Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelets in Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether antiplatelets or anticoagulants are more effective in preventing early recurrent stroke in patients with cervical artery dissection. Following the publication of the observational Antithrombotic for STOP-CAD (Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection) study, which has more than doubled available data, we performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. METHODS: The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023468063). We searched 5 databases using a combination of keywords that encompass different antiplatelets and anticoagulants, as well as cervical artery dissection. We included relevant randomized trials and included observational studies of dissection unrelated to major trauma. Where studies were sufficiently similar, we performed meta-analyses for efficacy (ischemic stroke) and safety (major hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and death) outcomes using relative risks. RESULTS: We identified 11 studies (2 randomized trials and 9 observational studies) that met the inclusion criteria. These included 5039 patients (30% [1512] treated with anticoagulation and 70% [3527]) treated with antiplatelets]. In meta-analysis, anticoagulation was associated with a lower ischemic stroke risk (relative risk, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.94]; P=0.02; I2=0%) but higher major bleeding risk (relative risk, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.07 to 4.72]; P=0.03, I2=0%). The risks of death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were similar between the 2 treatments. Effect sizes were larger in randomized trials. There are insufficient data on the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy or direct oral anticoagulants. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with cervical artery dissection, anticoagulation was superior to antiplatelet therapy in reducing ischemic stroke but carried a higher major bleeding risk. This argues for an individualized therapeutic approach incorporating the net clinical benefit of ischemic stroke reduction and bleeding risks. Large randomized clinical trials are required to clarify optimal antithrombotic strategies for management of cervical artery dissection.

Collet-Sicard syndrome due to cervical artery dissection disclosed by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) represents a leading cause of unilateral lower cranial nerve IX-XII palsy, known as Collet-Sicard syndrome (CSS). High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) is widely used in the evaluation of patients with CAD, providing information regarding vessel wall abnormalities and intraluminal thrombus. METHODS: We present a patient with palsy of multiple lower cranial nerves in the context of CSS, attributed to unilateral spontaneous internal carotid artery dissection. RESULTS: We describe a 68-year-old man with unremarkable previous history, who presented with subacute, gradually worsening dysphagia and hoarse voice. Clinical examination revealed right-sided palsy of cranial nerves IX-XII. Three-dimensional fat-saturated black-blood T1-weighted high-resolution vessel wall imaging disclosed spontaneous dissection with intramural hematoma along the distal right internal carotid artery. Neck MRI showed inward displacement of right aryepiglottic fold, right pyriform sinus dilatation, and right true vocal cord in middle position, indicative of right vagus nerve palsy, atrophy of right trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, due to right spinal accessory nerve palsy, and unilateral tongue atrophy with fatty infiltration, characteristic for right hypoglossal nerve palsy. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the utility of high-resolution vessel wall imaging and especially fat-saturated T1-weighted black-blood SPACE (sampling perfection with application-optimized contrast using different flip-angle evolutions) sequences in the accurate diagnosis of CAD, revealing the characteristic mural hematoma and intimal flap. HR-MRI is also valuable in the recognition of indirect signs of lower cranial nerve compression.

Ominous Causes of Headache.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While primary headaches like migraines or cluster headaches are prevalent and often debilitating, it's the secondary headaches-those resulting from underlying pathologies-that can be particularly ominous. This article delves into the sinister causes of headaches, underscoring the importance of a meticulous clinical approach, especially when presented with red flags. RECENT FINDINGS: Headaches, one of the most common complaints in clinical practice, span a spectrum from benign tension-type episodes to harbingers of life-threatening conditions. For the seasoned physician, differentiating between these extremes is paramount. Headache etiologies covered in this article will include subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), cervical artery dissection, cerebral venous thrombosis, meningitis, obstructive hydrocephalus, and brain tumor.

High risk and low prevalence diseases: Spontaneous cervical artery dissection.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCAD) is a serious condition that carries with it a high rate of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This review highlights the pearls and pitfalls of sCAD, including presentation, diagnosis, and management in the emergency department (ED) based on current evidence. DISCUSSION: sCAD is a condition affecting the carotid or vertebral arteries and occurs as a result of injury and compromise to the arterial wall layers. The dissection most commonly affects the extracranial vessels but may extend intracranially, resulting in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Patients typically present with symptoms due to compression of local structures, and the presentation depends on the vessel affected. The most common symptom is headache and/or neck pain. Signs and symptoms of ischemia may occur, including transient ischemic attack and stroke. There are a variety of risk factors for sCAD, including underlying connective tissue or vascular disorders, and there may be an inciting event involving minimal trauma to the head or neck. Diagnosis includes imaging, most commonly computed tomography angiography of the head and neck. Ultrasound can diagnose sCAD but should not be used to exclude the condition. Treatment includes specialist consultation (neurology and vascular specialist), consideration of thrombolysis in appropriate patients, symptomatic management, and administration of antithrombotic medications. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of sCAD can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this potentially deadly disease.

Sex-based difference in selected stroke etiologies: cerebral dural sinus venous thrombosis, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, dissection, migraine, pregnancy/puerperium/OC use.

Females are at higher risk than males for a multitude of cerebrovascular conditions, both common and rare; partially resulting from a complex interplay between differing process involving genetics, hormonal influences, common cerebrovascular risk factors among others. Specific topics including cervical artery dissection, cerebral dural sinus venous thrombosis, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, migraine, along with these disorders in the setting of pregnancy, puerperium and oral contraceptive utilization. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, basics of management and outcomes are presented, with sex differences throughout.

Necessary to continue imaging spontaneous cervical artery dissecting pseudoaneurysms after one year?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The value of long-term serial imaging of dissecting pseudoaneurysm (dPSA) is poorly characterized. This study investigated the long-term radiographic evolution of dPSA. METHODS: We performed a query in our institutional craniocervical artery dissection registry to identify cases with spontaneous dPSA who had at least one year of follow-up with serial angiographic imaging. We performed Wilcoxon rank-sum pairwise comparison test to determine if there was a significant change in the aneurysm size over time. RESULTS: This observational cohort study included 76 patients (46 females; 64 dPSA in the internal carotid artery [ICA] and 12 in the vertebral artery [VA]) with a median age of 49.5 years (range 24-77). The initial median dPSA size was 8 mm (interquantile range(iqr) = 5.88-11mm), and the final median dPSA size was 7 mm (iqr = 4-11 mm). Most patients had either no change or reduction in dPSA size in the serial follow-up, with no significant change over time. All the patients had favorable outcomes at the last follow-up, and most patients were symptom-free from dPSA (92 %). Two patients (2.6%) experienced recurrent ischemic strokes in the same territory as the initial ischemic stroke without any change in dPSA size. CONCLUSION: Further serial scans for dPSA after one year may be deferred in the absence of interim clinical symptoms as most dPSA either remains stable or decreases in size. Recurrent stroke, although a rare event, was not associated with an increase in dPSA size.

Peripheral Blood Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Molecular Pathways Associated with Cervical Artery Dissection.

Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is the primary cause of ischemic stroke in young adults. Monogenic heritable connective tissue diseases account for fewer than 5% of cases of CeAD. The remaining sporadic cases have known risk factors. The clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics of systemic vasculopathy and undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia are present in up to 70% of individuals with sporadic CeAD. Genome-wide association studies identified CeAD-associated genetic variants in the non-coding genomic regions that may impact the gene transcription and RNA processing. However, global gene expression profile analysis has not yet been carried out for CeAD patients. We conducted bulk RNA sequencing and differential gene expression analysis to investigate the expression profile of protein-coding genes in the peripheral blood of 19 CeAD patients and 18 healthy volunteers. This was followed by functional annotation, heatmap clustering, reports on gene-disease associations and protein-protein interactions, as well as gene set enrichment analysis. We found potential correlations between CeAD and the dysregulation of genes linked to nucleolar stress, senescence-associated secretory phenotype, mitochondrial malfunction, and epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity.

Long-term outcome of cervical artery dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the natural history of extracranial cervical artery dissection (CAD) including comorbidities, symptoms at presentation, recurrence of symptoms, and long-term outcome following different treatment approaches. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated for acute CAD was performed over a 5-year period from January 2017 to April 2022. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included in the study, 25 (64.1%) with acute internal carotid artery dissection and 14 (35.9%) with acute vertebral artery dissection. Thirty-four patients (87.1%) had spontaneous CAD, and five patients (12.8%) had traumatic CAD. The mean age of the cohort was 54.2 years. The mean time from symptom onset to presentation was 4.34 days. The most common symptoms in internal carotid artery dissection were unilateral weakness (44%), headache (44%), slurred speech (36%), facial droop (28%), unilateral paraesthesia (24%), neck pain (12%), visual disturbance (8%), and Horner's syndrome (8%). The most common symptoms in vertebral artery dissection were headache (35.7%), neck pain (35.7%), vertigo (28.57%), ataxia (14.28%), and slurred speech (14.28%). The imaging modalities used for diagnosis included computed tomography angiography (48.7%), magnetic resonance angiography (41%), and duplex ultrasound (10.2%). In patients with carotid artery dissection, 57% had severe stenosis, 24% had moderate stenosis, and 20% had mild stenosis. All patients treated were managed conservatively with either anticoagulation or antiplatelets. Long-term clinical follow-up was available for 33 patients (84.6%). Thirty patients (90.9%) reported complete resolution of symptoms, and three patients (9%) reported persistent symptoms. Anatomic follow-up with imaging was available for 17 patients (43.58%). Thirteen patients (76.47%) had complete resolution of dissection, two patients (11.76%) had partial resolution of dissection, and two patients (11.76%) had persistent dissection. There was one death unrelated to CAD in a multi-trauma patient. There were four early recurrent symptoms in the first 3 to 8 weeks post discharge. The mean follow-up time was 308.27 days. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of CADs can be managed conservatively with good clinical and anatomical outcome and low rates of recurrence.

Internal carotid artery dissection in a patient with hemophilia A: a case report and literature review.

Spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCeAD) is the most common cause of ischemic stroke at a young age, but its pathogenetic mechanism and risk factors are not fully elucidated. It is reasonable to think that bleeding propensity, vascular risk factors such as hypertension and head or neck trauma, and constitutional weakness of the arterial wall together play a role in the pathogenesis of sCeAD. Hemophilia A is known to be an X-linked condition that leads to spontaneous bleeding in various tissues and organs. To date, a few cases of acute arterial dissection in patients with hemophilia have been reported, but the relationship between these two diseases has not been studied so far. In addition, there are no guidelines indicating the best antithrombotic treatment option in these patients. We report the case of a man with hemophilia A who developed sCeAD and transient oculo-pyramidal syndrome and was treated with acetylsalicylic acid. We also review previous published cases of arterial dissection in patients with hemophilia, discussing the potential pathogenetic mechanism underlying this rare association and potential antithrombotic therapeutic options.

The association between cervical artery dissection and spinal manipulation among US adults.

