Efficacy and safety of different chemotherapy regimens concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of different chemotherapy regimens concurrent with radiotherapy in treating locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). METHODS: Retrospective data was collected from LACC patients who were treated at our institution. These patients were categorized into three groups: the single-agent cisplatin (DDP) chemoradiotherapy group, the paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) chemoradiotherapy group, and the nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab-) paclitaxel combined with cisplatin (nPP) chemoradiotherapy group. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were enrolled (32 in the DDP group, 41 in the TP group, and 51 in the nPP group). There were differences in OS (P = 0.041, HR 0.527, 95% CI 0.314-0.884) and PFS (P = 0.003, HR 0.517, 95% CI 0.343-0.779) between the three groups. Notably, the 2-year OS rate was significantly higher in the nPP group compared to the DDP group (92.2% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.012). The 2-year PFS rates showed a marked increase in the TP group (78.0% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.048) and the nPP group (88.2% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.001) relative to the DPP group, with multiple comparisons indicating that the 2-year PFS rate was significantly superior in the nPP group versus the DDP group (88.2% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.001). Moreover, the ORR was also significantly higher in the nPP group than in the DDP group (P = 0.013); and no statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of AEs among the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In LACC treatment, the two cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy regimens are associated with better outcomes, with the nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen showing better efficacy than the paclitaxel plus cisplatin regimen. Furthermore, the AEs associated with these regimens were deemed tolerable. These findings could provide a reference for the clinical treatment of LACC. However, further prospective studies are needed to verify it.

Reduction in chemotherapy relative dose intensity decreases overall survival of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Many patients undergo dose reduction or early termination of chemotherapy to reduce chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, which may increase their risk of survival. However, this strategy may result in underdosing patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and survival outcomes in patients with LA-ESCC. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed patients with LA-ESCC (cT2N + M0, cT3-4NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with curative-intent esophagectomy. The patients received 2 courses of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) combination radiotherapy prior to undergoing surgery. During NCRT, RDI was computed, defined as the received dose as a percentage of the standard dose, and the incidence of dose delays was estimated (≥ 7 days in any course cycle). The best RDI cutoff value (0.7) was obtained using ROC curve. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, the treatment effect was measured using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 132 patients in this study, divided into RDI < 0.7 and RDI ≥ 0.7 groups using cut-off value of 0.7. RDI grade was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between the groups. There was no evidence that patients with RDI < 0.7 experienced less toxicity or those with RDI ≥ 0.7 resulted in more toxicity. However, patients with RDI < 0.7 who were given reduced doses had a worse overall survival [HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, P = 0.015]. The risk of a lower RDI increased with a longer dose delay time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The RDI below 0.7 for avoiding chemoradiotherapy toxicity administration led to a reduction in the dose intensity of treatment and decreased overall survival.

TURALIO® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program (tREMS): 3-year retrospective hepatic safety assessment.

Aim: Hepatic safety data assessment from the TURALIO® (pexidartinib) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (tREMS) Program. Methods: Retrospective 3-year assessment (August 2019 to June 2022) of hepatic events from the TURALIO® (pexidartinib) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program. Results: A total of 451 patients, 369 prescribers, 2 wholesalers/distributors and 2 pharmacies were enrolled and certified. Twenty-one (4.7%) patients met the criteria for a hepatic adverse event or laboratory abnormality suggestive of serious and potentially fatal liver injury, all with onset within 2 months of therapy. No new hepatic safety signals were identified. Conclusion: Results are consistent with the phase 3 ENLIVEN trial data. Liver enzyme monitoring, combined with early intervention, including dose modification and discontinuation, conducted in patients treated with pexidartinib mitigate the risk of potential hepatotoxicity.

Safety findings from the 3-year data collected in the TURALIO^® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy ProgramPexidartinib (TURALIO^®) is an oral drug that is used to treat adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) that cannot be fixed with surgery. TGCTs are rare, noncancerous tumors that cause pain, stiffness and difficulty moving. Pexidartinib works by blocking a protein that helps these tumors grow. Before pexidartinib, there were no good treatments for TGCT and surgery often could not remove all the tumors, so they would frequently grow back.Pexidartinib was approved in 2019 after a clinical trial showed it worked well in adults with TGCT. However, pexidartinib can sometimes cause serious liver harm for some patients. To handle this risk, a program called the tREMS (TURALIO^® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy) was established to ensure that pexidartinib is used safely.The tREMS Program teaches doctors, pharmacists and patients about the safe use of pexidartinib and potential liver risks and enrolls patients in a registry to watch their health. Doctors and pharmacies must be certified, and patients need regular liver tests. In the first 3 years, 451 patients and 369 doctors joined the program. Unintended liver issues were found in around 5% of patients, a rate that is about the same as that seen in pexidartinib clinical trials, and no new safety concerns were found. About half of patients with liver issues could reverse them by stopping pexidartinib. No patient had permanent liver damage, needed a transplant or died from liver problems. These results show that the tREMS Program is working well to keep patients with TGCT safe while taking pexidartinib.

Analysis of Factors Contributing to Adverse Events and Evaluation of Their Impact on Prognosis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients-Real-World Experience in a Single-Center Retrospective Study and Narrative Review.

Background and Objectives: More than 430,000 new cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were reported in 2020. Clear cell RCC, which occurs in 80% of cases, is often associated with mutations in the VHL gene, leading to dysregulation of hypoxia-induced transcription factors pathways and carcinogenesis. The purpose of this study is to examine the adverse events (AEs) of cabozantinib treatment and the relationship between individual patient factors and the frequency of their occurrence in detail. Materials and Methods: Seventy-one patients with metastatic RCC were treated with second or further lines of cabozantinib at the Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology. Comprehensive data, including demographics, clinicopathological factors, and AEs, were collected from January 2017 to June 2021. This study evaluated the impact of various patient-related factors on the rate of adverse events and treatment tolerance using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Cabozantinib-induced AEs were significantly associated with body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), IMDC prognostic score, and treatment line. Notably, patients receiving cabozantinib post-tyrosine kinase inhibitors reported fewer AEs. Dose reduction was unrelated to adverse event frequency, but patients requiring dose reduction were characterized with lower body mass and BSA but not BMI. Conclusions: The factors described make it possible to predict the incidence of AEs, which allows for faster detection and easier management, especially in the high-risk group. AEs should be reported in detail in real-world studies, as their occurrence has a significant impact on prognosis.

A retrospective pilot study of transarterial chemoembolisation using camrelizumab-eluting Callisphere beads for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of initial hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolisation using camrelizumab-eluting Callisphere beads (camrelizumab-DEB-TACE) for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Enrolment included patients with unresectable HCC who underwent camrelizumab-DEB-TACE treatment from September 2021 to February 2023. The assessment included the examination of tumour response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the monitoring of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included in the study. The objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 55.0% and 90.0% at 1 month and 57.9% and 78.9% at 3 months, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 7.4 and 15.5 months months, respectively. Among the 21 patients, 4 underwent more than 2 procedures of camrelizumab-DEB-TACE, with a mean of 1.9 ± 1.1 procedures (range: 1-4) per patient. No severe complications or treatment-related mortalities were observed. In addition, no patient developed severe AEs related to camrelizumab, such as reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, immune-related pneumonia, or immune-related myocarditis. Nineteen patients experienced at least one type of AEs related to DEB-TACE, with abdominal pain (n = 16, 76.2%) being the most prevalent AE. CONCLUSION: Camrelizumab-DEB-TACE demonstrated effectiveness and safety as a treatment for unresectable HCC, with no occurrence of severe camrelizumab-related AEs.

Imprecision in adverse event reports following immunization against HPV in Japan and COVID-19 in the USA, UK, and Japan-and the effects of vaccine hesitancy and government policy.

INTRODUCTION: Erroneous reports of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) likely exacerbated the 2013 collapse of Japan's HPV immunization program. A similar phenomenon characterized the first months of COVID-19 immunization programs in the USA, UK, and Japan with high rates of reported anaphylaxis. These reports illustrate the susceptibility of supposedly objective medical judgments to public anxiety. PURPOSE AND METHODS: This study documents inaccuracies in reported AEFIs using three quantitative methods. RESULTS: One of these quantitative methods revealed that false-positive rates for anaphylaxis reports following HPV and later COVID-19 vaccination ranged from 74 to 91 percent. However, unlike HPV vaccinations in Japan, anaphylaxis reports following COVID-19 vaccines fell in Japan, the USA and the UK in the latter months of 2021. Nevertheless, false-positive rates for anaphylaxis reports remained high, suggesting a high degree of imprecision in serious AEFI reports from many countries for many vaccines. Japan's HPV immunization program indicates that media reports, patient hesitancy, healthcare providers' perspectives on vaccine safety, and consistency of government messaging, all influence report number and accuracy. A parallel publication analyzes in depth how such factors affect AEFI reports. CONCLUSION: Confidence in the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines may have been bolstered trough rapid monitoring of AEFI reports and communication of these findings. This may partly explain the different trajectories of serious AEFI following HPV immunizations in Japan and COVID-19 immunizations in the USA, UK, and Japan.

Safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy containing INSTIs and chemotherapy drugs in people living with HIV and concomitant colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical data have shown that raltegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) with fewer drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and adverse events (AEs) is a good regimen in patients with HIV infection who need cancer chemotherapy. There are currently few data on ART regimens that include Integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) other than RAL among this patient subgroup. METHODS: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of different kinds of INSTI-based regimens among patients with HIV and concomitant colorectal cancer (CRC) who received antineoplastic agents. RESULTS: From January 2020 to November 2021, 66 patients were enrolled. The patients were divided into three groups: 20 patients treated with dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC)/tenofovir (TDF) (group I), 24 patients treated with DTG/albuvirtide (ABT) (group II), and 22 patients treated with bictegravir (BIC)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)/emtricitabine (FTC) (group III). The majority of AEs during treatment were of grade 1-2. Treatment-related AEs of grade 3-4 occurred in 6 patients (9.09%), and no grade 5 AEs occurred. The most common AEs were nausea (100%) and neutrophils (84.85%) attributed to anticancer agents, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of these AEs among the three groups (P > 0.05). Viral load rebound was not observed among pretreated patients during chemotherapy. The viral load of untreated patients who started their ART concomitant with chemotherapy almost decreased to the lower limit of detection 6 months after ART initiation (only one patient in group III had a viral load of 102 copies/ml). At the 6th month, the CD4 count in group I decreased significantly from baseline (P < 0.05). However, the change in CD4 count was not significant in group II (P = 0.457) or group III (P = 0.748). CONCLUSIONS: DTG- or BIC-containing regimens are good options for patients with HIV and concomitant CRC.

Obesity in patients with carcinoma cervix increases the risk of adverse events.

Obesity has become epidemic both in developed and developing countries. Socio-economic (SE) development has resulted in increased prevalence of obesity across all social groups in developing countries that is contrary to the effects of rising SE status on prevalence of obesity in the developed world. Obesity is not only associated with metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, diabetes but is also a risk factor for cancer and is responsible for increased cancer mortality. Published articles have reported higher rates of treatment failure and adverse events (AEs) of anti-cancer therapy in obese patients with carcinoma cervix in comparison to their normal body mass index (BMI) counterparts. Hence, there is a need to elucidate factors that may increase the risk of AEs. Aim of this paper is to discuss the delivery of radiotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy and their effect on AEs in obese patients with carcinoma cervix.

