Towards the establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for chest x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka: a multi-centric study.

The establishment of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) is an effective tool for optimising radiation doses delivered to patients during medical imaging procedures. This study aimed to compare the institutional DRLs (IDRLs) and propose a multi-centric diagnostic reference level (MCDRL) for chest x-ray examinations in adult patients in Sri Lanka. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 1091 adult patients across six major tertiary care hospitals. Data on patient characteristics, such as age, sex, weight, and body mass index, and exposure parameters, such as tube voltage (kVp) and the product of tube current and exposure time (mAs), were collected. Patient doses were measured in terms of kerma-area product (PKA) using a PKAmeter mounted on the collimator of the x-ray tube. IDRLs were computed for each hospital according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection guidelines, and the 75th percentile PKAwas used to propose the MCDRL. The relationship between patient weight and exposure parameters was examined using Spearman's rank correlation to investigate the radiographic practice among hospitals. Results showed that IDRLs varied from 0.10 to 0.26 Gy cm2. The proposed MCDRL was 0.23 Gy cm2, substantially higher than the recently published DRLs from other countries. The median kVp ranged from 95 to 104, while mAs ranged from 2.5 to 5.6. Large variations in the PKAand exposure parameters were observed within and among hospitals. The elevated PKAvalues observed in this study were mostly due to the use of high mAs in clinical practice. The weak correlation observed between patient weight and exposure parameters suggests the need to standardise examination protocols concerning patient size. The observed dose variations demonstrate the need for the establishment of national DRLs. Until then, the proposed MCDRL can be considered as the benchmark dose level for chest x-ray examinations in Sri Lanka.

National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Optimisation Strategies.

OBJECTIVE: The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has highlighted the large number of medical specialties using fluoroscopy outside imaging departments without programmes of radiation protection (RP) for patients and staff. Vascular surgery is one of these specialties and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is one of the most challenging procedures requiring RP guidance and optimisation actions. The recent European Directive on Basic Safety Standards requires the use and regular update of diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for interventional procedures. The objective of the study was to know the doses of patients undergoing EVAR with mobile Xray systems and with hybrid rooms (fixed Xray systems), to obtain national DRLs and suggest optimisation actions. METHODS: The Spanish Chapter of Endovascular Surgery launched a national survey that involved hospitals for 10 autonomous communities representing the 77% of the Spanish population (46.7 million inhabitants). Patient dose values from mobile Xray systems were available from nine hospitals (sample of 165 EVAR procedures) and data from hybrid rooms, from seven hospitals, with dosimetric data from 123 procedures. The initial national DRLs have been obtained, as the third quartile of the median values from the different centres involved in the survey. RESULTS: The proposed national DRLs are 278 Gy cm2 for hybrid rooms and 87 Gy cm2 for mobile Xray systems, and for cumulative air kerma (cumulative AK) at the patient entrance reference point, 1403 mGy for hybrid rooms, and 292 mGy for mobile systems. CONCLUSION: An audit of patient doses for EVAR procedures to identify optimised imaging protocol strategies is needed. It is also appropriate to evaluate the diagnostic information required for EVAR procedures. The increase by a factor of 3.2 (for kerma area product) and 4.8 (for cumulative AK) in the DRLs needs to be justified when the procedures are performed in the hybrid rooms rather than with mobile Xray systems.

[A Questionnaire Survey on the Levels of Perception and Implementation on Diagnostic Reference Levels in Japan (Japan DRLs 2015)].

In June 2015, Japanese diagnostic reference levels (Japan DRLs 2015) was released by Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposures (J-RIME). After six months the release of Japan DRLs 2015, we have conducted a questionnaire and received 222 responses from hospital staff regarding their perception level, and implementation on Japan DRLs 2015 at their facilities. 131 people (59.0%) were familiar with Japan DRLs 2015, of which 56 people (29.2%) were not currently implementation of them. A total of 66 people (30.1%) understood how to implement Japan DRLs 2015. There were 35 people (18.2%) who heard of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for the first time through this survey. Those are the levels of perception and implementation on Japan DRLs 2015 became clear. It is necessary to compare the dose levels used at each facility with Japan DRLs 2015 to optimize patient protection during medical exposure. It is essential to continue to grow the medical community's understanding of DRLs with the expanded perception and implementation of this survey as an opinion poll across Japan.

[Multicenter Survey on Radiation Dose of Cardiac Intervention].

We conducted a nationwide survey of multiple institutions and collected data of various interventional procedures in the field of cardiology. Included in the analysis were 126 institutions, 381 X-ray systems, and 805 protocols. The dose values were compared with the Japanese diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) 2015. Fluoroscopy time, air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka, r), and air kerma-area product (PKA ) were analyzed for various interventional procedures in 5,734 cardiology patients. The fluoroscopic dose rate (FDR) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was less than half that of the 75th percentile of the Japanese DRLs 2015. The 75th percentiles of fluoroscopy time, Ka, r, and PKA for the respective interventional procedures were as follows: 11.0 min, 735 mGy, and 64 Gyï½¥cm2 for diagnostic coronary angiography (CA); 13.2 min, 839 mGy, and 75 Gyï½¥cm2 for CA + left ventriculography; 34.4 min, 1,810 mGy, and 148 Gyï½¥cm2 for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) excluding chronic total occlusion; 80.1 min, 4,338 mGy, and 312 Gyï½¥cm2 for PCI for chronic total occlusion; 74.4 min, 833 mGy, and 90 Gyï½¥cm2 for PVI; and 34.0 min, 795 mGy, and 94 Gyï½¥cm2 for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, respectively. In assessing dose values in interventional radiology, the difficulty of the technique needs to be considered, and the DRL values for FDR, fluoroscopic time, Ka, r, and PKA for each interventional procedure are considered necessary when reassessing or updating DRLs.

[Evaluation of Entrance Surface Dose in Chest Radiography Using Clinical Images: Estimation of Subject Thickness Using Two-direction Radiography].

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends adaptation of the diagnostic reference levels as an indicator of optimization of protection, and diagnostic reference levels of 2015 were also published in Japan in 2015 (Japan DRLs 2015). The entrance surface dose (ESD) is evaluated to the published standard subject thickness in Japan DRLs 2015. However, the standard radiographic settings of each facility may not be a radiographic condition of the standard subject thickness of Japan DRLs 2015. We measure and record the thickness of the subject in every examination, and it can solve this problem, but it is difficult to carry out it in the actual clinical scene. In this study, we aimed to estimate the subject thickness by using chest clinical images and to calculate ESD for each radiography. We evaluated and compared with Japan DRLs 2015 using these data. The subject thickness was estimated from 200 cases of digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) image obtained by both the frontal and lateral views of the chest radiography. Also, at the same time, the radiographic settings were acquired from the information of the DICOM tag. The subject thickness was 23.60 cm on the average, and the median of the ESD was 0.104 mGy. Also, the median of the ESD at the standard subject thickness of 20 cm in Japan DRLs 2015 was 0.075 mGy. The ESD can be calculated without measuring the body thickness of the patient of every examination by using the method of this study.

Investigating knowledge of DRLs, image quality and radiation dose in PET/CT and CT imaging among medical imaging professionals.

Objective: To investigate the knowledge of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), image quality, radiation dose and protocol parameters among Jordanian medical imaging professionals (MIPs) involved in PET/CT and CT scan procedures. Materials and methods: A questionnaire was designed and distributed to MIPs in Jordan. The survey comprised four sections: demographic data, MIP knowledge on dose/protocol parameters, image quality, and DRLs. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing Pearson's correlation, t-tests, ANOVA, and linear regression, with a significance level of 95 % and a p-value threshold of <0.05. Results: The study involved 147 participants. Most respondents were male (76.2 %), and most were aged 26-35 years (44.2 %). Approximately 51 % held a bachelor's degree, and the most common range of experience was 3-5 years (28.6 %). Participants showed a moderate level of knowledge regarding dose and protocol parameters, with a mean score of 61.8 %. The mean scores for knowledge of image quality and DRLs were 45.2 % and 44.8 %, respectively. The age group of the MIPs and the total experience were found to have a significant impact on the knowledge of the dose and protocol parameters, as well as the DRLs. Additionally, experience was found to have a significant influence on knowledge of the dose and protocol parameters. The study revealed a positive and significant effect of MIPs' knowledge of dose/protocol parameters and image quality on their knowledge of DRLs. Conclusions: This study indicates that professionals across five specialties who are engaged in PET/CT and CT imaging possess a moderate understanding of dosage and protocol parameters. However, there is a notable gap in knowledge regarding DRLs and image quality. To address this issue, it is recommended that MIPs actively engage in educational programs emphasizing exposure parameters and their impact on image quality. Additionally, access to comprehensive education and training programs will enable MIPs to grasp the complexities of DRLs and their implications, facilitating their implementation in clinical practice.

Establishing Protocol-based Dose Metrics for Common Abdomen and Pelvis Computed Tomography Protocols

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The majority of the existing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) that have been established for computed tomography (CT) are based on various anatomical locations, such as the head, chest, abdomen, etc. However, DRLs are initiated to improve radiation protection by conducting a comparison of similar examinations with similar objectives. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of establishing dose baselines based on common CT protocols for patients who underwent enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis exams. METHODS: Dose length product total (tDLPs), volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), effective dose (E), and scan acquisition parameters for a total of 216 adult patients, who underwent an enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis exams over a one-year period, were obtained and retrospectively analyzed. Spearman coefficient and one-way ANOVA tests were used to check significant differences between dose metrics and the different CT protocols. RESULTS: The data exhibited 9 different CT protocols to acquire an enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis exam at our institute. Out of these, 4 were found more common, i.e., CT protocols were acquired for a minimum of 10 cases. Triphasic liver demonstrated the highest mean and median tDLPs across all 4 CT protocols. Triphasic liver protocol registered the highest E followed by gastric sleeve protocol with a mean of 28.7 and 24.7 mSv, respectively. Significant differences (p < 0.0001) were found between the tDLPs of anatomical location and the CT protocol. CONCLUSION: Evidently, wide variability exists across CT dose indices and patient dose metrics relying on anatomical-based dose baseline, i.e., DRLs. Patient dose optimizations require establishing dose baselines based on CT protocols rather than the anatomical location.

[Questionnaire Survey on IVR Dose Management in Tokai Region].

PURPOSE: National diagnostic reference levels in Japan 2020 (DRLs 2020) have been published. In the field of angiography, in addition to the fluoroscopic dose rate, incident air kerma at the patient entrance reference point displayed on the equipment (Ka,r: mGy) and air kerma-area product displayed on the equipment (PKA: Gycm2) were set. A questionnaire survey was conducted at each facility in the Tokai region to confirm the status of medical radiation dose control in the region. METHOD: A questionnaire survey was conducted at each facility in the Tokai region. The items were fluoroscopic dose rate in each area (head and neck, cardiac, chest and abdomen, and limbs), DA and DSA dose rates, and dose area product meter (Ka,r, PKA) for the main procedures in each area. RESULT: The median values in this study were lower than those in the DRLs 2020, indicating that appropriate dose control is being implemented in the Tokai region. The trends of fluoroscopic and radiographic dose rates were different in each area, and there was some variation among the facilities. CONCLUSION: We believe that the incorporation of fluoroscopic and radiographic dose rates by area into the DRLs will facilitate more appropriate dose control at each facility in the future.

Investigating CT head diagnostic reference levels based on indication-based protocols - a single site study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to provide clinically-relevant insights into establishing CT DRLs based on indication-based protocols in Ireland, focusing on CT head examinations performed at a neurology centre of excellence hospital. METHODS: Dose data were collected retrospectively. Typical values for six CT head indication-based protocols were established using a sample size of 50 patients for each protocol. Typical values for each protocol were set as the median of the distribution curve. Dose distributions for each protocol were calculated and compared using non-parametric median test (k-samples) to ascertain significant dose differences between the typical values. RESULTS: Most typical values pairings showed significant differences (p < 0.001) except between stroke/non-vascular brain, stroke/acute brain, and acute brain/non-vascular brain pairings. This was expected due to similar scan parameters. The typical value for stroke (3-phases angiogram) was 52% lower than the typical value for stroke. Dose levels of the male populations recorded were higher than female populations for all protocols. Statistical comparison showed significant differences for dose quantities and/or scan length between both genders in five protocols. CONCLUSION: Proposed values for DLP were up to 63% and 69% lower than the EU and Irish national DRLs respectively. Establishment of CT stroke DRLs should be based on the scan performed instead of number of scan acquisitions. Lastly, gender-based CT DRLs for specific protocols within the head region require further investigation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: With increasing CT examinations worldwide, radiation dose optimisation is key. The value of indication based DRLs is to enhance the required patient protection so image quality can be maintained, however with relevant DRLs for varying protocols. Establishment of CT typical values and site specific DRLs for procedures beyond the national DRLs can drive dose optimisation locally.

National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Nuclear Medicine in Qatar.

Nuclear medicine (NM) started in Qatar in the mid-1980s with a 1-head γ-camera in Hamad General Hospital. However, Qatar is expanding, and now Hamad Medical Corp. has 2 NM departments and 1 PET/CT Center for Diagnosis and Research, with several hybrid SPECT/CT and PET/CT cameras. Furthermore, 2 new NM departments will be established in Qatar in the coming 3 y. Therefore, there is a need to optimize radiation protection in NM imaging and establish diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for the first time in Qatar. This need is not only for the NM part of the examination but also for the CT part, especially in hybrid SPECT/CT and PET/CT. Methods: Data for adult patients were collected from the 3 SPECT/CT machines in the 2 NM facilities and from the 2 PET/CT machines in the PET/CT center. The 75th percentile values (also known as the third quartile) were considered preliminary DRLs and were consistent with the most commonly administered activities. The results for various general NM protocols were described, especially 99mTc-based radiopharmaceuticals and PET/CT protocols including mainly oncologic applications. Results: The first DRLs for NM imaging in Qatar adults were established. The values agreed with other published DRLs, as was the case, for example, for PET oncology using 18F-FDG, with DRLs of 258, 230, 370, 400, and 461-710 MBq for Qatar, Kuwait, Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States, respectively. Similarly, for cardiac stress or rest myocardial perfusion imaging using 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile, the DRLs were 926, 976, 1,110, 800, and 945-1,402 MBq for Qatar, Kuwait, Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States, respectively. Conclusion: The optimization of administered activity that this study will enable for NM procedures in Qatar will be of great value, especially for new departments that adhere to these DRLs.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the radiation dose of computed tomography in hybrid nuclear medicine imaging.

BACKGROUND: While diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are well-established for the radiopharmaceutical part, published DRLs for the CT component of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides an overview of the different objectives of CT in hybrid imaging and summarizes reported CT dose values for the most common PET/CT and SPECT/CT examinations. Also, an overview of already proposed national DRLs is given. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles reporting CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and/or national DRLs for the most frequently performed PET/CT and/or SPECT/CT examinations. Data were grouped according to the clinical objective: diagnostic (D-CT), anatomical localisation (AL-CT) or attenuation correction (AC-CT) CT. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles were identified of which twelve reported national DRLs. For brain and tumour PET/CT imaging, CTDIvol and DLP values were higher for a D-CT (brain: 26.7 mGy, 483 mGy cm; tumour: 8.8 mGy, 697 mGy cm) than for an AC/AL-CT (brain: 11.3 mGy, 216 mGy cm; tumour: 4.3 mGy, 419 mGy cm). Similar conclusions were found for bone and parathyroid SPECT/CT studies: D-CT (bone: 6.5 mGy, 339 mGy cm; parathyroid: 15.1 mGy, 347 mGy cm) results in higher doses than AL-CT (bone: 3.8 mGy, 156 mGy cm; parathyroid: 4.9 mGy, 166 mGy cm). For cardiac (AC-CT), mIBG/octreotide, thyroid and post-thyroid ablation (AC/AL-CT) SPECT/CT pooled mean CTDIvol (DLP) values were 1.8 mGy (33 mGy cm), 4.6 mGy (208 mGy cm), 3.1 mGy (105 mGy cm) and 4.6 mGy (145 mGy cm), respectively. For all examinations, high variability in nuclear medicine practice was observed. CONCLUSION: The large variation in CT dose values and national DRLs highlights the need for optimisation in hybrid imaging and justifies the clinical implementation for nuclear medicine specific DRLs.

[Examination of Optimization of Exposure Dose by IVR Procedure Based on DRLs 2020].

DRLs 2020 has been revised, and Ka,r and PKA for each procedure have been set for IVR along with the reference fluoroscopic dose rate. The total dose of IVR includes fluoroscopic and digital acquisition (DA) doses, but in actual clinical practice, the ratio varies greatly depending on the procedure (diagnosis/treatment purpose and procedure content), and there are not many detailed data on the ratio. Therefore, we evaluated previous efforts that optimized radiation protection through examining dose for each procedure and the ratio of fluoroscopic and DA doses to total dose, and reviewing protocols. Since the ratio of fluoroscopy and DA dose differs depending on the procedure, it was suggested that the radiation dose exposed to patients can be optimized by sharing the dose information with physicians and constructing a protocol while considering the image quality for each procedure.

An assessment of Sri Lankan radiographer's knowledge and awareness of radiation protection and imaging parameters related to patient dose and image quality in computed tomography (CT).

INTRODUCTION: As computed tomography (CT) examinations have considerably risen, safe operation is essential to reduce the patients' dose. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge and awareness regarding the CT exposure parameters and radiation protection in CT imaging among Sri Lankan radiographers. METHODS: An online survey-based study was devised and distributed among the Sri Lankan CT radiographers working in 63 CT units. Questions were divided into three subsections that collected data on the participants' demographic features, knowledge of the radiation protection, and imaging parameters. RESULTS: Eighty-eight radiographers from 32 CT units (out of 63 CT units) distributed across 11 districts (out of 27 districts) participated in this survey.The percentages of correct responses for the questions related to radiation protection, imaging parameters, noise, Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL), and CT dosimetric parameters were 71%, 79%, 87%, 50%, and 66%, respectively. Although the years of experience did not influence any of above aspects, the level of education significantly impacted the knowledge about radiation protection, exposure parameters, and noise. CONCLUSION: The radiographer's knowledge of radiation protection and most imaging parameters associated with patient safety and image quality is satisfactory. However, findings also show that participants should fill the knowledge gap in radiation-related risks, CT exposure parameters, dosimetric parameters, and DRL. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The study suggests the necessity of initiating continuous education programs for radiographers in line with national radiation protection legislation requirements that can be linked with code of practice.

Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in Thailand.

PURPOSE: To establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Thailand for lesions of different complexity. METHODS: Radiation dose quantity as kerma-area-product (KAP) and cumulative air-kerma at reference point (CAK) from 76 catheterization labs in 38 hospitals in PCI registry of Thailand was transferred online to central data management. Sixteen months data (May 2018 to August 2019) was analyzed. We also investigated role of different factors that influence radiation dose the most. RESULTS: Analysis of 22,737 PCIs resulted in national DRLs for PCI of 91.3 Gy.cm2 (KAP) and 1360 mGy (CAK). The NDRLs for KAP for type C, B2, B1 and A lesions were 106.8, 82.6, 67.9, and 45.3 Gy.cm2 respectively and for CAK, 1705, 1247, 962, and 790 mGy respectively. Thus, as compared to lesion A, lesion C had more than double the dose and B2 had nearly 1.6 times and B1 had 1.2 times CAK. Our DRL values are lower than other Asian countries like Japan and Korea and are in the middle range of Western countries. University hospital had significantly higher dose than private or public hospital possibly because of higher load of complex procedures in university hospitals and trainees performing the procedures. Transradial approach showed lower doses than transfemoral approach. CONCLUSIONS: This large multi-centric study established DRLs for PCIs which can act as reference for future studies. A hallmark of our study is establishment of reference levels for coronary lesions classified as per ACC/AHA and thus for different complexities.

[Development of Dose Management Software Using Visual Basic for Applications and Dose Evaluation in the Field of Nuclear Medicine].

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop software for smooth dose management based on the Japan diagnostic reference levels (DRLs 2020) in the field of nuclear medicine. METHOD: Using the programming language Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), we implemented a function for calculating actual doses, a function for comparing doses at one's own facility with those of DRLs 2020, a function for calculating appropriate doses for pediatric nuclear medicine examinations, and so on. In addition, we evaluated actual doses before and after the software implementation. RESULT: The software enabled easy calculation of actual doses and comparison with DRLs 2020 for smooth dose management. Furthermore, we were able to use the results of dose evaluation to determine the dosage at our facility and to use them as a reference for optimization. CONCLUSION: In the field of nuclear medicine, it is possible to manage doses in accordance with DRLs 2020 by introducing own software into our clinical practice.

[Effect of Residual Volume in a Three-way Stopper and a Syringe on Actual Dose of Radiopharmaceuticals: Effect of Different Three-way Stoppers and Washing].

The purpose of this study were to evaluate the residual volume of radiopharmaceuticals in the three-way stopper and syringe used during radiopharmaceutical administration and the effect of washing. The three-way stoppers were a top injector tube, a top three-way stopper, and a Nipro three-way stopper with a needle. Sodium pertechnetate [99mTc] injection (99mTcO4-) was used to compare the residual volume of radiopharmaceuticals in the three-way stopper and syringe without and with washing. Clinically, 137 patients who underwent cerebral blood flow scintigraphy, dopamine transporter scintigraphy, and bone scintigraphy were included. N-isopropyl-p-[123I]iodoamphetamine (123I-IMP), 123I-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2ß-carboxymethoxy-3ß-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane (123I-FP-CIT), and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) were used to compare the residual volume of radiopharmaceuticals in the three-way stopper and syringe without and with washing. The residual volume depended on the type of three-way stopper and radiopharmaceutical used. The residual volume could be reduced by washing, but the effect depended on the type of three-way stopper and radiopharmaceutical used. The residual volume of radiopharmaceuticals in three-way stoppers and syringes can be determined and subtracted to achieve more accurate dose control.

T-shirt size as a classification for body habitus in computed tomography (CT) and development of size-based dose reference levels for different indications.

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of patient size on dose indices and develop size-based reference levels (50th and 75th percentiles) for 20 body CT exams for routine and organ-specific clinical indications. METHODS: Based on effective diameter estimated from adult body CT, each acquisition was classified into T-shirt size as XXS, XS, S, M, L, XL, and XXL. Radiation dose indices for each size and each exam type were correlated. RESULTS: About 0.93 million CT exams from 256 CT facilities in the United States were analysed. Taking T-shirt size M as a reference, the CTDIvol for other sizes were: XXS (∼60%), XS (∼65%), S (∼75%), L (∼130%), XL (∼165%), XXL (∼210%), or grossly small patients received about 60% of the dose as compared to M sized patients and XXL required doubling the dose. Taking ratio of the dose indices of the largest to smallest size, it was evident that SSDE variation was much less (about 50%) than that in CTDIvol, but there was still nearly 40 to 220% variation in SSDE across the range of t-shirt sizes. The 50th and 75th percentile values are presented for CTDIvol, SSDE and DLP for each of the 20 CT exams and for each of the seven T-shirt sizes. CONCLUSIONS: A novel approach expressing body habitus in terms of T-shirt size is not only simple and intuitive, but it also provides a tool to have a perception of differences in dose metrices among patients of different body build.

Challenges Associated with Effective Implementation of CT Dose Check Standards and Radiation Monitoring Index in Computed Tomography: Healthcare Sector Experience.

Computed tomography (CT) radiation dose management tools should be used whenever possible, particularly with the increasing demand for acquiring CT studies. Herein, we aim to assess the advantages and challenges faced with implementing two CT dose management tools. A second aim was to highlight CT examinations exceeding dose notification values (NVs) and define the common set of causes. A total of 13,037 CT examinations collected over a six-month period, were evaluated, using two independent CT dose management tools, a CT Dose Notification prospective-view tool (PVT) following CT Dose Check standards and a retrospective statistical-based view tool (RSVT). Dose NVs were set to twice the Local Diagnostic Reference Levels. There was a significant discrepancy between dose NV counts registered with prospective (4.15%) and retrospective (7.98%) tools using T-Test. A core difference is the dose configuration setup, with PVT and RSVT being dose per series and whole study, respectively. Both prospective and retrospective dose management tools were equally useful despite their technical difference. Configuring the CT prospective dose notification check tool using NVs that is based on DRLs has limitations, and one needs to establish dose NVs per series to overcome this technical hurdle. Technical challenges make the implementation of CT Dose Check standards puzzling.

Diagnostic Reference Levels for Fluoroscopy-guided Gastrointestinal Procedures in Japan from the REX-GI Study: A Nationwide Multicentre Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are required to optimize medical exposure. However, data on DRLs for interventional fluoroscopic procedures are lacking, especially in gastroenterology. This study aimed to prospectively collect currently used radiation doses and help establish national DRLs for fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures in Japan. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, observational study collected actual radiation dose data from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), enteral metallic stent placement, and enteral tube placement from May 2019 to December 2020. The study outcomes were fluoroscopy time (FT: min), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r: mGy), air kerma area product (PKA: Gycm2), and radiation dose rate (RDR: mGy/min). Additionally, the basic settings of fluoroscopy equipment and the factors related to each procedure were investigated. This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000036525). FINDINGS: Overall, 12959 fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures were included from 23 hospitals in Japan. For 11162 ERCPs, the median/third quartile values of Ka,r (mGy), PKA (Gycm2), and FT (min) were 69/145 mGy, 16/32 Gycm2, and 11/20 min, respectively. Similarly, these values were 106/219 mGy, 23/41 Gycm2 and 17/27 min for 374 interventional EUSs; 53/104 mGy, 16/32 Gycm2 and 10/15 min for 523 metallic stents; 56/104 mGy, 28/47 Gycm2, and 12/18 min for 599 tube placements; and 35/81 mGy, 16/43 Gycm2 and 7/15 min for 301 BAEs, respectively. For the overall radiation dose rate, the median/third quartile values of RDR were 5.9/9.4 (mGy/min). The RDR values at each institution varied widely. INTERPRETATION: This study reports the current radiation doses of fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures expressed as DRL quantities. This will serve as a valuable reference for national DRL values. FUNDING: This work was supported by a clinical research grant from the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.

National indication-based diagnostic reference level values in computed tomography: Preliminary results from Ghana.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to develop national indication-based DRL values for common indications of adult computed tomography (CT) examinations for clinical application in Ghana. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The methodological approach recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Publication 135, for the development of DRLs, was employed. Studies on CT infrastructure, common indications and quality control tests were first undertaken. A sample of 20 CT dose descriptor/quantity data sets were collected from each centre for each indication. Overall, 3960 data sets were collected for all identified common indications from 71.4% of the total CT scanners in Ghana (25/35). The data were collected from image folders reported and accepted by radiologists. The objective image quality was assessed through a signal to noise ratio (SNR) analysis prior to using the data and extracting DRL values. RESULTS: Clinical indications and their respective DRL values in terms of volume weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) were cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/stroke (77 mGy; 1313 mGy.cm), head trauma/injury (76 mGy; 1596 mGy.cm), brain tumour/space occupying lesion (SOL) (77 mGy; 2696 mGy.cm), lung tumour/cancer (12 mGy; 828 mGy.cm) and chest lesion with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (13 mGy; 467 mGy.cm). Others were abdominopelvic lesion (17 mGy; 1299 mGy.cm), kidney stones (15 mGy; 731 mGy.cm), urothelial malignancy/CT-intravenous urogram (CT-IVU) (11 mGy; 1449 mGy.cm) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (14 mGy; 942 mGy.cm). CONCLUSION: National Indication-based DRL values developed in this study are recommended to be used to manage CT radiation dose in Ghana.