Does a higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) score forecast an increased risk of malignancy? A correlation study of ACR TI-RADS with FNA cytology in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound has become the initial approach to evaluating thyroid nodules, facilitating the distinction between benign and malignant nodules based on composition, echogenicity, nodule border or margin, shape, the presence of calcifications, and nodule dimensions. The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommended the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) as a classification system to standardize thyroid ultrasound reports and to predict the probability of malignancy in thyroid nodules using a scoring system (TR1-TR5) based on multiple ultrasound characteristics and nodule size. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is recommended as the next step for nodules that warrant further workup. The authors assessed the accuracy of the ACR TI-RADS based on the corresponding FNA cytology results (Bethesda system diagnoses I-VI). METHODS: ACR TI-RADS ultrasound reports and corresponding FNA cytology diagnoses from January 1, 2018 to August 30, 2018 were evaluated. RESULTS: From January 1, 2018 to August 30, 2018, 2306 thyroid ultrasound-guided FNAs were performed at our institution. Of 2306 cases, 361 had ACR TI-RADS reports available. The majority of FNAs were TR4 (180; 49.9%) or TR3 (108; 29.9%). No TR2 or TR3 nodules were associated with Bethesda category V or VI diagnoses. The majority of TR4 nodules (142 of 180; 78.9%) and TR5 nodules (42 of 65; 64.6%) exhibited benign (Bethesda category II) cytology. Fourteen TR5 cases (21.5%) had malignant (Bethesda category VI) cytology. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no TR2 or TR3 malignant (Bethesda category VI) diagnoses, and there were only a few malignancies in the TR4 and TR5 categories, the current results reassert the notion that the ACR TI-RADS scoring system shows at least some correlation between benign or malignant cytology diagnoses, as illustrated by the greater number of malignant cases in the higher ACR TI-RADS categories.

BRAFV600E mutation combined with American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system significantly changes surgical resection rate and risk of malignancy in thyroid cytopathology practice.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography patterns and molecular testing may assist in stratifying the malignancy risk of indeterminate cytology diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in combination with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) and BRAFV600E mutation in differentiating high-risk thyroid nodules. METHODS: From February 2010 to February 2014, 2,643 consecutive thyroid nodules from 2,399 patients (688 men and 1,711 women; mean age, 44.3±12.5 years) who underwent preoperative FNA biopsies were enrolled. The Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine has adopted TI-RADS stratification and BRAFV600E mutation analysis as a routine procedure to assist in evaluating FNA cytopathology since January 2016. From February 2017 to July 2018, 1,905 thyroid nodules of 1,837 patients (501 men and 1,336 women, 49.5±12.8 years) who underwent preoperative ultrasound-guided FNA biopsies with BRAFV600E mutation analysis and ACR TI-RADS grading data available were enrolled for comparison in this study. RESULTS: The cancer risk in nodules with BRAFV600E mutation was 99.7% (905/908) according to the histological findings. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was found to increase with advancing ACR TI-RADS category. High-risk ultrasound features (TI-RADS 5) did show a good performance in predicting malignancy (98.1%). The combination of TI-RADS 5 and BRAFV600E mutation reached the best diagnostic efficiency [sensitivity 97.7%, specificity 94.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) 99.6%]. It is apparent that after the implementation of ACR TI-RADS and the BRAFV600E mutation analysis, the resection rates (RRs) of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) I and III categories showed significant decreases (39.1% vs. 21.6% and 36.1% vs. 16.7%, respectively). In contrast, the risks of malignancy of TBSRTC I and III categories indicated substantial increases (41.5% vs. 80.0% and 34.6% vs. 50.0%, respectively). The ROM of thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic (ND, I) category showed the most significant increase of 41.5% to 80.0%. CONCLUSIONS: ACR TI-RADS, together with BRAFV600E mutation and cytological diagnoses, can assist in improving the prediction of malignancy of thyroid nodules, especially in the TBSRTC I and III categories.