Why don't dental teams routinely discuss dentine hypersensitivity during consultations? A qualitative study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

AIM: Although dentine hypersensitivity is widespread, can cause substantial pain and impact quality of life, it is not routinely discussed during dental consultations. This qualitative study aimed to develop an understanding of the barriers and facilitators to these discussions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Theoretical Domains Framework to shape the topic guide, N = 7 online focus groups were organized with a total N = 40 participants comprising experienced dentists, dental foundation trainees and dental care professionals. Inductive and deductive thematic analyses of the anonymized, transcribed focus group conversations were undertaken. RESULTS: An attitude-behaviour gap was observed in dental teams' accounts. Although they saw it as part of their professional role to routinely discuss sensitivity, and believed that such conversations were 'an easy win', in practice they experienced several behavioural barriers that hindered these conversations from taking place. These included competing priorities, a perceived lack of seriousness and assessment of dentine hypersensitivity and practical issues such as time. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic (e.g., lack of time and training, professional culture) and behavioural (e.g., dental teams' belief that conversations should take place only with patients likely to be adherent) barriers to dentine hypersensitivity conversations explain why these conversations do not routinely take place.

The prevalence and predictive factors of dentine hypersensitivity among adults in Turkey.

AIM: This study sought to determine the prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity (DH) among adults in Turkey. Also, to ascertain the association between DH and both etiological predictors and demographic patient characteristics. MATERIAL METHOD: Using a questionnaire and thermal and evaporative tests, 259 women and 209 men in the age range of 18 to 72 were analyzed. Individually, a clinical evaluation of DH signs was conducted. The DMFT index, gingival index, and gingival bleeding were reported for each subject. The gingival recession and tooth wear of sensitive teeth were also evaluated. Pearson Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. Logistic Regression Analysis was used to examine the risk factors of DH. Data with dependent categorical variables were compared using the McNemar-Browker test. The significance level was p < 0.05. RESULTS: The average age of the population was 35.6 years. In the present study, a total of 12,048 teeth were analyzed. 1755 had thermal hypersensitivity (14.57%), while 470 experienced evaporative hypersensitivity (3.9%). The incisors were the teeth most impacted by DH, whereas the molars were the least affected. Exposure to cold air and sweet foods, gingival recession, and the presence of noncarious cervical lesions were all strongly linked to DH (Logistic regression analysis, p < 0.05). The cold stimulus increases sensitivity more than the evaporation stimulus. CONCLUSION: Significant risk factors for both thermal and evaporative DH include cold air, consumption of sweet food, presence of noncarious cervical lesions, and gingival recession. More epidemiological research in this area is still required to fully characterize the risk factors and implement the most effective preventive interventions.

Efficacy of near infrared dental lasers on dentinal hypersensitivity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Conventional therapies have aimed to try to help individuals suffering with dentine hypersensitivity (DH/DHS). A relatively new approach, laser therapy claims to be beneficial while having immediate and long-lasting effect. Therefore, our analysis aims to explore the immediate and 1-month efficacy of near-infrared laser (NIR) therapy in treating dentinal hypersensitivity. A systematic literature search conducted in databases, and analysis was undertaken utilizing a meta-analysis approach. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing near-infrared lasers and placebo/no treatment in patients (> 18 years) were included. The risk of bias for included studies was assessed using Cochrane RoB tool (for randomized studies). Random effects meta-analyses model of standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A comprehensive electronic and manual search yielded a total of 1081 potential articles. Following the implementation of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 6 studies were included in the analysis. Near-infrared laser therapy led to statistical significant reduction in immediate and 1-month follow-up VAS (visual analog scale) scores compared to placebo/no treatment (p < 0.05). Statistical heterogeneity across the studies was high (I2-96%). The findings suggest that near-infrared laser therapy does have a significant immediate effect in reducing dentine hypersensitivity compared to placebo/no treatment. Furthermore, this effect is not diminished and endured at 1-month follow-up.

A comparative study on the effect of propolis and dentine bonding agent in treating dentine hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: To find out if there is a difference in the efficacy of propolis and seventh-generation dentine bonding agent in reducing dentine hypersensitivity. METHODS: The randomised, single-blind study was conducted at the Department of Periodontology, Dow International Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, from December 2018 to November 2019, and comprised patients with complaint of dentine hypersensitivity who were divided in group A which received 30% ethanolic extract of propolis, and group B which received dentine bonding agent. Recordings of dentine hypersensitivity were obtained at baseline, before and after the application of experimental agents, and on days 7, 15 and 30. The response was measured using the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 52 patients, 19 (36.5%) were males and 33 (63.5%) were females. The overall mean age was 29.9 ± 6.5 years. Majority of the subjects were students i.e. 16 (30.8%) and housewives i.e. 11 (21.2%), while drivers, teachers, businessmen etc. constituted of 25 (48%) subjects. Significant reduction of dentine hypersensitivity was observed in both groups (p<0.05). Intergroup comparison showed non-significant differences (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Propolis and dentine bonding agent had significant effect in reducing dentine hypersensitivity. The difference between the two was not significant.

Are there associations between the occurrence of dental fluorosis and the experience of dentine hypersensitivity? A cross-sectional study.

Objectives: Associations between the occurrence of dentine hypersensitivity (DH) and dental fluorosis (DF) have been suggested. Testing this association requires studies among populations with both conditions. This study aimed to determine the association between DF and the experience of DH among a population endemic for DF. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 2021 over 6 months among 428 adult patients. Participants' demographics were collected, followed by verbal screening for DH and oral examinations. Clinical assessment for DH was carried out by tactile and evaporative methods. The presence and severity of DF were also assessed using the Thylstrup and Fejerskov Index. Data analysis included Chi-square and correlation statistics to assess the presence and strength of associations. Results: The overall prevalence of DH was 31.1%. A higher proportion (41.1%, P < 0.001) of participants with DF had DH than those without DF. The association between DH and DF was minimal but statistically significant (r = 0.174, P < 0.001). Among those with DF, the prevalence of DH was highest in participants with severe fluorosis (50%, P = 0.740). The proportion of sensitive teeth to the teeth examined was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) for participants with DF (289/4167, 6.9%) than participants without DF (267/6758, 4%). This proportion was also highest for severe DF (20/254, 7.9%, P = 0.572) than the mild and moderate forms. Conclusion: DH was more prevalent among individuals with DF. The prevalence of DH was not dependent on the severity of DF.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Arabic version of the DHEQ-15.

OBJECTIVES: Many patients who suffer from Dentine Hypersensitivity (DH) often go undiagnosed because they do not consider DH as serious problem that requires treatment. The use of patient-reported outcome measures can help in diagnosis and management of DH problems. The aim of the present study was to adapt cross-culturally the original English version of the Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ-15) for use in Arabic-speaking countries. METHODS: An Arabic version of DHEQ-15 was first developed by forward-backward translation and piloted among a group of dental patients. A cross-sectional study design was then used to test the psychometric properties of the Arabic DHEQ-15 in a wider convenience sample of Libyan dental patients diagnosed with DH. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the three-dimensional distribution of the subscales. The significance level of all statistical tests was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The Arabic DHEQ-15 demonstrated good face and content validity. A total of 462 participants aged, on average, 39.2 ± 12.9 years took part in the psychometric testing of the Arabic DHEQ-15. The overall Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire was 0.91, and overall Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for test-retest repeatability was 0.914. Participants with more severe DH had a significantly higher DHEQ-15 score than those with less severe DH (p < 0.001). Those who reported better global rating of their oral health had lower scores on the Arabic DHEQ-15 (p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed three subscales of the Arabic DHEQ-15. CONCLUSIONS: The Arabic DHEQ-15 has been developed and further testing has demonstrated acceptable levels of psychometric properties in an Arabic population. The Arabic DHEQ-15 is a reliable measure of the quality-of-life impact of DH for use with Arabic-speaking populations.

Laser therapy versus topical desensitising agents in the management of dentine hypersensitivity: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of lasers and topical desensitising agent treatments for dentine hypersensitivity. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge were electronically searched without restrictions. Study search, selection, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were conducted independently by two reviewer authors. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration). RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 13 eligible studies that compared topical desensitising agents and Nd:YAG or diode laser. Four, six and three studies were considered to have low, moderate and high risks of bias, respectively. The follow-up period varied from immediate to 9 months. All comparisons except the 3-month Nd:YAG laser parallel group and 6-month diode laser group showed that the clinical efficacy of lasers for dentine hypersensitivity was not significantly different with topical desensitising agents. CONCLUSION: We found low-quality evidence that was insufficient to draw any conclusions regarding the superiority of lasers or conventional topical desensitising agents in the treatment of DH. Further well-designed RCTs on this topic are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Comparative efficacy of BioMin-F, Colgate Sensitive Pro-relief and Sensodyne Rapid Action in relieving dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a sharp toothache that influences a patients' oral health-related quality of life. Oral dentifrices have been marketed for pain relief within a minute for DH. The permanent management of DH is being investigated with the remineralisation potential of bioactive agents in dentinal tubules. This study investigated the relief from pain in DH in one minute after applying over the counter (OTC) dentifrices with Pro-Argin™ and strontium acetate and directly compared them with fluoro-calcium phospho-silicate (FCPS)-based dentifrices for immediate and sustained inhibition of painful stimulus provoking DH. METHODS: A randomised, controlled, triple-blinded clinical trial was conducted with 140 participants clinically diagnosed with DH and equally randomized into four groups with parallel treatment assignment of FCPS, Pro-Argin™, 8% strontium acetate, and sodium fluoride-based OTC dentifrices, and tested for DH with air blast, mechanical, and water jet stimuli on SCHIFF cold air sensitivity scale (SCASS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) at interim efficacy intervals of one minute, three days, two, four, and six weeks, subsequently. RESULTS: A total of 128 participants completed the trial. All the treatment groups showed statistically significant improvement in DH with p < 0.001 relative to baseline at all time points. Pro-Argin™ showed a greater reduction in DH with mean scores of (1.34 ± 0.68) (4.20 ± 1.70) (3.05 ± 2.17) followed by strontium acetate (1.57 ± 0.81) (4.65 ± 1.87) (3.75 ± 1.97) on SCASS and VAS for mechanical and water jet stimuli, one minute after application. There was no statistically significant treatment difference between the two (p = 0.499). FCPS showed the highest reduction in DH on SCASS and VAS for waterjet stimuli with mean scores of (0.97 ± 0.68) (1.80 ± 1.73) and Pro-Argin™ on VAS for mechanical stimuli with mean scores of (2.15 ± 1.92) in six weeks. CONCLUSION: OTC dentifrices with Pro-argin™ and strontium acetate are effective for immediate pain relief from DH, and FCPS could be the best possible treatment option for long term management of DH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ID: NCT04249336 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04249336 ), Date of Registration: January 30, 2020 (Retrospectively registered).

Network meta-analysis of the desensitizing effects of lasers in patients with dentine hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVES: This network meta-analysis compares different lasers, placebo, and no treatment in terms of their effects on dentine hypersensitivity (DH) immediately after treatment and over the long term (1 month). METHODS: A systematic electronic literature search of four databases and a manual search were performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining different laser treatments for the treatment of DH. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed to analyze the desensitization effect immediately after treatment and over the long term. The risk of bias was assessed based on the Cochrane guidelines and funnel plots. The quality of the evidence, statistical heterogeneity, inconsistencies, and ranking probability were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 11 RCTs were included in the network meta-analysis; 11 and 9 of these studies analyzed immediate and long-term effects, respectively. All four types of laser had a better desensitizing effect than controls immediately after treatment and over the long term, but there were no significant differences among the four different lasers. There was a significant placebo effect immediately after treatment. The laser with the highest probability of being the most effective treatment for DH was Er,Cr:YSGG immediately after treatment and over the long term (73% and 47%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All four types of laser had significantly better effects than no treatment on DH immediately after treatment and in the long term, but there were no significant differences among the four lasers. In addition, there was a significant placebo effect, supporting the importance of including a placebo group in future studies. Furthermore, Er,Cr:YSGG may be the most effective laser for the treatment of DH immediately and over the long term. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study used network meta-analyses to compare different lasers, placebo, and no treatment over different time periods, which is to provide guidance for selecting an appropriate laser treatment in patients with DH.

Dentine hypersensitivity and dentine exposure in Arab patient populations.

BACKGROUND: Dentine hypersensitivity is a frequent oral complaint that is usually associated with several factors including diet and oral hygiene practices. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, severity and correlates of dentine hypersensitivity and dentine exposure-related risk indicators in a sample from six Arab countries. METHODS: A multinational cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 2924 participants, attending dental practices, aged 18-35 years from six Arab countries. Trained examiners assessed dentine hypersensitivity using the Schiff scale and scored the tooth with the highest value in each sextant. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire that assessed the frequency of drinking and eating acidic foods and their oral health habits. RESULTS: Overall, the Schiff score 1 was found in 938 (32.6%), score 2 in 613 (21%) and score 3 in 274 (9%) of the participants. There was variation between countries with Saudi Arabia (13.9%) and Oman (15%) having the highest prevalence of hypersensitivity and Kuwait (2.2) and Jordan the lowest (4.8%). Participants who experienced toothache and difficulty eating once a day were significantly more likely to have Schiff score 2 or 3 (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.54-2.87; OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.04-1.73, respectively). Furthermore, drinking soft drinks once a day was also significantly associated with dentine exposure (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.65). CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study, dentine sensitivity and exposure were common in Arab patient populations.

Not all Desensitizing Toothpastes Perform Equally Well.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Network Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Desensitizing Toothpastes on Dentine Hypersensitivity. Hu ML, Zheng G, Lin H, Yang M, Zhang YD, Han JM. J Dent 2019;88:103170. SOURCE OF FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771119). TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of data.

Decision-making process as guide to the management of non-carious cervical lesions with and without painful symptomatology.

The aim of this study is to develop a decision-making path for the management of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) associated with or without dentin hypersensitivity (DH) This will allow to limit or delay invasive approaches identifying the causes that produced them. The need for this review is because there are no clear guidelines in the current literature for the treatment of NCCLs. Usually, the selection of the best therapy option is postponed to clinical judgment which can be influenced by a patient's demands (aesthetic, symptomatologic reasons or worsening of pre-existing NCCL). To establish a therapeutic plan the young dentist should be able to distinguish the NCCLs that need to be monitored over time from those in need of early treatment. Indeed, the experience of the dentist and the compliance of the patient play a decisive role for the success of the therapy.

Prevalence of self-reported versus diagnosed dentinal hypersensitivity: a cross-sectional study and ROC curve analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify and compare the self-reported and diagnosed prevalence of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) in an University population; and to verify accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of DH stimuli tests. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and eighty patients (67.2% women and 32.8% men) were assessed by questionnaire, clinical exam, tactile and cold water tests. The intensity of DH was assessed using a visual analogue scale, and a calibrated examiner measured the scores using a caliper. The ICC for intra-examiner was 0.990. Scores above 5 mm were considered sensitive teeth. The association between variables was assessed by Chi-square test. ROC curve analysis determined accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the tests (p < .05). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 24.08 years. 158 (41.7%) volunteers self-reported the presence of DH, while, 88.7% of the participants were clinically diagnosed (p = .023). In total, 8958 teeth were evaluated, of those 3367 (37.6%) were diagnosed sensitive. The most prevalent teeth with DH were incisors and premolars. The accuracy of the tests with cold water and tactile were 99%. The sensitivity and specificity for cold water and tactile tests were 99.9%, 99.7%, 99.1% and 87.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The self-reported prevalence of DH was significantly lower than that clinically diagnosed. The cold test proved to be a highly accurate stimulus for the diagnosis of DH.

The Role of Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels in the Transduction of Dental Pain.

Dental pain is a common health problem that negatively impacts the activities of daily living. Dentine hypersensitivity and pulpitis-associated pain are among the most common types of dental pain. Patients with these conditions feel pain upon exposure of the affected tooth to various external stimuli. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying dental pain, especially the transduction of external stimuli to electrical signals in the nerve, remain unclear. Numerous ion channels and receptors localized in the dental primary afferent neurons (DPAs) and odontoblasts have been implicated in the transduction of dental pain, and functional expression of various polymodal transient receptor potential (TRP) channels has been detected in DPAs and odontoblasts. External stimuli-induced dentinal tubular fluid movement can activate TRP channels on DPAs and odontoblasts. The odontoblasts can in turn activate the DPAs by paracrine signaling through ATP and glutamate release. In pulpitis, inflammatory mediators may sensitize the DPAs. They could also induce post-translational modifications of TRP channels, increase trafficking of these channels to nerve terminals, and increase the sensitivity of these channels to stimuli. Additionally, in caries-induced pulpitis, bacterial products can directly activate TRP channels on DPAs. In this review, we provide an overview of the TRP channels expressed in the various tooth structures, and we discuss their involvement in the development of dental pain.

Effect of Lasers on Dentine Hypersensitivity: Evidence From a Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the immediate and long-term desensitizing effect of lasers in reducing dentine hypersensitivity (DH) compared with negative controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six databases were searched to identify relevant articles published up to June 8, 2018. Randomized controlled trials comparing lasers with placebo or no treatment control in adult patients who suffer from DH were included. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane guidelines, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Inverse-variance random effects meta-analyses of standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-two randomized controlled trials were finally included in the meta-analysis, and 21 studies of these were conducted to analyze the immediate and long-term effects. All types of lasers had better immediate and long-term desensitizing effects on DH than negative controls. The quality of evidence of the included studies showed that lasers compared with negative controls had moderate-quality immediate and long-term effects on DH. The statistical heterogeneity of these comparisons was high, for which the result of I2 ranged from 90% to 98%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that all types of lasers had a better desensitizing effect on DH than negative controls, both in immediate and long term. Furthermore, more high-quality studies with a large sample size are needed to confirm our results (PROSPERO CRD42018102260).

[The effectiveness of Sensodyne Instant effect toothpaste for dentin hypersensitivity treatment]. / Éffektivnost' primeneniia zubnoi pasty Sensodyne Mgnovennyi éffekt pri lechenii povyshennoi chuvstvitel'nosti dentina zubov.

The article presents an analysis of the clinical efficacy of Sensodyne Instant Effect toothpaste containing sodium fluoride and tin fluoride for the treatment of increased sensitivity of hard dental tissues. The study proved long-term efficiency of Sensodyne Instant Effect toothpaste designed to reduce tooth hyperesthesia. Toothpaste Sensodyne Instant Effect can be widely recommended to reduce the hypersensitivity of dentin.

Reducing dentine hypersensitivity with nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The present randomized double-blind clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a dentifrice formulation containing nano-hydroxyapatite with a fluoride dentifrice and a placebo. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and five subjects were recruited to participate in the study. A computer-generated random table with blocking to one of the three study treatments was used in order to have 35 subjects per group: (1) nano-hydroxyapatite 2% gel toothpaste fluoride free; (2) fluoride gel toothpaste; (3) placebo. Groups 1, 2, and 3 were instructed to treat their teeth for 10 min twice a day with the provided toothpaste gel. The participant's dentin hypersensitivity was evaluated at baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks using airblast and tactile tests. In addition, a subjective evaluation using a visual analogue scale was used. RESULTS: Significant lower values of cold air sensitivity and tactile sensitivity (p < 0.05) were found for the test group at 2 weeks and 4 weeks. In addition, statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower values of sensitivity were reported for group 1 compared to those for groups 2 and 3 at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. The VAS scores were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the test group at 2 and 4 weeks compared to those at baseline and in the control groups. CONCLUSION: The application of nano-hydroxyapatite in gel toothpaste fluoride free is an effective desensitizing agent providing relief from symptoms after 2 and 4 weeks.

Randomised clinical trial to evaluate changes in dentine tubule occlusion following 4 weeks use of an occluding toothpaste.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine whether a silicone impression material could precisely replicate dentine tubule changes following 4 weeks toothbrushing with occluding or non-occluding toothpaste and whether changes reflected hypersensitivity clinical assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single site, examiner blind, parallel, two treatment arm, randomised clinical trial. Participants were healthy, ≥18, with ≥1 sensitive tooth with exposed dentine, Schiff sensitivity score ≥2, and patent tubules with dentine occlusion score 4-5 as determined by scanning electron microscopy of replica impressions. Nine participants received Sensodyne® Rapid Relief (occluding toothpaste) and 10 Crest® Decay Prevention (non-occluding toothpaste), and were re-evaluated for sensitivity and occlusion score after two timed minutes and 4 weeks twice-daily home brushing. RESULTS: Occlusion scores did not correlate significantly with pain scores, but correlations were positive and impressions showed characteristic dentine tubule patency and occlusion. After 4 weeks, thermal VAS was significantly lower than baseline for the non-occluding toothpaste; all other pain scores were significantly lower for both treatments. Dentine occlusion scores also decreased after 4 weeks of either treatment, but did not achieve significance (p = 0.0625). CONCLUSIONS: Both toothpastes reduced clinical sensitivity and increased tubule occlusion. It is hypothesised that during impression, taking some material may have sheared off and occluded tubules resulting in false positives. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study has demonstrated that a silicone impression material can accurately replicate the dentine surface to demonstrate dentine tubular occlusion and patency; however, although the association between occlusion and pain score was positive, this technique needs to be refined before use in future studies.

New toothpaste to deal with dentine hypersensitivity: double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to evaluate a combined effect of active ingredients contained in new toothpaste in reducing dentine hypersensitivity. METHODS: The tested toothpaste contained active ingredients potassium nitrate (5.00%) and zinc citrate (0.50%). Pain to water stimulus and blowing air was reported on hypersensitive teeth and measured using the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). The degree of pain to water stimulus was detected after each subject drank a few sips of water which was boiled to the room temperature. Data were collected on each subject's dental history. RESULTS: A significant reduction in dentine hypersensitivity (26-29% after 2 weeks versus 40% after 4 weeks) was detected in the tested group. The controls also showed significant reduction to both stimuli, but at lower rate. A statistically significant difference to blowing air and water stimuli showed the highest impact for the tested group after 4 weeks (P = 0.033, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: This study supports the efficacy of the tested toothpaste in reducing the phenomenon of dentine hypersensitivity after 4 weeks of usage.

[Experimental and clinical rationale for the use of modern methods of teeth hyperesthesia treatment]. / Éksperimental'no-klinicheskoe obosnovanie primeneniia sovremennykh metodov lecheniia giperestezii zubov.

The aim of the study was to increase the effectiveness of treatment hyperesthesia of tooth tissues by improving medical and hygienic complexes based on the study of structural changes in dentin. A two-stage study was conducted. In the course of the experimental stage, the microstructure of the tooth dentin surface was studied in terms of its relief on an atomic force microscope in normal conditions, with hypersensitivity and under the influence of the studied preparations (Gluma Desensitizer, Tokuyama Shield Force Plus, Colgate SensitivePro-Relief, Biorepair Oral Care), the material for studing was human teeth with hypersensitive dentin (100) of 1-2 degrees and 25 teeth without hyperesthesia (control group). In the groups for the clinical study were included 100 people with localized hyperesthesia of teeth I-II degree, which, depending on the medical-hygienic complexes used, were divided into 2 groups, 4 subgroups of 25 people. The clinical efficacy of the proposed treatment regimens was assessed using indices: Schiff sensitivity, NRS pain scale, tooth hyperesthesia intensity and prevalence, OHI-S hygiene index in dynamics (before and after treatment, at 3 and 9 months). As a result of the in vitro experiment it was established that after the use of professional desensitizers, the roughness parameters of teeth with hypersensitivity approach the values of a healthy tooth, and after using home remedies there is no qualitative change in the surface. In clinical conditions, it was found that the means for professional use have a significant effect of reducing the sensitivity of teeth, the subsequent treatment of hyperesthesia of the teeth at home is necessary to achieve a stable result. The obtained results allowed to optimize the pathogenetic treatment regimens for dentine hypersensitivity and to integrate the developed medical-hygienic complexes.