Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment of children with acute intussusception: a case series.

BACKGROUND: To summarize the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of acute intussusception. METHODS: This retrospective study included pediatric patients with acute intussusception admitted to the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, from January 2014 to December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 402 infants/children were included (301 males and 101 females) with a mean age of 2.4 ± 1.5 years (2 months to 9 years). Thirty patients (7.5%) had a history of cold food intake, diarrhea, and upper respiratory infection before disease onset. Paroxysmal abdominal pain and crying occurred in 338 patients (84.1%). Eight patients (2.0%) had the typical triad, 167 (41.5%) had vomiting, 24 (6.0%) had bloody stools, and 273 (67.9%) had palpable abdominal mass. The average intussusception depth was 4.0 ± 1.4 cm. Air enema reduction was performed in 344 cases: 335 (97.3%) were successful. Fifty-eight patients were treated with intravenous phloroglucinol (2 mg/kg), and 53 (91.4%) were successful. Sixty-five patients suffered relapses, with a relapse rate of 16.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric acute intussusception is common. There was no obvious etiology. The clinical manifestations are mostly atypical. Abdominal pain is the most common complaint. Air enema reduction is an effective treatment. The recurrence rate is high.

A large single-center experience in management of pediatric intussusception.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to present the results of a comprehensive single-center study of the management and outcome of intussusception over a 10-year period and to review the recent literature. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of all children less than 16 years old, admitted with intussusception to our tertiary center between January 2007 and December 2016. Air enema was attempted routinely, with primary surgery reserved for selected cases. If air enema failed, open surgery was performed. The data collected included age, enema reduction rate, need for laparotomy, detail of bowel resection, hospital stay, and complications noted. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-one children presented with intussusception, totaling 200 admissions. One hundred and seventy-four patients (87%) underwent air enema. There was a complete reduction in 66% of these cases and a perforation rate of 1.1%. Twenty-six patients (13%) underwent primary surgery. Of the 59 patients with incomplete enema reduction, 50.8% required bowel resection while 49.2% required only manual reduction. Bowel resection was necessitated in 26% of total admissions and 61.2% of those requiring surgery. Hospital stays ranged from 3-97 days (median 7 days). There were four complications (2%). CONCLUSION: This comprehensive study reveals a higher rate of surgical intervention and bowel resection than was anticipated from selective series in published literature. Institutional variation in outcome is likely multifactorial but incomplete data make comparisons difficult.

Outcomes in pediatric patients with documented delays between ileocolic intussusception diagnosis and therapeutic enema attempt: evaluation of reduction efficacy and complication rate.

BACKGROUND: Ileocolic intussusception is considered a pediatric emergency, with concerns for risk of significant morbidity in children with a prolonged intussusception state. Emergent therapy is standard of care, as prior studies have shown poor outcomes in patients with long delays (> 24 h) before intervention. Various factors can result in shorter delays, and there are limited studies evaluating outcomes in these patients. This study aimed to determine if there were differences in reduction success rates associated with short in-hospital time delays. OBJECTIVE: This study is to determine enema success rate and morbidity in patients with documented time delays between intussusception diagnosis and therapeutic enema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of pediatric patients with intussusception at a single children's hospital between 2007 and 2019 was performed. Patient's records were reviewed for time of symptom onset, radiologic diagnosis, and attempted enema. Ultrasounds and radiographs were reviewed for bowel obstruction, free peritoneal fluid, trapped fluid around the intussusceptum, and absent bowel wall perfusion. Patients were evaluated for efficacy of reduction attempt, requirement for surgical reduction, and complications including bowel resection and bowel perforation. RESULTS: There were 175 cases of ileocolic intussusception requiring enema reduction. Successful reduction occurred in 72.2% (13/18) of cases performed within 1 h of diagnosis; 74.3% (78/105) between 1 and3 h; 73.2% (30/41) between 3 and 6 h; and 81.2% (9/11) with greater than 6 h. Need for bowel resection was not associated with short delays between diagnosis and reduction attempts (p = .07). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in intussusception reduction efficacy or complication rate in patients with increasing time between imaging diagnosis of ileocolic intussusception and reduction attempt, including delay intervals up to 8 h.

Effect of manipulative reduction combined with air enema on intestinal mucosal immune function in children with intussusception.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of manipulative reduction combined with air enema on intestinal mucosal immune function in children with intussusception. METHODS: This is a prospective randomized controlled study in which 60 children with primary intussusception admitted to Hebei Children's Hospital from October 2018 to October 2019 were selected for this study. They were randomly divided into two groups. The 30 patients in the experimental group underwent manipulative reduction and air enema reduction, and 30 patients in the control group underwent only air enema reduction. Pain scores and pressure during enema were recorded and analyzed. Fasting blood of children in the experimental group were drawn to test the serum T lymphocyte subsets CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ levels, B lymphocyte subsets CD19+ level, and NK cell subsets CD56+ levels before reduction. Among them, fasting blood of 28 children with successful reduction were drawn again in the morning after reduction, and the indicators of each immune cell subgroup before and after reduction were analyzed. Two children with unsuccessful reduction were no longer tested for these indicators. RESULTS: Twenty-Eight children in the experimental group had successful reduction, and two children with unsuccessful reduction were changed to open surgery (28/30). Twenty five Children in the control group had successful reduction, and five were changed to open surgery (25/30). There was no significant difference in the success rate of reduction between two groups (p>0.05). Close observation for 12~24h after reduction found that none of the children had signs of peritonitis. The pain score and reduction pressure of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The levels of serum CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ after reduction in the experimental group were significantly higher than before reduction, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). CD19+ level was significantly lower than before reduction, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in changes of other indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Manipulative reduction combined with air enema reduction can relieve pain and air injection pressure during enema, reduce reperfusion injury caused by intestinal ischemia, and protect intestinal mucosal immune function, which is a favored treatment.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Intussusception.

BACKGROUND: Delayed diagnosis of intussusception can lead to air enema failure and increased morbidity. There are limited studies reporting the accuracy of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in diagnosing intussusception. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to evaluate the accuracy of PEM POCUS in identifying ileocolic intussusception. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with air enema failure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of children who underwent POCUS for suspected intussusception in a pediatric emergency department between January 2001 and December 2015. Patients were included if a pediatric radiologist confirmed the POCUS examination interpretation by image review, radiology department ultrasound, or air enema. Age, symptom duration, recurrent intussusception, and location of intussusception were examined as factors for air enema failure. RESULTS: One hundred and two POCUS examinations were completed on 101 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 22 months. Of 75 patients with intussusception, 72 were detected with POCUS. PEM POCUS had a sensitivity of 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.6-100.0%), specificity of 92.6% (95% CI 82.7-100.0%), positive predictive value of 97.3% (95% CI 93.6-100.0%), and negative predictive value of 89.3% (95% CI 77.8-100.0%). Air enema failure was associated with intussusception distal to the splenic flexure (odds ratio = 10.00 [95% CI 2.81-35.61]; p < 0.01) and age <6 months (OR = 6.83 [95% CI 1.94-24.09]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: PEM POCUS identifies intussusception with high sensitivity and specificity. Patients <6 months old or with intussusception distal to the splenic flexure had a higher risk of air enema failure.

Comparative safety and efficacy of balloon use in air enema reduction for pediatric intussusception.

BACKGROUND: Intussusception, a common cause of bowel obstruction in young children, is primarily treated with air enema reduction. There is little literature comparing the safety and efficacy of air reduction without or with a rectal balloon. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of a rectal balloon seal in air enema reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of children who underwent air reduction for ileocolic or ileo-ileocolic intussusception over an 8-year period. We sorted data from 566 children according to whether a rectal balloon was used in the reduction, and further sorted them by type and experience level of the practitioner. Using logistic regression analyses, we identified risk factors for iatrogenic bowel perforation or failed reduction. RESULTS: Significant associations with bowel perforation included balloon use (P=0.038), age <1 year (P<0.0001), and attending physician's level of experience <5 years (P=0.043). Younger age was associated with both perforation (P<0.0001) and procedural failure (P=0.001). The risk-adjusted predicted probability of perforation decreased with age, approaching zero by 10 months regardless of balloon use. For cases without bowel resection, the risk-adjusted predicted probability of failure decreased toward zero by 30 months with balloon use, while remaining constant at 3-12% regardless of age when not using a balloon. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of a successful air reduction might be safely increased by using an inflated rectal balloon in children older than 9 months. Use of a balloon in younger infants is associated with a higher risk of iatrogenic bowel injury.

Assessment of a modified technique for air delivery during fluoroscopic-monitored pneumatic intussusception reduction.

BACKGROUND: Intussusception is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal emergency in children. Image-monitored pressure reduction is the first line of treatment. OBJECTIVE: We report on a modified technique of air delivery during fluoroscopic-monitored pneumatic intussusception reductions, and compare it with an established technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We modified the Shiels intussusception reduction device so that the air used for intussusception reduction is delivered not by the device's insufflator bulb, but rather by the hospital medical air supply system, eliminating the need for continuous pumping of the insufflator bulb during the procedure. Subsequently, we retrospectively compared sequential fluoroscopy-monitored pneumatic intussusception reduction procedures performed in patients younger than 18 years using either the standard or modified devices, evaluating technical procedure parameters (i.e. median procedure time length, fluoroscopy time length and radiation dose) and patient outcomes (i.e. number of complete intussusception reductions, number of incomplete intussusception reductions, number of intussusception recurrences within 3 days of the procedure, number of procedures followed by surgery). RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences between procedures performed with the standard and modified techniques. CONCLUSION: The device modification allows for increased operator comfort. Evaluated procedure parameters and patient outcomes appear similar to those of the standard technique.

Failed Intussusception Reduction in Children: Correlation Between Radiologic, Surgical, and Pathologic Findings.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify causes of irreducible intussusception after contrast enema and to correlate imaging findings with surgical and histopathologic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2005 and 2013, a total of 543 children underwent reduction of intussusception with the use of an enema technique (hereafter referred to as "enema reduction"). The medical records of 72 children (56 boys [mean age, 24.8 months; range, 3.8 months to 10.9 years] and 16 girls [mean age, 14.2 months; range, 1.5 months to 6.9 years) who underwent unsuccessful reduction and were treated surgically were retrospectively analyzed. The data collected included information on the cause of intussusception, the risk factors noted on ultrasound, operative management, outcome, and the length of the hospital stay. The imaging findings for these patients were compared with findings for statistically similar age-matched control subjects. RESULTS: Ultrasound detected 56 of 57 cases of intussusception, but it failed to detect the lead point in three cases and failed to detect ischemic necrosis in seven cases. Positive predictors of failed enema reduction were the presence of a distal mass and observation of the dissecting sign. Of the 72 patients who underwent surgical treatment of intussusception, 26 (36.1%) underwent laparoscopy, 38 (52.8%) underwent laparotomy, and eight (11.1%) underwent conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy. Surgical reduction was performed in 61.1% of cases, small bowel resection in 19.4%, ileocecectomy in 12.5%, and self-reduction in 69%. Pathologic lead points (noted in 25% of cases) included lymphoid hyperplasia (n = 7), Meckel diverticulum (n = 3), Burkitt lymphoma (n = 3), enteric duplication cyst (n = 2), juvenile polyp (n = 2), and adenovirus appendicitis (n = 1). The length of the hospital stay was significantly longer after laparotomy. CONCLUSION: The distalmost location of the intussusception mass and presence of the dissecting sign on images obtained during contrast enema have a higher positive predictive value for failed reduction. Screening ultrasound decreases the number of unnecessary contrast enemas performed; however, classic pathologic lead points, such as Burkitt lymphoma and Meckel diverticulum, may be difficult to diagnose with the use of ultrasound. Laparotomy and laparoscopy are equally safe and efficacious in reducing intussusception, with the length of the hospital stay after laparoscopy significantly shorter than that noted after laparotomy. Most failed enema reductions are idiopathic, and pathologic lead points are noted in 25% of cases.

Meta-analysis of Air Versus Liquid Enema for Intussusception Reduction in Children.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of air versus liquid enema reduction in the treatment of intussusception in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted from January 1, 1966, through May 31, 2013. Articles on the use of air or liquid enema in children with a confirmed diagnosis of intussusception and reporting either a success rate for enema reduction of intussusception or a perforation rate were selected. Enema reduction success rate, perforation rate, and recurrence rate were the main outcomes and were calculated by random effects modeling. RESULTS: One hundred two articles (101 reporting success rate, 71 reporting perforation rate) were included that presented results for 32,451 children (age range, 1 day-22 years; boys, 66%; girls, 34%). In 44 studies (16,187 children), the combined estimate for success rate of air enema was 82.7% (95% CI, 79.9-85.6%; inconsistency index [I(2)] = 97%), and in 52 studies (13,081 children) of liquid enema, it was 69.6% (95% CI, 65.0-74.1%; I(2) = 98%). In 38 studies (15,752 children), the combined estimate of perforation rate for air enema was 0.39% (95% CI, 0.23- 0.55%; I(2) = 40%), and in 30 studies (9429 children) of liquid enema, it was 0.43% (95% CI, 0.24- 0.62%; I(2) = 9%). Among 10,494 children (26 studies) undergoing air enema reduction, the rate of first intussusception recurrence was 6% (95% CI, 4.5-7.5%; I(2) = 89%), similar to the 7.3% (95% CI, 5.8-8.8%; I(2) = 71%) found for 4004 children (24 studies) undergoing liquid enema reduction. CONCLUSION: Air enema was superior to liquid enema for intussusception reduction. The success rate was higher without a difference in perforation rate. Limitations included heterogeneity and publication bias.

Fluoroscopic criteria for on-site evaluation of failed intussusception reduction during air enema technique.

Background: There is no reliable fluoroscopic criteria for failed intussusception reduction during air enema technique. Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 373 episodes of ileocolic intussusceptions who had undergone air enema under fluoroscopy. All procedures were initially classified by conventional fluoroscopic criteria: presumptive successful procedures (PSP) vs. presumptive failed procedures (PFP). PFP were divided into true failure, false failure, and undetermined groups. The configuration and size of the residual mass were evaluated on fluoroscopic images. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, logistic regression analyses, and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test with a post hoc Tukey test. Results: PSP was 264 episodes (71%) and PFP was 109 episodes (29%). The true failure was 40 (37%) and false failure was 48 (44%). The true failure group commonly showed a larger size and round configuration for the residual mass than false failure (P<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed configuration (P=0.004) and transverse diameter (P=0.007) as significant parameters that differentiated true and false failure. The optimal cut-off value of the transverse diameter of the residual mass was 2.3 cm. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional fluoroscopic criteria for failed reduction was 100% and 85%, respectively. The combination of new fluoroscopic findings and conventional criteria increased the specificity to 100%. Conclusions: Fluoroscopic finding of round-shape and larger size residual mass combined with conventional criteria may be useful for differentiating false failure from truly failed enema reduction in children with intussusception.

Intussusception: A 14-year experience at a UK tertiary referral centre.

AIMS: Intussusception is the most common cause of acute intestinal obstruction in infants. First line management in uncomplicated cases at our centre is fluoroscopy guided air enema reduction. This study reports a 14 year UK single centre experience highlighting management and outcomes of intussusception in children. METHODS: All cases of intussusception (ICD 10-code K56.1) at a single tertiary referral centre from 2004 to 2017 were analyzed. Data evaluated included patient demographics, clinical presentation, treatment modality(s), complications and outcome(s). RESULTS: Two hundred ninety confirmed cases (69% male) of intussusception were identified during the study period. The median age at presentation was 9.5 months (range 4 days-15 years). One hundred eighty-six (64%) cases occurred in children who were transferred to Alder Hey from peripheral district hospitals. One hundred ninety-six cases (68%) proceeded directly to air enema reduction and successful reduction was achieved in 129 cases (66%). A single case (0.5%) of attempted air enema reduction was complicated by perforation. Early recurrence rate following air enema reduction was 9%. Operative management was indicated in 140 (48%) cases of which 66 required bowel resection (47%). There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: We highlight one of the largest single centre UK studies defining practice outcomes for intussusception across the British Isles. Our centre has achieved a 66% success rate of non-operative reduction over 14 years in line with the British Society Pediatric Radiology (BSPR) recommendations and within 5% of the national median metric (71%). Moreover these outcomes were achieved with a very low complication rate (0.5%) from air enema reduction and no mortality in the series. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Emergency department discharge following successful radiologic reduction of ileocolic intussusception in children: A protocol based prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Pediatric intussusception's first line treatment consists of fluoroscopic guided air enema reduction. Postprocedure, these patients are usually admitted overnight for observation. The purpose of our study was to document the results of emergency department (ED) observation and discharge protocol after successful reduction of ileocolic intussusception. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted after implementation of an ED protocol for ileocolic intussusception from 10/2014 to 7/2017 and compared these patients to a historical cohort immediately prior to protocol initiation (10/2011-9/2014). Data collected included demographics, total time in the ED and hospital, enema reduction, recurrence, and requirement for operative intervention. Results reported as means with standard deviation and medians reported with interquartile ranges (IQR). RESULTS: 115 patients were treated with the prospective protocol and were compared to a 90 patient historical cohort. Reduction was successful in 84%-89% of cases. Median hospital time after enema was shorter in the protocol group [4.8 h (4.25, 14.97) versus 19.7 h (13.9, 33.45), p < 0.01]. Only 33% of patients were admitted following the protocol; the most common admission reason was persistent abdominal discomfort. CONCLUSION: ED observation and discharge after successful air enema reduction in children with ileocolic intussusception are safe, facilitate early discharge, and reduce hospital resource utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Establishing content validity and fidelity of a novel paediatric intussusception air enema reduction simulator.

BACKGROUND: Intussusception is a common, potentially life-threatening paediatric condition. Non-operative treatment with an air enema has been established as the clinical gold standard. There is no validated model for the training of this procedure. Our aim was to produce a novel air enema reduction simulator and validate its use as a training tool. METHODS: A low-cost paediatric intussusception air enema simulator was created. It was designed to include essential key clinical procedural steps. Participants included both procedural experts and novices from the Departments of Paediatric Radiology and Surgery. The simulator was assessed for face and content validity and its physical, conceptual and experiential fidelity by a structured questionnaire using a 5-point Likert's scale. Statistical analysis included a t-test, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Twenty-four clinicians completed the simulation activity (expert: 13 and novices: 11). All experts had performed a minimum of 40 clinical procedures, and 46% had performed >50 procedures. All scores were favourable in all domains for face and content validity: 3.5 (physical appearance), 3.3 (insertion of the tube and taping), 3.1 (holding of the buttocks) and 3.5 (performing the air enema). The simulator also scored highly with fidelity assessment; visual 3.5, conceptual 3.4. There was no difference in procedural confidence with experts (3.8 versus 3.6, P = 0.28), but there was for novices (1.0 versus 2.9, P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: This low-cost air enema reduction simulator for intussusception has an excellent educational potential for use in a training program in a tertiary centre, as well as, resource-constrained environments.

Intussusception in children presenting to the emergency department.

A retrospective chart review of children diagnosed with intussusceptions from March 2005 to March 2007 was conducted at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. There were 152 children with 170 episodes of intussusceptions during the study period. Around one third (30%) of children diagnosed with intussusceptions had a concurrent infection. There were 114 large bowel intussusceptions, with a mean age of 27 months (SD = 25) and a success rate of 91% for air enema reductions. Bowel resection was performed in 8.8% of children with large bowel intussusceptions. Small bowel intussusceptions (n = 38) were associated with gastrostomy tubes in 42% (n = 16) of patients, and 81% needed tube shortening. The varying age range of many children diagnosed with intussusceptions and the high incidence of intercurrent illnesses and fever in our study alert health professionals to suspect intussusceptions in children presenting with abdominal pain or crying.

An air insufflation device for reduction of intussusception in children.

The authors have developed a portable device for insufflation of air reliably at pressures accepted as safe for effective reduction of intussusception in children under fluoroscopic guidance. The results of reduction with the device were equal to those by saline enema reduction under ultrasound guidance.