Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part 1: biology and biomechanics.

A trend within the orthopedic community is rejection of the belief that "one size fits all." Freddie Fu, among others, strived to individualize the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries based on the patient's anatomy. Further, during the last two decades, greater emphasis has been placed on improving the outcomes of ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). Accordingly, anatomic tunnel placement is paramount in preventing graft impingement and restoring knee kinematics. Additionally, identification and management of concomitant knee injuries help to re-establish knee kinematics and prevent lower outcomes and registry studies continue to determine which graft yields the best outcomes. The utilization of registry studies has provided several large-scale epidemiologic studies that have bolstered outcomes data, such as avoiding allografts in pediatric populations and incorporating extra-articular stabilizing procedures in younger athletes to prevent re-rupture. In describing the anatomic and biomechanical understanding of the ACL and the resulting improvements in terms of surgical reconstruction, the purpose of this article is to illustrate how basic science advancements have directly led to improvements in clinical outcomes for ACL-injured patients.Level of evidenceV.

Adjustable-length loop cortical button versus interference screw fixation in quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A biomechanical in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: This biomechanical cadaveric in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the dynamic elongation behavior and ultimate failure strength of tibial adjustable-length loop cortical button versus interference screw fixation in quadriceps tendon-based anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Sixteen human quadriceps tendons were harvested and fixed into porcine tibiae using either biodegradable interference screw (n = 8) or adjustable loop device (n = 8) fixation. An acrylic block was utilized for femoral adjustable loop device fixation for both groups. All constructs were precycled for 10 times at 0.5 Hz and manually retensioned before tested in position and force control mode each for 1000 cycles at 0.75 Hz according to in vitro loading conditions replicating the in vivo ACL environment. Subsequently, an ultimate failure test at 50 mm/min was performed with mode of failure noted. FINDINGS: Tibial IS fixation showed no statistically significant differences in the initial (-0.46 vs. -0.47 mm; P = 0.9780), dynamic (2.18 mm vs. 2.89 mm; P = 0,0661), and total elongation (1.72 mm vs. 2.42 mm; P = 0,0997) compared to adjustable loop device fixation. The tibial button fixation revealed an increased ultimate failure load (743.3 N vs. 606.3 N; P = 0.0027), while stiffness was decreased in comparison to screw fixation (133.2 N/mm vs. 153.5 N/mm; P = 0,0045). INTERPRETATION: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for quadriceps tendon graft using a tibial adjustable-length loop cortical button provides for comparable dynamic stabilization of the knee with increased ultimate failure load at decreased stiffness compared to screw fixation.