Association between cup orientation and low back pain after total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative low back pain (LBP) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is classified as secondary hip-spine syndrome. The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations between cup orientation of THA and postoperative LBP in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included 364 ONFH patients who underwent bilateral THA between January 2011 and December 2020. Among them, 53 patients (14.6%) experienced postoperative LBP at the end of follow-up and were designated as pain group (PG). A control group (CG) consisting of 106 patients with similar age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to those in the PG was selected. Postoperative LBP in the PG was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Demographic data, clinical information, and radiographic criteria were evaluated as potential predictors of LBP. RESULTS: Patients in PG (mean age, 47.3 years [range, 27 to 75 years]; 42 [79%] male) had a mean VAS score of 4.6 (range, 1 to 9) compared with 0 for the patients in CG (mean age, 47.6 years [range, 19 to 77 years]; 84 [79%] male). There were no significant differences in clinical data between the two groups (p > 0.05). Preoperative radiographic variables also showed no significant differences between the PG and CG (p > 0.05). However, the postoperative inclination, anteversion, and standing ante-inclination (AI) were significantly lower in the PG compared to the CG, whereas the sitting and standing sacral slope (SS) were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Moreover, the variations in standing AI, standing and sitting pelvic tilt (PT) were significantly lower in the PG compared to the CG, while the variations in standing and sitting SS and lumbar lordosis (LL) were significantly higher (p < 0.05). The variation in standing AI in the PG showed a significantly correlation with the variation of standing SS, standing PT, and LL (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Postoperative LBP in ONFH patients after bilateral THA is significantly associated with the intraoperative cup orientation. The variation in standing AI is correlated with the variations in standing SS, standing PT, and LL, potentially contributing to the development of postoperative LBP.

Intraoperative cell salvage reduces postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion and shortens off-bed time in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SI-THA) results in more blood loss and a greater need for postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). Previous studies have reported that multimodal patient blood management (PBM) strategies were associated with a smaller effect of intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in unilateral total hip arthroplasty. However, there are few studies on the role of ICS in SI-THA. This study aims to explore the effect of ICS with multimodal PBM strategies on SI-THA and to identify risk factors associated with ABT. METHODS: This retrospective matched cohort study included 72 patients in the ICS group and 72 patients in the control group who were matched according to age, sex, and year of hospitalization. Demographic data, hematological indicators, blood loss, and ABT were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for postoperative ABT. Postoperative outcomes were also recorded. RESULTS: In the cohort of 144 patients, 27 patients (37.5%) in the ICS group while 45 patients (62.5%) in the control group received postoperative ABT after SI-THA. Compared with the control group, the ICS group showed significant differences in terms of blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit. The transfused volume of allogeneic red blood cells per ABT patient was also lower in the ICS group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that sex, the utilization of ICS, and preoperative hematocrit level were identified as independent factors associated with postoperative ABT. The utilization of ICS significantly shortened off-bed time and length of hospital stay, but had no effect on early pain and functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: The utilization of ICS can significantly affect postoperative ABT in SI-THA patients with multimodal PBM strategies. Sex, the utilization of ICS and preoperative hematocrit level were identified as independent factors associated with postoperative ABT. The utilization of ICS promoted weight-bearing functional exercises, but had no effect on early outcomes.

To Stage or Not to Stage? Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Complications, and Discharge Disposition After Staged and Simultaneous Bilateral Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have bilateral hip arthritis can be treated with bilateral total hip arthroplasty (bTHA) in either a staged or simultaneous fashion. The goal of this study was to determine whether staged and simultaneous posterior bTHA patients differ in regard to (1) patient-reported outcome measures, (2) 90-day complication rates, and (3) discharge dispositions and cumulative lengths of stay. METHODS: Patients who (1) underwent simultaneous bTHA or staged bTHA (within 12 months) using the posterior approach, and (2) completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement surveys were included in the study. A total of 266 patients (87 simultaneous bTHA and 179 staged bTHA) were included. Chart review was performed to collect patient-level variables, postoperative complications, discharge dispositions, and lengths of stay. RESULTS: Staged bTHA patients had higher Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey physical component scores compared to simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery (P = .019, .006, and .008, respectively), but these differences did not meet the minimal clinically important difference threshold for any questionnaire. Simultaneous bTHA was associated with higher rate of periprosthetic fractures (P = .034) and discharge to a location other than home (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There were statistically significant, but likely not clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes for staged and simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the higher periprosthetic fracture risk and greater likelihood of discharge to a rehabilitation facility associated with simultaneous bTHA. Further research should aim to understand which patients may benefit most from simultaneous bTHA.

One-stage vs two-stage bilateral THA in Lombardy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most common treatment for primary and secondary end-stage hip osteoarthritis (OA). Almost 20% of all patients undergoing primary THA suffer from bilateral hip OA and, consequently, will need a contralateral procedure to be performed in the following years. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and the reliability of one-stage bilateral THA (1-BTHA) compared to two-stage bilateral THA (2-BTHA), in low-risk patients, performed with anterior minimally invasive surgery (AMIS). METHODS: Single patient's costs were obtained by dividing the annual costs report by the number of hospitalizations, considering the diagnosis related group (DRG) of the two procedures. Then, 16 patients undergoing 1-BTHA and 8 undergoing 2-BTHA were examined. Hemoglobin (Hb) values before surgery and before discharge, transfusion rate and the occurrence of post-operative complications were observed. RESULTS: Procedural costs were divided in different subgroups: pre-hospitalization, operating room, hospital stay, post-operative follow-up and other costs. 1-BTHA total costs amount to 5.754,82€, while performing 2-BTHA costs 7.624,32€. However, considering DRG reimbursement, the hospital's profit margin following 1-BTHA is lower than that following 2-BTHA (6.346,18€ versus 9.261,68€). Surgical time was found not to be significantly different between 1-BTHA and 2-BTHA (141,13 ± 26,1 min vs 164,8 ± 44,3 min; p = 0,111). The two groups showed a statistically significant difference in Hb decrease (4,8 ± 1,3 g/dl vs 3,3 ± 0,9; p = 0,001), despite no variances in transfusion rate. No further complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates how, in carefully selected patients, 1-BTHA performed with AMIS is a cost-effective and safe technique compared to 2-BTHA, resulting in a shorter OR time, LOS and lower overall costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Contralateral Total Hip Arthroplasty Staged Within Six Weeks Increases the Risk of Adverse Events Compared to Unilateral Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The ideal timing for bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. This study compared 90-day outcomes after simultaneous bilateral THA and contralateral surgery in staged bilateral THA to a matched cohort of unilateral procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary, elective THA during 2015 to 2020 were reviewed in a national database. Of the 273,281 patients identified, 39,905 (14.6%) were bilateral. Patients were divided into cohorts of unilateral THA, simultaneous bilateral THA, and staged bilateral THA at 1 to 14 days, 15 to 42 days, 43 to 90 days, and 91 to 365 days. Bilateral THA cohorts were matched with unilateral THA patients based on demographics and comorbidities. Ninety-day outcomes after the second THA were compared between matched groups. RESULTS: Simultaneous bilateral THA resulted in higher rates of transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 4.43, 95% confidence interval 2.31-2.63, P < .001), readmission (OR 2.60, 2.01-3.39, P < .001), and any complication (OR 1.86, 1.55-2.24, P < .001) compared to unilateral THA. Contralateral THA staged at 1 to 14 days increased the risk of readmission (OR 1.83, 1.49-2.24, P < .001) and any complication (OR 1.45, 1.26-1.66, P < .001) relative to unilateral THA. Contralateral THA staged at 15 to 42 days increased the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (OR 3.15, 1.98-5.19, P < .001), readmission (OR 1.92, 1.55-2.39, P < .001), and any complication (OR 1.70, 1.46-1.97, P < .001). Contralateral THA staged beyond 42 days resulted in similar or decreased rates of adverse events relative to unilateral THA. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral THA should be staged a minimum of 6 weeks apart in appropriately selected patients to avoid an increased risk of adverse events after the second THA compared to unilateral THA.