Stakeholder perspectives on addressing adverse events from adjuvant cancer therapy: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: With increasing survival rates, a growing population of patients with cancer have received or will receive adjuvant therapy to prevent cancer recurrences. Patients and caregivers will confront the complexities of balancing the preventative benefits of adjuvant therapy with possible near-term or long-term adverse events (AEs). Adjuvant treatment-related AEs (from minimal to severe) can impact therapeutic adherence, quality of life, emotional and physical health, and survival. However, to the authors' knowledge, limited information is available regarding how stakeholders use or desire to use adjuvant-related AE information to inform the care of patients with cancer. METHODS: A qualitative, purposeful sampling approach was used to elicit stakeholder feedback via semistructured interviews (24 interviews). Drug development, drug regulatory, clinical, payer, and patient/patient advocacy stakeholders were questioned about the generation, dissemination, and use of adjuvant treatment-related AE information to inform the care of patients with cancer. Transcripts were coded independently by 2 senior health care researchers and reconciled to identify key themes. RESULTS: All stakeholder groups in the current study identified needed improvements in each of the following 4 areas: 1) improving the accessibility and relevance of AE-related information; 2) better integrating and implementing available information regarding AEs for decisions; 3) connecting contemporary cultural and economic value systems to the generation and use of information regarding adjuvant treatment-related AEs; and 4) addressing a lack of alignment and ownership of stakeholder efforts to improve the use of AE information in the adjuvant setting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite commonalities in the overall needs identified by the diverse stakeholders in the current study, broad systemic change has been stymied. The current study identified the lack of alignment and the absence of a central "owner" of these diffuse efforts as a previously unrecognized hurdle to realizing the desired systemic improvements. Future initiatives aimed at improving quality of life and outcomes for patients receiving adjuvant therapy through the improved use of AE information must address this challenge through innovative collectives and novel leadership strategies.

Adverse Events in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreticography for Choledocholithiasis: A Holistic Perspective.

Background and aims In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of adverse events (AEs) in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreticography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis and the independent risk factors that may cause these conditions. We planned to evaluate all AEs including cardiopulmonary complications and the risk factors that may affect them holistically. Methods This study was designed as a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center's gastroenterology clinic. The study included patients with naive papillae and undergoing ERCP for choledocholithiasis between May 2019 and June 2022. Risk factors that may lead to AEs were analyzed in terms of both patient-related factors and procedure-related factors. Patients with and without AEs after ERCP were compared. Results This study included 812 patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis. AE occurred in 149 (18.3%) of patients, and the most common complication was pancreatitis (n=112, 13.8%). In regression analysis, of the patient- and procedure-related factors, only difficult cannulation was a significant independent risk factor for AEs (odds ratio=3.85, 95% CI: 1.102-13.498, p=0.035). Conclusion This study showed that, of patient- and procedure-related factors, only difficult cannulation is an independent risk factor for ERCP-related AEs.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of immune-related hepatitis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective study.

Background: With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), patients inevitably experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, the study was conducted on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with immune-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis). Methods: We identified patients with advanced NSCLC who developed ir-hepatitis after immunotherapy between June 2016 and December 2022. Their irAEs were categorized according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (CTCAE 4.03). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze survival. Results: A total of 35 patients were enrolled in the study. The numbers of mild (grade 1-2) and severe (grade 3-4) ir-hepatitis cases were 13 (grade 1, 3; grade 2, 10) and 22 (grade 3, 17; grade 4, 5), respectively. The median onset time of ir-hepatitis was 1.6 months. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 8.3 months. PFS differed between patients with early ir-hepatitis developing within two treatment cycles and those with ir-hepatitis developing more than two treatment cycles (5.5 vs. 12.7 months, P=0.004). Patients with severe rather than mild ir-hepatitis tended to poorer PFS survival (5.8 vs. 11.2 months, P=0.130). The appearance of ir-hepatitis within two treatment cycles (P=0.002) and higher severity grades of ir-hepatitis (P=0.005) were independent risk factors for PFS. Conclusions: Early and severe ir-hepatitis are associated with worse survival benefits, which still required more basic and perspective studies.

