RESUMO
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate if a negative test result for MYD88 L265P mutation, associated with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) and primary CNS lymphoma, in liquid biopsies from intraocular fluids can be a useful adjuvant test to diagnose chronic lymphocytic leukemia in clinically challenging cases. Case Presentations: We selected patients with a past medical history or examinations findings suspicious for intraocular lymphoma. We evaluated both vitreous and aqueous humor-derived (AHD) MYD88 L265P mutation from patients that had suspected intraocular lymphoma that warranted a liquid biopsy procedure. Gold-standard cytopathology, flow cytometry, and gene rearrangement studies were also performed. All 4 patients had negative AHD MYD88 L265P mutation testing. Gold-standard testing (cytology) either showed paucicellular specimens (1/4) or specimens with high background inflammation (3/4). One case showed a rare B-cell clonal population (CD5+, Kappa-restricted by flow cytometry), but this was not sufficient to make any definitive diagnosis. All patients were subsequently initiated on systemic therapy and had improvement in their disease burden. Conclusions: Negative AHD MYD88 L265P mutation testing can serve as an adjuvant molecular test to diagnose difficult cases of intraocular CLL.
RESUMO
Introduction: Proton beam therapy is an established primary treatment for patients with nonmetastasized uveal melanoma. Adjuvant local interventions, like intravitreal injections or surgery, were shown to improve long-term eye preservation; however, their impact on the patient's quality of life (QOL) remains unknown. Methods: In a post-radiotherapeutic follow-up, we prospectively collected data on QOL, visual acuity, and interventional adjuvant procedures. QOL was measured with QOL-C30 questionnaire and quality of life questionnaire OPT30 at baseline, and at 3 and 12 months after proton therapy. Patients were grouped by the type of adjuvant treatment. The impact on QOL was analyzed by comparing changes in the mean score values and visual acuity for different interventional subgroups, with generalized linear mixed models and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: We received 108 (100%) and 95 (88.0%) questionnaires at 3 and 12 months post-therapy, respectively. Adjuvant interventions included observation (n = 61, 56.5%), intravitreal injections (n = 17, 15.7%), and an intraocular surgical procedure (n = 30, 27.8%). In the latter group, several QOL items significantly declined after the 3-month adjuvant interval, but they partially recovered at the 12-month follow-up. In all adjuvant-intervention groups, global QOL scores returned to baseline levels at 12 months. Conclusion: Posttreatment adjuvant interventions had no long-lasting effects on QOL in patients with uveal melanoma.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe two cases of medium-sized uveal melanoma presenting with hemorrhagic choroidal detachments. OBSERVATIONS: The first case is a 39-year-old man who presented with choroidal hemorrhage and angle closure glaucoma. The second case is a 42-year-old man who presented with choroidal hemorrhage and posterior scleritis. Vitrectomy with transvitreous fine needle aspiration biopsy was ultimately required to diagnose malignant uveal melanoma in each case. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Intraocular hemorrhage is a rare presenting sign of uveal melanoma. When it does occur, it is typically associated with large tumors. Hemorrhagic choroidal detachments are particularly rare in uveal melanoma, and can limit the diagnostic utility of clinical exam, B-scan ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Although it is uncommon, it is important to maintain a high index of suspicion for choroidal melanoma in any patient with unexplained choroidal hemorrhage.