High-Resolution Manometry Thresholds and Motor Patterns Among Asymptomatic Individuals.

OBJECTIVE: High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the current standard for characterization of esophageal body and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function. We aimed to examine the prevalence of abnormal esophageal motor patterns in health, and to determine optimal thresholds for software metrics across HRM systems. DESIGN: Manometry studies from asymptomatic adults were solicited from motility centers worldwide, and were manually analyzed using integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL), and distal contractile integral (DCI) in standardized fashion. Normative thresholds were assessed using fifth and/or 95th percentile values. Chicago Classification v3.0 criteria were applied to determine motor patterns across HRM systems, study positions (upright vs supine), ages, and genders. RESULTS: Of 469 unique HRM studies (median age 28.0, range 18-79 years). 74.6% had a normal HRM pattern; none had achalasia. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was the most frequent motor pattern identified (15.1% overall), followed by EGJ outflow obstruction (5.3%). Proportions with IEM were lower using stringent criteria (10.0%), especially in supine studies (7.1%-8.5%). Other motor patterns were rare (0.2%-4.1% overall) and did not vary by age or gender. DL thresholds were close to current norms across HRM systems, while IRP thresholds varied by HRM system and study position. Both fifth and 95th percentile DCI values were lower than current thresholds, both in upright and supine positions. CONCLUSIONS: Motor abnormalities are infrequent in healthy individuals and consist mainly of IEM, proportions of which are lower when using stringent criteria in the supine position. Thresholds for HRM metrics vary by HRM system and study position.

Subjective Symptoms in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis Are Related to Esophageal Wall Thickness and Esophageal Body Pressure.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) can be used in the evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) for frequent symptoms such as dysphagia. However, the role of these examinations is not clear. AIMS: The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the subjective symptoms of EoE patients with EUS and HRM. METHODS: Patients who had endoscopic findings indicative of EoE and matched the number of eosinophil infiltrates used as diagnostic criteria were recruited between September 2018 and August 2019. Evaluable subjects underwent EUS and HRM and completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. The esophageal wall thickness (evaluated with EUS) and HRM parameters between patients with and without symptoms were retrospectively compared. Symptomatic patients were re-examined using EUS and HRM 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients (29 males, median age of 49 years) were divided into symptomatic (20 patients) and asymptomatic groups (15 patients). The esophageal wall was thicker, and the distal contractile integral (DCI) values were higher in the symptomatic group (P < 0.001). In addition, DCI values were positively correlated with esophageal wall thickness. After treatment, the GSRS scores showed an improving trend for each item. Esophageal wall thickness and DCI values were significantly decreased (Ps < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal wall thickening and increased esophageal body pressure may be involved in subjective symptoms. In addition, treatment may reduce esophageal thickness and pressure along with improvement of subjective symptoms.

Differences in clinical characteristics between conservative-treatment-response group and refractory (surgical-treatment) group in patients with jackhammer esophagus.

BACKGROUND: Jackhammer esophagus (JE) is a rare disease with unclear clinical features. The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare the clinical characteristics of patients with JE whose symptoms were controlled with conservative treatment, such as observation or medication, versus those who were required surgical treatment, such as surgical myotomy or per oral endoscopic myotomy. METHODS: Eighteen patients with JE were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who responded to conservative treatment (C group) and patients who were refractory to conservative treatment and underwent surgery (S group). Patient age, sex, disease duration before treatment, symptoms, esophagogastroduodenoscopic (EGD) findings, esophagographic findings, esophageal wall thickness on computed tomography, number of swallows with hypercontractile peristalsis in 10 water swallows, and maximum distal contractile integral (DCI) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Thirteen of 18 patients (72%) were in the C group and five of 18 (28%) were in the S group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, disease duration before treatment, symptoms, EGD findings, esophagographic findings, esophageal wall thickness, or number of swallows with hypercontractile peristalsis between the groups. On Starlet high-resolution manometry, the median maximum DCI value was significantly higher in the S group (32,651 mmHg-s-cm) than in the C group (17,926 mmHg-s-cm) (P = 0.0136). CONCLUSIONS: JE treatment should be carefully considered because some patients require surgery, whereas others are controlled with conservative treatment alone. A higher DCI value in patients with JE may predict resistance to conservative treatment.

Distal contractile integral measurement and vascular compression in the esophagus: a problem unsolved?

BACKGROUND: Distal contractile integral (DCI) is influenced by factors other than esophageal smooth muscle contractility, such as intrabolus pressure and vascular and respiratory movements' artifacts. We aimed to determine the size of the contribution of pressures generated by vascular compression on the esophagus to the DCI measured in HRM recordings in symptomatic patients. METHODS: HRM manometry recordings obtained from 383 subjects referred to the GI motility laboratory at a tertiary center (2012-2016) were evaluated by visual inspection for evidence of strong vascular compression (SVC) of the esophagus. Clinical, demographic, manometric, and serologic data for Chagas disease were obtained. Subjects were classified, respectively, as asymptomatics (ASYM) or symptomatics (SYMP). DCI and SVC-DCI were measured, and the SVC-DCI/DCI ratio was expressed as a percentage and the difference between DCI and SVC-DCI (neat-DCI) was calculated. DCI, SVC-DCI, SVC-DCI/DCI % and neat-DCI from SYMP and ASYM were compared. RESULTS: SVC was conspicuous in 42 of 383 subjects (11%). In 33 subjects, SVC was detected only in supine position. SVC was localized in middle esophagus in 21 subjects (50%), in distal esophagus in 12 subjects (29%) and in both regions in 9 subjects (21%). In 9 subjects, SVC vanished from the swallowing window analysis (21%). CONCLUSIONS: SVC is a common finding in esophageal HRM study, particularly in the supine position. Occasionally, its contribution to DCI value is sufficiently great to masquerade esophageal hypocontractility. Different manometric protocols may be required in patients with SVC.

Effects of viscosity and volume on the patterns of esophageal motility in healthy adults using high-resolution manometry.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), viscosity, and volume on esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry (HRM). Manometric studies were performed on 60 asymptomatic volunteers (27 men and 33 women, age: 19-56 years) while in a supine position. Manometric protocol included 10 water swallows (5 cc), 10 jelly swallows (5 cc), and 1 water swallow (20 cc). Evaluation of HRM parameters including length of proximal pressure trough (PPT length), distal latency (DL), contractile front velocity (CFV), distal contractile integral (DCI), and 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) was performed using MATLAB. Significant differences were noted in median IRP between water 5 cc (median 7.2 mmHg [range 5.5-9.6]), jelly 5 cc (median 6.0 mmHg [range 3.8-8.0]), and water 20 cc {(Median 4.8 mmHg [range 3.3-7.4]), P < 0.01}. DL were significantly different between water 5 cc, jelly 5 cc, and water 20 cc (P < 0.01), and in terms of PPT, proportions of small (2 cm ≤ < 5 cm) and large (5 cm≤) break for jelly 5 cc were significantly higher than those for the water 5 cc swallow (P < 0.05). Furthermore, DCI increased with age for water 5 cc, and a significant negative correlation was noticed between proportions of small break and BMI for water 5 cc. Manometric measurements vary depending on age, BMI, viscosity, and volume. These findings need to be taken into account in the interpretation of manometry results.

Botulinum toxin reduces Dysphagia in patients with nonachalasia primary esophageal motility disorders.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) has shown benefits for patients with diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) and nutcracker esophagus (NE) in small uncontrolled trials. We investigated the effect of BTX on symptoms of patients with DES or NE and assessed manometry findings in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study. METHODS: We assessed 22 patients with dysphagia-predominant, manometry-confirmed DES or NE (6 men; age, 63 ± 2 y) at a tertiary care medical center. Patients were given injections of BTX (8 × 12.5 U) or saline (8 × 0.5 mL) in 4 quadrants, at 2 and 7 cm above the esophagogastric junction. After 1 month, patients crossed over between groups and received endoscopic injections of BTX or saline. When the study began and 4 weeks after each injection, the patients were assessed by esophageal manometry and completed a symptom questionnaire (to determine solid and liquid dysphagia, chest pain, and regurgitation and heartburn; all scored 0-4). Responders were defined based on modified Vantrappen criteria for achalasia. RESULTS: After BTX injections, patients had significant decreases in total symptom scores (sum of solid and liquid dysphagia and chest pain; from 7.6 ± 0.7 to 4.8 ± 0.8; P = .01); this decrease was not observed in patients who received saline injections. Moreover, BTX injection stabilized unintentional weight loss (weight gain of 0.3 ± 0.3 after BTX injection vs further weight loss of 1.6 ± 0.5 kg after saline injection; P = .01). Fifty percent of patients had a response 1 month after BTX injection, compared with 10% after saline injection (P = .04); 30% still had a response 1 year after BTX injection. BTX injection also caused a significant decrease in the mean esophagogastric junction pressure, compared with baseline (15.8 ± 1.7 vs 24.0 ± 2.8 mm Hg; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective controlled study of patients with DES and NE, injections of BTX reduced symptoms and stabilized unintentional weight loss. TRIAL REGISTRY: http://www.targid.eu, ML2669, ML6294.

Análise crítica do vigor contrátil de ondas hipercontráteis para definer a doença esôfago hipercontrátil / Critical analysis of hypercontractile waves vigor to define hypercontractile esophagus disease

ABSTRACT Background: The current definition for hypercontractile esophagus was arbitrarily set at the uppermost range in volunteers for a specific equipment. Objective: This study aims to critically analyze the concept of hypercontractile waves to redefine hypercontractile esophagus parameters. Methods: We reviewed 500 unselected and consecutive HRM tests (5000 waves) performed in a water -perfused system. Results: Mean distal contractility integral (DCI) was 825±1492 (0-42775) mmHg.cm.s, two standard deviations above average = 3810; 95th percentile = 2798 mmHg.cm.s. Conclusion: In healthy volunteers, two standard deviations above average is 4000 mmHg.cm.s, we thus suggest this value to define hypercontractile waves and define hypercontractile esophagus in a water-perfused HRM system.

Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.

BACKGROUND: High-resolution manometry (HRM) utilizes software tools to diagnose esophageal motor disorders. Performance of these software metrics could be affected by averaging and by software characteristics of different manufacturers. METHODS: High-resolution manometry studies on 86 patients referred for antireflux surgery (61.6 ± 1.4 year, 70% F) and 20 healthy controls (27.9 ± 0.7 year, 45% F) were first subject to standard analysis (Medtronic, Duluth, GA, USA). Coordinates for each of 10 test swallows were exported and averaged to generate a composite swallow. The swallows and averaged composites were imported as ASCII file format into Manoview (Medtronic) and Medical Measurement Systems database reporter (MMS, Dover, NH, USA), and analyses repeated. Comparisons were made between standard and composite swallow interpretations. KEY RESULTS: Correlation between the two systems was high for mean distal contractile integral (DCI, r2 ≥ 0.9) but lower for integrated relaxation pressure (IRP, r2 = 0.7). Excluding achalasia, six patients with outflow obstruction (mean IRP 23.2 ± 2.1 with 10-swallow average) were identified by both systems. An additional nine patients (10.5%) were identified as outflow obstruction (15 mmHg threshold) with MMS 10-swallow and four with MMS composite swallow evaluation; only one was confirmed. Ineffective esophageal motility was diagnosed by 10-swallow evaluation in 19 (22.1%) with Manoview, and 20 (23.3%) with MMS. On Manoview composite, 17 had DCI <450 mmHg/cm/s, and on MMS composite, 21, (p ≥ 0.85 for each comparison) but these did not impact diagnostic conclusions. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Comparison of 10 swallow and composite swallows demonstrate variability in software metrics between manometry systems. Our data support use of manufacturer specific software metrics on 10-swallow sequences.

Recent concept in interpreting high-resolution manometry.

Esophageal manometry is considered the gold standard for assessing esophageal motor function. Although conventional manometry has been widely used to evaluate esophageal motor function, this is not fully satisfactory for explaining esophageal symptoms. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is designed to overcome the limitations of conventional manometric systems with advanced technologies. A solid-state HRM assembly with 36 solid-state sensors spaced at 1 cm intervals (Sierra Scientific Instruments Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA) has been widely used around the world. Calibration and post-study thermal correction should be performed at each test. The HRM assembly was passed transnasally and positioned to record from the hypopharynx to the stomach. After a 5 minutes resting period to assess basal sphincter pressure, 5 mL water swallows are obtained in a supine posture. The interpretation of HRM data is still being refined. Recently, the HRM Classification Working Group revised the Chicago classification based on a systematic analysis of motility patterns in 75 control subjects and 400 consecutive patients. The below will show you a summary of the new Chicago classification of distal esophageal motility disorders to provide a practical way of interpreting HRM.