Cardiac implantable electronic devices in female patients: Esthetic, breast implant, and anatomic considerations.

INTRODUCTION: The implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) can have esthetic and psychological consequences on patients. We explore a heart team model for care coordination and discuss esthetic approaches for improved cosmetic outcomes in patients undergoing (CIED)-related procedures or de novo implantation. METHODS: Patients undergoing CIED surgery for approved indications between June 2015 and June 2022 were identified. Patients were included when surgical care was provided by a collaborative relationship between the primary electrophysiologist and the plastic surgeon. Patient demographics, details of the surgical procedure, information on breast implants, complications, and outcomes related to cosmesis were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two female patients were included in this study. The mean age was 50.2 ± 18.2 years. The mean follow-up duration was 2.2 ± 5.5 months. The top two indications for the procedure included CIED generator change (n = 9, 41%) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation (n = 7, 32%). The most common reasons for involving plastic surgery in the procedure included surgery near breast implants (n = 10, 45%) and device displacement or discomfort (n = 8, 36%). CIED pocket position was prepectoral in 10 cases (45%), subpectoral in 11 patients (50%), and intramuscular in one patient (4.5%). The majority of the patients (20, 91%) had cosmetically acceptable results postprocedure. One patient (4.5%) had breast asymmetry on the CIED side, and another continued to have skin erosion over the CIED and leads. CONCLUSION: A heart team approach incorporating the expertize of cardiac electrophysiology and plastic surgery is essential for providing optimal care for patients with breast implants and patients requesting esthetic appeal.

Evidence-Based Data on the Diagnostic Role and Clinical Usefulness of [18F]FDG PET/CT in Endocarditis and Cardiac Device Infections.

Infective endocarditis and infection of cardiac devices are conditions characterized by high morbidity and mortality, thus requiring a prompt diagnosis. Advanced imaging modalities are often required in the management of infectious endocarditis according to guidelines. The aim of this review is to collect and describe evidence-based knowledge about the diagnostic role and clinical usefulness of [18F]FDG PET/CT in endocarditis and cardiac device infections based on published systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic and on recent guidelines. [18F]FDG PET/CT is recommended only in selected cases. This imaging method has good diagnostic accuracy in detecting prosthetic valve endocarditis and cardiac device infection. Furthermore, it can identify extra-cardiac infectious foci changing the clinical management in a significant percentage of cases.

Investigating the Cost-Effectiveness of Telemonitoring Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Telemonitoring patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can improve their care management. However, the results of cost-effectiveness studies are heterogeneous. Therefore, it is still a matter of debate whether telemonitoring is worth the investment. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to investigate the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring patients with CIEDs, focusing on its key drivers, and the impact of the varying perspectives. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and EconLit. The search was completed on July 7, 2022. Studies were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: patients had a CIED, comparison with standard care, and inclusion of health economic evaluations (eg, cost-effectiveness analyses and cost-utility analyses). Only complete and peer-reviewed studies were included, and no year limits were applied. The exclusion criteria included studies with partial economic evaluations, systematic reviews or reports, and studies without standard care as a control group. Besides general study characteristics, the following outcome measures were extracted: impact on total cost or income, cost or income drivers, cost or income drivers per patient, cost or income drivers as a percentage of the total cost impact, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, or cost-utility ratios. Quality was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria checklist. RESULTS: Overall, 15 cost-effectiveness analyses were included. All studies were performed in Western countries, mainly Europe, and had primarily a male participant population. Of the 15 studies, 3 (20%) calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, 1 (7%) the cost-utility ratio, and 11 (73%) the health and cost impact of telemonitoring. In total, 73% (11/15) of the studies indicated that telemonitoring of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy ICDs was cost-effective and cost-saving, both from a health care and patient perspective. Cost-effectiveness results for telemonitoring of patients with pacemakers were inconclusive. The key drivers for cost reduction from a health care perspective were hospitalizations and scheduled in-office visits. Hospitalization costs were reduced by up to US $912 per patient per year. Scheduled in-office visits included up to 61% of the total cost reduction. Key drivers for cost reduction from a patient perspective were loss of income, cost for scheduled in-office visits and transport. Finally, of the 15 studies, 8 (52%) reported improved quality of life, with statistically significance in only 1 (13%) study (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: From a health care and patient perspective, telemonitoring of patients with an ICD or a cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD is a cost-effective and cost-saving alternative to standard care. Inconclusive results were found for patients with pacemakers. However, telemonitoring can lead to a decrease in providers' income, mainly due to a lack of reimbursement. Introducing appropriate reimbursement could make telemonitoring sustainable for providers while still being cost-effective from a health care payer perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022322334; https://tinyurl.com/puunapdr.

Development of a carpark cardiac implantable electronic device clinic to improve time efficiency and patient satisfaction in the context of restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated time efficiency and patient satisfaction of a "car park clinic" (CPC) compared to traditional face-to-face (F2F) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Consecutive patients attending CPC between September 2020 and November 2021 were surveyed. CPC time was recorded by staff. F2F time was reported by patients and administrative data. RESULTS: A total of 591 patients attended the CPC. A total of 176 responses were collected for F2F clinic. Regarding satisfaction, 90% of CPC patients responded "happy" or "very happy." 96% reported feeling "safe" or "very safe." Patients spent significantly less time in CPC compared to F2F (17 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 24 min, p < .001). CONCLUSION: CPC had excellent patient satisfaction and superior time efficiency compared to F2F.

Transvenous lead extraction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A comprehensive outcome-and risk factor analysis.

BACKGROUND: Device complications, such as infection or lead dysfunction necessitating transvenous lead extraction (TLE) are continuously rising amongst patients with transvenous implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to characterize the procedural outcome and risk-factors of patients with indwelling 1- and 2-chamber ICD undergoing TLE. METHODS: We conducted a subgroup analysis of all ICD patients in the GALLERY (GermAn Laser Lead Extraction RegistrY) database. Predictors for procedural failure and all-cause mortality were assessed. RESULTS: We identified 842 patients with an ICD undergoing TLE with the mean age of 62.8 ± 13.8 years. A total number of 1610 leads were treated with lead dysfunction (48.5%) as leading indication for extraction, followed by device-related infection (45.4%). Lead-per-patient ratio was 1.91 ± 0.88 and 60.0% of patients had dual-coil defibrillator leads. Additional extraction tools, such as mechanical rotating dilator sheaths and snares were utilized in 6.5% of cases. Overall procedural complications occurred in 4.3% with 2.0% major complications and a procedure-related mortality of 0.8%. Clinical success rate was 97.9%. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 3.4%, with sepsis being the leading cause for mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed lead-age ≥10 years (OR:5.82, 95%CI:2.1-16.6; p = .001) as independent predictor for procedural failure. Systemic infection (OR:9.57, 95%CI:2.2-42.4; p < .001) and procedural complications (OR:8.0, 95%CI:2.8-23.3; p < .001) were identified as risk factors for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TLE is safe and efficacious in patients with 1- and 2-chamber ICD. Although lead dysfunction is the leading indication for extraction, systemic device-related infection is the main driver of all-cause mortality for ICD patients undergoing TLE.

Emerging Concepts on Infection of Novel Cardiac Implantable Devices.

Novel cardiac devices, including the MitraClip system, occluder devices, leadless pacemakers, and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD), are mostly used in the management of patients who are at high risk for surgery and/or developing infections. Several mechanisms render most of these devices resistant to infection, including avoiding long transvenous access and novel manufacturing material. Since subjects who use these devices already endure several comorbid conditions, uncommon cases of device-associated infection could result in serious complications and increased mortality. In this review, we aim to summarize the current state of evidence on the incidence, clinical presentation, management, and prognosis of new cardiac devices' associated infection.

Predictors for the detection of arrhythmia requiring pacemaker/ICD implantation-Results from a loop recorder study.

BACKGROUND: There are few large studies on which factors are associated with the occurrence of arrhythmias. Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are useful in detecting arrhythmia due to prolonged and continuous ECG monitoring. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify and evaluate clinical characteristics and ECG parameters for predicting arrhythmias requiring pacemaker/ICD implantation by analyzing a study cohort with ILR. METHODS: This bicentric study comprised a study cohort of 451 patients (mean age 64 ± 16 years, 209 women) receiving ILR implantation between 2011 and 2021. Patients were followed up on a 3 monthly outpatient interval. All arrhythmias with a pacemaker or ICD indication were considered clinically relevant. The primary study endpoint was the detection of clinically relevant arrhythmia. RESULTS: During a follow up of 678 ± 392 days, a clinically relevant arrhythmia was detected in 81 of 451 patients (18%). Multivariate analysis revealed five independent risk factors: coronary artery disease (HR 1.954, CI 1.077-3.546, p = .028), atrial fibrillation (HR 2.253, CI 1.201-4.228, p = .011), previous syncope (HR 6.404, CI 3.202-12.808, p < .001), right bundle branch block (HR 4.370, CI 2.215-8.621, p < .001) and left bundle branch block (HR 2.685, CI 1.116-6.461, p = .028). Our risk model, based on these independent predictors, divided the study cohort into patients with low (2%), intermediate (18%), medium (34%), and high (45%) risk for clinically relevant arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: By the use of ILR, a clinically relevant arrhythmia has been detected in almost one fifth of the study cohort. In addition, clinical and electrocardiographic parameters were shown to be suitable predictors of clinically relevant arrhythmia.

Device-detected nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in adult congenital heart disease without tetralogy of fallot.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate any association between non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) detected by intra-cardiac device and clinical outcomes in repaired adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) without tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). BACKGROUND: NSVT portends a higher risk of serious ventricular tachyarrhythmia in TOF. However its clinical significance when incidentally detected by implantable cardiac device is not well elucidated in non-TOF ACHD cohort. METHODS: We performed a single center, retrospective, longitudinal follow-up study in repaired ACHD (≥18 years) patients without TOF who hosted a pacemaker or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator (AICD). The cohort was divided based on presence/absence of device detected NSVT. The primary end-point was a composite of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), or sudden cardiac death (SCD). RESULTS: One hundred fifty eight patients (male 56.3%, median [IQR] age of 35 [28-43] years at last follow-up] with longitudinal post-implant follow-up duration of 8 (5-12) years were included. NSVT was detected in 52 (33%) patients. The primary composite end-point was more frequent in NSVT group [11.5% vs. 2.8%; p = .04]. Patients with NSVT were (i) older at the time of initial implant (age 25 vs. 18 years, p = .011) and more frequently demonstrated (ii) systemic ventricular dysfunction (44% vs. 26%; p = .015), as well as (iii) history of ventriculotomy (38% vs. 21%; p = .017). CONCLUSIONS: In our repaired ACHD cohort, we noted a significant association between device-detected-NSVT and the primary composite end-point of sustained VT/VF or SCD. Systemic ventricular dysfunction and history of ventriculotomy were more frequent in the NSVT group and likely constituted the clinical milieu.

Leadless AV pacemaker after RF ablation for treatment of bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia: A case report.

In the present article we report the case of a patient at high risk of infection wearing a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) due to previous system extractions, hospitalized for symptomatic BBR VT and underwent radiofrequency catheter (RF) ablation. Afterwards, to prevent the possible progression of the infra-His conduction disease to a complete block, it was decided to implant a pacemaker system. Since the high infectious risk, and the patient's firm refusal to implant another transvenous system given the previous extractions he underwent in the past, it was decided to implant a leadless pacemaker with atrioventricular synchrony.

Totally peripheral approach for ICD lead vegetation removal in a GUCH patient.

AngioVac system (AngioDynamics) has already proved to be a useful tool in the treatment of thrombotic and endocarditic formations concerning the venous district. Herein, the AngioVac aspiration system combined with the bidirectional rotational Evolution mechanical sheath lead extraction was used for an effective and safety cardiac-device-related-infective-endocarditis removal in a grown-up congenital heart disease patient through a totally peripheral approach.

Sudden cardiac death in dialysis patients: different causes and management strategies.

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) represents a major cause of death in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The precise estimate of its incidence is difficult to establish because studies on the incidence of SCD in ESKD are often combined with those related to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) occurring during a haemodialysis (HD) session. The aim of the European Dialysis Working Group of ERA-EDTA was to critically review the current literature examining the causes of extradialysis SCD and intradialysis SCA in ESKD patients and potential management strategies to reduce the incidence of such events. Extradialysis SCD and intradialysis SCA represent different clinical situations and should be kept distinct. Regarding the problem, numerically less relevant, of patients affected by intradialysis SCA, some modifiable risk factors have been identified, such as a low concentration of potassium and calcium in the dialysate, and some advantages linked to the presence of automated external defibrillators in dialysis units have been documented. The problem of extra-dialysis SCD is more complex. A reduced left ventricular ejection fraction associated with SCD is present only in a minority of cases occurring in HD patients. This is the proof that SCD occurring in ESKD has different characteristics compared with SCD occurring in patients with ischaemic heart disease and/or heart failure and not affected by ESKD. Recent evidence suggests that the fatal arrhythmia in this population may be due more frequently to bradyarrhythmias than to tachyarrhythmias. This fact may partly explain why several studies could not demonstrate an advantage of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in preventing SCD in ESKD patients. Electrolyte imbalances, frequently present in HD patients, could explain part of the arrhythmic phenomena, as suggested by the relationship between SCD and timing of the HD session. However, the high incidence of SCD in patients on peritoneal dialysis suggests that other risk factors due to cardiac comorbidities and uraemia per se may contribute to sudden mortality in ESKD patients.

The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus as the primary cause of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Increasing use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), as permanent pacemakers (PPM), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), is associated with the emergence of CIED-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE). We aimed to characterize CIED-IE profile, temporal trends, and prognostic factors. METHODS: CIED-IE diagnosed at Rennes University Hospital during years 1992-2017 were identified through computerized database, and included if they presented all of the following: (1) clinical signs of infection; (2) microbiological documentation through blood and/or CIED lead cultures; (3) lead or valve vegetation, or definite IE according to Duke criteria. Data were retrospectively extracted from medical charts. The cohort was categorized in three periods: 1992-1999, 2000-2008, and 2009-2017. RESULTS: We included 199 patients (51 women, 148 men, median age 73 years [interquartile range, 64-79]), with CIED-IE: 158 PPMs (79%), 24 ICD (12%), and 17 CRT (9%). Main pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS: n = 86, 43%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 60, 30%), and other Gram-positive cocci (n = 28, 14%). Temporal trends were remarkable for the decline in CoNS (P = 0.002), and the emergence of S. aureus as the primary cause of CIED-IE (24/63 in 2009-2017, 38%). Factors independently associated with one-year mortality were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD: hazard ratio 3.84 [1.03-6.02], P = 0.03), left-sided endocarditis (HR 2.25 [1.09-4.65], P = 0.03), pathogens other than CoNS (HR 3.16 [1.19-8.39], P = 0.02), and CIED removal/reimplantation (HR 0.41 [0.20-0.83], P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: S. aureus has emerged as the primary cause of CIED-IE. Left-sided endocarditis, COPD, pathogens other than CoNS, and no CIED removal/reimplantation are independent risk factors for one-year mortality.

Management of patients explanted for implantable cardioverter defibrillator infections: Bridge therapy with external temporary ICD.

AIMS AND METHODS: In case of cardiacimplantable electronicdevice (CIED)-related infections, it is mandatory to completely remove the device and administer prolonged antibiotic therapy. The management of patients explanted for an implantable defibrillator (ICD) infection is complex especially in patients needing anti-bradycardia pacing or tachyarrhythmia protection. We tested the efficacy and safety of a conventional ICD externally connected to a transvenous dual-coil lead as bridging therapy before the reimplant, comparing outcomes with a historical cohort of patients (N = 113) treated with temporary transvenous pacing. We enrolled 18 patients explanted for ICD infection and needing prolonged antibiotic therapy in three high-volume Italian centers. They received an external ICD stand-by for a mean of 16.5 (4-30) days before the reimplant. RESULTS: No patient experienced malfunction of the system, with a significant reduction of this complication versus temporary transfemoral pacing (37%, p = .004). Post-procedural occurrence of other complications (infection, relevant local bleeding, ventricular tachycardia during insertion of the lead, cardiac perforation, and venous thromboembolism) was low and not different in the two groups. One patient experienced an electrical storm, effectively recognized by the external ICD and treated with anti-tachycardia pacings (ATPs) and shocks. CONCLUSIONS: An approach with an external ICD seems to be a safe and viable option as bridging therapy in patients requiring ICD explant for CIED infection.

Cardiac device implant wound closure with a novel low-density suture spacing single layer method.

BACKGROUND: To establish a novel time-saving and safe suture method for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. METHODS: From January 2017 to April 2020, a total of 1317 patients scheduled for CIED procedure were consecutively enrolled in this study. Wound closure of all patients were prospectively assigned either to low-density suture spacing single layer suture group (single-layer group) or traditional two layer suture group (two-layer group). The effects of two closure methods on wound healing and pocket related complications were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, comorbid diseases (diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and chronic kidney disease), and antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug use between the two groups. The number of suture stitches in the single-layer group was significantly less than that in the two-layer group [3.03(3-4) vs. 7.17(7-10), p < .001], the suture time in the single-layer group was significantly shorter than that in the two-layer group [190.57(167-256) s vs. 493.36(452-655) s, p < .001], and the incidence of clinically significant hematoma in the single-layer group was comparable to that in the two-layer group (0.7% vs. 0.3%, p = .742). Additionally, there were no significant differences in the incidence of pocket infection, dehiscence and keloid between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Novel single-layer suture with low-density suture spacing is feasible and associated with a low incidence of wound dehiscence or infection for CIED implantation.

Vital prostheses: Killing, letting die, and the ethics of de-implantation.

Disconnecting a patient from artificial life support, on their request, is often if not always a matter of letting them die, not killing them-and sometimes, permissibly doing so. Stopping a patient's heart on request, by contrast, is a kind of killing, and rarely if ever a permissible one. The difference seems to be that procedures of the first kind remove an unwanted external support for bodily functioning, rather than intervening in the body itself. What should we say, however, about cases at the boundary-procedures involving items that seem bodily in some respects, but not others? When, for instance, does deactivating an implanted device like a pacemaker count as killing, and when as letting die? Contra existing proposals, I argue that the boundaries of the body for this purpose are not drawn at the boundaries of the self, or (if this is different) the human organism. Nor should we determine when we are killing and when we are letting die by deferring to existing practices for distinguishing ongoing from completed treatment. Rather, I argue that whether something (organic or inorganic) counts as body part for purposes of this distinction depends on the results of a normative analysis of the particular character of our rights in it-particularly, whether and in what way these rights ought to be alienable. I conclude by arguing that there are likely good reasons to recognize distinctively "bodily" rights and restrictions in at least some implantable devices.

Local device infection successfully treated without pacemaker removal in a neonate: a case report.

AIMS: Local device infection is a serious complication, especially in neonates. Complete device removal is the gold standard treatment for cardiac device infection; however, in selected cases alternative strategies could be adopted. We describe a case of a 14-day-old neonate, weighing 2.5kg, who had undergone epicardial double chamber pacemaker implantation for a congenital complete atrioventricular block. The generator pocket was created in the epigastric area below the rectus abdominis. At six days after implantation, pocket infection was found; blood cultures and the transoesophageal echocardiogram were normal. Due to the low weight of the neonate, and the limited possibility of finding a new comfortable site for housing the generator far from the infected area, we opted for a conservative strategy. We successfully applied a combination of antibiotic therapy, a vacuum-assisted wound closure system (KCI, Germany) for 40 days, and then skin transfer flap from the right flank without device removal. At one-year follow-up there were no local or systemic signs of infection.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalisation in Patients With Intracardiac Device-Related Tricuspid Regurgitation.

INTRODUCTION: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a known complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). A better understanding of the patient population affected by this complication and their outcomes is needed. The aims of our study were to: 1) describe the incidence of CIED-related tricuspid regurgitation; 2) identify patient characteristics conferring risk; 3) assess the long-term risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and mortality in patients with this complication. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2,265 patients that had a de novo device implantation at a tertiary referral centre between January 2010 and December 2017. Patients with echocardiograms prior to and at least 3 months after device implantation were included. Patients with moderate or severe TR at baseline were excluded. RESULTS: Following screening of medical records, 165 patients were analysed. Forty-four (44) (27%) patients developed new-onset moderate or severe device-related TR, without a significant difference between patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Patients with CIED-related tricuspid regurgitation had a higher rate of hospitalisation for heart failure than those without (63.6% vs 34.7%, p=0.001) during a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 13-60 months). Subsequent analyses showed that the association between CIED-related TR and heart failure hospitalisation only became significant in the period beyond 12 months following CIED implantation. Piecewise Cox regression analysis stratified at 12 months of follow-up showed that CIED-related TR was associated with an increased risk of heart failure hospitalisation beyond 12 months after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.05-3.76, p=0.03). There was a higher mortality rate in the group with CIED-related TR; however, this did not reach significance (36.3% vs 22.3%, p=0.09). CONCLUSION: CIED-related TR is common and clinically significant with serious implications for long-term outcomes, especially congestive heart failure.

