The evidence-based role of catecholaminergic PET tracers in Neuroblastoma. A systematic review and a head-to-head comparison with mIBG scintigraphy.

BACKGROUND: Molecular imaging is pivotal in staging and response assessment of children with neuroblastoma (NB). [123I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) is the standard imaging method; however, it is characterised by low spatial resolution, time-consuming acquisition procedures and difficult interpretation. Many PET catecholaminergic radiotracers have been proposed as a replacement for [123I]-mIBG, however they have not yet made it into clinical practice. We aimed to review the available literature comparing head-to-head [123I]-mIBG with the most common PET catecholaminergic radiopharmaceuticals. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for studies performing a head-to-head comparison between [123I]-mIBG and PET radiopharmaceuticals including meta-hydroxyephedrine ([11C]C-HED), 18F-18F-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]DOPA) [124I]mIBG and Meta-[18F]fluorobenzylguanidine ([18F]mFBG). Review articles, preclinical studies, small case series (< 5 subjects), case reports, and articles not in English were excluded. From each study, the following characteristics were extracted: bibliographic information, technical parameters, and the sensitivity of the procedure according to a patient-based analysis (PBA) and a lesion-based analysis (LBA). RESULTS: Ten studies were selected: two regarding [11C]C-HED, four [18F]DOPA, one [124I]mIBG, and three [18F]mFBG. These studies included 181 patients (range 5-46). For the PBA, the superiority of the PET method was reported in two out of ten studies (both using [18F]DOPA). For LBA, PET detected significantly more lesions than scintigraphy in seven out of ten studies. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT using catecholaminergic tracers shows superior diagnostic performance than mIBG scintigraphy. However, it is still unknown if such superiority can influence clinical decision-making. Nonetheless, the PET examination appears promising for clinical practice as it offers faster image acquisition, less need for sedation, and a single-day examination.

Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 124I-mIBG in adult patients with neural crest tumours and extrapolation to paediatric models.

AIM: Positron emission tomography (PET) using 124I-mIBG has been established for imaging and pretherapeutic dosimetry. Here, we report the first systematic analysis of the biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 124I-mIBG in patients with neural crest tumours and project the results to paediatric patient models. METHODS: Adult patients with neural crest tumours who underwent sequential 124I-mIBG PET were included in this retrospective single-center analysis. PET data were acquired 4, 24, 48, and/or 120 h after administration of a mean of 43 MBq 124I-mIBG. Whole-body counting and blood sampling were performed at 2, 4, 24, 48 and 120 h after administration. Absorbed organ dose and effective dose coefficients were estimated in OLINDA/EXM 2.2 according to the MIRD formalism. Extrapolation to paediatric models was performed based on mass-fraction scaling of the organ-specific residence times. Biodistribution data for adults were also projected to 123I-mIBG and 131I-mIBG. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (11 females, 10 males) were evaluated. For adults, the organs exposed to the highest dose per unit administered activity were urinary bladder (1.54 ± 0.40 mGy/MBq), salivary glands (0.77 ± 0.28 mGy/MBq) and liver (0.65 ± 0.22 mGy/MBq). Mean effective dose coefficient for adults was 0.25 ± 0.04 mSv/MBq (male: 0.24 ± 0.03 mSv/MBq, female: 0.26 ± 0.06 mSv/MBq), and increased gradually to 0.29, 0.44, 0.69, 1.21, and 2.94 mSv/MBq for the 15-, 10-, 5-, 1-years-old, and newborn paediatric reference patients. Projected mean effective dose coefficients for 123I-mIBG and 131I-mIBG for adults were 0.014 ± 0.002 mSv/MBq and 0.18 ± 0.04 mSv/MBq, respectively. CONCLUSION: PET-based derived radiation dosimetry data for 124I-mIBG from this study agreed well with historical projected data from ICRP 53. The effective dose coefficients presented here may aid in guidance for establishing weight-based activity administration protocols.

Diagnostic Performance of 124I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine PET/CT in Patients with Pheochromocytoma.

123/131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy has shown a high specificity for imaging pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, but with low sensitivity because of low spatial resolution. 124I-MIBG PET may be able to overcome this limitation and improve the staging of patients with (suspected) pheochromocytoma. Methods: We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 124I-MIBG PET in 43 consecutive patients with suspected (recurrence of) pheochromocytoma using histopathologic (n = 25) and clinical validation (n = 18) as the standard of truth. Furthermore, we compared the detection rate of 124I-MIBG PET versus contrast-enhanced (CE) CT on a per-patient and per-lesion basis in 13 additional patients with known metastatic malignant pheochromocytoma. Results:124I-MIBG PET/CT was positive in 19 (44%) of 43 patients with suspected pheochromocytoma. The presence of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in 22 (51%) of 43. 124I-MIBG PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 86%, 100%, 100%, and 88%, respectively. 124I-MIBG PET was positive in 11 (85%) of 13 patients with malignant pheochromocytoma. Combined 124I-MIBG PET and CE CT detected 173 lesions, of which 166 (96%) and 118 (68%) were visible on 124I-MIBG PET and CE CT, respectively. Conclusion:124I-MIBG PET detects pheochromocytoma with high accuracy at initial staging and a high detection rate at restaging. Future assessment of 124I-MIBG PET for treatment guidance, including personalized 131I-MIBG therapy, is warranted.

124I-MIBG PET/CT to Monitor Metastatic Disease in Children with Relapsed Neuroblastoma.

The metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan is one of the most sensitive noninvasive lesion detection modalities for neuroblastoma. Unlike 123I-MIBG, 124I-MIBG allows high-resolution PET. We evaluated 124I-MIBG PET/CT for its diagnostic performance as directly compared with paired 123I-MIBG scans. Methods: Before 131I-MIBG therapy, standard 123I-MIBG imaging (5.2 MBq/kg) was performed on 7 patients, including whole-body (anterior-posterior) planar imaging, focused-field-of-view SPECT/CT, and whole-body 124I-MIBG PET/CT (1.05 MBq/kg). After therapy, 2 of 7 patients also completed 124I-MIBG PET/CT as well as paired 123I-MIBG planar imaging and SPECT/CT. One patient underwent 124I-MIBG PET/CT only after therapy. We evaluated all 8 patients who showed at least 1 123I-MIBG-positive lesion with a total of 10 scans. In 8 pairs, 123I-MIBG and 124I-MIBG were performed within 1 mo of each other. The locations of identified lesions, the number of total lesions, and the curie scores were recorded for the 123I-MIBG and 124I-MIBG scans. Finally, for 5 patients who completed at least 3 PET/CT scans after administration of 124I-MIBG, we estimated the effective dose of 124I-MIBG. Results:123I-MIBG whole-body planar scans, focused-field-of-view SPECT/CT scans, and whole-body 124I-MIBG PET scans found 25, 32, and 87 total lesions, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in lesion detection for 124I-MIBG PET/CT versus 123I-MIBG planar imaging (P < 0.0001) and 123I-MIBG SPECT/CT (P < 0.0001). The curie scores were also higher for 124I-MIBG PET/CT than for 123I-MIBG planar imaging and SPECT/CT in 6 of 10 patients. 124I-MIBG PET/CT demonstrated better detection of lesions throughout the body, including the chest, spine, head and neck, and extremities. The effective dose estimated for patient-specific 124I-MIBG was approximately 10 times that of 123I-MIBG; however, given that we administered a very low activity of 124I-MIBG (1.05 MBq/kg), the effective dose was only approximately twice that of 123I-MIBG despite the large difference in half-lives (100 vs. 13.2 h). Conclusion: The first-in-humans use of low-dose 124I-MIBG PET for monitoring disease burden demonstrated tumor detection capability superior to that of 123I-MIBG planar imaging and SPECT/CT.

Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Neuroblastoma: Current Status and New Developments.

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid malignancy in children. At diagnosis, approximately 50% of patients present with metastatic disease. These patients are at high risk for refractory or recurrent disease, which conveys a very poor prognosis. During the past decades, nuclear medicine has been essential for the staging and response assessment of neuroblastoma. Currently, the standard nuclear imaging technique is meta-[123I]iodobenzylguanidine ([123I]mIBG) whole-body scintigraphy, usually combined with single-photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography (SPECT-CT). Nevertheless, 10% of neuroblastomas are mIBG non-avid and [123I]mIBG imaging has relatively low spatial resolution, resulting in limited sensitivity for smaller lesions. More accurate methods to assess full disease extent are needed in order to optimize treatment strategies. Advances in nuclear medicine have led to the introduction of radiotracers compatible for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in neuroblastoma, such as [124I]mIBG, [18F]mFBG, [18F]FDG, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides, [18F]F-DOPA, and [11C]mHED. PET has multiple advantages over SPECT, including a superior resolution and whole-body tomographic range. This article reviews the use, characteristics, diagnostic accuracy, advantages, and limitations of current and new tracers for nuclear medicine imaging in neuroblastoma.

Other PET tracers for neuroendocrine tumors.

In this article the applicability of (124)I-MIBG and (11)C-5-HTP PET for the detection of abdominal gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is discussed. (124)I-MIBG is a positron-emitting variant of (123)I-MIBG and therefore suited for PET imaging. Due to the better intrinsic characteristics of PET, (124)I-MIBG PET has a higher spatial resolution than (123)I-MIBG and may therefore lead to better lesion detection in patients with neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma. Research is ongoing to develop (18)F-labeled analogues and to assess its place in staging patients with gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors when compared with (18)F-FDOPA and (68)Ga-somatostatin PET analogues.