PURPOSE: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD), which includes both vertebral artery dissection (VAD) and carotid artery dissection (CAD), is the most serious safety concern associated with cervical spinal manipulation (CSM). We evaluated the association between CSM and CeAD among US adults. METHODS: Through analysis of health claims data, we employed a case-control study with matched controls, a case-control design in which controls were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, and a case-crossover design in which recent exposures were compared to exposures in the same case that occurred 6-7 months earlier. We evaluated the association between CeAD and the 3-level exposure, CSM versus office visit for medical evaluation and management (E&M) versus neither, with E&M set as the referent group. RESULTS: We identified 2337 VAD cases and 2916 CAD cases. Compared to population controls, VAD cases were 0.17 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.32) times as likely to have received CSM in the previous week as compared to E&M. In other words, E&M was about 5 times more likely than CSM in the previous week in cases, relative to controls. CSM was 2.53 (95% CI 1.71 to 3.68) times as likely as E&M in the previous week among individuals with VAD than among individuals experiencing a stroke without CeAD. In the case-crossover study, CSM was 0.38 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.91) times as likely as E&M in the week before a VAD, relative to 6 months earlier. In other words, E&M was approximately 3 times more likely than CSM in the previous week in cases, relative to controls. Results for the 14-day and 30-day timeframes were similar to those at one week. CONCLUSION: Among privately insured US adults, the overall risk of CeAD is very low. Prior receipt of CSM was more likely than E&M among VAD patients as compared to stroke patients. However, for CAD patients as compared to stroke patients, as well as for both VAD and CAD patients in comparison with population controls and in case-crossover analysis, prior receipt of E&M was more likely than CSM.

Early ischemic recurrence in acute spontaneous cervical artery dissection.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early ischemic recurrence (EIR) following the diagnosis of acute spontaneous cervical artery dissection (CeAD) has been little investigated. We aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants on admission of EIR in a large single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with CeAD. METHODS: EIR was defined as any ipsilateral clinical or radiological cerebral ischemia or intracranial artery occlusion, not present on admission and occurring within 2 weeks. CeAD location, degree of stenosis, circle of Willis support, presence of intraluminal thrombus, intracranial extension, and intracranial embolism were analyzed on initial imaging by 2 independent observers. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine their association with EIR. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-three consecutive patients with 286 CeAD were included. EIR was observed in 21 patients (9%,95%CI=5-13%) with a median time from diagnosis of 1.5 days (range:0.1-14.0 days). No EIR was observed in CeAD without ischemic presentation or with less than 70% stenosis. In the remaining cases, poor circle of Willis (OR=8.5, CI95%=2.0-35.4, p = 0.003), CeAD extending to other intracranial arteries than just V4 (OR=6.8, CI95%=1.4-32.6, p = 0.017), cervical artery occlusion (OR=9.5, CI95%=1.2- 39.0, p = 0.031), and cervical intraluminal thrombus (OR=17.5, CI95%=3.0-101.7, p = 0.001) were independently associated with EIR. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggests that EIR is more frequent than previously reported, and that its risk might be stratified on admission with a standard workup. In particular, the presence of a poor circle of Willis, intracranial extension (other than just V4), cervical occlusion, or cervical intraluminal thrombus are associated with high risk of EIR, for which specific management should be further evaluated.

Rural-Urban Differences in Diagnosed Cervical Artery Dissection in New York State.

