Operative Treatment of Acromial and Scapular Spine Fracture Nonunions Complicating Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the acromion and spine can have a major impact on the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with respect to pain, motion, and function. Reports on internal fixation for these fractures are isolated to small series or case reports with variable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to report on the outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acromion or spine fractures encountered before or after RSA and describe our evolution of fixation techniques. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2023, 22 fractures or nonunions of the acromion or spine of the scapula underwent ORIF at a single institution and were followed for a minimum of 1 year. In 16 shoulders, fractures occurred after RSA, whereas 5 shoulders underwent ORIF prior to RSA. One shoulder had undergone prior failed ORIF elsewhere and revision ORIF was performed at our institution. There were 10 males and 12 females with a mean age of 67 (SD=15.1) years. Fixation strategies included single (n=11) and double plate fixation (n=11). Kruskal-Wallis one-way analyses of variance were used to analyze continuous variables and Chi-square tests employed for categorical variables. RESULTS: Of the 5 fractures treated with ORIF pre-RSA, 1 shoulder suffered an additional fracture medial to the hardware and 1 required additional bone grafting for incomplete union at the time of RSA. These 5 shoulders all underwent RSA uneventfully, but one fracture experienced late displacement of the scapular spine nonunion, leading to plate removal. Of the 16 post-RSA ORIF shoulders, radiographic union was confirmed in 14 and substantial residual inferior angulation identified in 3. New fractures occurred after ORIF in 5 shoulders. For patients who underwent ORIF after RSA, pain scores improved from a mean of 8 to 1.9 points, with more modest elevation gains (58.2° to 91.3° pre- and postoperatively, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ORIF of acromion and scapular spine fractures or nonunions in the setting of RSA have the potential to lead to union. When these fractures and nonunions are encountered prior to RSA, ORIF allows for uneventful RSA implantation, but secondary displacement may occur. ORIF seems to lead to improvements in pain, but more modest improvements in motion and function. Our fixation strategy has evolved to (1) dual plating, (2) spanning the whole length of the spine with one of the plates, (3) use of hook features under the acromion or os trigonum if possible, and (4) liberal use of bone graft.

High Delta Angle after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty increases stresses of the acromion: Biomechanical study of different implant positions.

BACKGROUND: Acromial fractures after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) are a common complication. Nevertheless, only a few studies have identified risk factors for acromial fractures after RTSA. High delta angle (combination of inferiorization and medialization of the center of rotation) after RTSA was identified as a risk factor in recent studies. The aim of this study was the biomechanical exploration of different delta angles and implant configurations with regard to the acromial stress. METHODS: In a rigid body model of the upper extremity muscle, forces of the deltoid muscle were calculated before and after implanting RTSA in different arm and implant positions. The deltoid muscle was divided into an anterior, middle, and posterior part. Implant positions of the glenoid components were changed in the medialization, lateralization and inferiorization of the center of rotation (COR) as well as lateralization of the humeral component. Further, in a finite element model of the upper extremity, the stresses of the acromion in the same implant design configurations were measured. RESULTS: Differences in acromial stress between different delta angle model configurations were observed. Lateralization (5 mm, 10 mm) of the glenosphere reduced maximal acromial stress by 21% (1.5 MPa) and 31% (1.3 MPa), respectively. Inferiorization (5 mm, 10 mm) of the glenosphere increased maximal acromial stress by 5% (2.0 MPa) and 15% (2.2MPa), respectively. Changes in positioning the humeral component was found to have the highest impact in this model configuration. A 10 mm lateralized humeral component reduced acromial stress by 37% (1.2 MPa) while in the 6 mm medialized configuration, an increase in acromial stress by 83% (3.48 MPa) was observed. There was a high correlation between delta angle and acromial stress (R-squared = 0.967). CONCLUSION: Implant design configuration has an impact on the acromial stress. High delta angles correlate with an increase in acromial stress. Both lateralization of the COR and the humerus decreased the acromial stress in our study. The lateralization of the humerus has the highest impact in influencing acromial stress. Due to contrary results in the current literature, further studies with focus on the acromial stress influenced by different anatomical variants of the shoulder and the acromion are needed before a clinical recommendation can be made.

Radiographic and anatomic variations on postoperative acromion fractures after inlay and lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative fracture of the acromion is a complication uniquely more common after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) than other forms of shoulder arthroplasty. There is limited knowledge regarding the etiology of these fractures or the anatomic risk factors. The purpose of this study is to identify associations of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint and relative humeral and glenoid positioning on the occurrence of acromial fractures after RSA. METHODS: A retrospective case-controlled study was performed on primary RSA patients treated by a single surgeon from September 2009 to September 2019. Patients with a postoperative acromion fracture were matched in a 3:1 ratio based on gender, indication, and age to those without a fracture and with a 2-year minimum follow-up. Preoperative and the immediate postoperative radiographs were reviewed by 2 investigators to measure critical shoulder angle, acromion-humeral interval, global lateralization, delta angle, preoperative glenoid height, and the level of inlay or onlay of the humeral stem. The morphology, width, and stigmata of osteoarthritis in the AC joint were assessed using computed tomography scans taken preoperatively. RESULTS: Of a total of 920 RSAs performed, 47 (5.1%) patients suffered a postoperative acromion fracture. These patients were compared with a control group of 141 patients, with a mean age of 76.4 years and similar distributions of gender and surgical indication. Patients in both groups had similar preoperative glenoid height (P = .953) and postoperative degree of inset or offset of humeral implant relative to the anatomic neck (P = .413). There were no differences in critical shoulder angle, acromion-humeral interval, global lateralization, and delta angle both preoperatively and postoperatively between the fracture and nonfracture groups. Computed tomography analysis also showed no differences in AC joint morphology (P = .760), joint space (P = .124), and stigma of osteoarthritis (P = .161). CONCLUSION: There was no relation between the features of the AC joint and the anatomic parameters of the humerus relative to the glenoid and acromion on postoperative acromion fractures after RSA.

Clinical results of conservative versus operative treatment of acromial and scapular spine fractures following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Acromial and scapular spine fractures are common complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). There is limited information on the treatment outcome of these fractures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of operative and conservative treatment of patients with acromial or scapular spine fractures. METHODS: A total of 1146 RTSAs were performed in our institution between 1999 and 2016. In 23 patients (2%), we identified an acromial fracture, and in 7 cases (0.6%), a scapular spine fracture in the postoperative course. Of those patients, 7 patients (23%) were treated with open reduction and internal fixation and 23 (77%) were treated conservatively. We compared the outcome of operative vs. conservative treatment assessing the Constant score (CS), range of motion, and subjective shoulder value (SSV). Fractures were classified by the system of Crosby. Radiographic assessment consisted of measuring the healing rate, time to heal, and the displacement of the acromion before and immediately after the fracture as well as after treatment. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between operative and conservative treatment. The mean preoperative CS in the operative group was 32 points and improved to 45 points after surgery, whereas it was 35 points in the conservative group and improved to 61 points at the final follow-up. The mean SSV improved from 20 to 50 points in the operative group and from 22 to 58 points in the conservative group. Mean active flexion changed from 59° to 75°, mean abduction from 68° to 67°, and external rotation from 25° to 13° in the operative group and from 75° to 91°, 67° to 92°, and 28° to 24° in the conservative group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, operative treatment was not superior to conservative treatment, neither for CS, SSV, or range of motion. Both treatment forms, however, resulted in inferior results to those previously reported for RTSA without postoperative acromion fractures. Before better surgical methods have been developed, conservative treatment of acromial fractures may be the better treatment option for acromial fractures after RTSA.

Acromial spine fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) accounts for nearly one-third of shoulder arthroplasty utilization nationally. The complication rate has increased concurrently. Consensus is lacking regarding the incidence, etiology, and treatment of acromial or scapular spine fractures after RSA. The purpose of our study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to analyze the occurrence and outcomes of this complication. METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were queried in late 2017 for combinations of the words "acromial," "fracture," "reverse," "shoulder," and "arthroplasty." We included all studies that contained a clearly defined performance of RSA, acromial fracture(s) noted, and treatment (if any) and outcomes of treatment. The initial search yielded 50 studies; 32 met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Among 3838 RSAs, 159 acromial fractures were reported, for an overall incidence of 4.14%; the mean time to diagnosis from surgery was 9 months (range, 1.3-24 months). Treatments included nonoperative treatment in a sling or abduction brace in 139 cases and open reduction-internal fixation in 20. Regardless of treatment, patients reported inferior function after fracture compared with initially after RSA. Forward flexion was 95° (range, 30°-110°), abduction was 76° (range, 30°-180°), the Constant score was 63 (range, 59-67.5), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 57 (range, 7-83); all values were reduced compared with patients without fractures. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the occurrence of acromial fractures after RSA is a common event, with a rate of over 4%. These fractures correlate with worse postoperative outcomes regardless of treatment method; open reduction-internal fixation was not shown to be clinically superior despite a limited complication rate. Additional high-quality studies addressing acromial spine fracture after RSA are needed.

Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification.

BACKGROUND: The aims were to determine the sensitivity of plain radiographs to detect scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), to test the reliability of a proposed classification, and to evaluate risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We matched 53 patients with scapular fractures after RSA to 212 control patients. Clinical risk factors were assessed by correlating comorbidities. Independent observers reviewed radiographs to assess fracture detection accuracy and test the reliability of a proposed classification. Radiographic risks were evaluated by measuring acromial thickness, acromial tilt, glenoid-to-tuberosity distance, and acromion-to-tuberosity (AT) distance. RESULTS: Independent reviewers accurately diagnosed 78.8% of fractures and 97.4% of controls with good inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.782) and excellent intrarater reliability (κ = 0.862). Inter-rater reliability of the classification was moderate (κ = 0.422). Osteoporosis significantly increased the risk of fracture (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.91); however, no difference was found for other comorbidities or between preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters. A significant difference occurred between groups from the postoperative radiographs to the most recent radiographs for AT distance (0.4 ± 5.5 mm for control group and 8.3 ± 7.6 mm for fracture group, P < .001) and acromial tilt (1.8° ± 6.3° for control group and 14° ± 15° for fracture group, P < .001). Of 16 scapular spine fractures, 14 occurred from a screw tip; however, screw orientation and length were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for scapular fractures after RSA. The current classification has only moderate reliability, suggesting that an alternative classification method is needed. Decreasing AT distance and increasing acromial tilt on consecutive radiographs may improve fracture detection. Advanced imaging may be needed to confirm the diagnosis. Whereas most scapular spine fractures occurred from a screw, the surgical technique did not increase the relative risk.

Complications and further surgery after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty : report of 854 primary cases.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to report the incidence of implant-related complications, further operations, and their influence on the outcome in a series of patients who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). METHODS: The prospectively collected clinical and radiological data of 797 patients who underwent 854 primary RTSAs between January 2005 and August 2018 were analyzed. The hypothesis was that the presence of complications would adversely affect the outcome. Further procedures were defined as all necessary operations, including reoperations without change of components, and partial or total revisions. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the absolute and relative Constant Scores (aCS, rCS), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) scores, range of motion, and pain. RESULTS: The overall surgical site complication rate was 22% (188 complications) in 152 patients (156 RTSAs; 18%) at a mean follow-up of 46 months (0 to 169). The most common complications were acromial fracture (in 44 patients, 45 RTSAs; 5.3%), glenoid loosening (in 37 patients, 37 RTSAs; 4.3%), instability (in 23 patients, 23 RTSAs; 2.7%), humeral fracture or loosening of the humeral component (in 21 patients, 21 RTSAs; 2.5%), and periprosthetic infection (in 14 patients, 14 RTSAs; 1.6%). Further surgery was undertaken in 79 patients (82 RTSAs) requiring a total of 135 procedures (41% revision rate). The most common indications for further surgery were glenoid-related complications (in 23 patients, 23 RTSAs; 2.7%), instability (in 15 patients, 15 RTSAs; 1.8%), acromial fractures (in 11 patients, 11 RTSAs; 1.3%), pain and severe scarring (in 13 patients, 13 RTSAs; 1.5%), and infection (in 8 patients, 8 RTSAs; 0.9%). Patients who had a complication had significantly worse mean rCS scores (57% (SD 24%) vs 81% (SD 16%)) and SSV scores (53% (SD 27%) vs 80% (SD 20%)) compared with those without a complication. If revision surgery was necessary, the outcome was even further compromised (mean rCS score: 51% (SD 23%) vs 63% (SD 23%); SSV score: 4% (SD 25%) vs 61% (SD 27%). CONCLUSION: Although the indications for, and use of, a RTSA are increasing, it remains a demanding surgical procedure. We found that about one in five patients had a complication and one in ten required further surgery. Both adversely affected the outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(3):401-407.

Scapula insufficiency fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff arthropathy: What is their functional impact?

INTRODUCTION-OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence, etiological factors, functional impairment and therapeutic management of scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in rotator cuff arthropathy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted on 126 RSA between 2009 and 2011, in which 4 fractures were identified that were compared with a control group of 40 patients. An analysis was performed on the variables related to the surgical technique, functional results, and quality of life (Constant scale, EQ-5D). RESULTS: The fracture incidence was 3.28% with a mean age of 74.7 years. The mean time until diagnosis was 11.9 months. The preoperative Constant score in the control group was 37.3%, and 34.7% in the fracture group (P>.05); postoperative Constant score: 81.2 and 66.5%, respectively (P>.001). Forward elevation and abduction in fracture patients decreased by 39° (P=.02), and 34° (P=.057) respectively. The perceived quality of life (EQ-VAS) was lower in the fracture group (60 vs. 76) (P=.002). There were no instability cases, and no revision surgery was required. The union rate was 50% after a mean follow-up 39.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Scapular fracture after RSA is a rare complication. Despite its presence, the functional outcomes and quality of life of these patients are higher than preoperatively; however, they are lower than that obtained in patients with RSA without this complication. More prospective studies are needed to define guidelines for therapeutic action against this complication.