Simultaneous balloon aortic valvotomy and patent ductus arteriosus device closure in preterm newborn.

Multiple congenital heart disease in the small preterm newborn such as severe narrowing of aortic valve and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a therapeutic challenge. We report successful transcatheter antegrade balloon dilatation of the aortic valve and device closure of the PDA in a 1700-gram preterm newborn. Meticulous planning and team work aids in such transcatheter intervention. .

Current-Era Outcomes of Balloon Aortic Valvotomy in Neonates and Infants.

Background: The optimal initial treatment pathway for aortic valve stenosis remains debated. Objectives: The objective of this study was to review current outcomes of balloon aortic valvotomy (BAV) in neonates and infants. Methods: Neonates and infants with a biventricular circulation treated with BAV between 2004 and 2019 were reviewed. Results: One hundred thirty-nine infants (48% neonates) with median (Q1, Q3) age of 33(7, 84) days and weight 4.0 (3.4, 5.1) kg were followed up for 7.1 (3.3, 11.0) years. BAV reduced peak-to-peak gradient from mean (SD) 52 (16) mmHg to 18 (12) mmHg; P < 0.001. Aortic regurgitation (AI) increased with time after BAV. Three children died during follow-up. Fifty-one reinterventions (26 BAV, 19 aortic valve replacements [AVRs], and 6 surgical valvotomies) were performed on 40 children. Freedom from AVR (95% CI) was 96% (93%-99%) at 1, 91% (86%-96%) at 5, and 86% (79%-93%) at 10 years. The predictors of AVR were a unicommissural valve (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]: 3.7 [1.4-9.6]; P = 0.007) and moderate to severe AI after index BAV (HR [95% CI]: 3.3 [1.1-9.7]; P = 0.029). Freedom from reintervention was 84% (78%-90%) at 1, 76% (69%-83%) at 5, and 69% (60-78%) at 10 years. Main predictors of reintervention were age below 1 month (HR [95% CI]: 2.1 [1.1-4.1]; P = 0.032) and postdilation peak-to-peak gradient (per 10-mmHg increase; HR [95% CI]: 1.36 [1.02-1.79]; P = 0.032). Conclusions: BAV is a safe and effective treatment for aortic valve stenosis in neonates and infants. Outcomes are competitive with contemporary published data on aortic valve repair in relation to mortality, gradient relief, long-term AVR, and reintervention rates. In the absence of significant AI, surgery can be reserved for those with gradients resistant to valve dilation.

Outcomes following aortic valve procedures in 201 complex congenital heart disease cases-results from the UK National Audit.

OBJECTIVES: Some patients with complex congenital heart disease (cCHD) also require aortic valve (AoV) procedures. These cases are considered high risk but their outcome has not been well characterized. We aim to describe these scenarios in the current practice, and provide outcome data for counselling and decision-making. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using the UK National Congenital Heart Disease Audit data on cCHD patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, balloon dilation (balloon aortic valvuloplasty) or surgical repair (surgical aortic valve repair) between 2000 and 2012. Coarsened exact matching was used to pair cCHD with patients undergoing AoV procedures for isolated valve disease. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients with a varied spectrum of cCHD undergoing 242 procedures were included, median age 9.4 years (1 day-65 years). Procedure types were: balloon aortic valvuloplasty (n = 31, 13%), surgical aortic valve repair (n = 57, 24%) and aortic valve replacement (n = 154, 63%). Mortality at 30 days was higher in neonates (21.8% vs 5.3%, P = 0.02). Survival at 10 years was 83.1%, freedom from aortic valve replacement 83.8% and freedom from balloon aortic valvuloplasty/surgical aortic valve repair 86.3%. Neonatal age (P < 0.001), single ventricle (P = 0.08), concomitant Fontan/Glenn (P = 0.002) or aortic arch procedures (0.02) were associated with higher mortality. cCHD patients had lower survival at 30 days (93% vs 100%, P = 0.003) and at 10 years (86.4% vs 96.1%, P = 0.005) compared to matched isolated AoV disease patients. CONCLUSIONS: AoV procedures in cCHD can be performed with good results outside infancy, but with higher mortality than in isolated AoV disease. Neonates and patients with single ventricle defects, especially those undergoing concomitant Fontan/Glenn, have worse outcomes.