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of stroke in young adults. Incidence estimates may be limited by under- or overdiagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate if CeAD diagnosis would be higher in urban centers compared to rural regions of New York State (NYS). METHODS: For this ecological study, administrative codes were used to identify CeAD discharges in the NYS Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) from 2009 to 2014. Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes were taken from the US Department of Agriculture and included the classifications metropolitan, micropolitan, small town, and rural. Negative binomial models were used to calculate effect estimates and 95% confidence limits (eß; 95% CL) for the association between RUCA classification and the number of dissections per ZIP code. Models were further adjusted by population. RESULTS: Population information was obtained from the US Census Bureau on 1,797 NYS ZIP codes (70.7% of NYS ZIP codes), 826 of which had at least 1 CeAD-related discharge from 2009 to 2014. Nonrural ZIP codes were more likely to report more CeAD cases relative to rural areas even after adjusting for population (metropolitan effect = eß 5.00; 95% CI: 3.75-6.66; micropolitan effect 3.02; 95% CI: 2.16-4.23; small town effect 2.34; 95% CI: 1.58-3.47). CONCLUSIONS: CeAD diagnosis correlates with population density as defined by rural-urban status. Our results could be due to underdiagnosis in rural areas or overdiagnosis with increasing urbanicity.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenting for the Treatment of Cervical Carotid Artery Dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting for the treatment of extracranial carotid artery dissection (CAD). DATA SOURCES: Systematic review using Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis statement. Data from the eligible studies were extracted and meta-analysed. Primary endpoints included post-operative mortality, cerebrovascular events (CEs), and modified Rankin Score for neurological disability (mRS) at 90 days. Subgroup analyses were performed between stenting of spontaneous and traumatic CAD, primary stenting vs. stenting after failed medical therapy (FMT), and stenting of CAD in the presence of tandem occlusions vs. stenting of isolated extracranial CAD. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies with 1 224 patients were included. Pooled post-operative mortality, CE, and mRS 0 - 2 rates were 1.71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 - 2.80), 6.45% (95% CI 2.80 - 11.10), and 76.13% (95% CI 64.15 - 86.50), respectively. The pooled stroke rate was 2.16% (95% CI 0.0 - 6.64). Spontaneous vs. traumatic CAD mortality rates were 3.20% (95% CI 1.80 - 4.88) and 0.00% (95% CI 0.00 - 1.59) while CE rates were 14.26% (95% CI 6.28 - 24.36) and 1.64% (95% CI 0.0 - 6.08). Primary stenting and stenting after FMT mortality rates were 0.63% (95% CI 0.0 - 5.63) and 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 - 2.24), while CE rates were 5.02% (95% CI 0.38 - 12.63) and 3.33% (95% CI 0.12 - 9.03). Mortality rates for tandem occlusions and isolated extracranial CAD were 5.62% (95% CI 1.76 - 10.83) and 0.23% (95% CI 0.0 - 1.88), respectively, while CE rates were 15.28% (95% CI 6.23 - 26.64) and 1.88% (95% CI 0.23 - 4.51). The methodological index for non-randomised studies score was 8.66 (low). CONCLUSION: Both primary stenting and stenting of spontaneous CAD yielded unfavourable results with respect to stent thrombosis and stroke rates. Conversely, stenting following FMT had acceptable mortality and complication rates corroborating the use of stenting in the setting of CAD as a second line treatment. Due to the low quality of the included studies, definite conclusions cannot be drawn necessitating further research.

Cardiovascular manifestations of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorders.

Introduction: Mitral valve prolapse and aortic root dilatation are reported in association with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS), but the full phenotypic spectrum of cardiovascular complications in this condition has not been studied in the aftermath of updated nosology and diagnostic criteria. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 258 patients (> 94% adults) referred to a multidisciplinary clinic for evaluation of joint hypermobility between January 2017 and December 2020 and diagnosed with hEDS or a hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) to determine the incidence and spectrum of cardiovascular involvement. Results: Mitral valve prolapse was present in 7.5% and thoracic aortic dilatation in 15.2%. Aortic dilatation was more frequent in individuals with hEDS (20.7%) than with HSD (7.7%) and similarly prevalent between males and females, although was mild in > 90% of females and moderate-to-severe in 50% of males. Five individuals (1.9%) with hEDS/HSD had extra-aortic arterial involvement, including cervical artery dissection (CeAD, n = 2), spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD, n = 2), and SCAD plus celiac artery pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). This is the first series to report the prevalence of CeAD and SCAD in hEDS/HSD. Conclusions: Cardiovascular manifestations in adults with hEDS/HSD, especially females, are typically mild and readily assessed by echocardiography. Since the risk of progression has not yet been defined, adults with hEDS/HSD who are found to have aortic dilatation at baseline should continue ongoing surveillance to monitor for progressive dilatation. Cardiovascular medicine specialists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons should consider hEDS/HSD on the differential for patients with CeAD or SCAD who also have joint hypermobility.

