Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 27(7): 1490-1502.e3, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32730989

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Surgical management of deep endometriosis is associated with a high incidence of lower urinary tract dysfunction. The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the rates of voiding dysfunction according to colorectal shaving, discoid excision, and segmental resection for deep endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic review using bibliographic citations from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Medical Subject Headings terms for colorectal endometriosis and voiding dysfunction were combined and restricted to the French and English languages. The final search was performed on August 28, 2019. The outcome measured was the occurrence of postoperative voiding dysfunction. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Study Quality Assessment Tools were used to assess the quality of included studies. Studies rated as good and fair were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of each included study, discrepancies were discussed; if consensus was not reached, a third reviewer was consulted. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS: Out of 201 relevant published reports, 51 studies were ultimately reviewed systematically and 13 were included in the meta-analysis. Rectal shaving was statistically less associated with postoperative voiding dysfunction than segmental colorectal resection (Odds ratio [OR] 0.34; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.18-0.63; I2 = 0%; p <.001) or discoid excision (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51; I2 = 0%; p  <.001). No significant difference was noted when comparing discoid excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.32-1.69; I2 = 29%; p = .47). Similarly, rectal shaving was associated with a lower risk of self-catheterization >1 month than segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.3; 95% CI, 0.14-0.66; I2 = 0%; p = .003). This outcome was no longer significant when comparing discoid excision and segmental colorectal resection (OR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.4-1.31; I2 = 63%; p = .28). CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgery for endometriosis has a significant impact on urinary function regardless of the technique. However, rectal shaving causes less postoperative voiding dysfunction than discoid excision or segmental resection.


Assuntos
Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Endometriose/cirurgia , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Transtornos Urinários/etiologia , Colo/cirurgia , Doenças do Colo/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Endometriose/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Doenças Retais/epidemiologia , Reto/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Transtornos Urinários/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA