Detection of blasts using flags and cell population data rules on Beckman Coulter DxH 900 hematology analyzer in patients with hematologic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: White blood cell (WBC)-related flags are essential for detecting abnormal cells including blasts in automated hematology analyzers (AHAs). Cell population data (CPD) may characterize each WBC population, and customized CPD rules can be also useful for detecting blasts. We evaluated the performance of WBC-related flags, customized CPD rules, and their combination for detecting blasts on the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 AHA (DxH 900, Beckman Coulter, Miami, Florida, USA). METHODS: In a total of 239 samples from patients with hematologic diseases, complete blood count on DxH 900 and manual slide review (MSR) were conducted. The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the five WBC-related flags, nine customized CPD rules, and their combination were evaluated for detecting blasts, in comparison with MSR. RESULTS: Blasts were detected by MSR in 40 out of 239 (16.7 %) samples. The combination of flags and CPD rules showed the highest sensitivity compared with each of flags and CPD rules for detecting blasts (97.5 vs. 72.5 % vs. 92.5 %). Compared with any flag, the combination of flags and CPD rules significantly reduced false-negative samples from 11 to one for detecting blasts (27.5 vs. 2.5 %, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluated the performance of both flags and CPD rules on DxH 900. The customized CPD rules as well as the combination of flags and CPD rules outperformed WBC-related flags for detecting blasts on DxH 900. The customized CPD rules can play a complementary role for improving the capability of blast detection on DxH 900.

Retrospective study on the efficacy of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening test for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Pathogenic genetic testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can detect viruses with high sensitivity; however, there are several challenges. In the prevention, testing, and treatment of COVID-19, more effective, safer, and convenient methods are desired. We evaluated the possibility of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as an infection biomarker in COVID-19 testing. METHODS: The efficacy of MDW as a screening test for COVID-19 was retrospectively assessed in 80 patients in the COVID-19 group and 232 patients in the non-COVID-19 group (141 patients with acute respiratory infection, 19 patients with nonrespiratory infection, one patient with a viral infection, 11 patients who had received treatment for COVID-19, one patient in contact with COVID-19 patients, and 59 patients with noninfectious disease). RESULTS: The median MDW in 80 patients in the COVID-19 group was 23.3 (17.2-33.6), and the median MDW in 232 patients in the non-COVID-19 group was 19.0 (13.6-30.2) (P < 0.001). When the COVID-19 group was identified using the MDW cut-off value of 21.3 from the non-COVID-19 group, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.844, and the sensitivity and specificity were 81.3% and 78.2%, respectively. Comparison of MDW by severity between the COVID-19 group and patients with acute respiratory infection in the non-COVID-19 group showed that MDW was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group for all mild, moderate I, and moderate II disease. CONCLUSIONS: MDW (cut-off value: 21.3) may be used as a screening test for COVID-19 in fever outpatients. Trial registration This study was conducted after being approved by the ethics committee of National Hospital Organization Omuta National Hospital (Approval No. 3-19). This study can be accessed via https://omuta.hosp.go.jp/files/000179721.pdf .

Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer UniCel DxH 900.

INTRODUCTION: UniCel DxH900 (Beckman Coulter, Miami, Florida, USA) is a quantitative, multi-parameter, automated hematology analyzer for in vitro diagnostic use in clinical laboratories. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the new DxH900 analyzer to verify its diagnostic and clinical utility in the hematology laboratory of a tertiary care hospital in Spain. The most important and novel feature offered by DxH900 analyzer is providing MDW (monocyte distribution width), a new hematologic parameter which is being clinically validated as an early sepsis indicator with promising results. METHODS: We evaluated imprecision (including MDW), linearity, and carryover of DxH900. Method comparison for cell blood count (CBC) was performed in relation to DxH800 with 100 samples. We compared leukocyte differential (DIFF) from DxH900 with manual 400-cell differential. 390 samples were assessed for flag performance. RESULTS: Results obtained for between days and within-run imprecision were good. DxH900 showed excellent linearity (R = 1.00) over analytical range for white blood cells, red blood cells, hemoglobin, platelets, and reticulocyte count (RET) (R = 0.96) and no significant carryover effect. CBC and RET on the DxH900 correlated well with DxH800 (R ≥ 0.99). Comparison with manual differential showed excellent correlation (R ≥ 0.88), except for basophils. Flagging performance exhibited sensitivity over 90% for majority of alarm messages and very high negative predictive value (over 95%). CONCLUSION: UniCel DxH900 Coulter analyzer provides reliable results and fully comparable to DxH800. DxH900 is an accurate, highly precise analyzer with good analytical performances to be used effectively in high-volume laboratories.

Evaluation of the New Beckmann Coulter Analyzer DxH 900 Compared to Sysmex XN20: Analytical Performance and Flagging Efficiency.

Efficiency and accuracy in automated hematology analyzers are very important for clinical laboratories. The purpose was to evaluate the flags and results reported by the newest Beckman Coulter analyzer DxH 900 compared to the Sysmex XN20 system. Samples were analyzed on the XN20 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) and on the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 (Beckman Coulter, Miami, Florida, USA). Slide reviews were performed microscopically. Morphologic criteria were used to identify abnormal cells as recommended by International Consensus Group for Hematology (ICSH): blasts, immature granulocytes (IG%), abnormal lymphocytes (ALs) and plasma cells. Results: there was a strong correlation between the analyzers in almost all clinical parameters tested. Both DxH 900 and XN20 showed an excellent degree of association for the leukocyte differential compared to the reference method (manual microscopy). When it comes to IG%, XN20 showed a positive bias for higher results. Related to platelets, there are no differences between the two methods for PLT count. For mean platelet volume (MPV), DxH 900 provided 100% results of the samples analyzed while XN20 while in the XN20 analyzer, 16% of the results were missing. From our results we came to the conclusion that both analyzers, DxH 900 and XN20 were clinically accurate and efficient. Abnormal Lymphocyte detection highlighted the differences between the two technologies as only minimal agreement was obtained. DxH 900 demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting IG with good correlation with microscopic review. The DxH 900 for platelet clumps identification provides an excellent flag (PLT Clumps) with the highest sensitivity observed in our evaluation.