Association between cervical artery dissection and spinal manipulative therapy -a medicare claims analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection and subsequent ischemic stroke is the most serious safety concern associated with cervical spinal manipulation. METHODS: We evaluated the association between cervical spinal manipulation and cervical artery dissection among older Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. We employed case-control and case-crossover designs in the analysis of claims data for individuals aged 65+, continuously enrolled in Medicare Part A (covering hospitalizations) and Part B (covering outpatient encounters) for at least two consecutive years during 2007-2015. The primary exposure was cervical spinal manipulation; the secondary exposure was a clinical encounter for evaluation and management for neck pain or headache. We created a 3-level categorical variable, (1) any cervical spinal manipulation, 2) evaluation and management but no cervical spinal manipulation and (3) neither cervical spinal manipulation nor evaluation and management. The primary outcomes were occurrence of cervical artery dissection, either (1) vertebral artery dissection or (2) carotid artery dissection. The cases had a new primary diagnosis on at least one inpatient hospital claim or primary/secondary diagnosis for outpatient claims on at least two separate days. Cases were compared to 3 different control groups: (1) matched population controls having at least one claim in the same year as the case; (2) ischemic stroke controls without cervical artery dissection; and (3) case-crossover analysis comparing cases to themselves in the time period 6-7 months prior to their cervical artery dissection. We made each comparison across three different time frames: up to (1) 7 days; (2) 14 days; and (3) 30 days prior to index event. RESULTS: The odds of cervical spinal manipulation versus evaluation and management did not significantly differ between vertebral artery dissection cases and any of the control groups at any of the timepoints (ORs 0.84 to 1.88; p > 0.05). Results for carotid artery dissection cases were similar. CONCLUSION: Among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who received cervical spinal manipulation, the risk of cervical artery dissection is no greater than that among control groups.

Headache secondary to cerebrovascular disease.

OBJECTIVES: To discuss headache secondary to cerebrovascular disease. BACKGROUND: Headache is an important symptom in cerebrovascular diseases. In some conditions, headache is the leading symptom. Migraine is associated with an increased risk of stroke. METHODS: The authors undertook a literature search for the terms "headache" and "cerebrovascular diseases". RESULTS: We report studies on headache in subarachnoidal hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, TIA, basilar artery thrombosis, cervical artery dissection, cerebellar stroke, arteritis and cerebral sinus venous thrombosis. In addition, we discuss migraine and stroke and thunderclap headache. CONCLUSIONS: Headache is a leading symptom in many cerebrovascular diseases. Headache in combination with focal neurological deficits requires immediate diagnosis and treatment.

Thyrotoxicosis and bilateral internal carotid artery dissections.

Cervical artery dissection is a rare but important diagnosis to consider in young patients presenting with stroke. Multiple etiologies of cervical artery dissections have been previously reported, but the association with thyrotoxicosis is extremely rare. A previously healthy 43-year-old female presented to the emergency department with new symptoms related to thyrotoxicosis and bilateral internal carotid artery dissections. Her atrial fibrillation and hypertension resolved by treating the underlying hyperthyroidism with methimazole and propranolol. The bilateral internal carotid artery dissections were managed conservatively with acetylsalicylic acid. Despite an initially poor prognosis, the patient made a complete recovery with resolution of her neurological symptoms.

Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is rare, yet it is a common cause of stroke in young and middle-aged adults. Historically, some senior clinicians favored anticoagulation in the prevention of stroke due to CAD. Choosing the optimal antithrombotic treatment with either antiplatelet (AP) or anticoagulant (AC) medications remains a challenge. This paper will review the clinical features and imaging of CAD, and the acute treatment and prevention of stroke due to CAD. RECENT FINDINGS: Until 2015, there were no prospective randomized trials in the optimal antithrombotic management of CAD. The Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study (CADISS) trial found that treatment with AC did not lower the risk of subsequent stroke or death at 3 months when compared to AP agents. This led to a paradigm shift in national guidelines. In 2021, The Biomarkers and Antithrombotic Treatment in of Cervical Artery Dissection (TREAT-CAD) trial however did not confirm the non-inferiority of AP therapy in stroke prevention due to CAD. The optimal antithrombotic management for stroke prevention in CAD remains uncertain, while the superiority of anticoagulation has not been established, nor has the non-inferiority of AP agents. The future direction of research should consider early preventative treatment, dual treatment with AP agents, direct oral AC medications, and aggregation of data from existing randomized trials.

Influenza-Like Illness is Associated with Increased Short-Term Risk of Cervical Artery Dissection.

INTRODUCTION: Non-traumatic Cervical Artery Dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke in the young. Influenza-like illnesses (ILI) trigger ischemic strokes. We hypothesized that influenza and ILI are associated with CeAD. METHODS: In a case-crossover study within the New York State (NYS) Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (2006-2014), we used ICD-9 codes to exclude major trauma and to define CeAD, influenza, and the Centers for Disease Control defined ILI. We estimated the association of ILI and influenza with CeAD by comparing their prevalence in intervals immediately prior (0-30,0-90,0-180, and 0-365 days) to CeAD (case period) to their prevalence exactly one and two years earlier (control periods). Conditional logistic regression models generated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (OR, 95% CI). Models were adjusted for NYS estimates of influenza prevalence rates. RESULTS: Our sample included 3,610 cases of CeAD (mean age 52±16 years, 54.7% male, 6.2% Hispanic, 9.9% Black, 68.7% White). During case periods, 7.3% had one or more ILI. ILI was more likely within 90 days of CeAD compared to the same time interval one and two years before (0-15 days: adjusted OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.20-2.94; 0-30 days: adjusted OR 1.74, 95%CI 1.22-2.46; 0-90 days: adjusted OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.00-1.81). Influenza trended with CeAD (adjusted OR 1.86, 95%CI 0.37-9.24), but these results were not statistically significant, due to limited instances of confirmed influenza. CONCLUSIONS: ILI may increase risk of CeAD for 15 days, and possibly up to three months.

Early Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy Is Critical in Craniocervical Artery Dissection: Results from the COMPASS Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Craniocervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of stroke in the young patient population. Recent studies reported a low rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with CeAD, with no significant difference between patients randomized to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in patients with CeAD. METHODS: All CeAD patients from 2015 to 2017 were consecutively identified by an electronic medical record-based application and enrolled in this prospective longitudinal registry. CeAD was confirmed by imaging and graded using the Denver scale for blunt cerebrovascular injury. Patients were followed for 12 months for MACE defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or death. RESULTS: The cohort included 111 CeAD patients (age 53 ± 15.9 years, 56% Caucasian, 50% female). CeAD was detected by magnetic resonance (5%), computed tomography (88%), or catheter angiography (7%). CeAD was noted in the carotid (59%), vertebral (39%), and basilar (2%) arteries, 82% of which were extracranial dissections. CeAD was classified as grade I, II, III, and IV in 16, 33, 19, and 32%, respectively. A total of 40% of dissections were due to known trauma. A predisposing factor was noted in the majority (78%) of patients, including violent sneezing (21%), carrying a heavy load (19%), sports/recreational activity (11%), chiropractic manipulation (9%), abrupt/prolonged rotation of head (9%), and prolonged phone use (9%). At presentation, 41% had a stroke, 5% had TIA, 39% had headache, and 36% were asymptomatic. Favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 was noted in 68% at 3 months and 71% at 12 months. The rate of MACEs at 3 and 12 months was 11 and 14%, respectively, with more events observed in patients who were not receiving anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy due to contraindications (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: We report diagnostic characteristics, as well as short- and long-term outcomes of CeAD. A high MACE rate was observed within the first 2 weeks of CeAD diagnosis, notably in patients not initiated on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy.