatment. Cortisone treatment is generally successful and provides clinical remission in the large majority of patients (>90%). In the further course of the disease, a considerable number of patients develop PEI and diabetes. Only one-quarter of patients exhibit on imaging the characteristic "sausage-like" pancreas (diffuse enlargement), approximately three-quarters had a focal mass that could be misdiagnosed as pancreatic malignancy.

Fractional tumor burden maps increase the confidence of reading brain MR perfusion.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Various methods exist to perform and post-process perfusion weighted MR imaging in the post-treatment imaging of glioma patients to differentiate tumor progression from tumor-related abnormalities. One of these post-processing methods produces 'fractional tumor burden' maps. This multi-reader study investigated the clinical feasibility of fractional tumor burden maps on real world data from radiological follow-up of high-grade astrocytoma patients. METHODS: Five readers with background in radiology and varying levels of experience were tasked with assessing 30 astrocytoma and glioblastoma patients during one reader session. First, they were provided with a dataset of conventional MRI sequences, including perfusion MRI with regional cerebral blood volume maps. Then the dataset was expanded with a corresponding fractional tumor burden maps. Diagnostic accuracy, duration of post-processing, duration of the assessment of the fractional tumor burden maps, the diagnostic confidence reported by the readers and their diagnoses were recorded. Final diagnosis was determined by clinical and radiological follow-up and/or histopathological data used as gold standard. RESULTS: A mean sensitivity of 83.3 % and mean specificity of 55.1 % was obtained without the use of fractional tumor burden maps, whereas their additional of fractional tumor burden maps resulted in a mean sensitivity and specificity of 79.5 % and 54.2 %, respectively. Diagnostic accuracies with and without fractional tumor burden maps were not significantly different (Z = 0.76, p = 0.450). The median time spent post-processing was 313 s, while the median duration of the assessment of the FTB maps was 19 s. Interestingly, reader confidence increased significantly after adding the fractional tumor burden-maps to the assessment (Z = 454, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While the use of fractional tumor burden maps does not carry additional value in the radiological follow-up of post-operative high-grade astrocytoma and glioblastoma patients, it does give readers more confidence in their diagnosis.