[Treatment resistance in anxiety disorders-Definition and treatment options]. / Therapieresistenz bei Angsterkrankungen ­ Definition und Behandlungsoptionen.

Treatment resistance in anxiety disorders represents a clinical challenge, contributes to the chronicity of the diseases as well as sequential comorbidities, and is associated with a significant individual and socioeconomic burden. This narrative review presents the operational definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders according to international consensus criteria (< 50% reduction in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, HAM­A, score or < 50% reduction in the Beck Anxiety Inventory, BAI, score or a clinical global impression-improvement, CGI­I, score > 2). At least two unsuccessful guideline-based treatment attempts with pharmacological monotherapy or at least one unsuccessful treatment attempt with adequately delivered cognitive behavioral therapy are required. Pharmacotherapeutically, after excluding pseudo-resistance, switching the medication within one class or to another class and augmentation strategies with other antidepressants (mirtazapine, agomelatine), antipsychotics (quetiapine) or anticonvulsants (valproate) are recommended. Psychotherapeutically, third-wave therapies, psychodynamic therapy, systemic therapy and physical exercise can be considered for therapy resistance. In cases of no response to psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy, the respective other form of therapy or a combination of both should be offered. Compounds targeting the glutamatergic and endocannabinoid systems as well as neuropeptides are being tested as potential innovative pharmaceuticals for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders. There is an urgent need for further research to identify predictive markers and mechanisms as well as to develop innovative pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders.

A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating PAN-PROMISE, a Patient-reported Outcome Measure to Detect Post-ERCP Morbidity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Cotton Consensus (CC) criteria for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) may not capture post-ERCP morbidity. PAN-PROMISE, a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), was developed to quantify acute pancreatitis-related morbidity. This study aims to determine the value of PAN-PROMISE in independently defining ERCP-related morbidity. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing ERCP at 2 academic centers from September 2021 to August 2022. We administered PAN-PROMISE and assessed quality of life and work productivity at baseline, 48 to 72 hours, 7 days, and 30 days following ERCP. PEP was defined by a 3-physician committee using the CC criteria. We defined high morbidity following ERCP (elevated PROM) by an increase of PAN-PROMISE score of >7 at 7 days post-procedure. The McNemar test assessed discordance between PEP and elevated-PROM. RESULTS: A total of 679 patients were enrolled. Choledocholithiasis (30%) and malignant biliary obstruction (29%) were the main indications for ERCP. Thirty-two patients (4.7%) developed PEP. One hundred forty-seven patients (21.6%) had an elevated PROM, whereas only 20 of them (13.4%) had PEP by the CC criteria (P < .001 for discordance). An elevated PROM strongly correlated with lower physical quality of life and increased direct and indirect health care costs ($80 and $25 per point increase in PAN-PROMISE, respectively). Patients with pancreatic cancer (odds ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-10.74) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.45) had the highest odds of elevated PROM. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients experience significant morbidity after ERCP despite not developing PEP or other adverse events. Future studies are needed to characterize better the reasons behind this increase in symptoms and potential interventions to reduce the symptom burden post-ERCP. CLINICALTRIALS: gov number, NCT05310409.

Consensus based recommendations for the diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: an international Delphi study.

AIM: Reliably diagnosing or safely excluding serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a precursor lesion of tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), is crucial for individual patient care, for better understanding the oncogenesis of HGSC, and for safely investigating novel strategies to prevent tubo-ovarian carcinoma. To optimize STIC diagnosis and increase its reproducibility, we set up a three-round Delphi study. METHODS AND RESULTS: In round 1, an international expert panel of 34 gynecologic pathologists, from 11 countries, was assembled to provide input regarding STIC diagnosis, which was used to develop a set of statements. In round 2, the panel rated their level of agreement with those statements on a 9-point Likert scale. In round 3, statements without previous consensus were rated again by the panel while anonymously disclosing the responses of the other panel members. Finally, each expert was asked to approve or disapprove the complete set of consensus statements. The panel indicated their level of agreement with 64 statements. A total of 27 statements (42%) reached consensus after three rounds. These statements reflect the entire diagnostic work-up for pathologists, regarding processing and macroscopy (three statements); microscopy (eight statements); immunohistochemistry (nine statements); interpretation and reporting (four statements); and miscellaneous (three statements). The final set of consensus statements was approved by 85%. CONCLUSION: This study provides an overview of current clinical practice regarding STIC diagnosis amongst expert gynecopathologists. The experts' consensus statements form the basis for a set of recommendations, which may help towards more consistent STIC diagnosis.

The optimal diagnostic cut-off of WBC and PMN counts for joint aspiration in periprosthetic joint infection is 2479/µL and 67%, respectively: ICM criteria thresholds are too high.

BACKGROUND: Various organizations have published definitions for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with significant differences in the cut-offs of white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte cells. Herein, we aim to analyze optimal cut-offs in patients which are planned to undergo a prosthesis revision and compare them with the actual published thresholds of the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) and European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). METHODS: A test kit was compiled in a monocentric prospective study, according to the ICM criteria (2018) and 2021 EBJIS criteria. The kit was implemented using: blood samples (including leukocyte count and C-reactive protein); samples for examining the synovial fluid (WBC count, PMN cell differentiation, microbiological culture for incubation over 14 days, alpha-defensin ELISA laboratory test, and leukocyte-esterase test). The cut-offs for WBC and PMN counts were investigated using ROC analyses and Youden index. The ICM 2018 criteria were applied, using alpha-defensin in all cases. Patients which have to undergo a prosthesis revision were included, a pre-operative joint aspiration had been performed, and the patients had been followed up prospectively. RESULTS: 405 patients were examined with the compiled test kit; 100% had a complete dataset with respect to alpha-defensin; 383 patients, according to WBC count; and 256, according to PMN cell differentiation The cut-off of 2478.89 cells/µl in the WBC count (sensitivity: 87.70%; specificity: 88.10%) and the cut-off of 66.99% in PMN differentiation showed the best accuracy (sensitivity: 86.00%; specificity: 88.80%). Other published cut-offs for WBC were tested in this cohort and showed the following accuracy: 3000/µl (EBJIS/ICM; sensitivity: 82.10%; specificity: 91.00%), 2000/µl (sensitivity: 89.60%; specificity: 83.40%), and 1500/µl (sensitivity: 91.50%; specificity: 75.00%). The published cut-offs for PMN had the following accuracy in this cohort: 80% (ICM; sensitivity: 66.3%; specificity: 96.50%), 70% (sensitivity: 82.6%; specificity: 90%), and 65% (EBJIS, sensitivity: 86%; specificity: 88.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to improve current cut-offs for PMN- and WB-Count, even though PJI diagnosis is based on the combination of all defined tests. The optimal diagnostic cut-off of WBC and PMN counts was found to be 2479/µL and 67%, respectively, whereas ICM cut-offs in this cohort seem too high, as they provide high specificity but very low sensitivity. On the other hand, a cut-off for WBC count of 1500/µl alone would be very low, leading to low specificity and very high suspicion of PJI. The current consensus guidelines could be actualized considering these results to significantly improve the diagnostic quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Early-phase clinical trial eligibility and response evaluation criteria for refractory, relapsed, or progressive neuroblastoma: A consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting.

BACKGROUND: International standardized criteria for eligibility, evaluable disease sites, and disease response assessment in patients with refractory, progressive, or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma enrolled in early-phase clinical trials are lacking. METHODS: A National Cancer Institute-sponsored Clinical Trials Planning Meeting was convened to develop an international consensus to refine the tumor site eligibility criteria and evaluation of disease response for early-phase clinical trials in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. RESULTS: Standardized data collection of patient and disease characteristics (including specified genomic data), eligibility criteria, a definition of evaluable disease, and response evaluations for primary and metastatic sites of disease were developed. Eligibility included two distinct patient groups: progressive disease and refractory disease. The refractory disease group was subdivided into responding persistent disease and stable persistent disease to better capture the clinical heterogeneity of refractory neuroblastoma. Requirements for defining disease evaluable for a response assessment were provided; they included requirements for biopsy to confirm viable neuroblastoma and/or ganglioneuroblastoma in those patients with soft tissue or bone disease not avid for iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine. Standardized evaluations for response components and time intervals for response evaluations were established. CONCLUSIONS: The use of international consensus eligibility, evaluability, and response criteria for early-phase clinical studies will facilitate the collection of comparable data across international trials and promote more rapid identification of effective treatment regimens for high-risk neuroblastoma.

Volumetric differences in hippocampal subfields and associations with clinical measures in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients suffer from a cognitive and memory dysfunction. Because the hippocampus plays a key role in both cognition and memory, we tested for volumetric differences in the subfields of the hippocampus in ME/CFS. We estimated hippocampal subfield volumes for 25 ME/CFS patients who met Fukuda criteria only (ME/CFSFukuda ), 18 ME/CFS patients who met the stricter ICC criteria (ME/CFSICC ), and 25 healthy controls (HC). Group comparisons with HC detected extensive differences in subfield volumes in ME/CFSICC but not in ME/CFSFukuda . ME/CFSICC patients had significantly larger volume in the left subiculum head (p < 0.001), left presubiculum head (p = 0.0020), and left fimbria (p = 0.004). Correlations of hippocampus subfield volumes with clinical measures were stronger in ME/CFSICC than in ME/CFSFukuda patients. In ME/CFSFukuda patients, we detected positive correlations between fatigue and hippocampus subfield volumes and a negative correlation between sleep disturbance score and the right CA1 body volume. In ME/CFSICC patients, we detected a strong negative relationship between fatigue and left hippocampus tail volume. Strong negative relationships were also detected between pain and SF36 physical scores and two hippocampal subfield volumes (left: GC-ML-DG head and CA4 head). Our study demonstrated that volumetric differences in hippocampal subfields have strong statistical inference for patients meeting the ME/CFSICC case definition and confirms hippocampal involvement in the cognitive and memory problems of ME/CFSICC patients.

Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) among the Italian Dementia Centers: a study by the Italian DLB study group (DLB-SINdem).

INTRODUCTION: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may represent a diagnostic challenge, since its clinical picture overlaps with other dementia. Two toolkits have been developed to aid the clinician to diagnose DLB: the Lewy Body Composite Risk Score (LBCRS) and the Assessment Toolkit for DLB (AT-DLB). We aim to evaluate the reliability of these two questionnaires, and their ability to enhance the interpretation of the international consensus diagnostic criteria. METHODS: LBCRS and AT-DLB were distributed to 135 Italian Neurological Centers for Cognitive Decline and Dementia (CDCDs), with the indication to administer them to all patients with dementia referred within the subsequent 3 months. We asked to subsequently apply consensus criteria for DLB diagnosis, to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the two toolkits. RESULTS: A total of 23 Centers joined the study; 1854 patients were enrolled. We found a prevalence of possible or probable DLB of 13% each (26% total), according to the consensus criteria. LBCRS toolkit showed good reliability, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.77, stable even after removing variables from the construct. AT-DLB toolkit Cronbach alpha was 0.52 and, after the subtraction of the "cognitive fluctuation" criterion, was only 0.31. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were higher for LBCRS vs. AT-DLB. However, when simultaneously considered in the logistic models, AT-DLB showed a better performance (p < 0.001). Overall, the concordance between LBCRS positive and AT-DLB possible/probable was of 78.02% CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting, the LBCRS and AT-DLB questionnaires have good accuracy for DLB diagnosis.

Electroclinical patterns in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Etiology, treatment, and outcome.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) features and prognostic factors of patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical files and EEG data of 45 (28 females, mean age 54 ±â€¯22.6 years) consecutive patients with NCSE over a five-year period. An EEG interpreter who was blinded to the clinical findings evaluated the EEGs according to the Salzburg Consensus Criteria (SCC) for NCSE. Patient demographics, etiology, neuroimaging and laboratory data, EEG features, treatment, and outcome measures were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common etiology for NCSE was acute symptomatic etiologies (57.8%) and cerebrovascular disease (48.9%). The majority (68.9%) of the patients presented with new-onset status epilepticus (SE). NCSE was refractory to treatment in 31.1% of patients. The most common status pattern consisted of rhythmic delta/theta activity in 62.3% of EEGs. Twenty-five status patterns on the EEGs were classified as definite, 30 as possible, and six as no NCSE according to the SCC. The in-hospital mortality rate was high (33.3%) showing an association with potentially fatal etiology, refractory SE, treatment with continuous I.V. anesthetics and also the presence of multiple status patterns and nonreactivity in EEGs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The SCC for NCSE have high diagnostic accuracy but do not affect prognosis. Potentially fatal etiology, multiple status patterns on EEG and non-reactive EEGs may carry significantly greater risk for short-term mortality.

A Prospective, Longitudinal Observation of the Incidence, Treatment, and Survival of Late Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease by National Institutes of Health Criteria in a Japanese Cohort.

To prospectively validate the incidence, manifestations, and outcomes of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by National Institutes of Health criteria, we recruited 406 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients at 16 transplant centers in Japan from May 2012 to June 2014. The 2-year cumulative incidence of late acute and chronic GVHD was 3.2% (n = 13) and 35.4% (n = 145), with a median onset of 3.6 and 4.7 months after transplant, respectively. The global severity at onset was mild in 30.3%, moderate in 43.5%, and severe in 26.2%. Eighty-two patients were followed up for 2 years, with 79.3% still manifesting GVHD symptoms, and 80.6% (n = 117) of the patients received systemic immunosuppressive treatment (IST), with a 2-year cumulative incidence of IST termination of 33.1%. Severe patients showed a significantly lower rate of IST termination than those with mild and moderate severities (mild, 38.5%; moderate, 40.9%; and severe, 17.2%). The 2-year incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse was not significantly different according to the severity at onset (NRM: mild [16.6%] versus moderate [8.7%] versus severe [16.1%]; relapse: mild [14.9%] versus moderate [14.7%] versus severe [5.3%]). As a result, 2-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-specific survival (GSS) were equivalent according to the severity at onset (mild: OS = 81.0%, GSS = 85.7%; moderate: OS = 84.2%, GSS = 92.5%; severe: OS = 83.9%, GSS = 89.2%). Our study helped identify the characteristics of late acute and chronic GVHD in Japanese patients. Further investigation is needed to identify an optimal endpoint for survival prediction.

Occurrence and Severity of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion-Associated Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Influence the Clinical Outcomes in Relapsed Acute Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence and severity of chemotherapy plus donor lymphocyte infusion (Chemo-DLI)-associated chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in a consecutive cohort of patients with acute leukemia who experienced relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n = 104). The 5-year cumulative incidence of complete remission after Chemo-DLI was 81.0% (95% CI, 73.3% to 88.7%) and 84.6% (95% CI, 74.5% to 94.7%) in the moderate and severe cGVHD groups, respectively, which was significantly higher than that of the mild cGVHD group at 40.9% (95% CI, 29.3% to 52.5%) and non-cGVHD group at 29.2% (95% CI 23.1% to 35.3%). The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was comparable between patients with and without cGVHD. The 5-year probabilities of progression-free survival after Chemo-DLI were 42.9% (95% CI, 26.2% to 70.2%) and 34.6% (95% CI, 15.3% to 78.2%) in the moderate and severe cGVHD groups, respectively, which were both significantly higher than those of the mild cGVHD group at 9.1% (95% CI, 2.4% to 34.1%) and non-cGVHD group at 8.3% (95% CI 3.3% to 21.3%). The 5-year probabilities of overall survival after Chemo-DLI were 56.7% (95% CI, 38.9% to 82.7%) and 43.1% (95% CI, 22.1% to 84.0%) in the moderate and severe cGVHD groups, respectively, which were both significantly higher than those of the mild cGVHD group at 9.1% (95% CI 1.8% to 47.1%) and non-cGVHD group at 14.9% (95% CI, 7.3% to 30.2%). Our observations highlight the close relationship between cGVHD and immune-mediated graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect in patients with relapse receiving Chemo-DLI; however, mild cGVHD may not be associated with a sufficiently strong GVL effect to induce remission and improve survival.

Long-Term Morbidity and Mortality in Children with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Classified by National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

We report the long-term morbidity and mortality of 105 pediatric patients who developed chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). According to the consensus criteria of the National Institutes of Health, the global severity of cGVHD was mild in 26 patients (25%), moderate in 30 patients (29%), and severe in 49 patients (47%). Patients with severe cGVHD had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of cGVHD remission and higher probability of continuing cGVHD at 8 years from cGVHD diagnosis compared with those with mild or moderate cGVHD. The 10-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality in severe cGVHD patients was significantly higher and the probability of disease-free survival was significantly lower than those among patients with mild and moderate cGVHD. Of the 59 patients who survived for more than 5 years, 20 (34%) (4 with moderate and 16 with severe cGVHD) had persistent functional impairment caused by cGVHD with a Karnofsky/Lansky performance score of 90% in 3 patients, 80% in 4 patients, and below 70% in 13 patients at the time of relapse, death, or last follow-up. Better therapeutic strategies are needed to lower the incidence of severe cGVHD, considering the longer life expectancy of pediatric HSCT survivors.

Orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson disease: how much you fall or how low you go?

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is frequent in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and can occur with or without symptoms. Pharmacological treatments are effective, but often exacerbate supine hypertension. Guidelines exist for the diagnosis, but not for the treatment of OH. We examined the relationship between blood pressure (BP) and symptoms in a cohort of PD patients with the goal of identifying a hemodynamic target to guide treatment. We measured BP supine and upright (tilt or active standing) and identified the presence or absence of symptomatic OH by using a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire in 210 patients with PD. We evaluated the usefulness of the 20/10 and 30/15 mmHg diagnostic criteria (systolic/diastolic) to identify symptomatic OH. Fifty percent of the PD patient cohort met criteria for the 20/10 fall and 30% for the 30/15 BP fall. Among the patients who met either OH criteria, the percentage of those with symptoms was small (33% of those with 20/10 and 44% of those with 30/15 mmHg; 16% and 13%, respectively, overall). Symptomatic OH was associated with an upright mean BP below 75 mmHg. A mean standing BP <75 mmHg had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 98% for detecting symptomatic OH. Although the prevalence of OH in PD is high, not all patients have symptoms of organ hypoperfusion. A mean standing BP below 75 mmHg appears to be a useful benchmark when deciding whether the benefits of initiating pharmacological treatment of OH outweigh the risks of exacerbating supine hypertension.

Validation of National Institutes of Health global scoring system for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) according to overall and GVHD-specific survival.

A new severity grading system for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria (NCC). However, its prognostic value still needs to be validated. Four hundred twenty-five consecutive patients who survived beyond 100 days after allogeneic stem cell transplantation were reviewed and reclassified using NCC. GVHD-specific survival (GSS) and cumulative incidence of relapse were compared according to the NIH global score at the onset and peak of chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Of 346 patients with cGVHD diagnosed by the Revised Seattle Criteria, 317 patients were reclassified according to the NCC as classic cGVHD (n = 144) and overlap syndrome (n = 173). The NIH global scores at onset were mild (43.2%), moderate (42.3%), and severe (14.5%), whereas more moderate (55.5%) and severe (31.6%) cGVHD was observed at the peak of cGVHD. With a median follow-up duration of 34 months, the 5-year GSS was significantly worse for the severe group than the moderate/mild groups at onset and at peak: 50.9% ± 7.8% versus 89.7% ± 3.2% versus 93.5% ± 2.4% at onset (P < .001) and 69.1% ± 5.2% versus 93.2% ± 2.1% versus 97.3% ± 2.7% at peak (P < .001). Severe NIH global score at onset and peak were confirmed as a poor prognostic factor for GSS in multivariate analysis. The cumulative incidence of relapse did not differ among the severity groups at onset or peak. In conclusion, the new NIH global scoring system was shown to differentiate a high-risk group of patients (with severe grade cGVHD) in terms of long-term transplant outcomes.

Survival impact of response within the first year in a multicenter prospective observational study of chronic GVHD in a Japanese cohort.

A prospective multicenter observational study of organ response was conducted in patients with chronic GVHD diagnosed by the NIH criteria. When response was assessed at 12 months (12 M) in 118 patients, 74.6% were classified as responders and 25.4% as non-responders. The skin and oral cavity were the most frequent organs used as the basis for determining overall response. The lungs, liver, and eyes were also used in 20% of patients. Non-response decisions at 12 M were most frequent in the lungs. A significantly higher percentage of responders than non-responders completed systemic treatment (24.3% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.02). Global scoring showed significant changes, with improvement in responders and worsening in non-responders throughout the observation period. Two-year transplant-related mortality, using the 12 M assessment as the landmark, was significantly worse in non-responders (28.5% vs. 2,7%, P = 0.0001), while the 2-year recurrence rate was equivalent (5.4% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.78). Consequently, the 2-year overall survival rate from the 12 M assessment was significantly better in responders than non-responders (95% vs. 65.3%, P = 0.0001). Our data suggests that patients who do not achieve a response within the first year should be candidates for clinical studies on chronic GVHD.

Extra-Limbic Seronegative Encephalitis Preceding Recurrent Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Gastric Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report.

We describe a patient with extra-limbic seronegative encephalitis with relapsing progressive course as the harbinger of sequential Hodgkin's lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell lymphoma. Diagnosis of probable paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS) was arrived at by exhaustive elimination of alternative causes and supportive tissue diagnosis. This case highlights the phenotypic variety of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes associated with hematologic malignancies and the challenges in their recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. We discuss and apply the updated consensus diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic syndromes to our case as a means of bolstering probability in cases of diagnostic uncertainty.

Objectivity, practicality, and significance of practice guidelines for the practicing neurologists: What we learnt from consensus criteria in CIDP, Myasthenia Gravis and Inflammatory Myopathies.

The value of practice guidelines in the three most common autoimmune neuromuscular disorders, namely Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP), Myasthenia Gravis (MG) and Autoimmune Inflammatory Myopathies (AIM), has been extensively debated regarding their usefulness in clinical practice, objectivity and universal value considering that guidelines are also established regionally in certain countries. This commentary highlights common concerns on how guidelines are presently generated, pointing out: (a) non-sufficient diversity among Task-Force members to identify and address not only routine clinical and electrophysiology issues but also immunology, imaging, pathology, biomarkers, epidemiology or treatment economics; (b) Task-Force being often comprised by the same or seemingly like-minded members conveying the erroneous impression that experts with opposing views might have been excluded, even if this is clearly not the case; and (c) relying on web-based registries or retrospective data collections from heterogeneous sources. As a result, the existing practice guidelines in CIDP, MG and AIM remain an unfinished business but an excellent base for further enhancement. Guidelines can be extremely helpful not only for clinical trials but also in clinical practice if viewed as a living document with continuously updated versions by experts even with opposing views with precise information on diagnostics, pathomechanisms, therapeutic schemes, evolving biomarkers and economics of new therapies with validation of the post-guidelines criteria. Geographic diversity should be taken into consideration because the availability of biomarker testing, and therapies differ among countries. Patient preferences need to be also considered in therapeutic guidelines because newly marketed drugs offer more options steadily changing the therapeutic algorithms in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases generating also questions as to whether they also influence decisions on insurance coverage. Collectively, these startup considerations are aimed to make practice guidelines more objective, widely acceptable worldwide and more practical or easier to follow in clinical practice.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus characteristics in glioma patients: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy is a common complication of gliomas. The diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is challenging because it causes impaired consciousness and mimics glioma progression. NCSE complication rate in the general brain tumor patient population is approximately 2%. However, there are no reports focusing on NCSE in glioma patient population. This study aimed to reveal the epidemiology and features of NCSE in glioma patients to enable appropriate diagnosis. METHODS: We enrolled 108 consecutive glioma patients (45 female, 63 male) who underwent their first surgery between April 2013 and May 2019 at our institution. We retrospectively investigated glioma patients diagnosed with tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) or NCSE to explore disease frequency of TRE/NCSE and patient background. NCSE treatment approaches and Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPS) changes following NCSE were surveyed. NCSE diagnosis was confirmed using the modified Salzburg Consensus Criteria (mSCC). RESULTS: Sixty-one out of 108 glioma patients experienced TRE (56%), and five (4.6%) were diagnosed with NCSE (2 female, 3 male; mean age, 57 years old; WHO grade II 1, grade III 2, grade IV 2). All NCSE cases were controlled by stage 2 status epilepticus treatment as recommended in the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Epilepsy by the Japan Epilepsy Society. The KPS score significantly decreased after NCSE. CONCLUSION: Higher prevalence of NCSE in glioma patients was observed. The KPS score significantly decreased after NCSE. Actively taking electroencephalograms analyzed by mSCC may facilitate accurate NCSE diagnosis and improve the activities of daily living in glioma patients.

Incidence and Outcome of Atypical Manifestations of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: Results From a Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the leading cause of late nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and defined by 8 diagnostic target organs. Recently, provisional criteria for atypical manifestations of cGVHD that include manifestations in nonclassic organs as well as atypical manifestations in National Institutes of Health (NIH)-defined organs, were proposed by a NIH task force. Little is known about the incidence, risk factors, and impact on survival of atypical cGVHD, however. The aim of the present study was to analyze these parameters in a sequential patient population. We retrospectively screened 623 patients who underwent alloHSCT at the University Medical Center Regensburg between January 2008 and December 2020 for atypical cGVHD manifestations, applying the provisional NIH taskforce criteria. A total of 102 patients (16.4%) met the criteria, representing 25% of all cGVHD cases, and 14 patients (2.2%) had only atypical cGVHD. The most frequent manifestations were immune-mediated cytopenias (24.5%), renal cGVHD (13.7%) and (poly)serositis (13.7%). Multivariate analysis identified prior acute GVHD (odds ratio [OR], 2.28 and 2.93) and infusion of donor lymphocytes (OR, 1.77 for both) as risk factors for classic cGVHD and atypical cGVHD, whereas total body irradiation was an independent risk factor for atypical cGVHD manifestations only (OR, 1.76). Compared to patients without cGVHD, those with atypical and NIH-defined cGVHD showed similarly better overall survival (P = .034 and < .001) and low relapse-related mortality (P < .001 for both). NRM was significantly increased by atypical GVHD, but not by NIH-defined cGVHD (P = .019 and .10), which was driven only by a few atypical organ manifestations (eg, renal, restrictive lung disease, peripheral neuropathy), whereas others did not contribute to NRM (eg, thyroid gland, musculoskeletal, pancreas). In summary, atypical cGVHD is more common than previously estimated and has both similarities with and differences from NIH-defined cGVHD. In particular, the increased NRM and a subset of patients with only atypical cGVHD point to the urgent need to capture these manifestations in cGVHD cohorts, including analysis of treatment outcomes.