Wild-type distributions of minimum inhibitory concentrations and epidemiological cut-off values-laboratory and clinical utility.

The characterization of wild-type minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and zone diameter distributions with the setting of epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs or ECVs) provides a reference for the otherwise relative MIC values in the international system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Distributions of MIC values for a species and an agent follow a log-normal distribution, which in the absence of resistance mechanisms is monomodal and designated wild type (WT). The upper end of the WT distribution, the ECOFF, can be identified with statistical methods. In the presence of phenotypically detectable resistance, the distribution has at least one more mode (the non-WT), but despite this, the WT is most often identifiable using the same methods. The ECOFF provides the most sensitive measure of resistance development in a species against an agent. The WT and non-WT modes are independent of the organism´s response to treatment, but when the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) determines the clinical breakpoints, the committee avoids breakpoints that split WT distributions of target species. This is to avoid the poorer reproducibility of susceptibility categorization when breakpoints split major populations but also because the EUCAST has failed to identify different clinical outcomes for isolates with different MIC values inside the wild-type distribution. In laboratory practice, the ECOFF is used to screen for and exclude resistance and allows the comparison of resistance between systems with different breakpoints from different breakpoint organizations, breakpoints evolving over time, and different breakpoints between human and animal medicine. The EUCAST actively encourages colleagues to question MIC distributions as presented on the website (https://www.eucast.org/mic_and_zone_distributions_and_ecoffs) and to contribute MIC and inhibition zone diameter data.

Amoxicillin-clavulanate Breakpoints Against Enterobacterales: Rationale for Revision by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

Amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC) is among the most frequently prescribed antibiotics globally. It has broad antibacterial activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria, and has been utilized to treat infections caused by a broad range of pathogens. AMC breakpoints against Enterobacterales were initially set in the 1980s but since then increases in antibiotic resistance, advances in pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses, and publication of additional clinical data prompted a reassessment by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Based on this contemporary reappraisal, the CLSI retained the Enterobacterales breakpoints but revised comments regarding dosing associated with use of the AMC breakpoints in the 2022 supplement of M100. This viewpoint provides insight into the CLSI breakpoint reevaluation process and summarizes the data and rationale used to support these revisions to the AMC Enterobacterales breakpoint.

How New Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests Will Affect Infectious Diseases Clinical Practice.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) affects 2.8 million Americans annually. AMR is identified through antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), but current and proposed regulatory policies from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) jeopardize the future availability of AST for many microorganisms. Devices that perform AST must be cleared by the FDA using their susceptibility test interpretive criteria, also known as breakpoints. The FDA list of breakpoints is relatively short. Today, laboratories supplement FDA breakpoints using breakpoints published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, using legacy devices and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs). FDA proposes to regulate LDTs, and with no FDA breakpoints for many drug-bug combinations, the risk is loss of AST for key clinical indications and stifling innovation in technology development. Effective solutions require collaboration between manufacturers, infectious diseases clinicians, pharmacists, laboratories, and the FDA.

The modern alchemy of clinical pathology: turning the output of microbiology laboratory operations into gold.

The clinical microbiology laboratory generates a huge amount of high-quality data that play a vital role in clinical care. With proper extraction, cleaning, analysis, and validation pipelines, these data can serve multiple other purposes that include supporting laboratory operations, understanding local epidemiology, informing hospital-specific policies, and public health surveillance. In this review, I use one of the core activities of the microbiology laboratory, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), to illustrate several potential applications of next-generation data analytics. The first involves continuous monitoring of commercial AST systems using comparisons of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions over time to trigger re-verification when statistically significant differences are detected. An extension of this is temporal analysis of joint MIC distributions to understand performance for multidrug-resistant organisms. More sophisticated analyses involve linking microbiologic data to clinical metadata to gain insight into the clinical validity of AST data and to inform treatment policies. The elements of a robust, validated analysis engine using routine data streams already exist, but numerous challenges must be overcome to make it a reality. Most importantly, it will require the sustained collaboration and advocacy of hospital leadership, microbiologists, clinicians, antimicrobial stewardship, data scientists, and regulatory agencies. Though no small feat, achieving this vision would provide an important resource for microbiology laboratories facing a rapidly evolving practice landscape and further cement its role as an integral part of a learning health system.

Multicenter evaluation of the Selux Next-Generation Phenotyping antimicrobial susceptibility testing system.

The Selux Next-Generation Phenotyping (NGP) system (Charlestown, MA) is a new antimicrobial susceptibility testing system that utilizes two sequential assays performed on all wells of doubling dilution series to determine MICs. A multicenter evaluation of the performance of the Selux NGP system compared with reference broth microdilution was conducted following FDA recommendations and using FDA-defined breakpoints. A total of 2,488 clinical and challenge isolates were included; gram-negative isolates were tested against 24 antimicrobials, and gram-positive isolates were tested against 15 antimicrobials. Data is provided for all organism-antimicrobial combinations evaluated, including those that did and did not meet FDA performance requirements. Overall very major error and major error rates were less than 1% (31/3,805 and 107/15,606, respectively), essential agreement and categorical agreement were >95%, reproducibility was ≥95%, and the average time-to-result (from time of assay start to time of MIC result) was 5.65 hours.

Cefazolin as a predictor of urinary cephalosporin activity in indicated Enterobacterales.

Traditionally, cephalothin susceptibility results were used to predict the susceptibility of additional cephalosporins; however, in 2013-2014, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) revisited this practice and determined that cefazolin is a more accurate proxy than cephalothin for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). Therefore, a cefazolin surrogacy breakpoint was established to predict the susceptibility of seven oral cephalosporins for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis in the context of uUTIs. Clinical microbiology laboratories face several operational challenges when implementing the cefazolin surrogacy breakpoint, which may lead to confusion for the best path forward. Here, we review the historical context and data behind the surrogacy breakpoints, review PK/PD profiles for oral cephalosporins, discuss challenges in deploying the breakpoint, and highlight the limited clinical outcome data in this space.

Recommendation of a standardized broth microdilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Avibacterium paragallinarum and resistance monitoring.

This study aimed to develop a method for standardized broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of Avibacterium (Av.) paragallinarum, the causative agent of infectious coryza in chickens. For this, a total of 83 Av. paragallinarum isolates and strains were collected from 15 countries. To select unrelated isolates for method validation steps, macrorestriction analyses were performed with 15 Av. paragallinarum. The visible growth of Av. paragallinarum was examined in six broth media and growth curves were compiled. In Veterinary Fastidious Medium and cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) + 1% chicken serum + 0.0025% NADH (CAMHB + CS + NADH), visible growth of all isolates was detected and both media allowed adequate bacterial growth. Due to the better readability of Av. paragallinarum growth in microtiter plates, CAMHB + CS + NADH was chosen for AST. Repetitions of MIC testing with five epidemiologically unrelated isolates using a panel of 24 antimicrobial agents resulted in high essential MIC agreements of 96%-100% after 48-h incubation at 35 ± 2°C. Hence, the remaining 78 Av. paragallinarum were tested and demonstrated easily readable MICs with the proposed method. Differences in MICs were detected between isolates from different continents, with isolates from Africa showing lower MICs compared to isolates from America and Europe, which more often showed elevated MICs of aminoglycosides, quinolones, tetracyclines, and/or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. PCR analyses of isolates used for method development revealed that isolates with elevated MICs of tetracyclines harbored the tetracycline resistance gene tet(B) but none of the other tested resistance genes were detected. Therefore, whole-genome sequencing data from 62 Av. paragallinarum were analyzed and revealed the presence of sequences showing nucleotide sequence identity to the genes aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, blaTEM-1B, catA2, sul2, tet(B), tet(H), and mcr-like. Overall, the proposed method using CAMHB + CS + NADH for susceptibility testing with 48-h incubation time at 35 ± 2°C in ambient air was shown to be suitable for Av. paragallinarum. Due to a variety of resistance genes detected, the development of clinical breakpoints is highly recommended. IMPORTANCE: Avibacterium paragallinarum is an important pathogen in veterinary medicine that causes infectious coryza in chickens. Since antibiotics are often used for treatment and resistance of the pathogen is known, targeted therapy should be given after resistance testing of the pathogen. Unfortunately, there is currently no accepted method in standards that allows susceptibility testing of this fastidious pathogen. Therefore, we have worked out a method that allows harmonized susceptibility testing of the pathogen. The method meets the requirements of the CLSI and could be used by diagnostic laboratories.

Multicenter comparison of Etest, Vitek2 and BD Phoenix to broth microdilution for beta-lactam susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumonia.

