Novel cross-linkable fluorescent probe with oriented antibody to enhance lateral immunoassay strip for the detection of acetamiprid.

Time-resolved fluorescent lateral immunoassay strip (TRFLIS) is a reliable and rapid method for detecting acetamiprid. However, its sensitivity is often affected by the structural patterns and stability of the fluorescent probe. Researchers have shown significant interests in using goat anti-mouse IgG (GaMIgG) which is indirectly bound to time-resolved fluorescent microsphere (TRFM) and antibody. This allowed for oriented modification of the antibody. However, the stability of fluorescent probe in this binding mode remained unexplored. Herein, 1-ethyl-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride was innovatively used as a cross-linking agent to enhance the binding of antibody to GaMIgG, which improved the stability of the fluorescent probe. Under optimal working conditions, this strategy exhibited a wide linear response range of 5-700 ng/mL. Its limit of detection (LOD) was 0.62 ng/mL, the visual LOD was 5 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification (LOQ) of 2.06 ng/mL. Additionally, under tomato matrix, leek matrix and Chinese cabbage matrix, the linear response ranges were 5-400, 5-300, and 5-700 ng/mL, with LODs of 0.16, 0.60, and 0.41 ng/mL, with LOQs of 0.53, 2.01 and 1.37 ng/mL, respectively. In conclusion, this strategy effectively reduced the dosage of acetamiprid antibody compared with TRFM directly linking acetamiprid antibody, and greatly increased the sensitivity of TRFLIS. Meanwhile, it demonstrated outstanding specificity and accuracy in acetamiprid detection and had been successfully applied to vegetable samples. This method enables rapid and accurate detection of large-volume samples by combining qualitative and quantitative methods. As such, it has great potential in the development of low-cost and high-performance immunochromatographic platforms.

Brugia pahangi: immunization with early L3 ES alters parasite migration, and reduces microfilaremia and lymphatic lesion formation in gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus).

Previous studies have shown that intradermally (ID) injected Brugia pahangi L3 s migrate through various tissues and into the lymphatics of gerbils in a distinct pattern. Excretory/secretory products (ES) produced at the time of invasion of B. pahangi are likely to be important in this early migration phase of the parasite life cycle in their rodent host. Hence, early L3 ES was collected from 24h in vitro cultures of B. pahangi L3 larvae and used in immunization experiments to investigate the effect of immunity to early L3 ES on worm migration, survival and development of B. pahangi. Immunization of gerbils with ES in RIBI adjuvant produced antibodies to numerous ES proteins eliciting a strong humoral response to ES and indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) assay using anti-ES serum recognized the ES proteins on the surface of B. pahangi L3 larvae. Following ES immunization, gerbils were challenged either ID or intraperitoneally (IP) with 100 L3 s of B. pahangi and euthanized at 3 or 106 days post inoculation (DPI). Immunization with early ES slowed the migration of ID inoculated L3 at 3 DPI and significantly altered the locations of adult worms at 106 DPI. Immunization did not induce protection in any treatment group. However, immunized animals had significantly fewer microfilariae per female worm suggesting the antigens in ES are important in microfilariae development or survival in the host. The number of lymphatic granulomas was also significantly reduced in ES immunized animals. It is important to note that microfilariae serve as a nidus in these granulomas. Our results shows immunization with early Brugia malayi L3 ES alters the worm migration, affects circulating microfilarial numbers and reduces lymphatic granulomas associated with B. pahangi infection in gerbils.

Cross-reaction between mouse and rat immunoglobulin G: does it matter in sandwich ELISA?

BACKGROUND: Sandwich ELISA is an ideal antigen detection and quantification assay. Recently, it was used as the basic concept for high technology diagnostics. The specificity of the assay depends on the exclusion of detection cross-reactivity which arises from using two antibodies developed in different species. Since mice and rats are the common laboratory animals used to develop antigen specific antibodies. Therefore, the questions we addressed here were (1) can one use antigen-specific antibodies raised in mice and rats in the same assay to specifically detect/quantify antigens? and (2) which antibodies of the two rodents should be placed for capturing and for detection in the antigen-detection sandwich? RESULTS: Direct ELISA assay was used to assess for the specific reaction of the HRP-conjugated antibody to the target serum. First reaction was to compare between either conjugate anti-rat IgG (homologous) or anti-mouse IgG (heterologous) for the detection of rat sera IgG. Following the dilution factor optimization, the O.D. were 0.744±0.051 and 0.604±0.05, respectively (p= .004). The difference in mean O.D. of 0.14 reflected an unaccepted non-specific reaction. The second reaction was to compare between either conjugate anti-mouse IgG (homologous) and anti-rat IgG (heterologous) for the detection of mouse sera IgG. The recorded O.D. were 0.9414±0.14 and 0.317 ±0.141, respectively (p= .0002). The improved difference in mean O.D. of 0.624 reflecting a minimized cross-reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that it is possible to use both Swiss albino mice and albino rats in a single sandwich ELISA, given that the captured antibody species to be from the Swiss albino mice and the detection antibody to be from the albino rat. The described working details are limited to the source of the antibodies used in the study. However, the approach stresses on the importance of such optimization steps before making any interpretations based on the antigen detection. To our knowledge, this study is the first to cover the optimal order of the capturing and the detection antibodies in a sandwich ELISA assay. In addition to addressing the possible interfering cross-reactivity that result from using mouse and rat serum antibodies in a single assay.