The relationship between antiepileptic drug load and challenging behaviors in older adults with intellectual disability and epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may affect mood and behavior in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability. A high AED load, derived from AED polytherapy and/or high doses of AEDs, has been suggested to be a risk factor for behavioral side effects. Data were drawn from Wave 3 of the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA). The Behavior Problems Inventory Short Form (BPI-S) was used to assess challenging behaviors. AED load was calculated and median AED loads obtained. Non-parametric tests and binary logistic regression were performed to determine the relationship between AED load and challenging behaviors. Of participants with a reported diagnosis of epilepsy who were taking a regular AED and had completed BPI-S (n = 142), 62.7% (n = 89) exhibited challenging behaviors. Challenging behavior was found to be more prevalent in those with more severe levels of intellectual disability (p < 0.001). Aggressive/destructive behavior and stereotyped behavior were significantly more likely in participants living in residential/campus settings. For participants with a severe/profound intellectual disability, a significantly higher median AED load was found for participants exhibiting aggressive/destructive behavior and self-injurious behavior (SIB) compared to participants not exhibiting these behaviors, indicating a high AED load may contribute to some behavioral problems in this population group. However, many factors can influence behavioral outcomes, creating difficulties in determining those that are associated and the nature of the association. Careful monitoring of AED load, together with increased vigilance for breakthrough behavioral issues is essential for dealing with these complex cases. Larger studies are needed to account for the potential confounding factors.

Sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in patients treated with adjunctive perampanel for focal seizures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate subjective sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in patients receiving adjunctive perampanel for focal seizures. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, interventional, open-label study in patients aged >16 with focal seizures who received adjunctive perampanel (flexible dosing: 2-12mg). Sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and daytime sleepiness with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at baseline and 3 and 6months after initiating perampanel. Patients with modifications in their baseline AEDs or sleep medications were excluded. RESULTS: In 72 patients with drug-resistant focal seizures, mean baseline PSQI score (±standard deviation) was 7.26 (±4.6), and ESS was 6.19 (±4.2). At 3months (median perampanel dose: 4mg), there was no significant mean change from baseline in ESS score (n=61) and a significant improvement in PSQI (-1.51 points; n=44; p=0.007), driven mainly by improved sleep efficiency (p=0.012). In the 31 patients with 6-month data, ESS (but not PSQI) improved significantly at 6months vs baseline (p=0.029). The only factor significantly correlated with sleep parameters was number of baseline AEDs (higher number correlated with worse daytime sleepiness). Seizure frequency was reduced significantly from baseline at 3 and 6months. In bivariate analysis, neither PSQI nor ESS was associated with seizure frequency, suggesting that the changes in daytime sleepiness and sleep quality may be independent of the direct effect on seizures. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive perampanel did not worsen sleep quality or daytime sleepiness at 3months and reduced daytime sleepiness in patients continuing perampanel for 6months. Perampanel may be a suitable AED in patients with sleep disorders, in addition to refractory focal seizures.

Depression in patients receiving pharmacotherapy for epilepsy: An audit in a tertiary care centre.

BACKGROUND: The association of depression and epilepsy is thought to be bidirectional. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of depression in patients on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and factors affecting it. METHODS: In this preliminary cross sectional study, patients at epilepsy clinic of a tertiary care centre were studied for occurrence of depression, using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) scales. Correlation analysis was carried out to determine the factors associated with presence of depression in these patients. RESULTS: A total of 12 AEDs (maximum 5 per patient including older and newer) were prescribed to 933 patients in different treatment regimens over a period of 3 years. The median age of the patients was 22 years (10-77) and among them 63.5% were men. Mild and clinically relevant depression occurred in 279 (29.9%) and 223 (23.9%) patients, respectively. Mean HADS-D and PHQ-2 score was significantly higher with polytherapy as compared to monotherapy (p < 0.001). Patients on levetiracetam exhibited significantly higher HADS-D score in comparison to phenytoin (p < 0.001), carbamazepine (p < 0.001) and sodium valproate (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in PHQ score among patients on monotherapy of different AEDs. Multivariate regression analysis suggested correlation between depression and seizure frequency, total number of AEDs and their load (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Depressive symptoms were found to be present in more than half of the patients with epilepsy which require detailed work up for depression. Levetiracetam was found to be associated with a higher incidence of subclinical depression which needs further investigation.