Long-term results of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty of congenital aortic stenosis in adolescents and young adults.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is a well accepted modality of treatment in congenital aortic stenosis in all age groups. Although in infants and children it is the modality of choice, in adolescents and young adults, it is of debatable efficacy. AIM: To evaluate long-term results of aortic valvuloplasty particularly in adolescent and adults (>12 years) and compare the outcome in other age groups that are <1 year and between 1 are 11 years. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: 165 consecutive patients treated at the median age of 9 years (1 day to 64 years). The follow-up was up to 14 years (median 3 years). The whole cohort was divided into 3 age-based subgroups: Group A (<1 year) n=45, Group B (1 year-11 years) n=52, and Group C (>12 years) n=68. The characteristics of each subgroup were mutually compared. INTERVENTION: Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty with mean (SD) balloon to annulus ratio of 0.93. Main outcome measures were repeat BAV, significant aortic regurgitation (AR), and aortic valve replacement/repair. RESULTS: The incidence of significant AR from the whole cohort was 9.9% (8% moderate, 1.9% severe); n=16. Group A=significant AR 9.5% (7.1% moderate, 2.4% severe), Group B=significant AR 11.3% (9.4% moderate, 1.9% severe), and Group C=significant AR 9% (7.5% moderate, 1.5% severe); p value=0.99 (Group C vs Group A) and 0.92 (Group C vs Group B). Repeat BAV rate was 13.3% (n=22 out of 165 patients). Group A - n=5 (11.9%), Group B - n=10 (18.2%), and Group C - n=7 (10.3%). p Value=0.78 (C vs A) and 0.19 (C vs B). Surgery in follow-up was needed in n=4 (2.4%), none in Group A, 2 patients in Group B (3.6%), and 2 patients in group C (2.9%). Patients were followed up for a period of 14 years; Group A=up to 8 years, Group B=up to 13 years, and Group C=up to 14 years. Mean survival probability after the procedure was 8 years (Group A=6.5 years, Group B=8.1 years, and Group C=9.9 years), and p value=0.49 (A vs B), 0.23 (B vs C), and 0.4 (A vs C). CONCLUSION: There is no statistical difference in the long-term outcome in the adults and adolescents as compared to the children; thus BAV remains an obvious treatment of choice with good long-term outcome.

Percutaneous aortic balloon valvotomy in the United States: a 13-year perspective.

BACKGROUND: We determined the contemporary trends of percutaneous aortic balloon valvotomy and its outcomes using the nation's largest hospitalization database. There has been a resurgence in the use of percutaneous aortic balloon valvotomy in patients at high surgical risk because of the development of less-invasive endovascular therapies. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study with time trends using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database between the years 1998 and 2010. We identified patients using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code for valvotomy. Only patients aged more than 60 years with aortic stenosis were included. Primary outcome included in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included procedural complications and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 2127 percutaneous aortic balloon valvotomies (weighted n = 10,640) were analyzed. The use rate of percutaneous aortic balloon valvotomy increased by 158% from 12 percutaneous aortic balloon valvotomies per million elderly patients in 1998-1999 to 31 percutaneous aortic balloon valvotomies per million elderly patients in 2009-2010 in the United States (P < .001). The hospital mortality decreased by 23% from 11.5% in 1998-1999 to 8.8% in 2009-2010 (P < .001). Significant predictors of in-hospital mortality were the presence of increasing comorbidities (P = .03), unstable patient (P < .001), any complication (P < .001), and weekend admission (P = .008), whereas increasing operator volume was associated with significantly reduced mortality (P = .03). Patients who were admitted to hospitals with the highest procedure volume and the highest volume operators had a 51% reduced likelihood (P = .05) of in-hospital mortality when compared with those in hospitals with the lowest procedure volume and lowest volume operators. CONCLUSION: This study comprehensively evaluates trends for percutaneous aortic balloon valvotomy in the United States and demonstrates the significance of operator and hospital volume on outcomes.