Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Hum Reprod ; 32(10): 1974-1994, 2017 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117384

RESUMO

STUDY QUESTION: How does the data collection XIV-XV of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium compare with the cumulative data for data collections I-XIII? SUMMARY ANSWER: The 14th and 15th retrospective collection represents valuable data on PGD/PGS cycles, pregnancies and children: the main trend observed is the increased application of array technology at the cost of FISH testing in PGS cycles and in PGD cycles for chromosomal abnormalities. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since 1999, the PGD Consortium has collected, analysed and published 13 previous data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data were collected from each participating centre using a FileMaker Pro database (versions 5-12). Separate predesigned FileMaker Pro files were used for the cycles, pregnancies and baby records. The study documented cycles performed during the calendar years 2011 and 2012 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born which resulted from these cycles (until October 2013). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHOD: Data were submitted by 71 centres (full PGD Consortium members). Records with incomplete or inconsistent data were excluded from the calculations. Corrections, calculations and tables were made by expert co-authors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For data collection XIV-XV, 71 centres reported data for 11 637 cycles with oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 2147 pregnancies and 1755 babies born. A total of 1953 cycles to OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 144 cycles to OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 3445 cycles to OR for monogenic diseases, 6095 cycles to OR for PGS and 38 cycles to OR for social sexing. From 2010 until 2012, the use of arrays for genetic testing increased from 4% to 20% in PGS and from 6% to 13% in PGD cycles for chromosomal abnormalities; the uptake of biopsy at the blastocyst stage (from <1% up to 7%) was only observed in cycles for structural chromosomal abnormalities, alongside the application of array comparative genomic hybridization. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings apply to the 71 participating centres and may not represent worldwide trends in PGD. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The annual data collections provide an important resource for data mining and for following trends in PGD/PGS practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None.


Assuntos
Hibridização Genômica Comparativa , Recuperação de Oócitos , Taxa de Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Coleta de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Hum Reprod ; 30(8): 1763-89, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26071418

RESUMO

STUDY QUESTION: How do data in the 13th annual data collection (Data XIII) of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium compare with the cumulative data for collections I-XII? SUMMARY ANSWER: The 13th retrospective collection represents valuable data on PGD/PGS cycles, pregnancies and children: the main trend observed is the decrease in the routine implementation of PGS. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since 1999, the PGD Consortium has collected, analysed and published 12 data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data were collected from each participating centre using a FileMaker Pro database (versions 5-11). Separate predesigned FileMaker Pro files were used for the cycles, pregnancies and baby records. The study documented cycles performed during the calendar year 2010 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born which resulted from these cycles (until October 2011). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data were submitted by 62 centres (full PGD Consortium members). The submitted data were thoroughly analysed to identify incomplete data entries and corrections were requested from the participating centres. Records remaining with incomplete or inconsistent data were excluded from the calculations. Corrections, calculations and tables were made by expert co-authors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For data collection XIII, 62 centres reported data for 5780 cycles with oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 1503 pregnancies and 1152 babies born. A total of 1071 OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 108 OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 1574 OR for monogenic diseases, 2979 OR for preimplantation genetic screening and 48 OR for social sexing. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The findings apply to the 62 participating centres and may not represent worldwide trends in PGD. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The annual data collections provide an important resource for data mining and for following trends in PGD practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None.


Assuntos
Aberrações Cromossômicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Recuperação de Oócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado da Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Coleta de Dados , Bases de Dados Factuais , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Seguimentos , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Hum Reprod ; 29(5): 880-903, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24619432

RESUMO

STUDY QUESTION: How do data in the 12th annual data collection (Data XII) of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium compare with the cumulative data for collections I-XI? SUMMARY ANSWER: Since the beginning of the data collections, there has been a steady increase in the number of cycles, pregnancies and babies reported annually. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The PGD Consortium has collected, analysed and published 11 previous data sets since 1997. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data were collected from each participating centre using a pre-designed FileMaker Pro database (versions 5-10). Separate FileMaker Pro files were used for the cycles, pregnancies and baby records. The study documented cycles performed during the calendar year 2009 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born which resulted from these cycles (until October 2010). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data were submitted by 60 centres (full PGD Consortium members), and the blank files were distributed to each PGD Consortium member centre at the end of 2008. The submitted data were thoroughly analysed to identify incomplete data entries and corrections were requested from the participating centres. Records remaining with incomplete data were excluded from the calculations. Corrections, tables and calculations were made by expert co-authors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For data collection XII, 60 centres reported data for 6160 cycles with oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 1607 pregnancies and 1238 babies born. A total of 870 OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 113 OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 1597 OR for monogenic diseases, 3551 OR for preimplantation genetic screening and 29 OR for social sexing. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: These data cannot include every PGD cycle performed annually, and only indicate the trends in PGD worldwide. WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS: The annual data collections provide an extremely valuable resource for data mining and for following trends in PGD practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Genéticas , Doenças Genéticas Inatas/diagnóstico , Doenças Genéticas Ligadas ao Cromossomo X/diagnóstico , Taxa de Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Recuperação de Oócitos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA