Comparison of the MIPS technique versus linear incision with tissue preservation in osseointegrated implants in the Ponto model®.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The surgery of osseointegrated implants has undergone different modifications over the years with the aim of achieving better results and facilitating the surgical technique. Today the most commonly used technique is the linear incision with tissue preservation and placement of the abutment and implant. The long-term success of this technique has served as the basis for the development of the so-called minimally invasive surgical approach (MIPS). This study compares the short-, medium- and long-term results between the classic linear incision technique and the MIPS technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on patients who had an osseointegrated implant placed between February 2016 and February 2020. A total of 59 surgeries were performed, 32 surgeries according to the linear incision technique with tissue preservation and 27 with MIPS technique. Outcomes were evaluated at one week, one month and one year. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were achieved between the 2 groups at one week after surgery. Eighty per cent of the MIPS patients had Holgers grades 0-1 compared to 35% of the linear technique patients (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed at one month (p = 0.457) and one year (p = 0.228). One case with grade 4 was recorded which resulted in implant extrusion one month after surgery with the MIPS technique. A new osseointegrated implant was placed 2 months after the fall using the same MIPS technique with good results. We were also able to verify that the duration of surgery was much shorter with the MIPS technique and better tolerated in terms of postoperative discomfort by the patient. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the MIPS technique is the technique of choice for surgery of osseointegrated Ponto model implants as it is simpler, faster and presents fewer problems in the immediate postoperative period, with similar long-term postoperative results.

Do surgical site complications after ankle fracture surgery reduce with Aquacel Extra Ag®? / ¿Disminuyen las complicaciones cutáneas tras la cirugía de fracturas de tobillo con el uso de Aquacel Extra Ag®?

INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures account for up to 10% of total fractures. Most of them require surgical fixation, which involves an important risk of wound complications. The aim of this study was to determine whether a silver-impregnated occlusive surgical dressing (Aquacel Ag Extra®) was effective in reducing the rates of wound complications after ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation compared to standard sterile dressing. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed 233 patients who underwent ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation. Surgeons switched from using a standard dressing to an Aquacel Ag Extra® from July 2017 to February 2018, without other major changes in perioperative management. We compared skin complications between both groups after 3 months' follow-up. RESULTS: The statistical analysis showed that there is no difference in the prevalence of skin complications between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The theoretical advantages of silver impregnated dressings need further prospective randomized controlled studies to assess the appropriate indications for their use in orthopaedic surgery.