Predictors of Long-Term Infections After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Surgery　- Utility of Novel PADIT and PACE DRAP Scores.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device-related infections (CDI) are of increasing importance and involve substantial healthcare resources. This study aimed to evaluate potential CDI risk factors and the utility of the novel PADIT and PACE DRAP scores to predict CDI.Methods and Results:The study group included 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) surgery. Patients' and procedural characteristics were collected. CDI occurrence was assessed during 1-year follow-up. Moreover, if periprocedural significant pocket hematoma (SPH) occurred, the maximal volume was calculated based on ultrasonographic measurements and ABC/2 formula. The overall incidence of CDI was 1.8%. In the multivariable regression analysis independent CDI risk factors were: age >75 years (odds ratio [OR]: 5.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-19.84), system upgrade procedure (OR: 6.46; CI: 1.94-21.44), procedure duration >1 h (OR: 13.96; CI: 4.40-44.25), presence of SPH (OR: 4.95; CI: 1.62-15.13) and reintervention within 1 month (OR: 16.29; CI: 3.14-84.50). The PACE DRAP score had higher discrimination of CDI incidence (area under curve [AUC] 0.72) as compared with the PADIT score (AUC 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 5 independent risk factors of CDI development. Our study also showed that the PACE DRAP score was better able to identify patients at high risk of CDI than the PADIT score.

Novel methodology to measure pre-procedure antimicrobial prophylaxis: integrating text searches with structured data from the Veterans Health Administration's electronic medical record.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is an evidence-proven strategy for reducing procedure-related infections; however, measuring this key quality metric typically requires manual review, due to the way antimicrobial prophylaxis is documented in the electronic medical record (EMR). Our objective was to electronically measure compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis using both structured and unstructured data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA) EMR. We developed this methodology for cardiac device implantation procedures. METHODS: With clinician input and review of clinical guidelines, we developed a list of antimicrobial names recommended for the prevention of cardiac device infection. We trained the algorithm using existing fiscal year (FY) 2008-15 data from the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology (CART-EP), which contains manually determined information about antimicrobial prophylaxis. We merged CART-EP data with EMR data and programmed statistical software to flag an antimicrobial orders or drug fills from structured data fields in the EMR and hits on text string searches of antimicrobial names documented in clinician's notes. We iteratively tested combinations of these data elements to optimize an algorithm to accurately classify antimicrobial use. The final algorithm was validated in a national cohort of VA cardiac device procedures from FY2016-2017. Discordant cases underwent expert manual review to identify reasons for algorithm misclassification. RESULTS: The CART-EP dataset included 2102 procedures at 38 VA facilities with manually identified antimicrobial prophylaxis in 2056 cases (97.8%). The final algorithm combining structured EMR fields and text note search results correctly classified 2048 of the CART-EP cases (97.4%). In the validation sample, the algorithm measured compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis in 16,606 of 18,903 cardiac device procedures (87.8%). Misclassification was due to EMR documentation issues, such as antimicrobial prophylaxis documented only in hand-written clinician notes in a format that cannot be electronically searched. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a methodology with high accuracy to measure guideline concordant use of antimicrobial prophylaxis before cardiac device procedures using data fields present in modern EMRs. This method can replace manual review in quality measurement in the VA and other healthcare systems with EMRs; further, this method could be adapted to measure compliance in other procedural areas where antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended.

Cryptococcus endocarditis: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Cryptococcus neoformans is known to be a cause of meningitis. However, as cryptococcal endocarditis is rare, it is not well understood. Here, we describe a case with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator associated endocarditis and meningitis caused by Cryptococcus neoformans and we review the literature associated cryptococcal endocarditis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72 years old Japanese male presented in emergency department with non-productive cough and respiratory discomfort. His past medical history was ischemic heart disease four years ago and ICD was implanted. Physical examination was unremarkable. Chest computer tomography revealed ground glass opacity in the right lung. He received a diagnosis of amiodarone-induced interstitial pneumonitis and high dose steroid pulse therapy. Septic shock and acute respiratory failure occurred after steroid therapy. Cryptococcus neoformans was identified by blood culture and cerebral spinal fluid. Intravenous liposomal Amphotericin B and oral flucytosine were initiated. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed vegetation on the lead of the ICD. Diagnosis of cryptococcal endocarditis was made. The patient died despite antifungal therapy was continued. DISCUSSION: We analyzed our case and 8 cases of cryptococcal endocarditis in the literature for 40 years. Almost all of the patients had previous valve replacement surgery or immunocompromised state. Three cases had meningitis. Surgery performed in 3 cases. The overall mortality rate were 44.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Cryptococcal endocarditis is rare and carries a high mortality. Almost all of the patients had underlying diseases. Diagnosis needs repeating blood culture and echocardiogram, sometimes. Cryptococcal endocarditis needs lumber puncture for rule out meningitis.