[Modern approaches to the detection of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) in patients with kidney diseases].

Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is not only the state preceding of hematological neoplasms, but also associated with non - hematological diseases, in particular kidney damage. AIM: To assess the diagnostic value of "Freelite" methods in addition to electrophoresis (EF) and immunofixation (IF) of serum and urine proteins for detecting MG in patients with kidney diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 87 patients with kidney damage, in which MG was established using the method of electrophoresis of serum proteins (EF), immunofixation (IF) and the method of free light chains determination - FLC "Freelite" were selected. The diagnostic value of three - component serum panel was compared with EF and IF. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: AL-amyloidosis with kidney involvement was diagnosed in 41% patients, cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis (cryo GN) - in 18%, chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN) - in 35%, also there was small number of patients with light chain disease and cast - nephropathy. Determination of MG using EP was possible only in 38 (44%). Adding to the serum electrophoretic methods instead of the "Freelite" method, the urine EF and IF reduced the number of missed patients with monoclonal gammopathy from 24 (27%) to 11 (13%), including in the subgroup of patients with AL-amyloidosis but did not reach the sensitivity of the three - component serum screening panel. In 10 (11.5%) MG was represented only by intact mIg with one type of light chain, either κ or λ. Most often - in 25% of patients, intact monoclonal gammopathy was observed in HCV (+) cryo GN. A combination of intact mIgM, mIgG or mIgA with mFLC, was detected in 37 (42.5%). In almost half (46%) of the patients, only mFLC was detected - an abnormal κ/λ ratio. CONCLUSION: The serum screening panel EF + IF + "Freelite" spreads the low - grade monoclonal gammopathy recognition (MGUS) and should be included in the algorithm of examining patients with kidney disease.

Immunoparesis defined by heavy+light chain suppression is a novel marker of long-term outcomes in cardiac AL amyloidosis.

Cardiac involvement and presenting dFLC (difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains) are independent predictors of outcome in systemic AL amyloidosis. These markers have limited prognostic utility in patients surviving the initial months following diagnosis. Here we assessed immunoparesis, as determined by novel heavy+light chain (HLC) immunoassays, as a prognostic marker for survival in AL amyloidosis. HLC measurements identified immunoparesis of at least one immunoglobulin (Ig) isotype in 145 (85%) patients; and severe immunoparesis (≥2 Ig isotypes suppressed by >50% below normal levels) in 29 (17%) patients. Median overall survival (OS) on intention to treat (ITT) analysis was 26·2 months. In the ITT cohort, dFLC >180 mg/l was associated with shorter OS (P = 0·05); whereas HLC immunoparesis was not prognostic. On a landmark analysis of 127 patients alive at 6 months, presenting dFLC was not prognostic for OS (P = 0·33) and severe HLC immunoparesis trended towards poorer survival (20·2 vs. 42·8 months; P = 0·09). In the subset of patients with cardiac involvement, severe HLC immunoparesis conferred very poor outcome (median OS 8·8 vs. 29·9 months, P = 0·007). In conclusion, severe HLC immunoparesis is an independent marker of long-term poor prognosis in AL patients with cardiac involvement. The pathophysiological significance of this observation needs further study.

[Analysis of the relationship of heavy/light chain pairs of immunoglobulin (Hevylite) to the results of gel electrophoresis and nefelometric examination of serum proteins at the time of multiple myeloma diagnosis]. / Analýza vztahu sérových hladin páru tezkých/lehkých retezcu imunoglobulinu (Hevylite) k výsledkum standardní gelové elektroforézy a nefelometrického vysetrení bílkovin séra pri diagnóze mnohocetného myelomu.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostics and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) requires precise analysis of serum immunoglobulins, which might be limited by the sensitivity of standard examination methods. Hevylite method enables quantitative analysis of heavy/light chain pairs (HLC) of normal and tumor IgG and IgA immunoglobulin and their ratio (HLC-r). The aim of the study was to assess the contribution of Hevylite method in the diagnostics of MM in comparison with nephelometry (NEF), standard protein electrophoresis (SPE), immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) and the examination of serum free light chains (FLC) of immunoglobulin using Freelite test and heavy/light chain pairs of immunoglobulin (HLC) using Hevylite. METHODS: Using the methods Hevylite, NEF, SPE, IFE and Freelite, we examined a cohort of 134 individuals fulfilling the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. 96 patients were of IgG and 38 of IgA type. RESULTS: The levels of HLC-kappa (K) and HLC-lambda (L), as well as HLC-r were independent of age and gender. Abnormal HLC levels were present in 84-100%, pathological HLC-r was in 92-100% cases based on MIg isotype. We found strong positive correlation between IgG and IgA (NEF) and the sum of HLC IgG-K + IgG-L (Hevylite) (r = 0.80, p < 0.0001) and HLC IgA-K + IgA-L (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001). Very strong positive correlation was between the concentration of MIg (SPE) and the levels of HLC (Hevylite) in IgG-K (r = 0.73), IgG-L (r = 0.76), IgA-K (r = 0.70) and IgA-L (r = 0.89), p < 0,0001. Systematic difference between Hevylite vs. MIg (SPE) was confirmed by Bland-Altmann test in the case of HLC IgA-K and IgA-L (not HLC IgG-K and IgG-L), and in the correlation of HLC with IgG and IgA (NEF). The most significant correlation between SPE (patients with < 15 g/L) vs. Hevylite was found within the analysis of HLC IgG-K+ IgA-K (r = 0.85, p < 0.0001), and in the whole cohort of MM patients, i.e. IgG + IgA-kappa and lambda (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001), confirmed by Bland-Altmann test. Tight positive correlation was between HLC-r and index of monoclonality FLC-K/L in MM of IgG and IgA type MM (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Hevylite method, especially the assessment of HLC-r of IgA type MM is more sensitive in comparison with SPE evaluated by NEF, and increases the diagnostic sensitivity and the extent of tumor mass examination. Despite its limitation in the case of high levels of IgG type MIg, Hevylite technique has a promising potential to enrich the standard analytic tools as it enables to assess the concentration and ratio of the levels of both tumor and physiological immunoglobulins e.g. depth of immunoparesis, valid especially in MM with low levels of MIg.

Data analytics improves the diagnostic accuracy of serum free light chain results for detecting monoclonal gammopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the real-world performance and reference intervals of the Binding Site Freelite serum free light chain (SFLC) assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific), a global standard for diagnosis, prognostication, and response assessment for monoclonal gammopathies. METHODS: An informatics-based approach was used to retrospectively evaluate concordance between SFLC and the orthogonal Sebia HYDRASYS immunofixation assay results in a large clinical data set consecutively reported between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: Among patients with monoclonal-negative results by both SFLC and Sebia HYDRASYS immunofixation assays, 25% (1226/5057) had κ/λ ratios (KLRs) outside the manufacturer-defined and International Myeloma Working Group-cited normal reference interval of 0.26 to 1.65. These results were consistent over the study period and were not affected by sex, age, impaired kidney function, or assay antisera lot variation. Assay drift, in addition to other potential factors, affected the KLR distribution. Using International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, kidney function data, and the central 95% of KLR values generated on the Optilite platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific), we derived a new reference interval of 0.67 to 2.13, reducing the KLR false-positive rate to 8%. However, normal KLR persisted among 16% (14/85) of samples with free λ chains by immunofixation, warranting caution during interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis indicated that revision of Freelite SFLC reference intervals improves assay interpretation and should prompt reconsideration of Freelite reference intervals worldwide.

Inter-assay diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid kappa free light chains for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chain (κFLC) measures gained increasing interest as diagnostic markers in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the lack of studies comparing assay-dependent diagnostic cutoff values hinders their use in clinical practice. Additionally, the optimal κFLC parameter for identifying MS remains a subject of ongoing debate. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare same-sample diagnostic accuracies of the κFLC index, κIgG index, CSF κFLC/IgG ratio, and isolated CSF κFLC (iCSF-κFLC) between two reference centers using different methods. Methods: Paired serum and CSF samples were analyzed for κFLC and albumin concentrations by Freelite®-Optilite (Sint-Jan Bruges hospital) and N Latex®-BNII (Ghent University hospital). Diagnostic performance to differentiate MS from controls was assessed using ROC curve analysis. Results: A total of 263 participants were included (MS, n = 80). Optimal diagnostic cutoff values for the κFLC index (Freelite®-Optilite: 7.7; N Latex®-BNII: 4.71), κIgG index (Freelite®-Optilite: 14.15, N Latex®-BNII: 12.19), and CSF κFLC/IgG ratio (Freelite®-Optilite: 2.27; N Latex®-BNII: 1.44) differed between the two methods. Sensitivities related to optimal cutoff values were 89.9% (Freelite®-Optilite) versus 94.6% (N Latex®-BNII) for the κFLC index, 91% (Freelite®-Optilite) versus 92.2% (N Latex®-BNII) for the κIgG index, and 81.3% (Freelite®-Optilite) versus 91.4% (N Latex®-BNII) for the CSF κFLC/IgG ratio. However, for iCSF-κFLC, optimal diagnostic cutoff values (0.36 mg/L) and related specificities (81.8%) were identical with a related diagnostic sensitivity of 89.9% for Freelite®-Optilite and 90.5% for N Latex®-BNII. The diagnostic performance of the κFLC index [area under the curve (AUC) Freelite®-Optilite: 0.924; N Latex®-BNII: 0.962] and κIgG index (AUC Freelite®-Optilite: 0.929; N Latex®-BNII: 0.961) was superior compared to CSF oligoclonal bands (AUC: 0.898, sensitivity: 83.8%, specificity: 95.9%). Conclusions: The κFLC index and the κIgG index seem to be excellent markers for identifying MS, irrespective of the method used for κFLC quantification. Based on the AUC, they appear to be the measures of choice. For all measures, optimal cutoff values differed between methods except for iCSF-κFLC. iCSF-κFLC might therefore serve as a method-independent, more cost-efficient, initial screening measure for MS. These findings are particularly relevant for clinical practice given the potential future implementation of intrathecal κFLC synthesis in MS diagnostic criteria and for future multicentre studies pooling data on κFLC measures.

Serum free light chain reference intervals in an Optilite and their influence on clinical guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Serum free light chain (FLC) analysis has been incorporated into the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for the diagnosis and management of all monoclonal gammopathies. These recommendations were solely based on a single assay method (Freelite assay) and instrument. Here, we establish new reference intervals (RIs) for kappa and lambda FLC and the kappa-lambda difference and sum and a new diagnostic range for kappa/lambda FLC ratio (K/L-FLC) in an Optilite turbidimeter (The Binding Site) with the Freelite assay. METHODS: To establish new RIs, the CLSI EP28-A3C protocol was applied to 249 sample blood donors from Fuenlabrada, Spain, and the central 95% and total range were estimated. Samples from patients with polyclonal hypo- and hypergammaglobulinemia were used for the evaluation of K/L-FLC as a monoclonal proliferation index. RESULTS: The new RIs and the new K/L-FLC diagnostic range for the Optilite (0.65-2.56 mg/L) are very different from those in on the guidelines (0.26-1.65 mg/L). We propose new RIs for the K - L difference and the K + L sum. Diagnostic range validation as a monoclonal proliferation index with samples with hypo- and hypergammaglobulinemia confirms this new range. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we present the FLC RI for Freelite reagents measured on an Optilite turbidimeter. These ranges are different from those provided by the manufacturer and from those used in most studies in the literature, which may lead to patient misclassification. Manufacturers and clinical laboratories must strive to provide RIs for the technology they are using and for their population.

[Diagnostic performance of κ/λ serum free light chain ratio (Freelite® assay) and IgGκ/IgGλ ratio (Hevylite® assay) as prognostic biomarkers of the evolution of immune thrombocytopenia into a chronic disease in adult patients]. / Performance diagnostique des rapports κ/λ des chaines légères libres sériques (test Freelite®) et IgGκ/IgGλ (test Hevylite®) comme marqueurs pronostiques de chronicisation du purpura thrombopénique immunologique de l'adulte.

INTRODUCTION: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired hemorrhagic disease due to antiplatelet antibodies, that will become a chronic disease in 70% of adults. Most of chronic ITP patients display clonal restriction of antiplatelet antibodies. To date, there is no biomarker able to predict the evolution of the disease. The objective of the study is to determine whether Hevylite® and/or Freelite® assays are prognostic factors for progression to chronic ITP. METHODS: This is a retrospective, monocentric, prognostic study of a biomarker, performed using frozen samples stored in a serum library. Freelite® and a Hevylite® assays were performed on the samples collected at diagnosis for adult patients with newly diagnosed ITP at the University Hospital of Poitiers between 2014/01/01 and 2017/05/01. To predict the evolution into a chronic disease, a ROC curve analysis was performed on four variables: IgGκ, IgGκ/IgGλ ratio, IgGκ - IgGλ, and κ/λ ratio. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included and analyzed. No patient had an abnormal κ/λ ratio. Three patients had an abnormal IgGκ/IgGλ ratio. The following variables IgGκ, IgGκ/IgGλ, IgGκ - IgGλ, and κ/λ ratio were not able to predict progression to chronic ITP in our study. CONCLUSION: This study did not reveal any prognostic value of the Freelite® and Hevylite® tests on the evolution of ITP into a chronic disease.

[Free light chains assay: Indications and methods]. / Dosage des chaînes légères libres : indications et méthodes.

Serum free light chains (sFLC) assay is an important marker in plasma cell dyscrasia. It is thus recommended for the diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy, together with serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation. sFLC assay has also a prognostic value and is a criterion for treatment response and relapse of some monoclonal gammopathies. Three assays are currently available in France, the gold standard being the Freelite® assay, the two others requiring further validation. These three assays are not interchangeable during patient's follow-up. The Freelite® assay is integrated in the myeloma diagnostic criteria from the International Myeloma Working Group 2014, and has a higher sensitivity than Bence Jones protein test for diagnosis, treatment response and follow-up of light chain myeloma. The Freelite® assay is the main marker of therapeutic response in light chain amyloidosis and allows to stratify the risk for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Some studies have also shown its value in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and in screening for monoclonal gammopathy in the cases of acute renal failure. The Freelite® assay is then currently essential in myeloma or amyloidosis, and could be soon extended to the management of autoimmune diseases.

Evaluation of the N-latex serum free light chain assay on the Siemens BNII analyzer and agreement with The Binding Site FreeLite assay on the SPAPlus.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the Siemens N-latex kappa free light chain (κFLC) and lambda FLC (λFLC) assays on the BNII nephelometer and assess agreement with The Binding Site Freelite FLC assays on the SPAPlus. DESIGN AND METHODS: Over 180 patient serum samples from routine analysis of κFLC and λFLC measured by the Freelite assay were collected for the study and measured with the N-latex κFLC and λFLC assays to assess precision, linearity, method comparison and dilutional effects. RESULTS: Complex precision showed coefficients of variation of 4.8-7.2% for the κFLC assay and 3.6-6.0% for the λFLC assay. Linearity assessment showed both assays were linear (κFLC, y=1.00x-0.09 and λFLC, y=1.050x-1.252). Qualitative method comparison showed 87.9% (116/132) agreement and Cohen's kappa of 80.4% between the κFLC assays and 72.6% (98/135) agreement and Cohen's kappa of 55.4% for the λFLC assays. Quantitative method comparison for κFLC<150mg/L was y=0.92x+2.21, R=0.661 and for λFLC<150mg/L was y=7.90x-137.96, R=0.526. Dilutional effects including antigen excess and non-linearity were also examined. CONCLUSIONS: The N-latex assay showed good precision and linearity with reasonable agreement to the Freelite assay. However, the assays should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients.

Comparison of Free Light Chain Assays: Freelite and N Latex in Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Predicting Survival in Light Chain Amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVES: Measurement of serum free light chains (FLCs) is critical in diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring treatment responses in light chain (AL) amyloidosis. We compare the Freelite assay (polyclonal antibodies to hidden light chain epitopes), which is the current gold standard, with a new assay: a mixture of monoclonal antibodies to light chain epitopes (N Latex). METHODS: We collected 240 serum samples from 94 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis (at least three serial serum samples during the first 6 months) analyzed at the National Amyloidosis Centre, London, from January 2011 to April 2012. Concordance in detecting abnormal light chain components and hematologic response was assessed at 2, 4, and 6 months. RESULTS: The κ and λ clonal light chain involvement was 21% and 79%, respectively, with an abnormal κ/λ ratio or detectable protein in 78.7%. Median κ, λ, and difference in involved and uninvolved FLCs by Freelite and N Latex assays were 17.3 vs 16 mg/L (R(2 ) = 0.91), 48.8 vs 52.6 mg/L (R(2) = 0.52), and 43.2 vs 39.1 mg/L, respectively. Discordant κ/λ ratios at presentation were as follows: 10 of 90 abnormal by Freelite/normal by N Latex and 11 of 90 abnormal by N Latex/normal by Freelite. CONCLUSIONS: Both FLC assays show good correlation in detecting the abnormal light chain subtype with discordance in absolute values and thus are not interchangeable.

Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies.

The diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma is a challenge to the physician due to the non-specific symptoms (anemia, bone pain and recurrent infections) that are commonplace in the elderly population. However, early diagnosis is associated with less severe disease, including fewer patients presenting with acute renal injury, pathological fractures and severe anemia. Since 2006, the serum free light chain test Freelite(®) has been included alongside standard laboratory tests (serum and urine protein electrophoresis, and serum and urine immunofixation) as an aid in the identification of monoclonal proteins, which are a cornerstone for the diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. The serum free light chain assay recognizes the light chain component of the immunoglobulin in its free form with high sensitivity. Other assays that measure light chains in the free and intact immunoglobulin forms are sensitive, but unfortunately, due to the nomenclature used, these assays (total light chains) are sometimes used in place of the free light chain assay. This paper reviews the available literature comparing the two assays and tries to clarify hypothetical limitations of the total assay to detect Multiple Myeloma. Furthermore, we elaborate on our study comparing the two assays used in 11 Light Chain Multiple Myeloma patients at presentation and 103 patients taken through the course of their disease. The aim of this article is to provide a clear discrimination between the two assays and to provide information to physicians and laboratory technicians so that they can utilize the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines.

Immunoglobulin heavy light chain test quantifies clonal disease in patients with AL amyloidosis and normal serum free light chain ratio.

BACKGROUND: Serum and urine immunofixation electrophoreses (SIFE/UIFE) are used for clonal detection in plasma cell dyscrasias, while serum free light chain (sFLC) testing provides quantitation of clonal disease. Up to 20% of patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis may present with normal FLC ratio (FLCr). METHODS: We assessed the diagnostic, quantitative and prognostic potential of serum heavy light chain ratio (HLCr) in 199 untreated patients at initial evaluation. RESULTS: An abnormal HLCr was found in 37.2%, abnormal FLCr in 81.9% and positivity by SIFE/UIFE in 94% of patients. HLCr together with SIFE/UIFE identified clonality in 94% patients; the combination with FLCr yielded 100% sensitivity. An HLCr abnormality was significantly over-represented in normal compared to abnormal FLCr group (63.9% versus 31.3%). HLCr did not predict overall survival (OS) (log rank, p = 0.09), while an abnormal FLCr was associated with decreased OS (log rank, p = 0.03). The combined use of both ratios trended toward increased OS in the abnormal HLCr/normal FLCr group (log rank, p = 0.11; Wilcoxon, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, HLCr was not predictive of OS, whereas an abnormal FLCr was associated with shorter OS (HR = 1.7, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The HLC assay has potential as a supplemental test to quantify monoclonal protein in patients with normal FLCr results.

Biological variation of immunoglobulin heavy chain-light chain pairs in serum.

BACKGROUND: Assays for immunoglobulin heavy chain-light chain (HLC) pairs called Hevylite® have recently been developed. These assays can be useful in patients with hard to interpret serum protein electrophoresis peaks. Measurement of the biological variation of clinical laboratory tests can help clinicians better interpret laboratory results. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 15 healthy donors and assayed with IgAκ, IgAλ, IgGκ and IgGλ Hevylite. The coefficients of the within-subject and between-subject biological variation, index of individuality (II), number of samples (n) required to determine the homeostatic setting points (HSP) and reference change values (RCV) were calculated. RESULTS: The coefficients of the within-subject biologic variation were all less than the between-subject biological variation. The II for all the assays and their κ/λ ratios were near or <0.6. The RCV ranged from 17 to 41%. The number of measurements to determine the HSP for an individual was 1 for the HLC ratios and between 2 and 9 for the individual isoforms. CONCLUSIONS: II indicates it is better to use the patient's individual results rather than population based reference values, fewer measurements are required to determine the HSP for the HLC ratios than the individual isoforms and the RCV can now be used to aid in interpretation.

Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies

Abstract The diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma is a challenge to the physician due to the non-specific symptoms (anemia, bone pain and recurrent infections) that are commonplace in the elderly population. However, early diagnosis is associated with less severe disease, including fewer patients presenting with acute renal injury, pathological fractures and severe anemia. Since 2006, the serum free light chain test Freelite® has been included alongside standard laboratory tests (serum and urine protein electrophoresis, and serum and urine immunofixation) as an aid in the identification of monoclonal proteins, which are a cornerstone for the diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. The serum free light chain assay recognizes the light chain component of the immunoglobulin in its free form with high sensitivity. Other assays that measure light chains in the free and intact immunoglobulin forms are sensitive, but unfortunately, due to the nomenclature used, these assays (total light chains) are sometimes used in place of the free light chain assay. This paper reviews the available literature comparing the two assays and tries to clarify hypothetical limitations of the total assay to detect Multiple Myeloma. Furthermore, we elaborate on our study comparing the two assays used in 11 Light Chain Multiple Myeloma patients at presentation and 103 patients taken through the course of their disease. The aim of this article is to provide a clear discrimination between the two assays and to provide information to physicians and laboratory technicians so that they can utilize the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines.