Breast and tumor volumes on 3D-MRI and their impact on the performance of a breast conservative surgery (BCS).

Breast conservation rate is being increasingly used nowadays as a marker of breast cancer care among hospitals. Searching for the ideal technique to predict the feasibility of BCS is ongoing. For this matter, the preoperative MRIs of 169 patients operated with radical or conservative surgery were reviewed. We estimated the tumor volume (TV) and breast volume (BV) on enhanced 3D-MRI and compared the tumor-to-breast volume ratio (TV/BV) in both groups. The mean ratio was 9.5% in the mastectomy group and 1.7% in the BCS group. A tumor-to-breast volume ratio less than 4% seemed to favor the adoption of a conservative option. Our data suggest that preoperative 3D-MRI can orient the surgical approach by assessing the TV/BV ratio, increasing lumpectomy rates with clear margins and good cosmetic outcome.

Radiotherapy in Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer.

Breast radiotherapy during pregnancy is a matter of debate as both the efficacy of treatment and the safety of the developing fetus should be considered. Currently there is not enough data to support the safety of in-utero exposure to radiation even with modern radiotherapy techniques. So it is highly recommended that breast radiotherapy is postponed to after delivery, though it might be considered in very selected patients according to risk-benefit assessment.

Comparative Evaluation of Iodine-125 Radioactive Seed Localization and Wire Localization for Resection of Breast Lesions.

PURPOSE: Radioactive seed localization (RSL) uses a titanium seed labeled with iodine-125 energy for surgery of nonpalpable breast lesions. RSL facilitates radiology-surgery scheduling and allows for improved oncoplasty compared with wire localization (WL). The purpose of this work was to compare the 2 techniques. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all breast lesions operated with RSL between February 2013 and March 2015 at our university institution, and compared with an equivalent number of surgeries performed with a single WL. Imaging and pathology reports were reviewed for information on guidance mode, accuracy of targeting, nature of excised lesion, size and volume of surgical specimen, status of margins, and reinterventions. RESULTS: A total of 254 lesions (247 women) were excised with RSL and compared with 257 lesions (244 women) whose surgery was guided by WL. Both groups were comparable in lesion pathology, guidance mode for RSL or WL positioning, and accuracy of targeting (98% correct). Mean delay between biopsy and surgery was 84 days for RSL versus 103 after WL (P = .04). No differences were noted after RSL or WL for surgical specimen mean weight, largest diameter, and volume excised. For malignancies, the rate of positive margins was comparable (2.8%-3%), with 5 of 10 women in the RSL group who underwent a second surgery displaying residual malignancy compared with 3 of 9 women in the WL group. CONCLUSIONS: RSL is safe and accurate, and has comparable surgical endpoints to WL. Because RSL offers flexible scheduling and facilitated oncoplasty, RSL may replace WL for resection of nonpalpable single breast lesions.

The role of platelet rich plasma enriched fat graft for correction of deformities after conservative breast surgery.

BACKGROUND: Fat transfer has been widely used after breast conservative surgery (BCS) where it aims to recover shapes as a simple, inexpensive, biocompatible method but the technique is not without complications. Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is a promising approach to enhance fat graft survival and subsequently improve the outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enriching fat graft with PRP for delayed correction of deformities after conservative surgery for breast cancer regarding esthetic outcome and incidence of complications. METHODS: The current study included 50 female patients who were scheduled for delayed lipofilling for correction of deformities after conservative surgery for breast cancer. The studied patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group I (G I) included 25 patients scheduled for PRP enriched lipoinjection and Group II (G II) included 25 patients scheduled for lipoinjection without PRP as a control group. RESULTS: Number of sessions of lipoinjection was significantly less in G I in comparison to G II (P = 0.024). During the 2nd session; the amounts of fat injected and harvested were significantly less in G I in comparison to G II (P = 0.049 and 0.001 respectively). Recipient site complications were significantly more evident in G II in comparison to G I (P = 0.01). Surgeon and patient satisfactions were significantly more evident in GI in comparison to G II (P = 0.005 and 0.029 respectively). CONCLUSION: The addition of PRP to fat grafts is a simple, cost-effective and safe method to improve esthetic outcome and decrease complications.

Sexual Health in Pre-menopausal Breast Cancer Survivors.

Sexual health is often a neglected issue and affects the quality of life after treatment completion in breast cancer patients. The aim of the study was to find the incidence of sexual dysfunction and impact of mastectomy, breast conservation surgery (BCS), and hormone therapy in eligible patients on female sexuality in breast cancer survivors. It is a prospective study of 150 non-metastatic pre-menopausal BC survivors. Each participant answered the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire at 4 weeks and at 3 months after completion of all therapy. Scores were compared between mastectomy and BCS patients and on hormonal therapy versus non-hormonal therapy. Chemotherapy was given to all patients and > 90% received adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients underwent both mastectomy (n = 104; 70%) and BCS (n = 46), based on imaging, staging, and patients' choice. Of the patients, 82.6% (n = 124) had sexual dysfunction at 3 months post-treatment (cutoff of 26.55). BCS survivors had significantly better scores in comparison to mastectomy survivors at 3-month interval evaluation (median 22.85 ± 2.19 versus 21.75 ± 2.09, p = 0.002). There was statistically non-significant reduction in arousal, lubrication, orgasm, pain in mastectomy survivors, and in desire, arousal, and pain in hormonal group survivors, at 3 months follow-up. Overall sexual dysfunction is high in breast cancer survivors irrespective of therapy (82.6%); however, it is more in patients undergoing mastectomy in comparison to patients undergoing conservative surgery in short-term follow-up. Sexual dysfunction issues needs to be addressed during survivorship programs, and longer follow-up is necessary to assess effect of various treatment modalities.

Conservative Surgery in cT4 Breast Cancer: Single-Center Experience in the Neoadjuvant Setting.

BACKGROUND: The diffusion of screening programs has resulted in a decrease of cT4 breast cancer diagnosis. The standard care for cT4 was neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA), surgery, and locoregional or adjuvant systemic therapies. NA allows two outcomes: 1. improve survival rates, and 2. de-escalation of surgery. This de-escalation has allowed the introduction of conservative breast surgery (CBS). We evaluate the possibility of submitting cT4 patients to CBS instead of radical breast surgery (RBS) by assessing the risk of locoregional disease-free survival, (LR-DFS) distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This monocentric, retrospective study evaluated cT4 patients submitted to NA and surgery between January 2014 and July 2021. The study population included patients undergoing CBS or RBS without immediate reconstruction. Survival curves were obtained using the Kaplan-Meyer method and compared using a Log Rank test. RESULTS: At a follow-up of 43.7 months, LR-DFS was 70% and 75.9%, respectively, in CBS and RBS (p = 0.420). DDFS was 67.8% and 29.7%, respectively, (p = 0.122). OS was 69.8% and 59.8%, respectively, (p = 0.311). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with major or complete response to NA, CBS can be considered a safe alternative to RBS in the treatment of cT4a-d stage. In patients with poor response to NA, RBS remained the best surgical choice.

A new oncoplastic technique for removal of centrally located malignant tumors and reconstruction by a local dermo-glandular flap in conservative breast surgery.

AIM: To evaluate the local dermo-glandular flap as a new reconstructive oncoplastic technique after removal of central malignant tumors of the breast, in terms of patient satisfaction and local recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 60 females with centrally located breast cancer who underwent central quadrantectomy and local dermo-glandular flap with either sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary clearance. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 49.68 ± 8.52 years. The duration of the operation ranged from 68-105 minutes, with a mean of 79.77 ± 9.41 minutes. Local recurrence was observed in three patients (5.00%) with no distant metastasis. Forty-seven patients (78.33%) reported satisfaction after the operation. Ugly scarring and the existence of tissue defects were the main factors affecting patient satisfaction. Correction of these complications increased overall satisfaction to 88.33%. CONCLUSIONS: For small- and medium-sized breasts, the use of a local dermo-glandular flap for the management of centrally located malignant tumors seems to be a simple and easy technique with good oncological outcomes and acceptable few minor complications. This technique offers an immediate reconstruction of a new areola with fewer scars that will be hidden later after areola tattooing. Most of the patients reported satisfaction three months after areola reconstruction.

Breast Lymphedema After Conservative Breast Surgery: An Up-to-date Systematic Review.

Although arm lymphedema following breast cancer treatment is a common complication; breast lymphedema following treatment is not uncommon. Several risk factors were found to contribute to breast lymphedema, including axillary surgery, high body mass index (BMI), increased bra cup size, adjuvant chemotherapy, locoregional and radiotherapy boost, and upper outer quadrant tumors. We aimed to provide a review to help avoiding or management of breast lymphedema. The search term 'breast lymphedema' was combined with 'breast conservative surgery' and was used to conduct a literature research in PubMed and Medline. The term lymphedema was combined with breast, conservative, and surgery to search the Embase database. All papers published in English were included with no exclusion date limits. A total of 2155 female patients were included in this review; age ranged from 26 to 90 years. The mean BMI was 28.4 of the studies that included patients who underwent conservative breast surgery. Incidence of breast lymphedema ranged from 24.8% to 90.4%. Several risk factors were linked to breast lymphedema after conservative breast surgery, such as BMI, breast size, tumor size, tumor site, type of surgery, and adjuvant therapy. Treatment options focused on decongestive lymphatic therapy, including manual lymphatic drainage, self-massaging, compression bras, or Kinesio taping. Breast lymphedema is a relatively common complication, yet there is no clear consensus on the definition or treatment options.

Mapping of multifocal breast cancer to achieve negative margins: A new step in the evolution of conservative breast surgery(A cohort study).

•Conservative breast surgery is the standard technique in breast cancer.•Multifocal breast cancer is a risk factor for involved margins.•Positive margins are considered one of the predictors for local recurrence.•Preoperative wire mapping after breast marking by the surgeon increase the chance to have negative margins.

Current approaches to managing partial breast defects: the role of conservative breast surgery reconstruction.

Recently breast surgeons can offer patients a variety of treatment and reconstructive alternatives when early breast cancer is diagnosed. In fact, advances in reconstructive techniques have reduced surgical trauma and thus are capable of preserving the breast form as well as quality of life. Depending on a variety of different factors, including stage, tumor size, location, hystological type, but also breast volume, a reconstructive schedule is established. The main techniques are related to volume displacement or replacement procedures including local flaps, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and reduction mammaplasty/ masthopexy. Regardless of the fact that there are is no consensus over the best approach, the criteria are determined by the surgeon's experience and the size of the defect in relation to the size of the remaining breast. Aim of every reconstructive procedure decision should be breast preservation and an adequate aesthetic outcome. Additionally, reconstruction permits wider excision of the tumor, with a superior mean volume of the specimen and potentially reducing the incidence of margin involvement. The objective of this review is to give an overview of reconstructive modalities for conservative breast surgery, based not only on traditional but also on the latest studies regarding the outcome of the main techniques employed. Surgical approaches, as well as conservative treatment options, such as lumpectomy and quadrantectomy, are further discussed. Surgical planning should include the patients' preferences, while chiefly addressing individual reconstructive requirements, and enabling each patient to receive an individual "custom-made" reconstruction.

Current aspects of therapeutic reduction mammaplasty for immediate early breast cancer management: An update.

