Emphysema Quantifications With CT Scan: Assessing the Effects of Acquisition Protocols and Imaging Parameters Using Virtual Imaging Trials.

BACKGROUND: CT scan has notable potential to quantify the severity and progression of emphysema in patients. Such quantification should ideally reflect the true attributes and pathologic conditions of subjects, not scanner parameters. To achieve such an objective, the effects of the scanner conditions need to be understood so the influence can be mitigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do CT scan imaging parameters affect the accuracy of emphysema-based quantifications and biomarkers? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty anthropomorphic digital phantoms were developed with diverse anatomic attributes and emphysema abnormalities informed by a real COPD cohort. The phantoms were input to a validated CT scan simulator (DukeSim), modeling a commercial scanner (Siemens Flash). Virtual images were acquired under various clinical conditions of dose levels, tube current modulations (TCM), and reconstruction techniques and kernels. The images were analyzed to evaluate the effects of imaging parameters on the accuracy of density-based quantifications (percent of lung voxels with HU < -950 [LAA-950] and 15th percentile of lung histogram HU [Perc15]) across varied subjects. Paired t tests were performed to explore statistical differences between any two imaging conditions. RESULTS: The most accurate imaging condition corresponded to the highest acquired dose (100 mAs) and iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) with the smooth kernel of I31, where the measurement errors (difference between measurement and ground truth) were 35 ± 3 Hounsfield Units (HU), -4% ± 5%, and 26 ± 10 HU (average ± SD), for the mean lung HU, LAA-950, and Perc15, respectively. Without TCM and at the I31 kernel, increase of dose (20 to 100 mAs) improved the lung mean absolute error (MAE) by 4.2 ± 2.3 HU (average ± SD). TCM did not contribute to a systematic improvement of lung MAE. INTERPRETATION: The results highlight that although CT scan quantification is possible, its reliability is impacted by the choice of imaging parameters. The developed virtual imaging trial platform in this study enables comprehensive evaluation of CT scan methods in reliable quantifications, an effort that cannot be readily made with patient images or simplistic physical phantoms.

Development and Application of a Virtual Imaging Trial framework for Airway Quantifications via CT.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the top three causes of death worldwide, characterized by emphysema and bronchitis. Airway measurements reflect the severity of bronchitis and other airway-related diseases. Airway structures can be objectively evaluated with quantitative computed tomography (CT). The accuracy of such quantifications is limited by the spatial resolution and image noise characteristics of the imaging system and can be potentially improved with the emerging photon-counting CT (PCCT) technology. This study evaluated the quantitative performance of PCCT against energy-integrating CT (EICT) systems for airway measurements, and further identified optimum CT imaging parameters for such quantifications. The study was performed using a novel virtual imaging framework by developing the first library of virtual patients with bronchitis. These virtual patients were developed based on CT images of confirmed COPD patients with varied bronchitis severity. The human models were virtually imaged at 6.3 and 12.6 mGy dose levels using a scanner-specific simulator (DukeSim), synthesizing clinical PCCT and EICT scanners (NAEOTOM Alpha, FLASH, Siemens). The projections were reconstructed with two algorithms and kernels at different matrix sizes and slice thicknesses. The CT images were used to quantify clinically relevant airway measurements ("Pi10" and "WA%") and compared against their ground truth values. Compared to EICT, PCCT provided more accurate Pi10 and WA% measurements by 63.1% and 68.2%, respectively. For both technologies, sharper kernels and larger matrix sizes led to more reliable bronchitis quantifications. This study highlights the potential advantages of PCCT against EICT in characterizing bronchitis utilizing a virtual imaging platform.

Task-based validation and application of a scanner-specific CT simulator using an anthropomorphic phantom.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative analysis of computed tomography (CT) images traditionally utilizes real patient data that can pose challenges with replicability, efficiency, and radiation exposure. Instead, virtual imaging trials (VITs) can overcome these hurdles through computer simulations of models of patients and imaging systems. DukeSim is a scanner-specific CT imaging simulator that has previously been validated with simple cylindrical phantoms, but not with anthropomorphic conditions and clinically relevant measurements. PURPOSE: To validate a scanner-specific CT simulator (DukeSim) for the assessment of lung imaging biomarkers under clinically relevant conditions across multiple scanners using an anthropomorphic chest phantom, and to demonstrate the utility of virtual trials by studying the effects or radiation dose and reconstruction kernels on the lung imaging quantifications. METHODS: An anthropomorphic chest phantom with customized tube inserts was imaged with two commercial scanners (Siemens Force and Siemens Flash) at 28 dose and reconstruction conditions. A computational version of the chest phantom was used with a scanner-specific CT simulator (DukeSim) to simulate virtual images corresponding to the settings of the real acquisitions. Lung imaging biomarkers were computed from both real and simulated CT images and quantitatively compared across all imaging conditions. The VIT framework was further utilized to investigate the effects of radiation dose (20-300 mAs) and reconstruction settings (Qr32f, Qr40f, and Qr69f reconstruction kernels using ADMIRE strength 3) on the accuracy of lung imaging biomarkers, compared against the ground-truth values modeled in the computational chest phantom. RESULTS: The simulated CT images matched closely the real images for both scanners and all imaging conditions qualitatively and quantitatively, with the average biomarker percent error of 3.51% (range 0.002%-18.91%). The VIT study showed that sharper reconstruction kernels had lower accuracy with errors in mean lung HU of 84-94 HU, lung volume of 797-3785 cm3 , and lung mass of -800 to 1751 g. Lower tube currents had the lower accuracy with errors in mean lung HU of 6-84 HU, lung volume of 66-3785 cm3 , and lung mass of 170-1751 g. Other imaging biomarkers were consistent under the studied reconstruction settings and tube currents. CONCLUSION: We comprehensively evaluated the realism of DukeSim in an anthropomorphic setup across a diverse range of imaging conditions. This study paves the way toward utilizing VITs more reliably for conducting medical imaging experiments that are not practical using actual patient images.

Scanner-specific validation of a CT simulator using a COPD-emulated anthropomorphic phantom.

Traditional methods of quantitative analysis of CT images typically involve working with patient data, which is often expensive and limited in terms of ground truth. To counter these restrictions, quantitative assessments can instead be made through Virtual Imaging Trials (VITs) which simulate the CT imaging process. This study sought to validate DukeSim (a scanner-specific CT simulator) utilizing clinically relevant biomarkers for a customized anthropomorphic chest phantom. The physical phantom was imaged utilizing two commercial CT scanners (Siemens Somatom Force and Definition Flash) with varying imaging parameters. A computational version of the phantom was simulated utilizing DukeSim for each corresponding real acquisition. Biomarkers were computed and compared between the real and virtually acquired CT images to assess the validity of DukeSim. The simulated images closely matched the real images both qualitatively and quantitatively, with the average biomarker percent difference of 3.84% (range 0.19% to 18.27%). Results showed that DukeSim is reasonably well validated across various patient imaging conditions and scanners, which indicates the utility of DukeSim for further VIT studies where real patient data may not be feasible.

Development and Clinical Applications of a Virtual Imaging Framework for Optimizing Photon-counting CT.

The purpose of this study was to develop a virtual imaging framework that simulates a new photon-counting CT (PCCT) system (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens). The PCCT simulator was built upon the DukeSim platform, which generates projection images of computational phantoms given the geometry and physics of the scanner and imaging parameters. DukeSim was adapted to account for the geometry of the PCCT prototype. To model the photon-counting detection process, we utilized a Monte Carlo-based detector model with the known properties of the detectors. We validated the simulation platform against experimental measurements. The images were acquired at four dose levels (CTDIvol of 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, and 12.0 mGy) and reconstructed with three kernels (Br36, Br40, Br48). The experimental acquisitions were replicated using our developed simulation platform. The real and simulated images were quantitatively compared in terms of image quality metrics (HU values, noise magnitude, noise power spectrum, and modulation transfer function). The clinical utility of our framework was demonstrated by conducting two clinical applications (COPD quantifications and lung nodule radiomics). The phantoms with relevant pathologies were imaged with DukeSim modeling the PCCT systems. Different imaging parameters (e.g., dose, reconstruction techniques, pixel size, and slice thickness) were altered to investigate their effects on task-based quantifications. We successfully implemented the acquisition and physics attributes of the PCCT prototype into the DukeSim platform. The discrepancy between the real and simulated data was on average about 2 HU in terms of noise magnitude, 0.002 mm-1 in terms of noise power spectrum peak frequency and 0.005 mm-1 in terms of the frequency at 50% MTF. Analysis suggested that lung lesion radiomics to be more accurate with reduced pixel size and slice thickness. For COPD quantifications, higher doses, thinner slices, and softer kernels yielded more accurate quantification of density-based biomarkers. Our developed virtual imaging platform enables systematic comparison of new PCCT technologies as well as optimization of the imaging parameters for specific clinical tasks.

A scanner-specific framework for simulating CT images with tube current modulation.

Although tube current modulation (TCM) is routinely implemented in modern computed tomography (CT) scans, no existing CT simulator is capable of generating realistic images with TCM. The goal of this study was to develop such a framework to (1) facilitate patient-specific optimization of TCM parameters and (2) enable future virtual imaging trials (VITs) with more clinically realistic image quality and x-ray flux distributions. The framework was created by developing a TCM module and integrating it with an existing CT simulator (DukeSim). The developed module utilizes scanner-calibrated TCM parameters and two localizer radiographs to compute the mAs for each simulated CT projection. This simulation pipeline was validated in two parts. First, DukeSim was validated in the context of a commercial scanner with TCM (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers) by imaging a physical CT phantom (Mercury, Sun Nuclear) and its computational analogue. Second, the TCM module was validated by imaging a computational anthropomorphic phantom (ATOM, CIRS) using DukeSim with real and module-generated TCM profiles. The validation demonstrated DukeSim's realism in terms of noise magnitude, noise texture, spatial resolution, and image contrast (with average differences of 0.38%, 6.31%, 0.43%, and -9 HU, respectively). It also demonstrated the TCM module's realism in terms of projection-level mAs and resulting noise magnitude (2.86% and -2.60%, respectively). Finally, the framework was applied to a pilot VIT simulating images of three computational anthropomorphic phantoms (XCAT, with body mass indices (BMIs) of 24.3, 28.2, and 33.0) under five different TCM settings. The optimal TCM for each phantom was characterized based on various criteria, such as minimizing mAs or maximizing image quality. 'Very Weak' TCM minimized noise for the 24.3 BMI phantom, while 'Very Strong' TCM minimized noise for the 33.0 BMI phantom. This illustrates the utility of the developed framework for future optimization studies of TCM parameters and, more broadly, large-scale VITs with scanner-specific TCM.