Rationale and design of a randomized trial of the dapagliflozin evaluation on atrial fibrillation patients followed Cox-Maze IV: the DETAIL-CMIV study.

AIMS: Dapagliflozin has been widely used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF). However, data concerning the association between dapagliflozin and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in patients following Cox-Maze IV (CMIV), are rare. We aim to explore the effect of dapagliflozin on the recurrence of AF after CMIV with and without T2DM or HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study of dapagliflozin evaluation in AF patients followed by CMIV (DETAIL-CMIV) is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 240 AF patients who have received the CMIV procedure will be randomized into the dapagliflozin group (10 mg/day, n = 120) and the placebo group (10 mg/day, n = 120) and treated for 3 months. The primary endpoint is any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia) lasting 30 s following a blanking period of 3 months after CMIV. CONCLUSION: DETAIL-CMIV will determine whether the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, added to guideline-recommended post-operative AF therapies, safely reduces the recurrence rate of AF in patients with and without T2DM or HF.

Novel Entropy-Based Metrics for Long-Term Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Prediction Following Surgical Ablation: Insights from Preoperative Electrocardiographic Analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia often treated concomitantly with other cardiac interventions through the Cox-Maze procedure. This highly invasive intervention is still linked to a long-term recurrence rate of approximately 35% in permanent AF patients. The aim of this study is to preoperatively predict long-term AF recurrence post-surgery through the analysis of atrial activity (AA) organization from non-invasive electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings. A dataset comprising ECGs from 53 patients with permanent AF who had undergone Cox-Maze concomitant surgery was analyzed. The AA was extracted from the lead V1 of these recordings and then characterized using novel predictors, such as the mean and standard deviation of the relative wavelet energy (RWEm and RWEs) across different scales, and an entropy-based metric that computes the stationary wavelet entropy variability (SWEnV). The individual predictors exhibited limited predictive capabilities to anticipate the outcome of the procedure, with the SWEnV yielding a classification accuracy (Acc) of 68.07%. However, the assessment of the RWEs for the seventh scale (RWEs7), which encompassed frequencies associated with the AA, stood out as the most promising individual predictor, with sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) values of 80.83% and 67.09%, respectively, and an Acc of almost 75%. Diverse multivariate decision tree-based models were constructed for prediction, giving priority to simplicity in the interpretation of the forecasting methodology. In fact, the combination of the SWEnV and RWEs7 consistently outperformed the individual predictors and excelled in predicting post-surgery outcomes one year after the Cox-Maze procedure, with Se, Sp, and Acc values of approximately 80%, thus surpassing the results of previous studies based on anatomical predictors associated with atrial function or clinical data. These findings emphasize the crucial role of preoperative patient-specific ECG signal analysis in tailoring post-surgical care, enhancing clinical decision making, and improving long-term clinical outcomes.

Prediction model of atrial fibrillation recurrence after Cox-Maze IV procedure in patients with chronic valvular disease and atrial fibrillation based on machine learning algorithm. / åŸºäºŽæœºå™¨å­¦ä¹ çš„æ ¢æ€§ç“£è†œç— åˆå¹¶å¿ƒæˆ¿é¢¤åŠ¨æ‚£è€ è¡ŒCox迷宫IV手术后心房颤动复发风险预测模型.

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, and Cox-maze IV procedure (CMP-IV) is a commonly employed surgical technique for its treatment. Currently, the risk factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence following CMP-IV remain relatively unclear. In recent years, machine learning algorithms have demonstrated immense potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, predicting patient outcomes, and devising personalized treatment strategies. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of CMP-IV on treating chronic valvular disease with AF, utilize machine learning algorithms to identify potential risk factors for AF recurrence, construct a CMP-IV postoperative AF recurrence prediction model. METHODS: A total of 555 patients with AF combined with chronic valvular disease, who met the criteria, were enrolled from January 2012 to December 2019 from the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and the Affiliated Xinqiao Hospital of the Army Medical University, with an average age of (57.95±7.96) years, including an AF recurrence group (n=117) and an AF non-recurrence group (n=438). Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the sinus rhythm maintenance rate, and 9 machine learning models were developed including random forest, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), bootstrap aggregating, logistic regression, categorical boosting (CatBoost), support vector machine, adaptive boosting, and multi-layer perceptron. Five-fold cross-validation and model evaluation indicators [including F1 score, accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the curve (AUC)] were used to evaluate the performance of the models. The 2 best-performing models were selected for further analyze, including feature importance evaluation and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis, identifying AF recurrence risk factors, and building an AF recurrence risk prediction model. RESULTS: The 5-year sinus rhythm maintenance rate for the patients was 82.13% (95% CI 78.51% to 85.93%). Among the 9 machine learning models, XGBoost and CatBoost models performed best, with the AUC of 0.768 (95% CI 0.742 to 0.786) and 0.762 (95% CI 0.723 to 0.801), respectively. Feature importance and SHAP analysis showed that duration of AF, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, postoperative heart rhythm, preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, preoperative left atrial diameter, preoperative heart rate, and preoperative white blood cell were important factors for AF recurrence. Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms can be effectively used to identify potential risk factors for AF recurrence after CMP-IV. This study successfuly constructs 2 prediction model which may enhance individualized treatment plans.

[Surgical concepts for atrial fibrillation in patients with concomitant mitral valve disease]. / Sravnitel'nyi analiz dvukh kontseptsii khirurgicheskogo lecheniya fibrillyatsii predserdii u patsientov s soputstvuyushchim porazheniem mitral'nogo klapana.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze in-hospital results after «Cox-maze III¼ and «Cox-maze IV¼ procedures with concomitant mitral valve surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included patients who underwent «Cox-maze III¼ and «Cox-maze IV¼ procedures between January 2015 and February 2022. We distinguished 2 groups using propensity score matching: «Cox-maze III¼ group (n=15), «Cox-maze IV¼ group (n=14). All patients had preoperative atrial fibrillation: paroxysmal (3 (10.3%) patients), persistent (5 (17.2%)) and long-standing persistent (21 (72.4%) patients). Mean duration of AF before surgery was 11 [9-60] months in both groups. We used standard statistical methods using the IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software package (USA). RESULTS: Aortic cross-clamping time was significantly less in the «Cox-maze IV¼ group (p<0.001). There was no in-hospital mortality in both groups. Mean duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly less in the «Cox-maze IV¼ group (5 [3.5-9] vs. 14 [12-18] hours, respectively, p<0.001). Drainage output in the first postoperative day was significantly less in the «Cox-maze IV¼ group (295 [220-370] vs. 400 [325-500] ml, respectively, p=0.02). Temporary pacemaker was required in 73.3% and 42.8% of cases, respectively (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: We should emphasize high efficiency of sinus rhythm recovery after both procedures without significant difference (p=0.16). However, time of aortic cross-clamping, mechanical ventilation and volume of postoperative bleeding were significantly less in the «Cox-maze IV¼ group.

Hybrid Ablation of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The Convergent and Totally Thoracoscopic Approaches.

Nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation continues to challenge electrophysiologist and surgeons alike. Stand-alone endocardial catheter ablation has resulted in less than satisfying results, and while the on-pump Cox-Maze surgery has excellent results, the invasiveness has limited its adoption amongst both referring providers and surgeons. The CONVERGE IDE trial has shed new light on this once dim problem. EPs and Surgeons are now working together in a Hybrid Team Ablation Approach to provide a combined ablation strategy that has improved patient outcomes and rekindled the collaboration necessary to better patient outcomes. We herein summarize the current Hybrid Team Ablation Approaches (CONVERGE and Totally Thoracoscopic) with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Comparing mid-term outcomes of Cox-Maze procedure and pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation after concomitant mitral valve surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although concomitant pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is used more frequently than the Cox-Maze procedure, which is currently the gold standard treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), data on the comparative effectiveness of the two procedures after concomitant mitral valve (MV) surgery are still limited. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the mid-term mortality and recurrence of AF after concomitant Cox-Maze and PVI in patients with AF undergoing MV surgery based on 12-month follow-up. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE databases, and the Cochrane Library were searched from 1987 up to March 2022 for studies comparing concomitant Cox-Maze and PVI. Additionally, a meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes between these two surgical ablation techniques. RESULTS: Three RCTs and three observational studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this systematic review with 790 patients in total (532 concomitant Cox-Maze and 258 PVI during MV surgery). Most studies reported that the concomitant Cox-Maze procedure was associated with higher freedom from AF at 12-month follow-up than PVI. Regarding AF recurrence, estimates pooled across the three RCTs indicated large heterogeneity and high uncertainty. In the largest and highest quality RCT, 12-month AF recurrence was higher in the PVI arm (risk ratio = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.91-2.73). In two out of three higher-quality observational studies, 12-month AF recurrence was higher in PVI than in the Cox-Maze arm (estimated adjusted probabilities 11% vs. 8% and 35% vs. 17%, respectively). RCTs demonstrated comparable 12-month mortality between concomitant Cox-Maze and PVI, while observational studies demonstrated the survival benefit of Cox-Maze. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant Cox-Maze in AF patients undergoing MV surgery is associated with better mid-term freedom from AF when compared to PVI with comparable mid-term survival. Large observational studies suggest that there might be a mid-term survival benefit among patients after concomitant Cox-Maze. Further large RCTs with longer standardized follow-up are required to clarify the benefits of concomitant Cox-Maze in AF patients during MV surgery.

Commentary to: "Comparing midterm outcomes" of Cox-Maze procedure and pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation after concomitant mitral valve surgery: A "systematic review".

There is no solid evidence from the literature that compare Cox-Maze with pulmonary vein isolation techniques for atrial fibrillation in the context of concomitant mitral valve surgery. Although the first is perhaps more effective and linked to higher freedom from atrial fibrillation, it is more invasive compared to the pulmonary isolation.

Robotic assisted cryothermic biatrial Cox-Maze.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic cryothermic Cox-Maze (CM) IV is a minimally invasive procedure that reliably replicates the biatrial lesion set of the CM III by utilizing cryothermia as a single power source. METHODS: Herein we describe a step by step creation of the biatrial CM III lesion sets utilizing the minimally invasive robotic platform. RESULTS: Technical details are reviewed for this single incision, single stage, highly effective option for stand-alone or concomitant surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). CONCLUSION: Robotic cryothermic CM IV can be safely performed as a stand-alone or concomitant procedure, and offers a comprehensive surgical ablation solution for patients with AF.

Efficacy of the stand-alone Cox-Maze IV procedure in patients with longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and results in significant morbidity and mortality. The Cox-Maze IV procedure (CMP-IV) has been shown to have excellent efficacy in returning patients to sinus rhythm, but there have been few reports of late follow-up in sizable cohorts of patients with longstanding persistent AF, the most difficult type of AF to treat. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between May 2003 and March 2020, 174 consecutive patients underwent a stand-alone CMP-IV for longstanding persistent AF. Rhythm outcome was assessed postoperatively for up to 10 years, primarily via prolonged monitoring (Holter monitor, pacemaker interrogation, or implantable loop recorder). Fine-Gray regression was used to investigate factors associated with atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence, with death as a competing risk. Median duration of preoperative AF was 7.8 years (interquartile range: 4.0-12.0 years), with 71% (124/174) having failed at least one prior catheter-based ablation. There were no 30-day mortalities. Freedom from ATAs was 94% (120/128), 83% (53/64), and 88% (35/40) at 1, 5, and 7 years, respectively. On regression analysis, preoperative AF duration and early postoperative ATAs were associated with late ATAs recurrence. CONCLUSION: Despite the majority of patients having a long-duration of preoperative AF and having failed at least one catheter-based ablation, the stand-alone CMP-IV had excellent late efficacy in patients with longstanding persistent AF, with low morbidity and no mortality. We recommend consideration of stand-alone CMP-IV for patients with longstanding persistent AF who have failed or are poor candidates for catheter ablation.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning ameliorates sinus rhythm restoration rate through Cox maze radiofrequency procedure associated with inflammation reaction reduction.

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) as adjuvant to selective heart surgery attenuates cardiac injury and atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence. We investigated its effect on sinus rhythm (SR) restoration rate in permanent AF patients undergoing Cox maze (CM) radiofrequency ablation with concomitant mitral valve surgery. From May 2013 to May 2017, 206 patients with rheumatic valve disease concomitant with permanent AF were randomized to receive prosthesis valve replacement and CM radiofrequency ablation procedure with (n = 104) or without (n = 102) RIPC (intermittent arm ischaemia through three cycles of 5-min inflation, followed by 5-min deflation of a blood pressure cuff). The primary end point of the study was freedom from cumulative AF without using antiarrhythmic drugs 1 year after operation; the secondary end points included inflammation reaction index over 48 h postoperatively and clinical outcomes. Baseline characteristics and preoperative data did not differ between groups. The SR restoration rates were significantly higher in the RIPC group, 85.6%, 83.7%, and 82.7%, than those in the control group, 72.5%, 70.6%, and 69.6%, at discharge, 6 months and 12 months, respectively, after the radiofrequency ablation procedure (P < 0.05). The serum concentration of high sensitivity C-reactive protein and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were significantly decreased at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively in the RIPC group compared to those in the control group (P < 0.05). RIPC induced by brief ischaemia and reperfusion of the arm ameliorated SR restoration rate in patients with permanent AF through CM radiofrequency ablation procedure and was associated with reduction of postoperative systemic inflammation reaction index.

Safety and efficacy of biatrial vs left atrial surgical ablation during concomitant cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of clinical studies with a focus on the causes of pacemaker implantation.

INTRODUCTION: The latest STS guidelines recommend concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation not only during mitral surgery (Class IA) but also during other-than-mitral cardiac surgery procedures (Class IB) in patients with preoperative AF. Conventional Cox-Maze III/IV procedures are performed on both atria (BA), but several studies reported excellent results with left atrial only (LA) ablations: the scope of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BA vs LA approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pubmed, Scopus, and WOS were searched from inception to November 2018: 28 studies including 7065 patients and comparing the performance of BA vs LA approaches were identified: of these, 16 (57.1%) enrolled exclusively patients with non-paroxysmal AF forms, 10 (35.7%) focused on mitral surgery as main procedure, and 16 (57.1%) regarded patients undergone Cox-Maze with radiofrequency. The 6- and 12-months prevalence of sinus rhythm were higher in the BA group (OR, 1.37, CI, 1.09-1.73, P = .008 and OR, 1.37, CI, 0.99-1.88, P = .05 respectively). Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (OR, 1.85, CI, 1.38-2.49, P < .0001) and reopening for bleeding (OR, 1.70, CI, 1.05-2.75, P = .03) were higher in the BA group. Among patients undergone PPM implantation, BA group had a significantly higher risk of sinoatrial node dysfunction (OR, 3.01, CI, 1.49-6.07, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant BA ablation appears superior to LA ablation in terms of efficacy but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding and of PPM implantation, more frequently due to sinoatrial node dysfunction. LA approach should be preferable in patients with a higher risk of bleeding or with perioperative risk factors for PPM implantation.

Impact of the Cox-Maze IV Procedure on Left Atrial Mechanical Function.

BACKGROUND: The Cox-Maze IV procedure is a proven surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Previous studies on the procedure and its effect on left atrial mechanical function have yielded mixed results. METHODS: Sixty-four (64) patients underwent Cox-Maze IV at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne between March 2010 and May 2016. Baseline characteristics were collected and outcomes assessed including rhythm analysis. Preoperative and postoperative transthoracic echocardiograms were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (57) patients had complete follow-up with all clinical measures collected. The mean age was 71.1±10.2years, 63% being male. Fifty-eight per cent (58%) (33/57) of patients were in AF and 42% (24/57) in sinus rhythm (SR) at preoperative transthoracic echocardiography. Follow-up postoperative transthoracic echocardiography was performed at a mean of 2.3±1.9years. Nineteen (19) patients with a history of paroxysmal AF were in SR both preoperatively and postoperatively. In these patients, there was a significant decrease in Mitral A wave 0.63±0.28m/s (pre-op) vs 0.47±0.29m/s (post-op), p=0.044. There was a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) postoperatively 64.2±9.7% vs 55.0±12.9%, p=0.005. At follow-up, 28% (16/57) were in AF, 61% (35/57) in SR, and 11% (6/57) in a paced rhythm. In a multivariate analysis, predictors of AF recurrence included higher LA volumes (p=0.042) and younger age at surgery p=0.030. Preoperative AF, sex and LVEF had no impact on AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The Cox-Maze IV procedure, while effective in converting patients to sinus rhythm, may reduce left atrial mechanical function in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Surgical and Hybrid Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in humans and is known to be associated with an increased risk of stroke, dementia, heart failure and mortality. Non-pharmacological therapy with ablation using either surgical or percutaneous techniques is recommended in drug refractory AF. Early attempts to devise procedures to ablate AF and restore sinus rhythm culminated with the Cox-Maze procedure, the first truly successful procedure. Since then, ablation surgery has been conducted predominately as a concomitant procedure. The Cox Maze procedure is complex and technically demanding and has, therefore, been extensively modified with new techniques for creating the linear ablation lines, new lesion sets, minimally invasive surgical techniques and most recently hybrid surgical-catheter ablation techniques. Surgical ablation techniques result in a marked reduction in atrial fibrillation when compared to conventional therapy with only a small increase in procedural risk. However, further research is required to more accurately quantify those benefits and to determine the optimal lesion sets, specific to the underlying arrhythmia mechanism and the optimal energy sources for ablation.

Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and its treatment options include drug therapy or catheter-based or surgical interventions. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation has undergone multiple evolutions over the last several decades. The Cox-Maze procedure went on to become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation and is currently in its fourth iteration (Cox-Maze IV). This article reviews the indications and preoperative planning for performing a Cox-Maze IV procedure. This article also reviews the literature describing the surgical results for both approaches including comparisons of the Cox-Maze IV to the previous cut-and-sew method.

Treating Atrial Fibrillation is No Maze: A Reminder to Heart Teams for Concomitant Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Cardiac Surgery.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia and is often found during times of other cardiac pathologies that require surgical management including coronary revascularization and valve surgery. Surgical ablation of AF, most frequently performed through the Cox-Maze IV procedure, is highly effective in restoring sinus rhythm. Despite robust society guideline recommendations for concomitant surgical ablation (CSA) for AF, the practice has yet to be widely adopted. In this review, we discuss the current indications for CSA, its efficacy in maintaining freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias, stroke, and adverse long-term outcomes, the safety profile of SA when performed alongside cardiac surgical cases, and challenges with its implementation across the most common concomitant cardiac operations. In conclusion, we present a reminder to multidisciplinary heart teams to consider CSA when indicated for their patients.

The outcomes of concomitant catheter ablation in non-mitral valve cardiac surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrythmia, with a key importance in the perioperative setting of cardiac surgery. In recent years, the question as to whether pre-existent AF should be treated concomitantly when undergoing cardiac surgery has been heatedly debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to delineate the outcomes of patients undergoing concomitant AF ablation procedures alongside cardiac surgery. Methods: The methods for this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Four databases were searched, ultimately yielding 22 papers for inclusion, using appropriate search terminology. Meta-analysis using proportions or means, as appropriate, were applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated using previously reported and validated techniques. Results: A total of 9,428 patients (67% male) were identified across the study period as having received non-mitral cardiac surgery and concomitant AF ablation procedures. On actuarial assessment, freedom from AF was found to be 93%, 88%, 85%, 82%, and 79% at 1 through to 5 years, respectively. Freedom from mortality was found to be 94%, 93%, 91%, 90%, and 87% at 1 through to 5 years, respectively. Conclusions: This review demonstrated excellent freedom from AF out to a long-term follow-up of 5 years. Freedom from mortality was also encouraging. Emerging data are increasingly illustrating that in this patient cohort, concurrent treatment of pre-existent AF with cardiac and/or valvular disease at the point of operation should be the standard of care. Robust data in the form of randomized control trials will hopefully solidify this assertion.

Durability of annuloplasty in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation associated with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the durability of mitral valve repair (MVr) with complete ring or flexible band annuloplasty in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) due to atrial fibrillation (AF) and identify risk factors associated with postoperative recurrence of mitral regurgitation. METHODS: Between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2023, 194 adults with a history of AF underwent MVr with annuloplasty alone for moderate/severe AFMR. Exclusion criteria were prior cardiac surgery, additional repair techniques, ejection fraction <45%, ischemic heart disease, aortic valve disease, mitral annular calcification, and concomitant procedures other than surgical ablation or tricuspid repair/replacement. The durability of annuloplasty was assessed using longitudinal analysis of postoperative echocardiographic data. RESULTS: Complete ring annuloplasty was performed in 126 of 194 patients (65%); partial ring (posterior band) in the other 68 (35%). Concomitantly, 124 of the 194 patients underwent tricuspid valve surgery, and 173 (89%) had a procedure for AF, including biatrial Cox-Maze III/IV lesion set in 152 (88%) and pulmonary vein isolation in 21 (12%). All patients were discharged with no/trace MR. Freedom from moderate/severe MR after repair with annuloplasty alone was 89% at 10 years, and no significant differences were noted between complete and partial ring annuloplasty (early, P = .41; late, P = .92). Forty-eight percent of patients developed AF at 3 months or longer after surgery, and the presence of postoperative AF was not associated with a greater likelihood of recurrence of MR (P = .15). Freedom from mitral reintervention was 96% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriate patients with AFMR, the long-term durability of annuloplasty is excellent with complete ring and posterior band annuloplasty techniques.

Efficacy of a surgical cardiac ablation clamp using nanosecond pulsed electric fields: An acute porcine model.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a recently developed nonthermal technology, nanosecond pulse-field ablation (nsPFA), for surgical ablation of the atria in a beating heart porcine model. METHODS: Six pigs underwent sternotomy and ablation using an nsPFA parallel clamp. The ablation electrodes (53 mm long) were embedded in the jaws of the clamp. Nine lesions per pig were created in locations chosen to be representative of the Cox-maze procedure. Four lesions were intended to electrically isolate parts of the atrium: the right atrial appendage, left atrial appendage, right pulmonary veins, and left pulmonary veins. For these lesions, exit block testing was performed both after ablation and before euthanasia; the time between the 2 tests was 3.3 ± 0.5 hours (range, 2-4 hours). Using purse string sutures, 5 more lesions were created up to the superior vena cava, down to the inferior vena cava, across the right atrial free wall, and at 2 distinct locations on the left atrial free wall. The clamp delivered a train of nanosecond duration pulses, with a total duration of 2.5 seconds, independent of tissue thickness. The heart tissue was stained with 1% triphenyltetrazolium chloride after a dwelling period of 2 hours. Subsequently, each lesion was cross sectioned at 5-mm intervals to assess the ablation depth and transmurality. In some sections, transmurality could not be established on the basis of triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining alone; for these lesions, Gomori-trichrome stains were used, and the histologic sections were evaluated for transmurality. RESULTS: The ablation time was 2.5 seconds per lesion, for a total of only 22.5 seconds ablation time to create 9 lesions. A total of 53 lesions were created, resulting in 388 separate histologic sections. Transmurality was established in 386 sections (99.5%). Mean tissue thickness was 3.1 ± 1.5 mm (range, 0.2-8.6 mm). Exit block was confirmed in 23 of the 24 lesions (96%) postablation and 23 of 24 (96%) before the animals were humanely killed. Over the course of the procedure, neither pulse-induced arrhythmias nor any other complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The novel nsPFA clamp device was effective in creating acute conduction block and transmural lesions in both the right and left atria in an acute porcine model. This nonthermal energy source has great potential to both shorten procedural time and enable effective ablation in the beating heart.

Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation in mitral valve surgery: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias in clinical practice, which leads to cardiac decompensation, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular infarction, and other thromboembolic diseases. AF is one of the most common comorbidities of valvular heart disease, especially in mitral valve disease. At the time of their mitral valve surgery, 20-42% of patients have AF. It is beneficial to maintain postoperative sinus rhythm and minimize complications when AF surgery is performed concurrently with mitral valve surgery. This review describes the surgical management of AF in mitral valve surgery, including AF surgical route, surgical ablation technology and surgical approaches. The aim of this review is to enable more patients with AF to receive more appropriate and individualised treatment. Methods: A narrative review was conducted on the literature on PubMed, Embase including all relevant studies published until November 2023. Key Content and Findings: This review focuses on the surgical management of AF during mitral valve surgery, including AF surgical route, surgical ablation technology and surgical approaches. Conclusions: Mitral valve surgery combined with AF surgery facilitates the maintenance of postoperative sinus rhythm in patients, reduces the risk of postoperative stroke, and improves survival. Advances in ablation technology have reduced the difficulty of the procedure, making it possible for more patients to undergo surgical ablation. In the future, it will be possible to tailor specific lesion sets and ablation modalities for individual patients. This would make surgical treatment of AF more effective and applicable to a larger population of patients with AF and mitral valve disease.