Ex situ Liver Resection and Partial Liver Autotransplantation for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma.

Surgery is the only known curative treatment option for cholangiocarcinoma. Ex situ liver surgery and autotransplantation are promising approaches in cases that cannot be treated by conventional methods and particularly in the presence of centrally localized liver tumors as well as tumors that invade the main vascular structures. A 53-year-old female patient presented with abdominal pain and nausea. Abdominal tomography showed a tumoral mass lesion that filled the left lobe of the liver and invaded the left hepatic vein and the inferior vena cava. Cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis was reached based on biopsy findings, and the patient was scheduled for surgery as positron emission tomography did not indicate any other disease focus. The patient underwent ex situ liver resection and autotransplantation. She was discharged on the 7th postoperative day. A 68-year-old male presented with abdominal pain, weakness, and weight loss. Laboratory analysis indicated elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9: 400 U/ml and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP): 2000 U/ml, and there was no other pathology. Abdominal tomography showed a mass that filled the center of the liver and invaded the left hepatic vein and the inferior vena cava. Pathological findings of the biopsy sample were reported as combined hepatocellular-cholangiocellular carcinoma. The patient's AFP levels continued to increase despite transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation therapy. Surgery was decided as indocyanine green clearance test, and the result was 8.5%. He underwent ex situ liver resection and autotransplantation. Unfortunately, he died on the 4th postoperative day due to respiratory failure. Ex vivo liver resection and partial liver autotransplantation should be considered for the surgical treatment of locally advanced cholangiocarcinomas that invaded the main vascular structures.

[Vascular reconstruction in hepatic surgery]. / Gefäßrekonstruktionen in der Leberchirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Due to their size or location liver tumors can infiltrate important vascular structures, which are essential for postoperative liver function. OBJECTIVE: To present the technical possibilities and results of current concepts of vascular resection and reconstruction in liver surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search of the Medline and Cochrane databases was performed regarding currently available studies on vascular resection and reconstruction in liver surgery. RESULTS: Portal vein resections are routinely performed by many institutions and can be performed as an end-to-end anastomosis or graft interposition. This is the basis of the en bloc resection concept, especially for Klatskin tumors. Reconstruction of the inferior vena cava as well as the hepatic arteries is technically feasible and is increasingly being reported in smaller series. In particular, the resection of tumors near the hepatic veins may require total vascular exclusion for complete interruption of liver perfusion, which enables resection in the non-perfused liver and by this reduced blood loss. Furthermore, in situ cooling, ante situm and ex situ resections increase both technical resectability and the ischemic tolerance of the liver to more than 60 min. The majority of vascular reconstructions can be performed without a significant increase in morbidity; however, vascular tumor infiltration is associated with impaired long-term survival. CONCLUSION: Based on the experience of transplantation surgery concepts for vascular reconstruction can be safely applied to liver surgery. These concepts contribute to increasing the resectability of liver tumors. Due to the often impaired prognosis of vascular tumor infiltration, the use of these concepts should be individually assessed by weighing the prognosis against the morbidity.

Ex-situ liver surgery without veno-venous bypass.

AIM: To evaluate the results of hepatic resection with ex-situ hypothermic perfusion and without veno-venous bypass. METHODS: In 3 patients with liver tumor, the degree of the inferior vena cava and/or main hepatic vein involvement was verified when the liver was dissociated in the operation. It was impossible to resect the tumors by the routine hepatectomy, so the patients underwent ex-situ liver surgery, vein cava replacement and hepatic autotransplantation without veno-venous bypass. All surgical procedures were carried out or supervised by a senior surgeon. A retrospective analysis was performed for the prospectively collected data from patients with liver tumor undergoing ex-situ liver surgery, vein cava replacement and hepatic autotransplantation without veno-venous bypass. We also compared our data with the 9 cases of Pichlmayr's group. RESULTS: Three patients with liver tumor were analysed. The first case was a 60-year-old female with a huge haemangioma located in S1, S4, S5, S6, S7 and S8 of liver; the second was a 64-year-old man with cholangiocarcinoma in S1, S2, S3 and S4 and the third one was a 55-year-old man with a huge cholangiocarcinoma in S1, S5, S7 and S8. The operation time for the three patients were 6.6, 6.4 and 7.3 h, respectively. The anhepatic phases were 3.8, 2.8 and 4.0 h. The volume of blood loss during operation were 1200, 3100, 2000 mL in the three patients, respectively. The survival periods without recurrence were 22 and 17 mo in the first two cases. As for the third case complicated with postoperative hepatic vein outflow obstruction, emergency hepatic vein outflow extending operation and assistant living donor liver transplantation were performed the next day, and finally died of liver and renal failure on the third day. Operation time (6.7 ± 0.47 h vs 13.7 ± 2.6 h) and anhepatic phase (3.5 ± 0.64 h vs 5.7 ± 1.7 h) were compared between Pichlmayr's group and our series (P = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Ex-situ liver resection and liver autotransplantation has shown a potential for treatment of complicated hepatic neoplasms that are unresectable by traditional procedures.