Long-term mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the reperfusion and modern secondary prevention therapy era according to coronary artery disease extent: The FAST-MI registries.

BACKGROUND: Historical cohorts have shown extent of coronary artery disease to be a predictor of poorer outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, contemporary data in the era of reperfusion and modern secondary prevention therapy are lacking. AIM: To compare 3-year survival in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease versus those with single-vessel disease. METHODS: Using data from the FAST-MI 2005, 2010 and 2015 registries, three nationwide French surveys, we included all patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24hours of symptom onset. Baseline characteristics, management and 3-year all-cause mortality were analysed according to coronary status (single-, two- and three-vessel disease). RESULTS: Among 3907 patients (mean age 62.4±13.7 years; 75.9% male), patients with multivessel disease (two- or three-vessel disease) accounted for 47.9%; overall, they were older, with higher cardiovascular risk profiles. In a multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression model, only patients with three-vessel disease had a higher rate of mortality at 3 years compared with those with single-vessel disease (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.68-2.26; P<0.001). Finally, patients with multivessel disease with complete myocardial revascularization before discharge had a similar prognosis to patients with single-vessel disease (hazard ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.64; P=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel disease still represents an important proportion of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Although three-vessel disease is associated with higher 3-year mortality, patients with multivessel disease and complete myocardial revascularization in the contemporary era have a 3-year risk of death similar to that in patients with single-vessel disease.

Factors associated with delay in transfer of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from first medical contact to catheterization laboratory: Lessons from CRAC, a French prospective multicentre registry.

BACKGROUND: It is critical to minimize the time between the first medical contact and primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. AIMS: To identify factors associated with a delay of>120min between first medical contact and primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: Data were analysed from a regional French registry of patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction<24h after symptom onset. Patients (n=2081) were grouped according to transfer times from first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention:>120min; or≤120min. Independent predictors of delay were identified by univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The median transfer time from first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention was 112min; 892 patients (42.9%) had a transfer time>120min. A delay of>120min was significantly associated with:≥75km distance from interventional cardiology centre at symptom onset (odds ratio 7.9); more than one medical practitioner involved before interventional cardiology centre (odds ratio 4.5); first admission to a hospital without an interventional cardiology centre (odds ratio 2.9); absence of emergency call (odds ratio 1.6); ≥90min between symptom onset and first medical contact (odds ratio 1.3); Killip class at admission>1 (odds ratio 1.8); lateral ischaemia (odds ratio 1.8); diabetes mellitus (odds ratio 1.6); and hypertension (odds ratio 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, a transfer time from first medical contact to primary percutaneous coronary intervention of>120min was associated with geographic, systemic and comorbid factors, several of which appear reasonably actionable.

[Demographic evolution, clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of older adults treated by primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction]. / Évolution démographique, caractéristiques et suivi clinique intrahospitalier des sujets âgés traités par angioplastie primaire pour syndrome coronarien aigu avec sus-décalage du segment ST.

BACKGROUND: The number of older adults treated for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is increasing. Nevertheless, their treatment might not be as optimal as younger adults. This study sought to evaluate demographic evolution, clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients of patients aged 75years-old or older treated by primary angioplasty for STEMI. METHODS: Retrospective study of all consecutive patients for STEMI between January 2012 and December 2017. Their clinical, biologic, echocardiographic and angiographic data, as well as in-hospital outcomes were collected and compared between two groups: younger and older than 75 year-olds. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-eight patients including 99 (17.4%) 75 year-old or older were included in the present study. Patients aged 75 or older had an increased delay of treatment between the time of the chest pain onset and revascularization (7.30±1,16 vs 4.77±0,36hours, P=0.0391), they were more frequently treated with clopidogrel rather than more potent anti P2Y12 antiplatelet therapies (55.6% vs 24.8%, P<0.0001) and received less frequently anti-GP2B3A therapy (44.8% vs 23.2%, P<0.0001). There was a trend for increased in-hospital mortality in the older group, despite non statistically significant (4.04% vs 1.5%, P=0.0847). Older adults had a worse clinical status with decreased post-STEMI left ventricular ejection fraction (44.42±1,38 vs 49.07±0,49, P=0,0019). They were also less treated with drug-eluting stents (51.5% vs 73.9%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Adults aged 75 years-old or older represent a subsequent proportion of patients admitted for STEMI. They had a worse initial clinical presentation associated with worse prognostic, as compared to younger adults. They experience delayed reperfusion therapy and suboptimal treatment as compared to younger adults.

Impact of platelet inhibition level on subsequent no-reflow in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: High P2Y12 platelet reactivity (PR) level after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) affects prognosis and may induce the no-reflow phenomenon. AIM: To investigate the role of PR in the genesis of microvascular obstruction. METHODS: Patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI within 12hours of symptoms onset were included prospectively. All patients received a 600mg clopidogrel-loading dose before PPCI and 250mg aspirin. PR was measured thereafter during PPCI while wiring the culprit lesion and before coronary dilatation, using the P2Y12 VerifyNow® assay. No-reflow was defined as ST-segment regression<50% observed 90minutes after PPCI. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and November 2015, 140 STEMI patients were included, and divided into two groups: a low PR group (LPR) defined as PR<209P2Y12 reaction units (PRU); and a high PR group (HPR) defined as PR≥209PRU. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between LPR and HPR groups, including age (57.8±11.9 vs. 59.4±13.2 years, respectively; P=0.44) and weight (76.1±15.1 vs. 74.8±10.9kg, respectively; P=0.55). Delay to revascularization was 270.1±175.5 vs. 295.6±206.2minutes (P=0.49) and time between clopidogrel-loading and PR measurement was 53±37 vs 65±54minutes (P=0.29) in the LPR and HPR groups, respectively. No-reflow was more frequent in the HPR group (44 [47.3%] vs. 9 [19.1%]; P=0.0012). Mean PR was higher in patients with no-reflow: 268.3±53 vs. 223.8±50.1 PRU (P=0.002). In multivariable analysis, HPR was an independent predictor of no-reflow. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.745 (0.654, 0.835); the cut-off value predicting no-reflow was 254PRU. CONCLUSION: High PR level measured at PPCI is independently associated with no-reflow.

Primary angioplasty: Effect of deferred stenting on stent size.

BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty with immediate stenting (IS) is the gold standard for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Deferred stenting (DS) has been proposed to limit periprocedural complications, and may influence stent size because of thrombus and spasm alleviation. AIM: We sought to study the effect of DS on stent size. METHODS: Over the study period, 258 patients underwent primary angioplasty for STEMI (DS, n=84; IS, n=174). An informative coronary angiogram run - i.e. allowing for proper lesion analysis - was selected and anonymized by an independent operator. Two experienced operators randomly analysed these runs, and proposed stent dimensions after having measured vessel diameter and lesion length by quantitative coronary analysis. The primary objective was the variation in stent size between the two coronary angiograms. RESULTS: The median delay between the two coronary angiograms was 2 days. Overall, the stent length was shorter (-1.64mm; P=0.030) and its diameter was larger (+0.13mm; P<0.001) during the second coronary angiogram, especially in the right coronary arteries. CONCLUSIONS: DS led to the implantation of a larger and shorter stent; this is probably because DS allows for more accurate assessment of the residual lesion after relief of spasm and thrombus, and may have clinical consequences in terms of stent thrombosis and restenosis.

[Intracoronary administration of antithrombotic agents via a perfusion balloon catheter in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting with massive intraluminal thrombus and failed aspiration]. / Apport de l'administration intracoronaire d'antithrombotiques par cathéter à ballon de perfusion en phase aiguë d'infarctus du myocarde avec thrombus massif et échec de la thromboaspiration.

BACKGROUND: Massive intracoronary thrombus is associated with adverse procedural results including failed aspiration and unfavourable reperfusion. We aim to evaluate the effect of the intracoronary administration of antithrombotic agents via a perfusion catheter in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting with a large thrombus burden and failed aspiration. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the thrombus burden, the TIMI grade flow, and the myocardial Blush in 25 consecutive STEMI patients with a large thrombus burden and failed manual aspiration, who received intracoronary infusion of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (N=17) or bivalirudine (N=8) via a 6F-infusion catheter (ClearWay™ RX) RESULTS: Mean age was 67±14 years, 16 patients (64 %) presented with anterior STEMI, and 7 (28 %) with cardiogenic shock. Immediately after intracoronary infusion, the TIMI flow grade improved of 2 grades in 7 patients (28 %), and 1 grade in 14 (56 %), a complete resolution of the thrombus was observed in 9 patients, and a >50 % resolution in 12. Blush was improved of 3 grades in 15 patients (60 %), of 2 grades in 7 (28 %), and Blush grade 0 remained in 3. At the end of procedure, we observed normal TIMI 3flow in most patients (92 %), a complete resolution of thrombus in 80 %, and a Blush grade 3 in 68 %. CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients presenting with a large thrombus burden and failed aspiration, intracoronary administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or bivalirudin via the perfusion catheter ClearWay™ RX significantly reduced the thrombus burden and improved the TIMI flow and the Blush grade, without bleeding.

[A case review: About a STEMI in the very elderly]. / Un cas, une revue: un SCA ST+ chez le sujet très âgé.