Increased Complication Risk Associated With Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Contemporary, Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (sbTHA) continues to be performed in patients who have bilateral end-stage osteoarthritis. However, few studies have evaluated the risk associated with this practice compared to unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Using a large national database, primary, elective sbTHAs, and unilateral THAs were identified from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021. The sbTHAs were matched to unilateral THAs at a 1:5 ratio on age, sex, and pertinent comorbidities. Patient characteristics and comorbidities, and hospital factors were compared between both cohorts. Additionally, 90-day risk of postoperative complications, readmissions, and in-hospital deaths were assessed. After matching, 2,913 sbTHAs were compared to 14,565 unilateral THAs with an average age of 58.5 ± 10.0 years. RESULTS: Compared to unilateral patients, sbTHA patients demonstrated higher rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) (0.4 versus 0.2%, P = .002), acute renal failure (1.2 versus 0.7%, P = .007), acute blood loss anemia (30.4 versus 16.7%, P < .001), and need for transfusion (6.6 versus 1.8%, P < .001). After accounting for confounders, sbTHA patients demonstrated increased risk of PE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.76, 95% CI: 1.84 to 7.70, P < .001), acute renal failure (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.72, P = .003), acute blood loss anemia (aOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 2.10 to 2.53, P < .001), and transfusion (aOR: 4.08, 95% CI: 3.35 to 4.98, P < .001) compared to unilateral THA patients. CONCLUSION: The practice of performing sbTHA was associated with an increased risk of PE, acute renal failure, and risk of transfusion. Careful evaluation of patient-specific risk factors is warranted when considering these bilateral procedures.

Is simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty deleterious in a biomechanical point of view? A comparative gait analysis study.

PURPOSE: Uni- or bilateral hip osteoarthritis is a common disease generating pain, stiffness, and functional disabilities. Changes in the normal walking with higher energy expenditures are observed. Facing a cruel lack of biomechanical data, we decided to analyse the impact on the walking of single and simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties (THA). METHOD: We conducted a prospective monocentric study, comparing two matched groups of 15 patients able to walk with symptomatic isolated uni- (group 1) or bilateral HO (group 2) and treated respectively by unilateral THA (UTHA) or simultaneous bilateral THA (SBTHA). Surgery was performed by a single surgeon with a direct anterior approach and approved by local ethical committee. Walking was assessed by a « 3D Gait analysis motion¼ pre and at 6 months post operatively. RESULT: In the UTHA group, recovery, i.e., efficiency of locomotor mechanism (p < 0.001) and pelvis sagittal balance (p = 0.031) improved, while external and total work (p = 0.010) decreased post operatively. In the SBTHA group, speed (p = 0.035), step length (p = 0.046), range of motion of knee sagittal stance (p = 0.009) and hip frontal (p = 0.031), and internal work are significatively higher (p < 0.001) post operatively. CONCLUSIONS: This original study attests that THA has a positive impact on walking and energetics outcome in UTHA and SBTHA.

Are Functional Outcomes of a Total Hip Arthroplasty Predictive of a Contralateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Current literature suggests that 8%-35% of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) undergo a subsequent contralateral THA. This study aims to determine if functional outcomes after primary THA predict outcomes in the subsequent primary THA of the contralateral side. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients undergoing staged bilateral primary THA was reviewed. The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was utilized as the functional outcome measurement tool and was assessed preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed. Based on the first-side THA one-year outcomes, the odds of maintaining an MCID, or not, for the second-side THA were determined. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 551 patients and 1102 primary THAs. The average postoperative OHSs were similar after the first and second THA. Patients achieving the MCID with the first-side surgery were 2.6 times (95% confidence interval 1.0 to 6.64, P = .04) more likely to achieve the MCID for the second-side surgery than patients failing to reach the MCID for their first-side surgery. After the first THA, 29 (5.3%) patients failed to reach the predefined MCID for the OHS compared with 54 (9.8%) patients undergoing their second THA (odds ratio: 1.96 [95% confidence interval: 1.23 to 3.1], χ2 = 8.14, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes after the first THA are predictive of functional outcomes of the second THA. Patients are more likely to achieve a clinically significant improvement after their first THA related to higher preoperative OHSs before the second THA.

Synchronous or sequential cementless bilateral total hip arthroplasty for osseous ankylosed hips with ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral osseous ankylosed hips secondary to ankylosis spondylitis (AS) are relatively rare but impact the quality of life hugely. Cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) for bilateral osseous ankylosed hips with AS is a challenging procedure. No previous literature compares the clinical outcomes of synchronous and sequential bilateral THA for these special patients. METHODS: 23 patients (46 hips) were retrospectively analyzed and divided into bilateral THA synchronously (group A) and sequentially (group B). The clinical measurement, radiological assessments, and complications were compared. Independent sample T test was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Harris Hip Scores (HHS) improved greatly for both groups (P = 0.58) as well as the range of motion (P = 0.64). But group B can realize shorter time (3.6 ± 1.2 days) to walk for the first time postoperatively (P = 0.02). Group A needed more blood transfusions (P = 0.028). For group A, no statistical difference was found in the bilateral inclination of cup (IC) (P = 0.48) and femoral offset (FO) (P = 0.07). For group B, no statistical difference was observed in bilateral IC (P = 0.37) but in bilateral FO (P = 0.04). Group A showed the fewer difference of bilateral IC (P = 0.02), while comparative measurements were found for two groups in the difference of bilateral FO (P = 0.78) and leg length discrepancy (P = 0.83). For both groups, the total hospital expense for each patient was similar and almost all patients were very satisfied with the outcomes. For group A, one patient encountered femoral fracture intraoperatively and another patient encountered hip dislocation and delay union of wound. 3 hips from group A and 3 hips from group B encountered heterotopic ossification. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective research demonstrated that cementless bilateral THA was a reliable treatment for osseous ankylosed hip due to AS. Synchronous and sequential bilateral THA can realize similarly satisfactory clinical outcomes and radiographic evaluation.

Comparison of tapered-wedge short and standard-length femoral stems in single-stage bilateral direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare short and standard-length tapered-wedge-type femoral stems in single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) through a direct anterior approach (DAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups according to their femoral stem types as short tapered-wedge stem and standard-length tapered-wedge stem groups. Outcome parameters were the surgical time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), thigh pain, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) score clinically, and canal fill ratio (CFR), coronal plan alignment of the stems, subsidence, and postoperative leg length difference (LLD), radiologically. RESULTS: The short-stem group and standard-length-stem group consisted of 20 patients (40 hips, mean age 52.0 ± 14.1) and 22 patients (44 hips, mean age 49.4 ± 11.9), respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean surgical times (p = 0.6), EBL (p = 0.2), LOS (p = 0.2), the rate of thigh pain (p = 0.4), improvements in HHS (p = 0.4) and VAS scores (p = 0.6), LLD (p = 0.3), amount of subsidence (p = 0.9), and varus or valgus misalignment (p = 0.7). The CFR at the level of the lesser trochanter was significantly higher in the short-stem group (0.79 ± 0.1) than the standard-length-stem group (0.73 ± 0.1) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In single-stage bilateral THA through DAA, short, tapered-wedge femoral stems provide similar radiographic and functional results to standard stems at short-term follow-up.

Bilateral total hip arthroplasty through minimally invasive direct anterior approach after Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Bilateral secondary osteoarthritis of the hip may affect also young patients following bilateral hip diseases such as slipped capital femoral epiphysis and developmental hip dysplasia. We report the case of an 18- year old male with a previous diagnosis of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease who underwent a bilateral total hip arthroplasty through minimally invasive direct anterior approach, with optimal results at 1-year follow up.

Bundled Payments Are Effective in Reducing Costs Following Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Alternative payment models such the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative have been effective in reducing costs following unilateral total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), but few studies exist on bilateral arthroplasty. This study aimed to determine whether the BPCI program for bilateral THA and TKA reduced episode-of-care costs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral primary THA and TKA between 2015 and 2016. We recorded demographic variables, comorbidities, readmissions, and calculated 90-day episode-of-care costs based on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data. We compared data from patients before and after the start of our BPCI program, and performed a multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for increased costs. RESULTS: Of 319 patients, 38 underwent bilateral THA (12%) while 287 underwent bilateral TKA (88%). There were 239 patients (74%) in the bundled payment group. Although there was no change in readmission rate (9% vs 8%), the post-BPCI group demonstrated reduced hospital costs ($21,251 vs $18,783), post-acute care costs ($15,488 vs $12,439), and overall 90-day episode-of-care costs ($39,733 vs $34,305). When controlling for demographics, procedure, and comorbidities, our BPCI model demonstrated a per-patient reduction of $5811 in overall claims costs. Additional risk factors for increased episode-of-care costs included age ($516/y increase) and cardiac disease ($5916). CONCLUSION: Our bundled payment program for bilateral THA and TKA was successful with reduction in 90-day episode-of-care costs without placing the patient at higher risk of readmission. Older Medicare beneficiaries and those with cardiac disease should likely not undergo a simultaneous bilateral procedure due to concerns about increased costs.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Blood Transfusion in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors for blood transfusion in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA) and simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA). METHODS: We identified 414 SBTHA and 1147 SBTKA procedures, and separated the patients into those who did and did not require allogeneic blood transfusion. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factors for transfusion. RESULTS: The transfusion rate after SBTHA was 50.0%, and significant risk factors for transfusion were female gender (odds ratio [OR] = 2.612), lower body mass index (OR = 1.093), inflammatory arthritis (OR = 1.970), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥3 (OR = 3.477), drain use (OR = 4.607), and increased intraoperative bleeding. We also found that higher preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and tranexamic acid use decreased the risk of transfusion. The transfusion rate after SBTKA was 29.1%, and significant risk factors for transfusion were ASA class ≥3 (OR = 8.959), tourniquet use (OR = 2.129), drain use (OR = 4.970), and increased intraoperative bleeding. A higher preoperative Hb was the only protective factor for transfusion. CONCLUSION: For SBTHA, the risk factors included female gender, lower body mass index, inflammatory arthritis, ASA class ≥3, drain use, and increased intraoperative bleeding, while for SBTKA, risk factors were ASA class ≥3, tourniquet use, drain use, and increased intraoperative bleeding. Increasing the preoperative Hb level may decrease transfusion risk. In addition, tranexamic acid was encouraged to use to decrease transfusion need in SBTHA.

No Difference in Total Episode-of-Care Cost Between Staged and Simultaneous Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Due to concerns about higher complication rates, surgeons debate whether to perform simultaneous bilateral total joint arthroplasty (BTJA), particularly in the higher-risk Medicare population. Advances in pain management and rehabilitation protocols have called into question older studies that found an overall cost benefit for simultaneous procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare 90-day episode-of-care costs between staged and simultaneous BTJA among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 319 simultaneous primary TJAs and 168 staged TJAs (336 procedures) at our institution between 2015 and 2016. We recorded demographics, comorbidities, readmission rates, and 90-day episode-of-care costs based upon Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data. To control for confounding variables, we performed a multivariate regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for increased costs. RESULTS: Simultaneous patients had decreased inpatient facility costs ($19,402 vs $23,025, P < .001), increased post-acute care costs ($13,203 vs $10,115, P < .001), and no difference in total episode-of-care costs ($35,666 vs $37,238, P = .541). Although there was no difference in readmissions (8% vs 9%, P = .961), simultaneous bilateral patients were more likely to experience a thromboembolic event (2% vs 0%, P = .003). When controlling for demographics, procedure, and comorbidities, a simultaneous surgery was not associated with an increase in episode-of-care costs (P = .544). Independent risk factors for increased episode-of-care costs following BTJA included age ($394 per year increase, P < .001), cardiac disease ($4877, P = .025), history of stroke ($14,295, P = .010), and liver disease ($12,515, P = .016). CONCLUSION: In the Medicare population, there is no difference in 90-day episode-of-care costs between simultaneous and staged BTJA. Surgeons should use caution in performing a simultaneous procedure on older patients or those with a history of stroke, cardiac, or liver disease.

Bilateral Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Average 10-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: The present study investigates the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with all 4 major lower extremity joints replaced. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institution's database identified 125 patients in whom both hips and both knees were replaced. The mean time between the first and last arthroplasty was 6.6 years. Preoperative diagnoses included osteoarthritis in 80% and rheumatoid arthritis in 20%. The average age at the time of the first arthroplasty was 63.7 years. The mean follow-up for all arthroplasties was 10.5 years (range 2-31 years). Patients were then matched according to age, gender, diagnosis, prosthesis, and follow-up, to patients with single or bilateral total hip or total knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: There were 11 aseptic hip revisions (4.4%) and 3 aseptic knee revisions (1.2%). At final follow-up, 86% of hips and 83% of knees were rated with no or mild pain, 68% of patients rated walking as unlimited, and 98% of patients were able to satisfactorily negotiate stairs. Aseptic survivorship for all joint arthroplasties was 93.8% at 15 years. No statistical differences were noted in pain, function, stair, and walking scores between the matched groups. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrated excellent clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes in patients with all 4 major lower extremity joints replaced. Walking aids were needed in 15% of patients, however. At final follow-up, this selected group of patients appears to fare just as well as patients with single or bilateral hip or knee arthroplasty with respect to pain and function.

The Direct Anterior Approach for 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: Early Outcome Analysis of a Single-Surgeon Case Series.

BACKGROUND: One-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty (B-THA) is rarely performed despite a 20% incidence of bilateral degenerative hip disease requiring surgical intervention. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated functional outcomes in 22 consecutive patients undergoing B-THA with a matched cohort undergoing unilateral THA by the same surgeon using the direct anterior approach. RESULTS: Although there was a significant difference in blood loss (P < .01) and surgical time (P < .001), there was no difference in length of hospital stay (P = .09), number of discharges to a rehabilitation facility (P = .22), or postoperative Harris Hip scores (P = .75). CONCLUSIONS: Advances in blood loss and pain management protocols in association with the direct anterior approach should renew interest in the efficacy of 1-stage B-THA.

Perioperative morbidity and mortality following bilateral total hip arthroplasty.

There is concern about safety of bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA).This study aims to compare in-hospital complication rates between unilateral, simultaneous and staged bilateral THAs. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2002-2010 was used. Patients and complications were identified using ICD-9-CM codes. In multivariate analysis, bilateral THA had higher risk of systemic complications (Odds ratio (OR): 2.1, P<0.001) compared to unilateral procedure, whereas no significant difference existed between simultaneous and staged bilateral THAs. The rate of local complications was higher in bilateral versus unilateral (4.96% versus 4.54%, P=0.009) and in staged versus simultaneous bilateral THAs (OR: 1.75, P=0.05). Bilateral THA increases risk of systemic complications compared to unilateral surgery and simultaneous bilateral THA appears to be safer than staging during one hospitalization.

Primary Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Patient With Short Stature and Hartofilakidis Type I Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Syndromes associated with osteochondrodysplasia, short stature, and DDH are rarely reported in the literature. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in such cases is a complex procedure with a high rate of complications and difficulties. In this case report, we describe the staged bilateral complex primary THA of a patient with the rare occurrence of a syndrome involving osteochondrodysplasia and DDH, highlighting the surgical challenges and importance of the right prosthesis selection.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Early Complications Between a Direct Anterior Approach or Posterolateral Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Controversies remain on the best surgical approaches for unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). There are little data on simultaneous bilateral THA via direct anterior approach (SimBDAA-THA) or posterolateral approach (SimBPA-THA). Purpose: We sought to assess differences in perioperative outcomes and early medical and surgical complications between SimBDAA-THA and SimBPA-THA. Methods: This retrospective study involved patients who underwent either SimBDAA-THA in a supine position (n = 73) or SimBPA-THA in a lateral position (n = 162) at our institution from January 2015 to November 2021. The 2 groups were compared in terms of clinical and demographic characteristics, surgical parameters, and complications during 6-months of follow-up. Results: There were no differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between the 2 groups prior to surgery. Simultaneous bilateral THA via direct anterior approach significantly shortened the length of both the operation (117.50 ±19.42 vs 143.97 ± 32.20 min) and the hospitalization (140.64 ± 43.22 vs 156.24 ± 56.64 h) but increased perioperative loss of hemoglobin (3.28 ± 1.01 vs 3.21 ± 2.26 g/dL). There were no significant differences between the two groups in transfusion rate; levels of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein or creatine kinase; or complications. Conclusion: This retrospective study of patients at a single institution found minimal differences in perioperative outcomes or early medical and surgical complications between SimBDAA-THA and SimBPA-THA except operative time and length of hospitalization. Larger studies with longer follow-up should be conducted to identify whether a direct anterior approach is superior to a posterolateral one.

Component Asymmetry in Bilateral Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: This study investigated the results of component asymmetry (CA) in bilateral cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: This study included 300 patients, who underwent bilateral cementless THA between April 2000 and December 2017. They were divided into the component symmetry (CS) and CA groups; CA group was sub-classified into acetabular component asymmetry (ACA) and femoral component asymmetry (FCA). Radiologic and clinical outcomes of the CA group were compared with those of the CS group. Results: The incidence of CA was 25.7% (77/300 patients), including 55 patients with ACA, 34 patients with FCA, and 12 with both components asymmetric. The mean time interval between operations in the CA group was significantly longer than that in the CS group (p < 0.001). The mean differences in horizontal and vertical distances from teardrop to the center of rotation of the acetabular component between both hips in the ACA group were significantly larger than those in the CS group (p = 0.033 and p < 0.001, respectively). The mean femoral component alignment angle difference between both hips was significantly larger in the FCA group than in the CS group (p < 0.001). The mean Harris Hip Score at last follow-up of the CA group was similar to that of the CS group. Conclusions: CA in patients undergoing bilateral cementless THA was not rare, especially with a longer time interval between operations. Regardless of CA, when stable fixation of the components was achieved, satisfactory radiologic and clinical outcomes were obtained.