Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.

Cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a common neurosurgical procedure with a high complication rate. The best material for the repair of large cranial defects is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate different implant materials regarding surgery related complications after CP. Type of materials include the autologous bone flap (ABF), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), calcium phosphate reinforced with titanium mesh (CaP-Ti), polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and hydroxyapatite (HA). A retrospective, descriptive, observational bicenter study was performed, medical data of all patients who underwent CP after DHC between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2022 were analyzed. Follow-up was until December 31st, 2023. 139 consecutive patients with a median age of 54 years who received either PMMA (56/139; 40.3%), PEEK (35/139; 25.2%), CaP-Ti (21/139; 15.1%), ABF (25/139; 18.0%) or HA (2/139; 1.4%) cranial implant after DHC were included in the study. Median time from DHC to CP was 117 days and median follow-up period was 43 months. Surgical site infection was the most frequent surgery-related complication (13.7%; 19/139). PEEK implants were mostly affected (28.6%; 10/35), followed by ABF (20%; 5/25), CaP-Ti implants (9.5%; 2/21) and PMMA implants (1.7%, 1/56). Explantation was necessary for 9 PEEK implants (25.7%; 9/35), 6 ABFs (24.0%; 6/25), 3 CaP-Ti implants (14.3%; 3/21) and 4 PMMA implants (7.1%; 4/56). Besides infection, a postoperative hematoma was the most common cause. Median surgical time was 106 min, neither longer surgical time nor use of anticoagulation were significantly related to higher infection rates (p = 0.547; p = 0.152 respectively). Ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation prior to CP was noted in 33.8% (47/139) and not significantly associated with surgical related complications. Perioperative lumbar drainage, due to bulging brain, inserted in 38 patients (27.3%; 38/139) before surgery was protective when it comes to explantation of the implant (p = 0.035). Based on our results, CP is still related to a relatively high number of infections and further complications. Implant material seems to have a high effect on postoperative infections, since surgical time, anticoagulation therapy and hydrocephalus did not show a statistically significant effect on postoperative complications in this study. PEEK implants and ABFs seem to possess higher risk of postoperative infection. More biocompatible implants such as CaP-Ti might be beneficial. Further, prospective studies are necessary to answer this question.

Letter to editor: Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.

This study presents a critical analysis of complications following cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive hemicraniectomy, focusing on autologous, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and computer-aided design (CAD) implants. The analysis encompasses a retrospective bicenter assessment, evaluating factors influencing surgical outcomes and emphasizing the significance of material selection in minimizing postoperative complications. The study's comprehensive examination of complication rates associated with various implant materials contributes significantly to understanding CP outcomes. While polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and autologous bone flaps (ABFs) exhibited higher rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and explantation, a meta-analysis revealed a contrasting lower infection rate for polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants. The study underscores the critical role of material selection in mitigating postoperative complications. Despite its strengths, the study's retrospective design, reliance on data from two centers, and limited sample size pose limitations. Future research should prioritize prospective, multicenter studies with standardized protocols to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy in CP procedures.

Letter to editor: Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: Comparative systematic review and meta­analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques of published cases.

The "Letter to the Editor" titled "Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques of published cases" provides a detailed analysis of different scalp incision techniques in decompressive hemicraniectomy procedures. While commendable for its systematic approach and valuable insights, the letter has several limitations, including a lack of transparency in the search strategy, failure to address potential sources of bias, and a narrow focus on technical aspects without considering broader outcome domains and practical considerations. Despite these limitations, the letter underscores the importance of evidence-based decision-making in neurosurgical practice and calls for further research to address these gaps.

Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a critical procedure used to alleviate elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in emergent situations. It is typically performed to create space for the swelling brain and to prevent dangerous and potentially fatal increases in ICP. DHC is indicated for pathologies ranging from MCA stroke to traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage-essentially any cause of refractory brain swelling and elevated ICPs. Scalp incisions for opening and closing the soft tissues during DHC are crucial to achieve optimal outcomes by promoting proper wound healing and minimizing surgical site infections (SSIs). Though the reverse question mark (RQM) scalp incision has gained significant traction within neurosurgical practice, alternatives-including the retroauricular (RA) and Kempe incisions-have been proposed. As choice of technique can impact postoperative outcomes and complications, we sought to compare outcomes associated with different scalp incision techniques used during DHC. We queried three databases according to PRISMA guidelines in order to identify studies comparing outcomes between the RQM versus "alternative" scalp incision techniques for DHC. Our primary outcome of interest in the present study was postoperative wound infection rates according to scalp incision type. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative duration. We identified seven studies eligible for inclusion in the formal meta-analysis. The traditional RQM technique shortened operative times by 36.56 min, on average. Additionally, mean EBL was significantly lower when the RQM scalp incision was used. Postoperatively, there was no significant association between DHC incision type and mean intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), nor was there a significant difference in predisposition to developing wound complications or infections between the RQM and retroauricular/Kempe incision cohorts. Superficial temporal artery (STA) preservation and reoperation rates were collected but could not be analyzed due to insufficient number of studies reporting these outcomes. Our meta-analysis suggests that there is no significant difference between scalp incision techniques as they relate to surgical site infection and wound complications. At present, it appears that outcomes following DHC can be improved by ensuring that the bone flap is large enough to enable sufficient cerebral expansion and decompression of the temporal lobe, the latter of which is of particular importance. Although previous studies have suggested that there are several advantages to performing alternative scalp incision techniques during DHC, the present study (which is to our knowledge the first to meta-analyze the literature on outcomes in DHC by scalp incision type) does not support these findings. As such, further investigations in the form of prospective trials with high statistical power are merited.

Prior Thrombectomy Does Not Affect the Surgical Complication Rate of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Patients with Malignant Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Even though mechanical recanalization techniques have dramatically improved acute stroke care since the pivotal trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant courses of ischemic stroke, decompressive hemicraniectomy remains a mainstay of malignant stroke treatment. However, it is still unclear whether prior thrombectomy, which in most cases is associated with application of antiplatelets and/or anticoagulants, affects the surgical complication rate of decompressive hemicraniectomy and whether conclusions derived from prior trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy are still valid in times of modern stroke care. METHODS: A total of 103 consecutive patients who received a decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. Surgical and functional outcomes of patients who had received mechanical recanalization before surgery (thrombectomy group, n = 49) and of patients who had not received mechanical recanalization (medical group, n = 54) were compared. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups did significantly differ regarding preoperative systemic thrombolysis (63.3% in the thrombectomy group vs. 18.5% in the medical group, p < 0.001), the rate of hemorrhagic transformation (44.9% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.04) and the preoperative Glasgow Coma Score (median of 7 in the thrombectomy group vs. 12 in the medical group, p = 0.04) were similar to those of prior randomized controlled trials of decompressive hemicraniectomy. There was no significant difference in the rates of surgical complications (10.2% in the thrombectomy group vs. 11.1% in the medical group), revision surgery within the first 30 days after surgery (4.1% vs. 5.6%, respectively), and functional outcome (median modified Rankin Score of 4 at 5 and 14 months in both groups) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A prior mechanical recanalization with possibly associated systemic thrombolysis does not affect the early surgical complication rate and the functional outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant ischemic stroke. Patient characteristics have not changed significantly since the introduction of mechanical recanalization; therefore, the results from former large randomized controlled trials are still valid in the modern era of stroke care.

Decompressive craniectomy incisions: all roads lead to bone.

INTRODUCTION: Decompressive craniectomy and craniotomy are among the most common procedures in Neurosurgery. In recent years, increased attention has focused on the relationships between incision type, extent of decompression, vascular supply to the scalp, cosmetic outcomes, and complications. Here, we review the current literature on scalp incisions for large unilateral front-temporo-parietal craniotomies and craniectomies. METHODS: Publications in the past 50 years on scalp incisions used for front-temporo-parietal craniectomies/craniotomies were reviewed. Only full texts were considered in the final analysis. A total of 27 studies that met the criteria were considered for the final manuscript. PRISMA guidelines were adopted for this study. RESULTS: Five main incision types have been described. In addition to the question mark incision, other common incisions include the T-Kempe, developed to obtain wide access to the skull, the retroauricular incision, designed to spare the occipital branch, as well as the N-shaped and cloverleaf incisions which integrate with pterional approaches. Advantages and drawbacks, integration with existing incisions, relationships with the main arteries, cosmetic outcomes, and risks of wound complications including dehiscence, necrosis, and infection were assessed. DISCUSSION: The reverse-question mark incision, despite being a mainstay of trauma neurosurgery, can place the vascular supply to the scalp at risk and favor wound dehiscence and infection. Several incisions, such as the T-Kempe, retroauricular, N-shaped, and cloverleaf approaches have been developed to preserve the main vessels supplying the scalp. Incision choice needs to be carefully weighted based on the patient's anatomy, position and size of main vessels, risk of wound dehiscence, and desired volume of decompression.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage-justifiable in light of long-term outcome?

PURPOSE: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a potentially lifesaving procedure in refractory intracranial hypertension, which can prevent death from brainstem herniation but may cause survival in a disabled state. The spectrum of indications is expanding, and we present long-term results in a series of patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of previously registered data including all patients treated for SAH between 2010 and 2018 in a single institution. Patients treated with decompressive hemicraniectomy due to refractory intracranial hypertension were identified. Clinical outcome was assessed by means of the Glasgow outcome scale after 12 months. RESULTS: Of all 341 SAH cases, a total of 82 (24.0%) developed intracranial hypertension. Of those, 63 (18.5%) patients progressed into refractory ICP elevation and were treated with DHC. Younger age (OR 0.959, 95% CI 0.933 to 0.984; p = 0.002), anterior aneurysm location (OR 0.253, 95% CI 0.080 to 0.799; 0.019; p = 0.019), larger aneurysm size (OR 1.106, 95% CI 1.025 to 1.194; p = 0.010), and higher Hunt and Hess grading (OR 1.944, 95% CI 1.431 to 2.641; p < 0.001) were independently associated with the need for DHC. After 1 year, 10 (15.9%) patients after DHC were categorized as favorable outcome. Only younger age was independently associated with favorable outcome (OR 0.968 95% CI 0.951 to 0.986; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Decompressive hemicraniectomy, though lifesaving, has only a limited probability of survival in a clinically favorable condition. We identified young age to be the sole independent predictor of favorable outcome after DHC in SAH.

How I do it: decompressive hemicraniectomy supplemented with resection of the temporal pole and tentoriotomy for malignant ischemic infarction in the territory supplied by the middle cerebral artery.

Malignant ischemic infarction in the territory supplied by the middle cerebral artery is an extremely severe form of ischemic stroke associated with development of massive uncontrollable postischemic edema of the affected cerebral hemisphere; the end result of which is development of transtentorial herniation and death. METHOD: The surgical technique of performance of decompressive hemicraniectomy involves removal of an extensive bone flap in the fronto-temporo-parieto-occipital zone with resection of the temporal squama and of the greater wing of the sphenoid bone to visualize the level of entrance of the middle meningeal artery to the cranial cavity, which, in its turn, allows resection of the upright margin of the middle cranial fossa. Decompressive hemicraniectomy is supplemented with resection of the temporal pole and tentoriotomy. CONCLUSION: Performance of decompressive hemicraniectomy in combination with resection of the resection of the temporal pole and tentoriotomy is an effective surgical method of treatment of malignant ischemic stroke in the territory supplied by the middle cerebral artery, capable of reducing the lethality rate during the postoperative period.

Management and Outcomes of COVID - 19 Associated Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic hyper-coagulabilty leading to micro and macro thrombosis is a known complication of Coronavirus disease - 2019(COVID -19). The postulated mechanism appears to be the viral activation of endothelium, triggering the coagulation pathways. Thrombosis of the cerebral veins and sinuses (CVT), a potentially serious condition, has been increasingly reported with COVID - 19 infection. In this clinical study we attempt to describe the clinical profile, investigations and outcomes of patients with COVID- 19 associated CVT. METHODS: This is a single center prospective observational study from South India. The study included patients (aged >18 years) with concomitant COVID infection and CVT. The clinical, laboratory, imaging characteristics, management and outcomes were described and compared with COVID negative CVT patients. RESULTS: Out of 97 cases of CVT treated at our center during the first and second waves of the COVID pandemic 11/97 (11%) were COVID related CVT. Among these 11 patients, 9 (81%) had presented with only CVT related symptoms and signs and were tested positive for COVID - 19 infection during the pre-hospitalization screening. Respiratory symptoms were absent in 90% of the patients. Headache (100%) and seizures (90%) were the common presenting symptoms. The median time to diagnosis was 6 hours, from presentation to the emergency department. Transverse sinus was involved 10/11 (90%) and majority of them (9/11) had Haemorrhagic Venous Infarction (HVI). Acute inflammatory markers were elevated in comparison with non COVID CVT patients, with the mean serum D-dimer being 2462.75 ng/ml and the C-reactive protein was 64.5 mg/dl. Three patients (30%) underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) because of large hemispheric HVI. All patients survived in the COVID CVT group while the mortality in the non COVID group was 4%. At 6 months follow up excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2) was noted equally in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms and signs of CVT may be the only presentation of COVID-19 infection. Prompt recognition and aggressive medical management including DHC offers excellent outcomes.

How I do it-the posterior question mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a lifesaving procedure which every neurosurgeon should master early on. As indications for the procedure are growing, the number of patients eventually requiring skull reconstruction via cranioplasty also increases. The posterior question mark incision is a straightforward alternative to the classic trauma-flap and can easily be adopted. Some particularities exist one should consider beforehand and are discussed here in detail. METHODS: Surgical steps, aids, and pitfalls are comprehensively discussed to prepare surgeons who wish to gain experience with this type of incision. CONCLUSION: Due to the lower complication rate after cranioplasty, the posterior question mark incision has superseded the traditional pre-auricular starting anterior question mark incisions, in our department for the performance of decompressive hemicraniectomies.

Hemicraniectomy for Dominant vs Nondominant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Decompressive hemicraniectomy decreases mortality and severe disability from space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction in selected patients. However, attitudes towards hemicraniectomy for dominant-hemispheric stroke have been hesitant. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the association of stroke laterality with outcome after hemicraniectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search up to 6th February 2020 to retrieve original articles about hemicraniectomy for space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction that reported outcome in relation to laterality. The primary outcome was severe disability (modified Rankin Scale 4‒6 or 5‒6 or Glasgow Outcome Scale 1‒3) or death. A two-stage combined individual patient and aggregate data meta-analysis evaluated the association between dominant-lateralized stroke and (a) short-term (≤ 3 months) and (b) long-term (> 3 months) outcome. We performed sensitivity analyses excluding studies with sheer mortality outcome, second-look strokectomy, low quality, or small sample size, and comparing populations from North America/Europe vs Asia/South America. RESULTS: The analysis included 51 studies (46 observational studies, one nonrandomized trial, and four randomized controlled trials) comprising 2361 patients. We found no association between dominant laterality and unfavorable short-term (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69‒1.45) or long-term (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.76‒1.33) outcome. The results were unchanged in all sensitivity analyses. The grade of evidence was very low for short-term and low for long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that patients with dominant-hemispheric stroke have equal outcome after hemicraniectomy compared to patients with nondominant stroke. Despite the shortcomings of the available evidence, our results do not support withholding hemicraniectomy based on stroke laterality.

Effect of decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with acute middle cerebral artery infarction

Background/aim: We aimed to determine in which cases this procedure may be more effective based on the data of patients who underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). Material and methods: Overall, 47 patients who underwent DHC due to acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction between January 2014 and january 2019 were retrospectively investigated. These patients were divided into two groups: those who died after DHC (Group A) and those who survived DHC (Group B). The groups were compared in terms of various parameters. We investigated whether the patient's modified Rankin scale (mRS) status changed depending on age (> 60 and < 60 years). Results: The median age of all patients was 65 (37­80) years; groups A and B had median ages of 66.5 (37­80) and 61 (44­79) years (p = 0.111), respectively; 55.3% patients were male. The elapsed times until hospitalization after the onset of symptoms were 4.5 and 3 h in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.014). The median GCS score at the time of admission was 7 (5­12) and 10 (8­14) in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.0001). At the time of admission, 63.3% patients in group A had anisocoria, whereas no patient in group B had anisocoria (p = 0.0001). In postoperative period, 40% patients in group A and all patients in group B received AC/AA treatment. The survival of patients aged < 60 and > 60 years who underwent DHC for MCA infraction was 61.5% and 26.5%, respectively (p = 0,041). The median mRS of patients < 60 and > 60 years were 4 (1­6) and 6 (1­6), respectively (p = 0.018). Conclusion: Age, DHC timing, and elapsed time until hospitalization or access to treatment directly affect the functional outcome and survival in MCA-infarcted patients who underwent DHC. In patients in whom the medical treatment fails, early DHC administration will increase survival without waiting for neurological worsening once herniation is detected radiologically.

Effect of Endovascular Therapy on Subsequent Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke with Proximal Intracranial Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation: Sub-Analysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2.

BACKGROUND: Cardioembolic stroke is associated with a higher rate of functional limitation, which may be related to the larger ischemic lesion size. Endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute stroke caused by large vessel occlusion reduces severe disabilities. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the relationship between EVT and decompressive hemicraniectomy (DH) in patients with cardioembolic proximal intracranial occlusion in the anterior circulation (CPIOAC) using the data from the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism (RESCUE)-Japan Registry 2. METHODS: Among 2,420 patients in the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2, 555 patients aged 20-80 years with acute cardioembolic occlusion of the internal carotid artery and/or the first segment of the middle cerebral artery were included. The primary outcome was DH. Secondary outcomes were any type of intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage indicating neurological worsening of >4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale within 72 h after the onset of stroke, and recurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days. RESULTS: The median age was 73 years (66-77 years), and 360 patients (65%) were male. DH was performed in 1 of 374 patients in the EVT group and 5 of 181 patients in the no-EVT group (p = 0.032). The incidence of any type of intracranial hemorrhage and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 72 h and recurrence of stroke or TIA within 90 days were similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: EVT may reduce DH in patients with CPIOAC without increasing intracranial hemorrhage.

Predictors of decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery stroke.

Identification of factors in malignant middle cerebral artery (MMCA) stroke patients that may be useful in selecting patients for DHC. This study was a retrospective multicenter study of patients referred for DHC based on the criteria of the randomized control trials of DHC in MMCA stroke. Demographic, clinical, and radiology data were analyzed. Patients who underwent DHC were compared to those who survived without surgery. Two hundred three patients with MMCA strokes were identified: 137 underwent DHC, 47 survived without DHC, and 19 refused surgery and died. Multivariate analysis identified the following factors determining DHC in MMCA stroke: age < 55 years (OR 8.5, 95% CI 3.3-22.1, P < 0.001), MCA with involvement of additional vascular territories (anterior cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.5-14.9, P = 0.007), septum pellucidum displacement ≥ 7.5 mm (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.9-11.7, P = 0.001), diabetes (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-10.6, P = 0.012), infarct growth rate (IGR) ml/h (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.2, P = 0.015), and temporal lobe involvement (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.01-6.1, P = 0.048). The internal validation of the multivariate logistic regression model using bootstrapping analysis showed marginal bias. Among patients with MMCA infarctions, an increased possibility of DHC is associated with younger age, MCA with additional infarction, septum pellucidum deviation of > 7.5 mm, diabetes, IGR, and temporal lobe involvement. The presence of these risk factors identifies those MMCA stroke patients who may require DHC. Bootstrapping analysis indicated the model is good enough to predict the outcome in general population.

Attitudes of Nurses Toward Disability and Treatment in Space-Occupying Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Attitudes toward the degree of acceptable disability and the importance of aphasia are critical in deciding on decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) in space-occupying middle cerebral artery stroke (SOS). The attitudes of nurses deserve strong attention, because of their close interaction with patients during acute stroke treatment. METHODS: This is a multicenter survey among 627 nurses from 132 hospitals in Germany. Questions address the acceptance of disability, importance of aphasia, and the preferred treatment in the hypothetical case of SOS. RESULTS: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 1 and 2 were considered acceptable by the majority of all respondents (89.7%). A mRS of 3, 4, and 5 was considered acceptable by 60.0, 15.5, and 1.6%, respectively. DHC was indicated as the treatment of choice in 31.4%. Every third participant considered the presence of aphasia important for treatment decision (33.3%). Older respondents more often refrained from DHC, irrespective of the presence of aphasia (dominant hemisphere p = 0.001, non-dominant hemisphere p = 0.004). Differences regarding acceptable disability and treatment decision were dependent on age, sex, and having relatives with stroke. CONCLUSION: Most German nurses indicate moderately severe disability after SOS not to be acceptable, without emphasizing the presence of aphasia. The results call for greater scientific efforts in order to find reliable predictors for outcome after SOS.

Older Age Is Not Associated with Worse Outcomes Following Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is commonly offered after large spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) as a life-saving measure. Based on limited available evidence, surgery is sometimes avoided in the elderly. The association between age and outcomes following DHC in spontaneous ICH remains largely understudied. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to investigate the influence of older age on outcomes of patients who undergo DHC for spontaneous ICH. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, inpatient data were obtained from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2011. Using International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision designations, patients with a primary diagnosis of nontraumatic ICH who underwent DHC were identified. The primary outcome of interest was the association of age to inpatient mortality and poor outcome. Subjects were grouped by age: 18-50, 51-60, 61-70, and more than 70 years. Sample characteristics were compared across age groups using χ2 testing, and univariate and multivariate Poisson Regression was performed using a generalized equation to estimate rate ratios for primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and forty four patient cases were isolated. Death occurred in an estimated 28.9% and poor outcome in 86.4%. In multivariate Poisson regression models, there was no difference in hospital mortality or poor outcome by age group. Although younger patients were more likely to be diagnosed with herniation, total complication rate was similar between age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results do not provide evidence that age independently predicts in-hospital mortality or poor outcomes. The true influence of age on outcomes is unclear, and further study is needed to determine which factors may be best in selecting candidates for DHC following spontaneous ICH.

Introducing the concept of "CSF-shift edema" in traumatic brain injury.

Brain edema after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) plays an important role in the outcome and survival of injured patients. It is also one of the main targets in the therapeutic approach in the current clinical practice. To date, the pathophysiology of traumatic brain swelling is complex and, being that it is thought to be mainly cytotoxic and vasogenic in origin, not yet entirely understood. However, based on new understandings of the hydrodynamic aspects of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), an additional mechanism of brain swelling can be considered. An increase in pressure into the subarachnoid space, secondary to traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, would result in a rapid shift of CSF from the cisterns, through the paravascular spaces, into the brain, resulting in an increase of brain water content. This mechanism of brain swelling would be termed as "CSF-shift edema." This "CSF-shift," promoted by a pressure gradient, leads to increased pressure inside the paravascular spaces and the interstitium of the brain, disturbing the functions of the paravascular system, with implications of secondary brain injury. Cisternostomy, an emerging surgical treatment, would reverse the direction of the CSF-shift, allowing for a decrease in brain swelling. In addition, this technique would reduce the pressure in the paravascular spaces and interstitium, leading to a recovery of the functionality of the paravascular system.

Factors associated with favourable outcome in large hemispheric infarctions.

BACKGROUND: Large hemispheric infarction (LHI) is a devastating condition with high mortality and poor functional outcome in most conservatively treated patients. The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with favorable outcome in patients with LHI. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with LHI. Favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 3 at 90 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the independent factors associated with favorable outcome. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six cases with LHI were identified: 41 (16.0%) died during hospitalization, 94 (36.7%) died at 3 month, and 113 (44.1%) survived with favorable outcome at day 90. Compared with patients with unfavorable outcome, the favorable cases were younger (55.8 ± 14.7 vs. 66.2 ± 14.1), had less history of hypertension (38.9% vs. 59.3%), lower baseline NIHSS score (median NIHSS score 11 vs. 17), lower blood pressure on admission (systolic 134.7 ± 24.9 vs. 145.1 ± 26.1 mmHg; diastolic 80.2 ± 14.9 vs. 86.9 ± 16.2 mmHg; respectively), lower level of baseline serum glucose (7.2 ± 3.3 vs. 8.2 ± 3.3 mmol/L), a lower frequency of stroke-related complications (55.8% vs. 91.4%), more use of antiplatelets (93.8% vs. 57.1%) and statins (46.9% vs. 25.7%) in the acute phase of stroke, but less use of osmotic agents (69.9% vs. 89.3%), mechanical ventilation (1.8% vs. 20.0%) or decompressive hemicraniectomy (1.8% vs. 15.7%). Multivariable analysis identified the following factors associated with favorable outcome: age (odds ratio, OR 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.98, p < 0.001), baseline NIHSS score (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.96, p = 0.002), statins used in acute phase (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.10-5.65, p = 0.029), brain edema (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.21, p < 0.001) and pneumonia (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: More than one third of patients with LHI have relatively favorable clinical outcomes at 90 days. Younger age, lower baseline NIHSS score, absence of brain edema and pneumonia, and statins used in the acute phase were associated with favorable outcome of patients with LHI at 90 days.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy after malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: does hospital of origin matter?

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) has been shown to reduce mortality in malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. Our primary objective was to compare 1-year mortality between patients receiving DHC for malignant MCA infarction at our institution based on hospital of origin. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients treated for malignant MCA infarction with DHC at our institution over a 3-year period. One-year mortality rates and time to surgery were comparable regardless of whether the patient first attended the tertiary referral centre or a peripheral centre.

Herniation despite Decompressive Hemicraniectomy in Large Hemispherical Ischemic Strokes.

BACKGROUND: Despite decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC), progressive herniation resulting in death has been reported following middle cerebral artery (MCA) strokes. We aimed to determine the surgical parameters measured on brain computed tomography (CT) scan that are associated with progressive herniation despite DHC in large MCA strokes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of medical records of patients with malignant hemispheric infarction who underwent DHC for cerebral edema was performed. Infarct volume was calculated on CT scans obtained within 24 hours of ictus. Radiological parameters of craniectomy bone flap size, brain volume protruding out of the skull, adequate centering of the craniectomy over the stroke bed, and the infarct volume outside the craniectomy bed (volume not centered [VNC]) were measured on the postoperative brain CT. RESULTS: Of 41 patients who underwent DHC, 7 had progressive herniation leading to death. Radiographic parameters significantly associated with progressive herniation included insufficient centering of craniectomy bed on the stroke bed (P = .03), VNC (P = .011), additional anterior cerebral artery infarction (P = .047), and smaller craniectomy length (P = .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for progressive herniation using craniectomy length and VNC as independent variables demonstrated that a higher VNC was significantly associated with progressive herniation despite surgery (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: In large MCA strokes, identification of large infarct volume outside the craniectomy bed was associated with progressive herniation despite surgery. These results will need to be verified in larger prospective studies.