PURPOSE: To assess performance of Etest®, Vitek®2 and BD Phoenix™ to determine the susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains to penicillin, ampicillin and cefotaxime. METHODS: Sixty unique S. pneumoniae challenge strains were selected to cover a wide range of penicillin, ampicillin and cefotaxime minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Strains were analyzed in four different Belgian laboratories. Etest® benzylpenicillin (BEN), ampicillin/amoxicillin (AMP) and cefotaxime (CTA) (bioMérieux), Vitek®2 AST-ST03 (bioMérieux) and BD Phoenix™ SMIC/ID-11 testing were each performed in two different labs. Results were compared to Sensititre® broth microdilution (BMD) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) results. MIC results were interpreted using EUCAST non-meningitis breakpoints (v 13.0). RESULTS: Essential agreement (EA) was ≥ 90% for all methods compared to BMD, except for Etest® BEN on Oxoid plate (58.3%), Etest® AMP (both on Oxoid (65.8%) and BD BBL plate (84.2%)). Categorical agreement (CA) for penicillin was only ≥ 90% for Vitek®2, for other methods CA ranged between 74 and 84%. CA for AMP was for all methods < 90% (range 75.8-88.3%) and CA for CTA was between 87 and 90% for all methods except for Etest on Oxoid plate (79.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that Vitek®2 and BD Phoenix™ are reliable for providing accurate pneumococcal susceptibility results for BEN, AMP and CTA. Using Etest BEN or AMP on Oxoid plate carries a risk of underestimating the MIC and should be interpreted with caution, especially when the obtained MIC is 1 or 2 doubling dilutions below the S or R clinical breakpoint.

Evaluation of the ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem susceptibility by MALDI-TOF MS directly from positive blood cultures.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the MBT-ASTRA to determine susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and meropenem (MEM) of Enterobacterales directly from positive blood cultures (BC). Bacterial suspension was incubated with antibiotic and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. The relative growth was calculated and cutoff values were determined to categorize isolates as "S," "I," and "R." Klebsiella spp. with CZA 20/8 mg/L and 1.5-h incubation presented 1 (5.9%) major discrepancy and 96.3% category agreement; other species required 2.5 h for 100% category agreement. For MEM, 4 mg/L and 1.5h were necessary, demonstrating 2 (6.67%) minor discrepancies and 93.3% categorical agreement.

Evaluation of the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. Baumannii by the broth disk elution test.

To evaluate the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii using the broth disk elution testing, a total of 150 A. baumannii isolates were collected from across China between January 2019 and January 2021, including 51 carbapenem-susceptible and 99 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Broth disk elution (BDE) and the broth microdilution (BMD) method were performed for all strains. The concentration range of the BDE was 10/10 µg/mL, 20/20 µg/mL, and 30/30 µg/mL for ampicillin-sulbactam, and 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, 112.5/45 µg/mL, and 150/60 µg/mL for cefoperazone-sulbactam, respectively. Compared with BMD, the BDE results of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam showed a categorical agreement of 83.3% (125/150) and 95.3% (143/150), with minor errors of 16.7% (25/150) and 4.7% (7/150), respectively. No major error or very major errors were detected. The sensitivity differences by BDE of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) to different concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam showed statistically significant (p < 0.017), while those to cefoperazone-sulbactam at 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, and 112.5/45 µg/mL were significant (p < 0.008). However, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between 112.5/45 µg/mL and 150/60 µg/mL (p > 0.008). In conclusion, the BDE is a reliable and convenient method to detect the in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii, and the results could serve as a clinical reference value when deciding whether or not to use high-dose sulbactam for the treatment of A. baumannii infections.

Performance evaluation of Bruker UMIC® microdilution panel and disc diffusion to determine cefiderocol susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Burkolderia species.

PURPOSE: Cefiderocol susceptibility testing (AST) represents an open challenge for clinical microbiology. Herein, we evaluated the performance of the UMIC® Cefiderocol broth microdilution (BMD) test and disc diffusion on Gram-negative species. METHODS: UMIC® Cefiderocol BMD test, disc diffusion and reference BMD were in parallel performed on a collection of 256 clinical isolates. Categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), bias, major errors (MEs) and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for both AST methods. RESULTS: The UMIC® Cefiderocol BMD strip exhibited an EA < 90% (85.5%), a CA higher than 90% (93.7%) and a low number of VMEs (n = 4, 4.2%) and MEs (n = 12, 7.4%). UMIC® Cefiderocol identified 96.2% of the resistant isolates [Enterobacterales, (39/40); P. aeruginosa (19/19); A. xylosoxidans (5/6); S. maltophilia (5/6); Burkholderia spp. (8/8)]. Disc diffusion showed a high CA (from 94.9 to 100%) regardless of disc manufacturer in Enterobacterales, P. aeuroginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia. However, high rates of results falling in the area of technical uncertainty (ATU) were observed in Enterobacterales (34/90, 37.8%) and P. aeruginosa (16/40, 40%). Disc diffusion showed a poor performance in A. xylosoxidans and Burkholderia spp. if PK/PD breakpoint was used (overall, 5/9 VMEs; in contrast, the use of P. aeruginosa-specific breakpoints resulted in 100% of CA with 24.6% of results in the ATU). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, disc diffusion and UMIC® Cefiderocol are valid methods for the determination of cefiderocol susceptibility. Given the high number of results in the ATU by disc diffusion, a combined use of both AST methods may represent a solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories.

Short-term culture for rapid identification by mass spectrometry and automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing from positive bottles.

BACKGROUND: Early and appropriate antibiotic treatment improves the clinical outcome of patients with sepsis. There is an urgent need for rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria that cause bloodstream infection (BSI). Rapid ID and AST can be achieved by short-term incubation on solid medium of positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) and the BD M50 system. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of rapid method compared to traditional method. METHODS: A total of 124 mono-microbial samples were collected. Positive blood culture samples were short-term incubated on blood agar plates and chocolate agar plates for 5 ∼ 7 h, and the rapid ID and AST were achieved through Zybio EXS2000 MS and BD M50 System, respectively. RESULTS: Compared with the traditional 24 h culture for ID, this rapid method can shorten the cultivation time to 5 ∼ 7 h. Accurate organism ID was achieved in 90.6% of Gram-positive bacteria (GP), 98.5% of Gram-negative bacteria (GN), and 100% of fungi. The AST resulted in the 98.5% essential agreement (EA) and 97.1% category agreements (CA) in NMIC-413, 99.4% EA and 98.9% CA in PMIC-92, 100% both EA and CA in SMIC-2. Besides, this method can be used for 67.2% (264/393) of culture bottles during routine work. The mean turn-around time (TAT) for obtaining final results by conventional method is approximately 72.6 ± 10.5 h, which is nearly 24 h longer than the rapid method. CONCLUSIONS: The newly described method is expected to provide faster and reliable ID and AST results, making it an important tool for rapid management of blood cultures (BCs). In addition, this rapid method can be used to process most positive blood cultures, enabling patients to receive rapid and effective treatment.

Persistent bacteremia caused by Ralstonia pickettii and Microbacterium: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Ralstonia pickettii is a low virulent, gram-negative bacillus that is rarely associated with human infections and may cause bacteremia. Microbacterium species are gram-positive coryneforms that are generally considered as a contaminant in Gram staining of blood cultures, especially when the time to positivity is longer than 48 h. Both these bacterial species are emerging opportunistic pathogens that may occasionally cause serious infections and even life-threatening health conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report the case of a patient with bacteremia caused by both R. pickettii and Microbacterium. We advocate for providers to order rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing, since our patient's suffered two kinds of rare pathogens with the opposite of drug sensitivity results to imipenem. CONCLUSIONS: Our case present a patient suffered septic shock caused by R. pickettii and Microbacterium. Improving the antibiotic management based on the result of antimicrobial susceptibility tests is the key of successful treatment.

Carbapenem non-susceptibility overcalling by BD phoenix NMIC-500 panel.

We aimed to assess the accuracy of BD Phoenix for determining carbapenem susceptibility because we observed a decline in carbapenem susceptibility rate from the biannual cumulative data, after we transitioned to the BD Phoenix form Vitek 2 system. Between October 2021 and May 2022, we collected 82 non-duplicated Enterobacterales showing non-susceptible to at least one of the three carbapenems by BD Phoenix. We performed the broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD) according to the CLSI guideline. Compared to BMD, the categorical agreements for ertapenem (ERT), imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEPM) was 58.8%, 56.8% and 91.5% for BD Phoenix and it was 85.4%, 89.0%, and 97.6%, respectively, for DD (p value; 0.0001 for ERT and IPM, p value; 0.17 for MEPM). The major errors/minor errors for ERT, IPM, and MEPM were 14.0%/31.7%, 2.94%/40.7%, and 2.56%/6.10%, respectively for BD Phoenix, compared to 0%/14.6%, 0%/9.8%, and 0%/2.5%, for DD. While errors in the BD Phoenix showed tendency towards resistance, those in DD displayed no tendency towards either resistance or susceptibility. With DD, 21 out of the 27 isolates showing susceptible/intermediate/susceptible pattern (ERT/IPM/MEPM) and 13 out of the 16 isolates showing intermediate/susceptible/susceptible pattern (ERT/IPM/MEPM), were correctly categorized by DD. However, for 22 isolates showing resistant/susceptible/susceptible pattern (ERT/IPM/MEPM), only 13 isolates were correctly categorized by DD. In conclusion, to mitigate the risk of overcalling carbapenem non-susceptibility with BD Phoenix, it will be helpful to perform a complementary test using DD and to provide comments on the DD results to clinicians.

Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates.

BACKGROUND: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method. METHODS: We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates. RESULTS: For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.

Rapid Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Positive Blood Cultures Using a Fully Automated Multiplex PCR Assay.

This study assessed the performance of the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel in identifying microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles in positive blood cultures (BCs) and its influence on turnaround time (TAT) compared with conventional culture methods. We obtained 117 positive BCs, of these, 102 (87.2%) were correctly identified using BCID2. The discordance was due to off-panel pathogens detected by culture (n = 13), and additional pathogens identified by BCID2 (n = 2). On-panel pathogen concordance between the conventional culture and BCID2 methods was 98.1% (102/104). The conventional method detected 19 carbapenemase-producing organisms, 14 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, 18 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp., and four vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. BCID2 correctly predicted 53 (96.4%) of 55 phenotypic resistance patterns by detecting AMR genes. The TAT for BCID2 was significantly lower than that for the conventional method. BCID2 rapidly identifies pathogens and AMR genes in positive BCs.

Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterizations of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from Diverse Retail Meat Samples in North Carolina During 2018-2019.

Surveillance of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in U.S. retail meats is conducted to identify potential risks of foodborne illness. In this study, we conducted a phenotypic and genotypic analysis of Escherichia coli recovered from a diverse range of retail meat types during 2018-2019 in North Carolina. The investigation was conducted as part of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS). Retail meat sampling and E. coli isolation were performed in accordance with NARMS retail meat isolation protocols. We used the Sensititre™ broth microdilution system to determine phenotypic resistance to 14 antimicrobial agents and the Illumina next-generation sequencing platform for genotypic resistance profiling. The highest prevalence of E. coli isolates was found in ground turkey (n = 57, 42.9%) and chicken (n = 27, 20.3%), followed by ground beef (n = 25, 18.9%) and pork (n = 24, 18%). The isolates were divided into seven different phylogroups using the Clermont typing tool, with B1 (n = 59, 44.4%) and A (n = 39, 29.3%) being the most dominant, followed by B2 (n = 14, 10.5%), D (n = 7, 5.3%), F (n = 6, 4.5%), E (n = 3, 2.3%), and C (n = 2, 1.5%). Using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), 128 Sequence types (STs) were identified indicating high diversity. Phenotypic and genotypic resistance was observed toward aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, beta-lactams, macrolides, tetracyclines, phenicols, and fluoroquinolones. Ground turkey samples were more resistant to the panel of tested antimicrobials than chicken, beef, or pork (p < 0.05). All isolates were found to be susceptible to meropenem. A high percentage of turkey isolates (n = 16, 28%) were multidrug-resistant (MDR) compared with 18.5% of chicken (n = 5), 8.4% of pork (n = 2), and 8% of beef isolates (n = 2). This study highlights the benefit of surveillance to identify MDR E. coli for epidemiologic tracking and is a comprehensive report of the phenotypic and genotypic characterization of E. coli isolated from retail meats in North Carolina.

Evaluation of an automated rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (ASTar, Q-linea AB) applied directly on blood cultures bottles positive for Gram-negative pathogens.

We evaluated the performance of a new rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test (ASTar; Q-linea AB) on Gram-negative bacilli, directly from positive blood cultures bottles. MIC values obtained by the routine reference method (Microscan, Beckman Coulter) were compared to the ones provided by the tested method (ASTar). ASTar demonstrated an overall essential agreement of 98% and a category agreement of 96.1%. The overall rate of major errors and very major errors was 2.5% and 3.3%, respectively. ASTar can represent a rapid, simple, and reliable method to speed up information about antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative pathogens from positive blood culture bottles.

[Does a rapid antibiotic susceptibility test optimize antibiotic therapy of patients with bacteremia ?] / Un antibiogramme rapide optimise-t-il la prise en charge thérapeutique des patients présentant une bactériémie ?

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the contribution of a rapid antibiotic susceptibility test performed directly from a positive blood culture (PBC), the dRAST™, in the management of patients with bacteremia. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the time from sampling to availability of antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results («time-to-result¼, TTR) between dRAST™ and classic AST (Vitek®2), in 150 patients with bacteremia. The antibiotic treatment of these 150 patients was classified into three categories (optimal, suboptimal, ineffective) according to the time of availability of AST results. RESULTS: Adaptation of antibiotic treatment to optimal therapy following AST results occurred in 46/100 (46 %) of Gram-negative PBC and in 4/50 (2 %) of Gram-positive HP. TTR was significantly lower with dRAST™ compared with classic AST (29:35 (± 08:48) hours versus 50:55 (± 12:45) hours, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For patients with bacteremia requiring adjustment of empirical antibiotic therapy based on AST, dRAST™ could allow a faster administration of optimal therapy.

CONTEXTE: Nous avons évalué la contribution d'un antibiogramme rapide réalisé directement à partir d'une hémoculture positive (HP), le dRAST™, dans la prise en charge des patients présentant une bactériémie. Méthodes: Nous avons comparé, rétrospectivement, le délai entre le prélèvement et la disponibilité des résultats d'antibiogramme («temps-pour-résultats¼, TPR) entre le dRAST™ et l'antibiogramme classique (Vitek®2), auprès de 150 patients présentant une bactériémie. Les antibiothérapies de ces 150 patients ont été classés en trois catégories (optimale, suboptimale, inefficace) en fonction du moment d'obtention des résultats de l'antibiogramme. Résultats : L'adaptation du traitement antibiotique en thérapie optimale suite au résultat de l'antibiogramme est survenue chez 46/100 (46 %) des HP à Gram négatif et chez 4/50 (2 %) des HP à Gram positif. Le TPR était significativement plus faible avec le dRAST™ par rapport à l'antibiogramme classique (29:35 (± 08:48) heures versus 50:55 (± 12:45) heures, p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Pour les patients avec bactériémie nécessitant une adaptation de l'antibiothérapie empirique basée sur l'antibiogramme, le dRAST™ permettrait une administration plus rapide du traitement optimal.

Diabetes-related lower limb wounds: Antibiotic susceptibility pattern and biofilm formation.

The expeditious incidence of diabetes mellitus in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, there is a significant increase in the total number of people with diabetic foot ulcers. For diabetic lower limb wound infections (DLWs) to be effectively treated, information on the prevalence of bacteria that cause in this region as well as their patterns of antibiotic resistance is significant. Growing evidence indicates that biofilm formers are present in chronic DFU and that these biofilm formers promote the emergence of multi-drug antibiotic resistant (MDR) strains and therapeutic rejection. The current study targeted to isolate bacteria from wounds caused by diabetes specifically at hospitals in Riyadh and assess the bacterium's resistance to antibiotics and propensity to develop biofilms. Totally 63 pathogenic microbes were identified from 70 patients suffering from DFU. Sixteen (25.4%) of the 63 bacterial strains were gram-positive, and 47 (74.6%) were gram-negative. Most of the gram-negative bacteria were resistant to tigecycline, nitrofurantoin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, cefalotin, and cefoxitin. Several gram-negative bacteria are susceptible to piperacillin, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim. The most significant antibiotic that demonstrated 100% susceptibility to all pathogens was meropenem. Serratia marcescens and Staphylococcus aureus were shown to have significant biofilm formers. MDR bacterial strains comprised about 87.5% of the biofilm former strains. To the best of our knowledge, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia is the first region where Serratia marcescens was the most common bacteria from DFU infections. Our research findings would deliver information on evidence-based alternative strategies to develop effective treatment approaches for DFU treatment.