Effect of Sequence of Radiotherapy Combined With Immunotherapy on the Incidence of Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: With the widespread application of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of lung cancer, increasing attention has been paid to treatment-related pneumonitis. The effect of the treatment sequence on the incidence of pneumonitis remains unclear. METHODS: We searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, meeting abstracts, and reference lists of relevant review articles for literature published on radio- and immunotherapy in lung cancer. Stata software (version 16.0) was used for meta-analysis. Data on the incidence of any grade and ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis was pooled using the random effects model. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used for arm-based pairwise comparisons. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify the potential influencing factors. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria. The network meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the incidence of pneumonitis in concurrent ICI with RT (concurrent arm) and RT followed by ICI (RT-first arm) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-4.81). In the meta-analysis of single group rates, RT following ICI (ICI-first arm) exhibited higher incidence of any grade pneumonitis compared with concurrent- and RT-first arms, with 0.321 (95% CI: 0.260-0.386) for programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors from clinical trials, and 0.480 (95% CI: 0.363-0.598) for PD-1 inhibitors from real-world retrospective data, respectively. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in the incidence of any grade and grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis was found between RT-first and concurrent arms. The ICI-first arm exhibited a higher incidence of pneumonitis, which needs to be further confirmed by follow-up studies.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based immune combination therapy versus sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based immunotherapy (hereafter referred to as "combination immunotherapy") compared with that of sorafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Databases such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from the date of their establishment to September 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of combination immunotherapy versus sorafenib for the treatment of advanced HCC. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies, extracted the data, and cross-checked the information. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 5 RCTs were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed the following: (1) Effectiveness. Compared to sorafenib, combination immunotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS, HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58 ~ 0.82, p < 0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50 ~ 0.78, p < 0.001) in patients with advanced HCC. (2) Safety. Both groups had comparatively high incidences of adverse events (AEs), but the difference in any treatment-related adverse events was not significant between the two arms (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.95 ~ 1.02, p = 0.34). The difference in the incidence of grade 1-2 adverse reactions was statistically significant (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49-0.90, p = 0.001). There were no differences in grade 3/4 TRAEs or grade 5 TRAEs (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 0.78 ~ 2.71, p = 0.24; OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.73 ~ 1.58, p = 0.71). Conclusion: Combined immunotherapy can significantly prolong the OS and PFS of patients with advanced HCC without increasing the incidence of adverse effects in terms of safety, but the incidence of AEs in different systems is different.

Treatment-related adverse events of combination chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Background: Numerous meta-analyses have examined immunotherapy-induced adverse events (AEs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is limited research comparing AEs from combination chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line NSCLC treatment, particularly regarding specific toxic symptoms and hematological toxicities associated with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ICIs + non-ICIs versus non-ICIs alone as first-line therapy in NSCLC, sourced from PubMed and Scopus databases. Our objective was to assess treatment-related AEs in both regimens, focusing on identifying the more prevalent toxic symptoms and hematological toxicities with ICI treatment. We calculated the relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and estimated the pooled RRs and 95% CIs using common- or random-effects models. Results: Our analysis included 10 trials with 6,008 patients. Combination chemoimmunotherapy significantly increased the risk of grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs, treatment discontinuation, and deaths due to treatment-related AEs. Moreover, patients receiving combination chemoimmunotherapy had a significantly higher risk of certain toxic symptoms (all-grade: vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation; high-grade: fatigue and diarrhea) and pneumonitis (both all-grade and high-grade). Conclusions: These findings offer crucial insights into the toxicity profile of combination chemoimmunotherapy, serving as a valuable resource for clinicians managing lung cancer care.

Dupilumab-related late adverse events in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

BACKGROUND: Anti-IL-4 receptor α antibody (dupilumab) has demonstrated favorable sinonasal outcomes for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), which is mainly caused by type 2 inflammation. Although increased blood eosinophil levels and injection site symptoms are frequently observed as acute adverse events (AEs) of dupilumab, limited knowledge is available regarding the late AEs of dupilumab for CRSwNP. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the late AEs following the initiation of dupilumab treatment for CRSwNP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with CRSwNP treated with dupilumab for > 3 months were enrolled, and their clinical data were collected from their medical records. RESULTS: Six (11.8%) patients experienced late AEs. One case of eczema with pruritus, one case of psoriasis-like dermatitis, two cases of severe rash, one case of malignant lymphoma, and one case of alopecia areata were observed. Skin disorders were the most common late AEs in this study. It is a Th1-inflammatory disease, and its mechanism is thought to be due to the immune imbalance caused by dupilumab. We could not confirm whether malignant lymphoma in our case was caused by dupilumab use. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Skin disorders are often late AEs associated with dupilumab; therefore, careful monitoring after dupilumab initiation should be considered.

Analysis of the adverse events following the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the adverse events (AEs) following the administration of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data. METHODS: In this case/non-case analysis, reports between 1 January 2021, and 27 October 2022, were extracted from VAERS. AEs were defined as preferred terms (PTs) by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to calculate the reporting odds and proportional reporting ratios. The Bayesian approach was used to calculate information component (IC) values and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean scores for all the AEs detected. RESULTS: 186 MedDRA PTs compromising 702,495 AEs associated with the mRNA-1273 vaccine were identified. Three statistically significant signals were identified for general and systemic AEs, administration site conditions, and product issues. Cardiac disorders were rarely reported, the most common being; 489 reports for 'myocarditis' (19.44%), 475 for 'acute myocardial infarction' (18.88%), 457 for 'myocardial infarction' (18.16%), 290 for 'bradycardia' (11.53%) and 281 for 'pericarditis' (11.17%). CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently identified AEs following mRNA-1273 vaccination agree with those listed within the Summary of Product Characteristics. In addition, disproportionality analysis did not find any statistically significant signals for myocarditis or pericarditis.

Raising awareness of immune-related side effects in oncological patients under palliative care: a report of two cases.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as a successful treatment option for diverse cancer entities. However, ICI therapy can be associated with immune-related adverse events (irAE) that can affect any organ system. These side effects can be severe, irreversible and sometimes even fatal. Due to the presentation as diverse and often unspecific clinical patterns, end-of-life care concepts may be pursued hastily suspecting disease progression in oncological patients receiving palliative care (PC). CASE DESCRIPTION: This report describes two cancer patients whose symptom burden was caused by such irAEs: One patient with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) presenting with disorientation and urinary incontinence, another patient with metastatic melanoma presenting with a sudden and unspecific deterioration of the overall condition. After imaging and blood sampling, an encephalitis and an immune-mediated diabetes mellitus were diagnosed. After treatment with corticosteroids and hydration alongside insulin substitution both patients experienced a complete symptom relief. CONCLUSIONS: We aim to emphasize the importance of continued collaboration between primary care givers and PC teams as well as raise awareness among PC providers of severe immune-related side effects in cancer patients receiving ICI. Especially within this patient cohort, PC teams play a crucial part in detecting possible irAEs, which resolve in the majority of cases when receiving early guideline-adapted treatment.

Factors and techniques associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes in patients with periampullary diverticulum: Results from a large tertiary center.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for patients with periampullary diverticulum (PAD) remains a challenge. This study aims to investigate the factors and techniques related to successful and safe ERCP in patients with PAD. Methods: We enrolled patients who underwent ERCP in a large tertiary center. The difficult cannulation rate, technical success rate, clinical success rate, and adverse events (AEs) rate were compared between patients with or without PAD. Three independent logistic regression models were established to identify factors and techniques associated with difficult cannulation, clinical success, and AEs. Results: Five thousand five hundred and ninety patients were included, of which 705 (12.6%) were diagnosed with PAD. Patients with PAD had a significantly higher difficult cannulation rate compared with patients without PAD (10.6% vs 8.0%, P < 0.0001), but the rates of technical success (clinical success (95.2% vs 95.2%, P = 0.951), and AEs (16.5% vs 14.4%, P = 0.156) were similar. Type I PAD (odds ratio [OR] = 2.114, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.05-5.25) and ERCP indication for pancreatic diseases (OR = 1.196, 95%CI: 1.053-1.261) were independently associated with difficult cannulation. Small endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) with balloon dilatation (OR = 1.581, 95%CI: 1.044-2.393) was independently associated with clinical success. Somatostatin injection showed no preventive effect on post-ERCP pancreatitis (OR = 1.144, 95%CI: 1.044-1.254). Moreover, the auxiliary cannulation techniques were safe for PAD patients. Conclusions: PAD did not affect ERCP outcomes. However, the choice of techniques and AE prophylactic measures should be more specific, especially for patients with type I PAD.

A real-world retrospective study of incidence and associated factors of endocrine adverse events related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Background: The adverse events (AEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been mostly described in clinical trials, however, such trials are restricted to selection criteria and the results cannot wholly represent the real-world setting. We aimed to evaluate the real-world endocrine AEs associated with programmed death receptor-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in Chinese population. Methods: This retrospective study included cancer patients who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between January 2018 and December 2020 at Xinqiao Hospital, the Third Military Medical University. The information of 581 patients was reviewed, and data on clinical characteristics, PD-1/PD-L1 use, occurrence of endocrine AEs, and response to PD-1 blockade treatment were collated. The definition of endocrine AEs relied on diagnostic tests. Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-squared test was used to analyze the associations between endocrine variables and several categorical variables. Multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model. Results: Endocrine AEs were observed in 116 of the 581 patients (20.0%). The median time to onset of endocrine AEs was approximately 12 weeks. Pembrolizumab was associated with a significantly higher incidence of endocrine AEs compared to other anti-PD-1 agents (38.5%; P=0.0002); PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment combined with antiangiogenic therapy or with two other therapies (chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy) was associated with a significantly increased occurrence of endocrine AEs, compared to PD-1 blockade treatment alone (41.2%; P=0.015), both based on multivariate analysis. Patients who developed endocrine AEs had significantly higher overall response rates (ORRs; 33.3% vs. 23.1%, P=0.045) and disease control rates (DCRs; 91.1% vs. 79.1%, P=0.008) compared to patients without endocrine AEs. In multivariate analysis, endocrine AEs remained an independent factor for both ORR (OR: 1.764, 95% CI: 1.052-2.957, P=0.031) and DCR (OR: 2.896, 95% CI: 1.324-6.332, P=0.008) after adjusting for the confounding factors. Conclusions: A real-world Chinese population receiving PD-1/PD-L1 treatment, pembrolizumab administrated and triple therapy treatment modalities had a higher incidence of endocrine AEs. Patients who developed endocrine AEs demonstrated a favorable response to PD-l blockade treatment.

Adverse events of bevacizumab for triple negative breast cancer and HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer (HER-2 negative MBC) are intractable to various treatment schemes. Bevacizumab as a novel anti-VEGF drug, its safety for these two high-risk breast cancers remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the safety of Bevacizumab for TNBC and HER-2 negative MBC. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane databases updated to 1 Oct 2022 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In all, 18 RCTs articles with 12,664 female patients were included. We used any grade Adverse Events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs to assess the AEs of Bevacizumab. Results: Our study demonstrated that the application of Bevacizumab was associated with increased incidence of grade ≥3 AEs (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.30-1.45, Rate: 52.59% vs. 41.32%). Any grade AEs (RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08, Rate: 64.55% vs. 70.59%) did not show a significant statistical difference in both overall results and among the subgroups. In subgroup analysis, HER-2 negative MBC (RR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.41-1.75, Rate: 39.49% vs. 25.6%), dosage over 15 mg/3w (RR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.07-1.92, Rate: 28.67% vs. 19.93%) and endocrine therapy (ET) (RR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.73-3.12, Rate: 31.17% vs. 13.42%) were associated with higher risk of grade ≥3 AEs. Of all graded ≥3 AEs, proteinuria (RR = 9.22, 95%CI 4.49-18.93, Rate: 4.22% vs. 0.38%), mucosal inflammation (RR = 8.12, 95%CI 2.46-26.77, Rate: 3.49% vs. 0.43%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (RR = 6.95, 95%CI 2.47-19.57, Rate: 6.01% vs. 0.87%), increased Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (RR = 6.95, 95%CI 1.59-30.38, Rate: 3.13% vs. 0.24%) and hypertension (RR = 4.94, 95%CI 3.84-6.35, Rate: 9.44% vs. 2.02%) had the top five risk ratios. Conclusion: The addition of Bevacizumab for TNBC and HER-2 negative MBC patients showed an increased incidence of AEs especially for grade ≥3 AEs. The risk of developing different AEs varies mostly dependent on the type of breast cancer and combined therapy. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42022354743].