Perioperative management protocol for pediatric endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe in esophageal motility disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Lower esophageal sphincter achalasia is associated with a higher risk of aspiration during anesthesia. Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) is used as an adjunctive tool in both the diagnosis and treatment of achalasia, for which all children require anesthesia. Anesthesia may affect the parameters of the EndoFLIP due to its effect on gut motility. There are no standard anesthesia protocols to help decrease the risk of aspiration and the undesirable effect of anesthesia on EndoFLIP parameters. This study aims to standardize an anesthesia protocol to target both goals. METHODS: A protocol was developed to address perioperative management in patients undergoing EndoFLIP for any indication to minimize both anesthetic effect on the esophageal motility as well as perioperative complications. A retrospective data analysis was conducted on patients who underwent EndoFLIP at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; pre- and post-protocol implementation data including adverse events was compared. RESULTS: Pre-protocol implementation: 60 cases (median age of 13.8 years, 30 [50%] females) with 2 cases of adverse events (3.3%). Post-protocol implementation: 71 cases (median age of 14.6 years, 37 [52.1%] females) with no adverse events (0/71 = 0%). In comparison between pre- and post-protocol cases, no significant difference was noted in gender, age, and adverse events. Post-protocol procedures were found to be significantly shorter (median time of 89 vs. 79 min, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our anesthesia protocol provides a standardized way of administering anesthesia minimizing impact on EndoFLIP parameters and aspiration for patients with achalasia.

Impedance planimetry and panometry (EndoFLIP™) can replace manometry in preoperative anti-reflux surgery assessment.

BACKGROUND: Endoluminal functional impedance planimetry and panometry assesses secondary peristalsis in response to volumetric distention under sedation. We hypothesize that impedance planimetry and panometry can replace high-resolution manometry in the preoperative assessment prior to anti-reflux surgery. METHODS: Single institution prospective data were collected from patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery between 2021 and 2023. A 16-cm functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) assessed planimetry and panometry prior to surgery under general anesthesia at the start of each case. Panometry was recorded and esophageal contractile response was classified as normal (NCR), diminished or disordered (DDCR), or absent (ACR) in real time by a single panometry rater, blinded to preoperative HRM results. FLIP results were then compared to preoperative HRM. RESULTS: Data were collected from 120 patients, 70.8% female, with mean age of 63 ± 3 years. There were 105 patients with intraoperative panometry, and 15 with panometry collected during preoperative endoscopy. There were 60 patients (50%) who had peristaltic dysfunction on HRM, of whom 57 had FLIP dysmotility (55 DDCR, 2 ACR) resulting in 95.0% sensitivity. There were 3 patients with normal secondary peristalsis on FLIP with abnormal HRM, all ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). No major motility disorder was missed by FLIP. A negative predictive value of 91.9% was calculated from 34/37 patients with normal FLIP panometry and normal HRM. Patients with normal HRM but abnormal FLIP had larger hernias compared to patients with concordant studies (7.5 ± 2.8 cm vs. 5.4 ± 3.2 cm, p = 0.043) and higher preoperative dysphagia scores (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Impedance planimetry and panometry can assess motility under general anesthesia or sedation and is highly sensitive to peristaltic dysfunction. Panometry is a novel tool that has potential to streamline and improve patient care and therefore should be considered as an alternative to HRM, especially in patients in which HRM would be inaccessible or poorly tolerated.

Outcomes after per-oral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticula (Z-POEM) and correlation with impedance planimetry (FLIP).

INTRODUCTION: Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a false pulsion diverticulum of the cervical esophagus. It is typically found in older adults and manifests with dysphagia. The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's (Z-POEM) and intraoperative impedance planimetry (FLIP). METHODS: We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients undergoing Z-POEM in a prospective database between 2014 and 2022. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) distensibility index (DI, mm2/mmHg) was measured by FLIP before and after myotomy. The primary outcome was clinical success. Secondary outcomes included technical failure, adverse events, and quality of life as assessed by the gastroesophageal health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL), reflux severity index (RSI), and dysphagia score. A statistical analysis of DI was done with the paired t-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Fifty-four patients underwent Z-POEM, with FLIP measurements available in 30 cases. We achieved technical success and clinical success in 54/54 (100%) patients and 46/54 patients (85%), respectively. Three patients (6%) experienced contained leaks. Three patients were readmitted: one for aforementioned contained leak, one for dysphagia, and one post-operative pneumonia. Three patients with residual dysphagia underwent additional endoscopic procedures, all of whom had diverticula > 4 cm. Following myotomy, mean DI increased by 2.0 ± 1.7 mm2/mmHg (p < 0.001). In those with good clinical success, change in DI averaged + 1.6 ± 1.1 mm2/mmHg. Significant improvement was found in RSI and GERD-HRQL scores, but not dysphagia score. CONCLUSION: Z-POEM is a safe and feasible for treatment of ZD. We saw zero cases of intraoperative abandonment. We propose that large diverticula (> 4 cm) are a risk factor for poor outcomes and may require additional endoscopic procedures. An improvement in DI is expected after myotomy, however, the ideal range is still not known.

Endoscopic impedance planimetry versus high-resolution manometry (HRM) for pre-operative motility evaluation in anti-reflux surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Pre-operative evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) includes assessment of esophageal motility. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard; endoscopic impedance planimetry (IP) with Endoflip 2.0 is increasingly utilized in esophageal disorders of motility. We hypothesized that normal IP motility would correlate with normal HRM motility and tested this in a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients presenting for surgical evaluation of GERD between 9/2020 and 10/2021 were prospectively enrolled under an IRB-approved protocol. Patients with prior esophageal/gastric surgery, known motility disorders, or large paraesophageal hernias were excluded. All underwent HRM and IP, with normal motility defined by Chicago 3.0 classification for HRM and the presence of repetitive antegrade contractions for IP. Logistic regression and t test were used to analyze the data; p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of 63 patients enrolled, 48 completed both IP and HRM testing. The cohort was 50% male with a median age of 52.5 [42.0, 66.0] years, mostly ASA class 1-2 (75.1%, n = 36) and had an average BMI of 31.4 ± 6.3 kg/m2. Normal motility tracings were in 62.5% of IP and 75% of HRM tests. Using HRM as the gold standard, IP detected normal motility with a sensitivity of 65.8% and a specificity of 50% (positive predictive value 83.3%, negative predictive value 27.8%). Normal IP was not statistically significant in predicting normal HRM (OR 3.182, 95% CI 0.826-12.262, p = 0.0926). Tolerability of IP was significantly better than HRM with lower rates of discomfort (10.9% vs. 93.4%, p < 0.0001) and higher willingness to repeat testing (100% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Esophageal motility testing with Endoflip 2.0 is well tolerated by patients. The low specificity (50%), poor negative predictive value (27.8%), and lack of statistically significant concordance between IP and HRM raises concern for the reliability of this test as a stand-alone replacement for HRM in the pre-operative evaluation for GERD.

Determination of causes of post-operative dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery based on intra-operative planimetry.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery (ARS) is one of the most common indications for re-operative anti-reflux surgery and a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction. Unfortunately, the factors affecting its development are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation between pre-operative manometric and the intra-operative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements and development of post-operative dysphagia. METHODS: A review of patients who underwent index robotic ARS in our institution. Patients who underwent pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP™ were included in our study. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3-month after surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (26.9%) reported post-operative dysphagia, and 34 (16.6%) reported new or worsening dysphagia. On pre-operative manometry, patients with post-operative dysphagia had a lower distal contractile integral [868.7 (IQR 402.2-1447) mmHg s cm vs 1207 (IQR 612.1-2111) mmHg s cm, p = 0.006) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure [14.7 IQR (8.9-23.6) mmHg vs 20.7 IQR (10.2-32.6) mmHg, p = 0.01] compared to those without post-operative dysphagia. They were also found to have higher pre-operative cross-sectional surface area (CSA) [83 IQR (44.5-112) mm2 vs 66 IQR (42-93) mm2, p = 0.02], and distensibility index (DI) [4.2 IQR (2.2-5.5) mm2/mmHg vs 2.9 IQR (1.6-4.6) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.003] compared to patients without post-operative dysphagia. Additionally, the decrease in CSA [- 34 (- 18.5, - 74.5) mm2 vs - 26.5 (- 10.5, - 53.7) mm2, p = 0.03] and DI [- 2.3 (- 1.2, - 3.7) mm2/mmHg vs - 1.6 (- 0.7, - 3.3) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.03] measurements were greater in patients with post-operative dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Patients who developed dysphagia post-operatively had poorer pre-operative motility and a greater change in LES characteristics intra-operatively. This finding suggests the utility of pre-operative manometry and intra-operative EndoFLIP in identifying patients at risk of developing dysphagia post-operatively.

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIPTM) and surgical outcomes after Hill compared to Toupet fundoplication.

INTRODUCTION: Endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) provides a real-time assessment of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) compliance during fundoplication. Given the limited data on EndoFLIP measurements during the Hill procedure, we investigated the impact of the Hill procedure on GEJ compliance compared to Toupet fundoplication. METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic Hill or Toupet fundoplication with intraoperative EndoFLIP between 2017 and 2022 were included. EndoFLIP measurements of the GEJ included cross sectional surface area (CSA), intra-balloon pressure, high pressure zone length (HPZ), distensibility index (DI), and compliance. Subjective reflux symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, and dysphagia score were assessed pre-operatively as well as at short- and longer-term follow-up. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty-four patients (71.9%) had a Toupet fundoplication while sixty (28%) patients underwent the Hill procedure. The CSA [27.7 ± 10.9 mm2 vs 42.2 ± 17.8 mm2, p < 0.0001], pressure [29.5 ± 6.2 mmHg vs 33.9 ± 8.5 mmHg, p = 0.0009], DI [0.9 ± 0.4 mm2/mmHg vs 1.3 ± 0.6 mm2/mmHg, p = 0.001], and compliance [25.9 ± 12.8 mm3/mmHg vs 35.4 ± 13.4 mm3/mmHg, p = 0.01] were lower after the Hill procedure compared to Toupet. However, there was no difference in post-fundoplication HPZ between procedures [Hill: 2.9 ± 0.4 cm, Toupet: 3.1 ± 0.6 cm, p = 0.15]. Follow-up showed no significant differences in GERD-HRQL scores, overall dysphagia scores or atypical symptoms between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Hill procedure is as effective to the Toupet fundoplication in surgically treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) despite the lower CSA, DI, and compliance after the Hill procedure. Both procedures led to DI < 2 mm2/mmHg with no significant differences in dysphagia reporting (12-24) months after the procedure. Further studies to elucidate a cutoff value for DI for postoperative dysphagia development are still warranted.

Using impedance planimetry to define the end of a peroral endoscopic myotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive endoscopic option for management of achalasia. Adequate distal myotomy is necessary for relief of symptoms, but when too long may also increase risk of reflux. The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes after POEM and final length of gastric myotomy using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP). METHODS: A retrospective review of 34 consecutive patients undergoing POEM with EndoFLIP were included. EndoFLIP measurements, including esophagogastric junction distensibility index (DI), minimum diameter (Dmin), and cross-sectional area (CSA) were recorded at 30- and 40-mL balloon-fill pre- and post- myotomy. The myotomy was considered complete when DI ≥ 3.4 mm2/mmHg. Postoperative Eckardt score (ES) was determined at initial postoperative visit and most recent follow-up. Linear and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between gastric myotomy length and post-myotomy EndoFLIP measurements on postoperative ES and GERD. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare gastric myotomy lengths and EndoFLIP parameters in relation to clinical success and development of GERD, and paired t-test to compare EndoFLIP measurements and ES pre- and post-myotomy. RESULTS: Final length of gastric myotomy measured 1 cm in 1 (2.9%), 1.5 cm in 11 (32.4%), 2.0 cm in 19 (55.9%), and 2.5 cm in 3 (8.8%) patients. Mean preoperative ES was 6.6 ± 2.2. All patients achieved ES < 3 postoperatively, which was maintained in 88.5% of patients at a median of 7.5 months of follow-up. Gastric myotomy length and post-myotomy EndoFLIP values were not associated with postoperative Eckardt scores or GERD. DISCUSSION: Early and late symptom relief was achieved in 100 and 88.5% of patients, respectively, at a gastric myotomy length of 1-2.5 cm. Using EndoFLIP to define a completed myotomy at DI of 3.4 mm2/mmHg yielded variable lengths of gastric myotomy.

Safety and efficacy of EsoFLIP dilation in patients with esophageal dysmotility: a systematic review.

Esophageal manometry is utilized for the evaluation and classification of esophageal motility disorders. EndoFlip has been introduced as an adjunctive test to evaluate esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility. Treatment options for achalasia and EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO) include pneumatic dilation, myotomy, and botulinum toxin. Recently, a therapeutic 30 mm hydrostatic balloon dilator (EsoFLIP, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has been introduced, which uses impedance planimetry technology like EndoFlip. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EsoFLIP in the management of esophageal motility disorders. A systematic literature search was performed with Medline, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to November 2022 to identify studies utilizing EsoFLIP for management of esophageal motility disorders. Our primary outcome was clinical success, and secondary outcomes were adverse events. Eight observational studies including 222 patients met inclusion criteria. Diagnoses included achalasia (158), EGJOO (48), post-reflux surgery dysphagia (8), and achalasia-like disorder (8). All studies used 30 mm maximum balloon dilation except one which used 25 mm. The clinical success rate was 68.7%. Follow-up duration ranged from 1 week to a mean of 5.7 months. Perforation or tear occurred in four patients. EsoFLIP is a new therapeutic option for the management of achalasia and EGJOO and appears to be effective and safe. Future comparative studies with other therapeutic modalities are needed to understand its role in the management of esophageal motility disorders.