Because of the demographic growth of our societies and the increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease with age, we will be increasingly faced with the treatment of myocardial ST+ very elderly patients (>90 years?). If evidence-based medicine does not exist within this framework, there are many registries that can guide us in their care. First, age should not in itself be an indication against reperfusion conventional techniques. In fact recommendations put no upper age limit. The primary angioplasty technical success, which is identical to the younger populations, is the treatment of choice and should be performed preferably by radial arterial access. The thrombolytic alternative, validated for octogenarians, has not been studied for older. Bleeding, neurological, ischemic complications and hospital mortality are more common than in younger populations, especially as the initial hemodynamic alteration is important, but the survivors have the same life-threatening or even better than that of a same reference population ages. Which in itself even justifies maximum adhesion to the therapeutic recommendations taking into account the co-morbidities and possible visceral shortcomings.

[Evolution of the interventional reperfusion strategy and reperfusion times in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction]. / Évolution de la prise en charge interventionnelle et des délais de reperfusion à la phase aiguë de l'infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), the recommended times (first medical contact-to-balloon (M2B) <120 or <90min, and door-to-balloon (D2B) <45min) are reached in less than 50% of patients. PURPOSE: To compare the interventional reperfusion strategy and reperfusion times between two series of consecutive STEMI patients referred for pPCI within 12hours of symptom onset, in 2007 and 2012. METHODS: Retrospective study of 182 patients, 87 admitted from January 2007 to March 2008 (period 1), and 95 admitted from January to December 2012 (period 2). The procedural characteristics and the different times between onset of pain and mechanical reperfusion were gathered and compared by non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Radial access, thromboaspiration, and drug eluting stents were more frequent, and cardiogenic shock was less common during period 2, compared with the period 1. The median time from first medical contact to balloon (M2B) decreased by 26% (135min, [quartiles: 113-183] in 2007 versus 100 [76-137] in 2012, P<0.001), in relation to the reduction in both prehospital times and time in the catheterization laboratory (D2B: 51 [44-65] and 44min [37-55], respectively, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The D2B and M2B times significantly decreased in our centre between 2007 and 2012, and reached the recommended values in >60% of the cases. This may be explained by better coordination between emergency medical units and interventional cardiologists, and by the presence of two paramedics in the catheterization laboratory for 24/24 7/7 pPCI since 2010 in France, in accordance with recent national regulation.

[What is the place of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?]. / Quelle place pour les stents biorésorbables dans la prise en charge du syndrome coronarien aigu avec sus-décalage du segment ST ?

A 50-year-old woman was admitted for an inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; immediate coronary angiogram revealed a subocclusive stenosis of the right coronary artery. After optimal antithrombotic treatment, the type of stent could be discussed. The latest generation of drug-eluting stents showed excellent efficacy and safety in the long-term but has limitations such as potential chronic inflammation of the arterial wall and no recovery of vasoactive function. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, with complete resorption within several months, may reduce these limitations. Implantation of bioresorbable scaffold in the context of myocardial infarction may be interesting. However, very few studies are currently available in this setting. Preliminary results and perspectives are presented in this review.

Impact of manual thrombectomy on myocardial reperfusion as assessed by ST-segment resolution in STEMI patients treated by primary PCI.

BACKGROUND: In STEMI patients treated by primary PCI, damage of the microvascular circulation caused by distal embolization of thrombotic material affects the quality of myocardial reperfusion. Important controversies remain concerning the usefulness of the manual thrombectomy to improve myocardial perfusion. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of manual thrombectomy on ST resolution as a surrogate of reperfusion extent. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-nine consecutive STEMI patients with an <12 hours onset of symptoms, were enrolled in an observational registry. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to the reperfusion strategy: manual thrombectomy before primary PCI (n=102) or conventional-PCI (n=137). The primary endpoint was the post procedural frequency of complete (>70%) resolution of ST segment elevation. RESULTS: A complete resolution of ST segment elevation occurred in 51.4% of patients in the thrombectomy group and in 35,6% of those in the conventional-PCI group (P=0.018). Thrombectomy strategy was associated with a lower use of stents. Multivariate analysis identified manual thrombectomy (HR=2.08 IC 95% (1.01-4.26); P=0.046), inferior location and short ischemic delay (<180 min) as independent predictors of ST resolution. The cumulative Kaplan-Meier estimate of MACE was not significantly different between the two groups at one, three years follow-up. CONCLUSION: In STEMI patients, manual thrombectomy improves myocardial reperfusion as assessed by the percentage of ST segment resolution and a lower use of stents. However, in this cohort of limited size, this strategy did not translate into an improved cardiovascular outcome at one year follow-up.