Modeling beta-sheet peptide-protein interactions: Rosetta FlexPepDock in CAPRI rounds 38-45.

Peptide-protein docking is challenging due to the considerable conformational freedom of the peptide. CAPRI rounds 38-45 included two peptide-protein interactions, both characterized by a peptide forming an additional beta strand of a beta sheet in the receptor. Using the Rosetta FlexPepDock peptide docking protocol we generated top-performing, high-accuracy models for targets 134 and 135, involving an interaction between a peptide derived from L-MAG with DLC8. In addition, we were able to generate the only medium-accuracy models for a particularly challenging target, T121. In contrast to the classical peptide-mediated interaction, in which receptor side chains contact both peptide backbone and side chains, beta-sheet complementation involves a major contribution to binding by hydrogen bonds between main chain atoms. To establish how binding affinity and specificity are established in this special class of peptide-protein interactions, we extracted PeptiDBeta, a benchmark of solved structures of different protein domains that are bound by peptides via beta-sheet complementation, and tested our protocol for global peptide-docking PIPER-FlexPepDock on this dataset. We find that the beta-strand part of the peptide is sufficient to generate approximate and even high resolution models of many interactions, but inclusion of adjacent motif residues often provides additional information necessary to achieve high resolution model quality.

FlexPepDock lessons from CAPRI peptide-protein rounds and suggested new criteria for assessment of model quality and utility.

CAPRI rounds 28 and 29 included, for the first time, peptide-receptor targets of three different systems, reflecting increased appreciation of the importance of peptide-protein interactions. The CAPRI rounds allowed us to objectively assess the performance of Rosetta FlexPepDock, one of the first protocols to explicitly include peptide flexibility in docking, accounting for peptide conformational changes upon binding. We discuss here successes and challenges in modeling these targets: we obtain top-performing, high-resolution models of the peptide motif for cases with known binding sites but there is a need for better modeling of flanking regions, as well as better selection criteria, in particular for unknown binding sites. These rounds have also provided us the opportunity to reassess the success criteria, to better reflect the quality of a peptide-protein complex model. Using all models submitted to CAPRI, we analyze the correlation between current classification criteria and the ability to retrieve critical interface features, such as hydrogen bonds and hotspots. We find that loosening the backbone (and ligand) RMSD threshold, together with a restriction on the side chain RMSD measure, allows us to improve the selection of high-accuracy models. We also suggest a new measure to assess interface hydrogen bond recovery, which is not assessed by the current CAPRI criteria. Finally, we find that surprisingly much can be learned from rather inaccurate models about binding hotspots, suggesting that the current status of peptide-protein docking methods, as reflected by the submitted CAPRI models, can already have a significant impact on our understanding of protein interactions. Proteins 2017; 85:445-462. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PepVis: An integrated peptide virtual screening pipeline for ensemble and flexible docking protocols.

Peptide therapeutics is proven to be highly potential in the treatment of various diseases due to its specificity, biological safety, and cost-effectiveness. Many of the FDA-approved peptides are currently available for therapeutic applications. In the current postgenomic era, high-throughput computational screening of drugs and peptides are highly exploited in peptide therapeutics for cost-effective and robustness. However, there is a paucity of efficient pipelines that automate virtual screening process of peptides through integration of open-source tools that are optimal to perform ensemble and flexible docking protocols. Hence, in this study, we developed a GUI-based pipeline named PepVis for automated script generation for large-scale peptide modeling and virtual screening. PepVis integrates Modpep and Gromacs for peptide structure modeling and optimization; AutoDock Vina, ZDOCK, and AutoDock CrankPep for virtual screening of peptides; ZRANK2 for rescoring of protein-peptide complexes, and FlexPepDock for flexible refinement of protein-peptide complexes. Benchmarking of ensemble docking through PepVis infers that ModPep + Vina to outperform ModPep + ZDock in terms of detecting near-natives from LEADS-PEP dataset. PepVis is built modular to incorporate many other docking algorithms in the future. This pipeline is distributed freely under the GNU GPL license and can be downloaded at https://github.com/inpacdb/PepVis.

Modeling Peptide-Protein Structure and Binding Using Monte Carlo Sampling Approaches: Rosetta FlexPepDock and FlexPepBind.

Many signaling and regulatory processes involve peptide-mediated protein interactions, i.e., the binding of a short stretch in one protein to a domain in its partner. Computational tools that generate accurate models of peptide-receptor structures and binding improve characterization and manipulation of known interactions, help to discover yet unknown peptide-protein interactions and networks, and bring into reach the design of peptide-based drugs for targeting specific systems of medical interest.Here, we present a concise overview of the Rosetta FlexPepDock protocol and its derivatives that we have developed for the structure-based characterization of peptide-protein binding. Rosetta FlexPepDock was built to generate precise models of protein-peptide complex structures, by effectively addressing the challenge of the considerable conformational flexibility of the peptide. Rosetta FlexPepBind is an extension of this protocol that allows characterizing peptide-binding affinities and specificities of various biological systems, based on the structural models generated by Rosetta FlexPepDock. We provide detailed descriptions and guidelines for the usage of these protocols, and on a specific example, we highlight the variety of different challenges that can be met and the questions that can be answered with Rosetta FlexPepDock.