Breast-conservation surgery (BCS) is established as a safe surgical treatment for most patients with early breast cancer. Recently, advances in oncoplastic techniques are capable of preserving the breast form and quality of life. Although most BCS defects can be managed with primary closure, the aesthetic outcome may be unpredictable. Among technical options, therapeutic reduction mammaplasty (TRM) remains a useful procedure since the BCS defect can be repaired and the preoperative appearance can be improved, resulting in more proportional breasts. As a consequence of rich breast tissue vascularization, the greater part of reduction techniques have based their planning on preserving the pedicle of the nipple-areola complex after tumor removal. Reliable circulation and improvement of a conical shape to the breast are commonly described in TRM reconstructions. With an immediate approach, the surgical process is smooth since both procedures can be carried out in one operative setting. Additionally, it permits wider excision of the tumor, with a superior mean volume of the specimen and potentially reduces the incidence of margin involvement. Regardless of the fact that there is no consensus concerning the best TRM technique, the criteria is determined by the surgeon's experience, the extent/location of glandular tissue resection and the size of the defect in relation to the size of the remaining breast. The main advantages of the technique utilized should include reproducibility, low interference with the oncological treatment and long-term results. The success of the procedure depends on patient selection, coordinated planning and careful intra-operative management.

Oncoplastic breast surgery: indications, techniques and perspectives.

Breast-conservation surgery (BCS) is established as a safe option for most women with early breast cancer. Recently, advances in oncoplastic techniques have reduced surgical trauma and thus are capable of preserving the breast form and quality of life. In spite of the most BCS defects can be managed with primary closure, the aesthetic outcome may be unpredictable. Oncoplastic reconstruction may begin at the time of BCS (immediate), weeks (delayed-immediate) or months to years afterwards (delayed). With immediate reconstruction, the surgical process is smooth, since both procedures can be associated in one operative setting. Additionally, it permits wider excision of the tumor, with a superior mean volume of the specimen and potentially reducing the incidence of margin involvement. The oncoplastic techniques are related to volume displacement or replacement procedures including local flaps, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and reduction mammaplasty/masthopexy. Regardless of the fact that there is no consensus concerning the best approach, the criteria are determined by the surgeon's experience and the size of the defect in relation to the size of the remaining breast. On the basis of our 15-year experience, it is possible to identify trends in types of breast defects and to develop an algorithm for immediate BCS reconstruction on the basis of the initial breast volume, the extent/location of glandular tissue ressection and the remaining available breast tissue. The main advantages of the technique utilized should include reproducibility, low interference with the oncologic treatment and long-term results. Surgical planning should include the patients's preferences, and chiefly addressing individual reconstructive requirements, enabling each patient to receive an individual "custom-made" reconstruction.

¿Es concordante el tamaño tumoral medido en resonancia magnética mamaria y el de la biopsia quirúrgica en pacientes con cáncer de mama, tratadas con quimioterapia neoadyuvante? / Is breast MRI concordant with pathologic tumor size in breast cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy?

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a treatment used in those breast cancers initially inoperable due to their size, and also in operable breast cancers where NACT could increase the rate of conservative breast surgery. To assess tumor response to treatment, clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound, and breast MRI are used, the latter being the modality that yields the best correlation with histologic tumor volume. We evaluated the correlation of tumor sizes as measured by MRI versus surgical pathological specimen in breast cancers treated with NACT. Eighteen patients underwent MRI to monitor NACT; in 15 (83 percent) of them the final biopsy was obtained. In this group a very good correlation was observed, with a mean difference between MRI and histology of 4 mm regarding tumor volumen, which has allowed an adequate management of patients in our daily practice.

La quimioterapia neoadyuvante (QTNA) es un tratamiento usado en aquellos cánceres mamarios cuyo tamaño los hace inoperables al momento del diagnóstico y en cánceres mamarios operables, pero cuyo uso podría permitir una cirugía conservadora. Para evaluar la respuesta al tratamiento, se ha utilizado el examen clínico, la mamografía, el ultrasonido y la resonancia magnética mamaria, siendo ésta última la que mejor correlación tiene con el tamaño tumoral histológico. Quisimos evaluar la concordancia del tamaño tumoral medido en resonancia magnética con el de la biopsia quirúrgica, en cánceres mamarios tratados con QTNA. Dieciocho pacientes se realizaron resonancia magnética para monitorización de QTNA, en 15 (83 por ciento) de ellas se obtuvo la biopsia definitiva. En este grupo observamos una muy buena correlación, con una diferencia promedio de 4 mm, entre el tamaño de la resonancia y el de la histología, lo que permitió en nuestro medio un adecuado manejo de las pacientes.