Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with poor physical status: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide registry database in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is an established minimally invasive procedure for gastric cancer. However, it is controversial whether LG is useful for patients with poor physical status classified into higher classes of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) classification. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of LG in patients with ASA-PS class ≥ 3. METHODS: We extracted data for a total of 28,160 patients with an ASA-PS class ≥ 3 who underwent distal or total gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2013 and December 2017 from the National Clinical Database Japan society for gastroenterological surgery registry. We developed a propensity score model from baseline demographics and comorbidities and matched patients undergoing LG to those undergoing open gastrectomy (OG) using a 1:1 ratio. Mortality and morbidities (within 30 days and in-hospital) were compared between the 6998 matched patient pairs. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients undergoing LG than in those undergoing OG (2.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.01), while the 30-day mortality was similar (1.6% vs. 1.5%). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LG group (median, 14 days vs. 17 days, p < 0.001). The LG group had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications in patients with any grade complication (20.3% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.002) as well as those with ≥ grade 3 complications (8.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: LG was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality and a lower incidence of several postoperative complications when compared to OG among patients with poor physical condition.

Influence of anesthetic technique on survival after tumor debulking surgery of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: Results of a retrospective cohort study.

Epidural analgesia could influence the postoperative oncologic outcomes in patients with specific types of non-metastatic solid neoplasms. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of anesthetic technique on survival in elderly patients with ovarian cancer (OC). The records of all women with OC older than 60 years of age undergoing tumor debulking surgery at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Mainz, Germany) between January 2008 and December 2019 were obtained. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on the use of perioperative epidural anesthesia or not. First, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze the prognostic influence of anesthetic technique on survival. Second, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was adjusted for multiple conventional prognostic factors concerning three main categories: i) Current clinical-pathological tumor characteristics; ii) anesthesiologic parameters, including mean age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Performance Status and preexisting comorbidities summarized in the Charlson Comorbidity Index; and iii) oncological and surgical parameters such as oncological radicality and Surgical complexity Score. A total of 110 patients were included in the study and 71 (64.5%) of them received epidural analgesia. The median survival time was 26.0 months from primary debulking surgery and no significant differences in progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were noted between the 'Epidural' and 'non-Epidural' cohorts. After adjustment for the selected risk factors from the three categories, the effects of epidural analgesia on PFS and OS remained non-significant [PFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.26; 95% CI, 0.66-2.39; and OS: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.45-1.40]. The present results did not support the independent association between epidural-supplemented anesthesia and improved PFS or OS in elderly patients with standardized ovarian cancer debulking surgery.