Esophageal Distensibility Defines Fibrostenotic Severity in Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Identification of fibrosis in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) relies on symptom assessment and endoscopy. Symptoms are highly variable, and early fibrotic remodeling may go undetected on endoscopy yet contribute to esophageal dysfunction. We aimed to assess whether esophageal distensibility has utility in defining fibrostenotic severity in a cohort of pediatric patients with EoE with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively recruited a cohort of children ages 9 to 21 years undergoing upper endoscopy and Endoscopic Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) for suspected or previously diagnosed EoE. Esophageal distensibility was evaluated by the distensibility index (DI) and esophageal diameter at the distensibility plateau. The association of esophageal distensibility to clinical, endoscopic, and histologic parameters of disease severity was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the utility of distensibility in defining esophageal rigidity in pediatric EoE. RESULTS: We identified 59 pediatric patients with EoE undergoing endoscopy and EndoFLIP at a single pediatric tertiary referral center. DI (mm2/mmHg) was significantly lower in patients with fibrotic as compared with inflammatory features on endoscopy (median, 3.3; interquartile range, 2.3-4.4) vs median, 5.5; interquartile range, 4.1-6.0; P = .02) and showed no correlation with eosinophil count. DI <4.5 mm2/mmHg predicted grade 2 rings on endoscopy with area under the curve of 0.81 (P = .0004). DI predicted food impaction in both unadjusted and adjusted models (fully adjusted odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.14; P = .0486). CONCLUSION: Esophageal distensibility determined by EndoFLIP is a measure of fibrostenotic severity that can be used to clinically phenotype pediatric EoE. We propose parameters of DI <4.5 mm2/mmHg for defining esophageal rigidity in pediatric patients with EoE ages 9 years and older.

What role does the submucosa play in the pathophysiology and treatment of achalasia? An analysis of impedance planimetry during POEM.

BACKGROUND: It is thought the therapeutic benefit of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of esophageal dysmotility disorders is from longitudinal myotomy creation, but it is unknown if the submucosa contributes to the pathophysiology. This study investigates if submucosal tunnel (SMT) dissection alone contributes to POEM's luminal changes as measured by EndoFLIP. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of consecutive POEM cases from June 1, 2011 to September 1, 2022 with intraoperative luminal diameter and distensibility index (DI) data as measured by EndoFLIP. Patients with diagnoses of achalasia or esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction were grouped by those with pre-SMT and post-myotomy measurements (Group 1) and those with a third measurement post-SMT dissection (Group 2). Outcomes and EndoFLIP data were analyzed using descriptive and univariate statistics. RESULTS: There were 66 patients identified, of whom 57 (86.4%) had achalasia, 32 (48.5%) were female, and median pre-POEM Eckardt score was 7 [IQR: 6-9]. There were 42 (64%) patients in Group 1, and 24 (36%) patients in Group 2, with no differences in baseline characteristics. In Group 2, SMT dissection changed luminal diameter by 2.15 [IQR: 1.75-3.28]cm, which comprised 38% of the median 5.6 [IQR: 4.25-6.3]cm diameter of complete POEM change. Similarly, the median post-SMT change in DI of 1 [IQR: 0.5-1.2]units comprised 30% of the median 3.35 [2.4-3.98]units overall change in DI. Post-SMT diameters and DI were both significantly lower than the full POEM. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal diameter and DI are significantly affected by SMT dissection alone, though not equaling the magnitude of diameter or DI changes from full POEM. This suggests that the submucosa does play a role in achalasia, presenting a future target for refining POEM and developing alternative treatment strategies.

Quantifying physiologic parameters of the gastroesophageal junction during robotic sleeve gastrectomy and identifying predictors of post-sleeve gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy is among the most commonly-performed procedures for morbid obesity. However, patients occasionally develop post-sleeve gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Identifying patients most at risk for this complication remains difficult. We aimed to correlate intra-operative physiologic measurements of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) during robotic sleeve gastrectomy in an attempt to identify predictors of post-sleeve GERD symptoms. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a prospectively maintained database identified 28 patients in whom robotic sleeve gastrectomy was performed utilizing EndoFLIP™ technology between January and September 2021. Intraoperative LES measurements at the GEJ including cross-sectional area (CSA), distensibility index (DI), intra-balloon pressure, and high-pressure zone (HPZ length) were correlated with post-operative GERD. RESULTS: GEJ CSA, pressure, and DI increased over the course of the surgery (CSA pre-op: 31 (IQR 19.3-39.5) mm2 vs. post-op: 67 (IQR 40.8-95.8) mm2, p < 0.001; pressure: 25.8 (IQR 20.2-33.1) mmHg vs. 31.5 (IQR 28.9-37.0) mmHg, p = 0.007; DI 1.1 (IQR 0.8-1.8) mm2/mmHg vs. 2.0 (IQR 1.2-3.0) mm2/mmHg, p = < 0.001), whereas HPZ length decreased (2.5 (IQR 2.5-3) cm vs. 2.0 (IQR 1.3-2.5) cm, p = 0.022). Twenty-three patients (82.1%) completed a post-operative GERD questionnaire. Fifteen (65.2%) had no GERD symptoms before or after surgery; 5 (21.7%) reported new post-sleeve GERD symptoms; 3 (13.0%) reported exacerbation of pre-existing GERD symptoms. Patients with new or worsening GERD symptoms had higher post-sleeve DIs (3.2 (IQR 1.9-4.5) mm2/mmHg vs. 1.5 (IQR 1.2-2.4) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.024) and lower post-sleeve LES pressures (29.9 (IQR 26.3-32.9) mmHg vs. 35.2 (IQR 31.0-38.0) mmHg, p = 0.023) than those without. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in GEJ CSA, pressure, and DI, and a decrease in GEJ length can be expected during robotic sleeve gastrectomy. Patients with new or worsening post-sleeve GERD symptoms have higher post-sleeve DI and lower post-sleeve LES pressure than their asymptomatic counterparts.

Esophagogastric junction compliance on impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) predicts improvement in postoperative eckardt score.

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a mainstay of treatment for achalasia. Tailored myotomy based on compliance, as measured with impedance planimetry (FLIP), has yet to be described. In this study we describe the associations between Eckardt score, postoperative GERD, and compliance. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed, evaluating patients who underwent POEM and intraoperative FLIP between January 2019 and November 2021. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests. Spearman's correlation coefficients (r) were used to assess the relationship between compliance and outcomes, all with two-tailed statistical significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty five patients underwent POEM with intraoperative FLIP. At a 30 mL and 40 mL fill, respectively, compliance increased by 80% (180 ± 152%) and 77% (177 ± 131%) from pre to post myotomy. Mean Eckardt score improved from 5.5 ± 2.6 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 1.6 and 1.8 ± 1.9 at first and second follow up, respectively. Median times to first and second follow up were 22 days (IQR 16-23) and 65 days (IQR 58-142). A higher compliance at 40 mL fill was moderately associated with lower Eckardt score at first (r = -0.49, p = 0.012) and second (r = -0.64, p = 0.014) follow up. Post myotomy compliance ≥ 125 mm3/mmHg at 40 mL fill was associated with lower Eckardt scores, < 3, at first (0.4 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 1.3, p = 0.008) and second (0.4 ± 0.5, vs 2.0 ± 1.4, p = 0.027) follow up. Compliance ≥ 125 mm3/mmHg performed better than previously defined ideal ranges of DI and CSA in predicting postoperative Eckardt scores. Compliance was not significantly associated with development of postoperative GERD. CONCLUSIONS: A target post myotomy compliance of ≥ 125 mm3/mmHg at a 40 mL fill is associated with normal Eckardt scores at first and second postoperative visits, and performs better than previously defined ideal ranges of DI and CSA in predicting post-operative Eckardt scores. Compliance is a poor predictor of developing GERD after POEM.

Esophageal dilation with EsoFLIP is faster than CRE balloon dilation combined with EndoFLIP in children.

BACKGROUND: Controlled radial expansion (CRE) balloon dilators are traditionally used to dilate esophageal strictures during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). EndoFLIP is a diagnostic tool used during an EGD to measure important parameters of the gastrointestinal lumen, capable of assessing treatment before and after dilation. EsoFLIP is a related device that combines a balloon dilator with high-resolution impedance planimetry to provide some of the luminal parameters in real time during dilation. We sought to compare procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and safety profile of esophageal dilation using either CRE balloon dilation combined with EndoFLIP (E + CRE) versus EsoFLIP alone. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed to identify patients ≤ 21 years of age who underwent an EGD with biopsy and esophageal stricture dilation using E + CRE or EsoFLIP between October 2017 and May 2022. RESULTS: Twenty-nine EGDs with esophageal stricture dilation were performed in 23 patients (19 E + CRE and 10 EsoFLIP). The two groups did not differ in age, gender, race, chief complaint, type of esophageal stricture, or history of prior gastrointestinal procedures (all p > 0.05). The most common medical history in the E + CRE and EsoFLIP groups were eosinophilic esophagitis and epidermolysis bullosa, respectively. Median procedures times were shorter in the EsoFLIP cohort compared to E + CRE balloon dilation (40.5 min [IQR 23-57 min] for the EsoFLIP group; 64 min [IQR 51-77 min] for the E + CRE group; p < 0.01). Median fluoroscopy times were also shorter for patients who underwent EsoFLIP (0.16 min [IQR 0-0.30 min] for EsoFLIP dilation; 0.30 min [IQR 0.23-0.55] for the E + CRE group; p = 0.003). There were no complications or unplanned hospitalizations in either group. CONCLUSION: EsoFLIP dilation of esophageal strictures was faster and required less fluoroscopy than CRE balloon dilation combined with EndoFLIP in children, while being equally as safe. Prospective studies are needed to further compare the two modalities.

Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The most common functional complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is the delayed emptying of the gastric conduit (DGCE) for which several diagnostic tools are available, e.g. chest X-ray, upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and water-soluble contrast radiogram. However, none of these diagnostic tools evaluate the pylorus itself. Our study demonstrates the successful measurement of pyloric distensibility in patients with DGCE after esophagectomy and in those without it. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Between May 2021 and October 2021, we performed a retrospective single-centre study of all patients who had an oncological Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and underwent our post-surgery follow-up programme with surveillance endoscopies and computed tomography scans. EndoFlip™ was used to perform measurements of the pylorus under endoscopic control, and distensibility was measured at 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml balloon filling. RESULTS: We included 70 patients, and EndoFlip™ measurement was feasible in all patients. Successful application of EndoFlip™ was achieved in all interventions (n = 70, 100%). 51 patients showed a normal postoperative course, whereas 19 patients suffered from DGCE. Distensibility proved to be smaller in patients with symptoms of DGCE compared to asymptomatic patients. For 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml, the mean distensibility was 6.4 vs 10.1, 5.7 vs 7.9 and 4.5 vs 6.3 mm2/mmHg. The differences were significant for all three balloon fillings. No severe EndoFlip™ treatment-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Measurement with EndoFlip™ is a safe and technically feasible endoscopic option for measuring the distensibility of the pylorus. Our study shows that the distensibility in asymptomatic patients after esophagectomy is significantly higher than that in patients suffering from DGCE. However, more studies need to be conducted to demonstrate the general use of EndoFlip™ measurement of the pylorus after esophagectomy.

Target distensibility index on impedance planimetry during fundoplication by choice of wrap and choice of bougie.

INTRODUCTION: Impedance planimetry (FLIP) provides objective feedback to optimize fundoplication outcomes. Ideal FLIP ranges for differing wraps and bougies have not yet been established. We report FLIP measurements during fundoplication grouped by choice of wrap and bougie with associated outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective gastroesophageal database was performed for all Nissen or Toupet fundoplication with intraoperative FLIP using an 8-cm catheter, 30-mL and/or 40-mL fill and/or 16-cm catheter, 60-mL fill. Surgeons used no bougie, the FLIP balloon as bougie, or a hard bougie. Outcomes included perioperative data, Reflux Symptom Index, GERD-HRQL, Dysphagia scores, need for dilation, postoperative EGD findings, and hernia recurrence. Group comparisons were made using two-tailed Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2022, 333 patients underwent fundoplication and intraoperative FLIP. Procedures included Toupet with hard bougie (TFHB, N = 147), Toupet with FLIP bougie (TFFB, N = 69), Toupet without bougie (TFNB, N = 78), Nissen with hard bougie (NFHB, n = 20), or Nissen with FLIP bougie (NFFB, N = 19). FLIP measurements at 30-mL/40-mL fills varied significantly between groups, notably distensibility index at crural closure (CCDI) and post-fundoplication (FDI). No significant differences in FLIP measurements were seen between those who developed poor postoperative outcomes and those who did not, including when grouping by choice of wrap and bougie. At a 40-mL fill, abnormal motility patients with CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg developed zero postoperative dysphagia. TFFB abnormal motility patients with CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg or FDI > 3.6 mm2/mmHg developed zero postoperative dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative FLIP measurements vary by fundoplication and bougie choice. A CCDI > 3.5 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) should be sought in abnormal motility patients, regardless of wrap or bougie, to avoid postoperative dysphagia. TFFB abnormal motility patients with FDI > 3.6 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) also developed zero postoperative dysphagia. FDI > 6.2 mm2/mmHg (40 mL fill) was seen in all postoperative hernia recurrences.

Esophageal remodeling in eosinophilic esophagitis: Relationships to luminal captured biomarkers of inflammation and periostin.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal remodeling is a factor in disease progression and symptom severity for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Remodeling can begin early in children, resulting in stricture and food impaction. Detection of esophageal remodeling often depends on endoscopy and is appreciated only in its later stages. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether luminal eosinophil-associated and remodeling proteins captured by the esophageal string test (EST) correlate with measures of esophageal remodeling and biomarkers of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). METHODS: Patients with EoE (7-18 years old) were enrolled from 2 pediatric hospitals. Participants performed the EST and underwent endoscopy. Histology, distensibility measured by endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe, and symptoms were assessed. Protein quantitation by ELISA was performed on mucosal biopsy and EST samples. Tissue sections were evaluated for EMT. Outcome measures were summarized, and Spearman ρ was used to assess bivariate correlations. RESULTS: Forty patients (68% male) were enrolled (mean age, 12.5 years). Twenty-four (60%) had active disease (≥15 eosinophils per high-power field). EST-captured eotaxin-3, major basic protein 1, EDN, eosinophil peroxidase, and Charcot-Leyden crystal protein/galectin-10 showed significant correlations with peak eosinophils per high-power field (ρ 0.53-0.68, P < .001). Luminal proteins positively correlated with endoscopic features and markers of EMT, and negatively with esophageal distensibility. Periostin was captured by the EST and correlated with eosinophil density, basal zone hyperplasia, endoscopic appearance, and markers of EMT. CONCLUSION: Luminal markers of esophageal remodeling in addition to biomarkers of eosinophilic inflammation correlate with epithelial and functional remodeling in EoE.

The Functional Luminal Imaging Probe (FLIP): A Good Tool for Adjustment of anal Canal Dimensions During Operative Management of Fecal Incontinence.

PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence is a troublesome problem in the field of colorectal surgery. The main aim of this study was to adjust the anal canal resistance during operative management of anal incontinence using Endo-FLIP. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study held at Cairo university hospital. Hundred forty-eight incontinent patients treated by different surgical procedures were included. During the procedure the Endo-FLIP was applied to adjust the anal canal dimensions (ACL and ACD) so the ACR could be adjusted based on the flow equation. These were also assessed pre-operatively with Endo-FLIP system and the flow equation calculator. The clinical severity of the disease and outcome after surgical procedures were assessed and correlated to the physiologic parameters. RESULTS: ACL, ACD and ACR had had significant correlations to the degree of incontinence (P < .001). ACL, ACD and ACR showed statistically significant change with primary repair and gluteus maximus transposition operations. After treatment of fecal incontinence, in good responders' group, the mean resting anal canal resistance increased significantly to 4649.05 ± 1161.49 (postoperative) while in poor responders' group it was 1919.9 ± 1077.73. CONCLUSIONS: The Endo-flip can be used to measure the anal canal geometric parameters (ACL and ACD) and then anal canal resistance could be calculated by the flow equation - pre-and post-operatively- which help the adjustment of the surgical repair of sphincter injury in fecal incontinence patients which may improve the surgical outcome.

Evaluation of post-operative dysphagia following anti-reflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Anti-reflux surgery (ARS) has known long-term complications, including dysphagia, bloat, and flatulence, among others. The factors affecting the development of post-operative dysphagia are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation of intra-operative esophagogastric junction (EGJ) characteristics and procedure type with post-operative dysphagia following ARS. METHODS: Robotic ARS was performed on 197 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux utilizing EndoFLIP™ technology. Intraoperative EGJ measurements including distensibility index (DI), cross-sectional area (CSA), and high-pressure zone (HPZ) length were collected. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3 months post-operatively. RESULTS: The median pre-operative DI for all procedures was 2.6 (IQR 1.6-4.5) mm2/mmHg. There was no difference in post-operative DI between procedures [Hill: 0.9 (IQR 0.7-1.1) mm2/mmHg, Nissen: 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.4) mm2/mmHg, Toupet: 1.2 (IQR 0.8-1.5) mm2/mmHg, Linx: 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.2) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.24], whereas post-operative HPZ length differed by augmentation type [Hill: 3 (IQR 2.8-3) cm, Nissen: 3.5 (IQR 3-3.5) cm, Toupet: 3 (IQR 2.5-3.5) cm, Linx: 2.5 (IQR 2.5-3) cm, p = 0.032]. Eighty-nine patients (45.2%) had pre-operative dysphagia. Thirty-two patients (27.6%) reported any dysphagia at their 3-month post-operative visit and 12 (10.3%) developed new or worsening post-operative dysphagia [Hill: 2/18 (11.1%), Nissen: 2/35 (5.7%), Toupet: 4/54 (7.4%), Linx: 4/9 (44.4%), p = 0.006]. The median pre-operative and post-operative DI of patients who developed new or worsening dysphagia was 2.0 (IQR 0.9-3.8) mm2/mmHg and 1.2 (IQR 1.0-1.8) mm2/mmHg, respectively, and that of those who did not was 2.5 (IQR 1.6-4.0) mm2/mmHg and 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.4) mm2/mmHg (p = 0.21 and 0.16, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative DI was similar between procedures, and there was no correlation with new or worsening post-operative dysphagia. Linx placement was associated with higher rates of new or worsening post-operative dysphagia despite a shorter post-procedure HPZ length and similar post-operative DI when compared to other methods of LES augmentation.

The impact of pneumoperitoneum on esophagogastric junction distensibility during anti-reflux surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the contribution of pneumoperitoneum on compliance of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) during anti-reflux surgery. BACKGROUND: Compliance of the EGJ is reduced with anti-reflux surgery. EndoFLIP® planimetry can be used to assess dynamic changes of EGJ compliance intraoperatively. It is unclear how pneumoperitoneum impacts intraoperative measurements by EndoFLIP® and the implications thereof on validity of the results. Therefore, determining variability in EndoFLIP® measurements based on pneumoperitoneum is warranted to establish guidelines to interpret clinical outcomes. METHODS: Primary anti-reflux surgery was performed on 39 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux. Intraoperative EGJ measurements including distensibility index (DI), cross-sectional area (CSA), and intrabag pressure were collected using EndoFLIP® at 0, 10, and 15 mmHg of intraperitoneal pressure. Data were acquired pre-procedure, post-hiatal hernia repair, and post-LES augmentation with fundoplications. RESULTS: Patients underwent Nissen (13.2%), Toupet (68.4%), LINX (10.5%), or Hill-fundoplications (7.9%). There was no difference between 0 and 10 mmHg of pneumoperitoneum in CSA, pressure, or DI measurements pre-procedure; however, there was a difference between 0 and 15 mmHg in pressure (p = 0.016) and DI (p = 0.023) measurements. After LES augmentation, 10 mmHg intraperitoneal pressure reduced DI, though the absolute difference is small (2.0 vs. 1.5 mm2/mmHg, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Pneumoperitoneum affected EGJ distensibility at 15 mmHg, but not 10 mmHg, of insufflation prior to anti-reflux procedures. After anti-reflux surgery, there was a significant variance between 0 and 10 mmHg of pneumoperitoneum in pressure and distensibility. The change in pressure appears linear and needs to be considered if procedural modifications are performed based on intraoperative findings and when evaluating clinical outcomes.

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) reveals changes in gastroesophageal junction compliance during fundoplication.

INTRODUCTION: Compliance is the ability of a hollow organ to dilate and increase volume with an increase in pressure, an accurate representation of food bolus transit through the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Impedance planimetry system can calculate compliance (change in volume over pressure) and distensibility (cross-sectional area over pressure) of the GEJ. We aim to describe the changes in compliance during anti-reflux surgery and hypothesize that compliance is a better predictor of patient outcomes than distensibility (DI). METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. Patients with FLIP measurements during laparoscopic fundoplication between August 2018 and June 2021 were included. GEJ compliance and DI were measured after hernia reduction, cruroplasty, and fundoplication. Patient-reported outcomes were collected through standardized surveys up to 2 years after surgery. A scatter plot was used to identify a correlation between compliance and DI. Comparisons of measurements between time points were made using paired t-tests. Spearman's correlation coefficients (ρ), Wilcoxon rank-sum, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate associations between measurements and outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. Compliance is strongly associated with DI (r = 0.96), and a comparison of measurements showed similar trends at specific time points during the operation. After hernia reduction, compliance at the GEJ was 168 ± 74 mm3/mmHg, cruroplasty 79 ± 39 mm3/mmHg, and fundoplication 90 ± 33 mm3/mmHg (all comparisons p < 0.05). GEJ compliance of 80-92 mm3/mmHg after fundoplication was associated with the best patient-reported outcome scores. A compliance of ≤ 79 mm3/mmHg had the highest percentage of patients who reported dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance and DI are strongly associated displaying the same directional change during anti-reflux surgery. GEJ compliance of 80-92 mm3/mmHg revealed the best patient-reported outcome scores, and avoiding a compliance ≤ 79 mm3/mmHg may prevent postoperative dysphagia. Therefore, GEJ compliance is an underutilized FLIP measurement warranting further investigation.