Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Sex Med ; 21(6): 529-532, 2024 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660738

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intracavernosal injection therapy (ICI) is a well-established therapeutic strategy for men with erectile dysfunction. Complications are often related to patient error when performong ICI. AIM: The objective of this study was to examine patient errors in an established patient training program for performing ICI and identify factors that could predict major errors. METHODS: Patients enrolled in our ICI program are trained on technical aspects, and dose titration is begun. Patients are given explicit instructions during training, both verbally and in written form. Records were reviewed for men using ICI for ≥6 months. Multivariable analysis was used to define predictors of major errors. OUTCOMES: Errors were listed as minor (zero-response injection, penile bruising, expired medication) and major (errors potentially leading to priapism: dose self-titration, double injecting). RESULTS: Overall, 1368 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean patient age was 66 ± 22 (range 29-91) years. Regarding education, 41% of patients had graduate-level education, 48% had college education, and 11% high school education. Mean follow-up was 3.2 ± 7.6 (range 0.5-12) years. The agents used were trimix (62%), bimix (35%), papaverine (2%), and prostaglandin E1 monotherapy (1%). At least 1 error occurred during self-administration in 42% of patients during their time in the program. Errors included zero response to medication due to technical error (8% of patients), penile bruising (34%), use of an expired bottle (18%), self-titration (5%), and double injecting (4% of patients); 12% of men committed ≥1 error during their time in the program. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of the occurrence of a major error included: young age, graduate-level education, and <12 months of injection use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported study to investigate ICI errors and risk factors. The identification of factors predictive of major errors allows for more tailored and intensive training in this subset of patients. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of this study include a large patient population (1386 men) with a considerable follow-up time. Additionally, the rigorous training, education, and monitoring of the participants, as well as the use of formal definitions, enhances the accuracy and reliability of the results. Despite the strengths of the study, recall bias may be a limitation concern. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients were error free, and the majority of the errors were minor in nature. Major errors occurred in <10% of patients. Younger age, graduate-level education, and less experience with ICI were independent predictors of major errors.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Injeções , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Papaverina/administração & dosagem , Pênis/anatomia & histologia , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Priapismo
2.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 24(8): 925-933, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37078428

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to attain and/or maintain a penile erection. The first introduction of intracavernosal injection (ICI) for the treatment of erectile failure was in 1982 by Virag who reported the positive effects of papaverine on erectile tissue, followed by Brindley concurrently conducting research on ICI therapy with alpha-blockade. ICI remains a viable option for the treatment of ED, even after FDA approval of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in 1998. The American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) both recommend ICI as a second-line therapy for the treatment of ED. We herein provide an overview of the current state of ICI therapy for the treatment of ED. AREAS COVERED: We performed a literature review from 1977-2022, using PubMed and the current AUA and EAU guidelines to discuss the current state of ICI for the treatment of ED. EXPERT OPINION: Although other oral agents are considered first line for the treatment of ED, the current guidelines and literature demonstrate that ICI is a safe and effective option for patients; however, careful patient selection and counseling should be performed to maximize the effectiveness and safety of this ED treatment.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Masculino , Humanos , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Alprostadil/farmacologia , Papaverina/farmacologia , Ereção Peniana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA