Falls in the Bathroom: A Mechanism of Injury for All Ages.

BACKGROUND: When ground-level falls occur in the bathroom, there is particular potential for morbidity and mortality given the high density of hard surfaces. Risk factors are not clearly defined by the existing literature. The objective of this study was to define the epidemiology, injury patterns, and outcomes after falls in the bathroom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients presenting to LAC+USC Medical Center (01/2008-05/2015) after a fall in the bathroom (ICD-9 code E884.6) were included. Demographics, injury data, investigations, procedures, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included, with mean age 45 y (range 0-92). All ages were affected, with ages 41-60 y at highest risk. Common comorbidities included cardiovascular disease (n = 23, 40%), neuromuscular disorders (n = 13, 23%), and diabetes (n = 9, 16%). Ten patients (18%) were intoxicated. Home medications included antihypertensives (n = 18, 32%), antipsychotics (n = 9, 16%), and anticoagulants (n = 8, 14%). Common investigations included X-rays (n = 41, 72%) and CT scans of the head (n = 20, 35%). The most frequent injuries were contusion/laceration (n = 45, 79%), fracture (n = 12, 21%), and traumatic brain injury (n = 7, 12%). Most patients did not require hospital admission (n = 46, 81%), although 4 (7%) needed intensive care unit care and operative intervention (ORIF [n = 2, 4%] or craniectomy [n = 2, 4%]). Mortality was low (n = 1, 2%). Most patients were discharged home (n = 40, 70%). CONCLUSIONS: All ages, especially 41-60 y, are susceptible to falls in the bathroom. Despite the potential for serious injury, most do not require hospital admission. Risk factors include drugs/alcohol, cardiovascular disease, neuromuscular disorders, and diabetes. Efforts to minimize fall risk should be directed toward these individuals.

Fatal falls in the elderly and the presence of proximal femur fractures.

Fatal falls are frequent and seem to be an increasing problem in the elderly. Especially ground level falls (GLFs) and falls on or from stairs and steps (stairs falls) are worth examining for forensic classification and in order to improve the development of preventive measures. We retrospectively analyzed 261 fatal falls of elderly age 65 + years, which were autopsied at the Institute of Legal Medicine in Munich between 2008 and 2014. After careful screening, the sub-set of all 77 GLFs and 39 stairs falls were analyzed towards socio-demographic characteristics, fall circumstances, injuries, and circumstances of death. A subsequent analysis of GLF cases regarding the presence of proximal femur fractures (PFF) was performed. The injury pattern of the GLFs and the stairs falls clearly differ with a higher share of injuries to the lower extremities in the GLFs. However, the most severely injured body region was the head in both groups (62% of the stairs cases, 49% of the GLF cases). Alcohol as contributing to the fall was seen more frequently in the stairs falls. PFF were not seen in the stairs falls, but then in 18 GLF cases. Yet, for 17 among them (22% of 77), their hip fracture was the only serious injury leading to hospitalization and death. Only one GLF case was already found dead. This finding indicates a potential of avoiding up to 22% of the GLF fatalities by preventing hip fractures by optimized hip protectors or other measures, especially for the elderly aged 75 + years.

Traumatic Brain Injury Profile of an Elderly Population in Puerto Rico.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the types of traumatic brain injury secondary to falls sustained by the members of an elderly population who received services at the Puerto Rico Medical Center and the demographic profile of that population. METHODS: A group of 332 adults (60 years and over) assessed for traumatic brain injury secondary to falls suffered in 2013 were included in the analysis. The cases were retrieved from the computerized database of the Neurosurgery Section. We analyzed information such as age, gender, type of traumatic brain injury, mechanism of injury, and the performance of surgery (if applicable). Descriptive analysis was performed to derive a general profile of elderly adults who presented with traumatic brain injury secondary to falls. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 332 elderly adults: 73% were men and 27% were women. The mean age was 76.74 (SD=9.95) years: 75.67 (SD=9.78) for men and 79.13 (SD=10.02) for women. The most common traumatic brain injury was subdural hematoma (51%) and the mechanism of injury most prevalent was the groundlevel fall (83%). Other traumatic brain injuries included traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhages (14%), cerebral contusions (18%) and epidural hematomas (3%). Of all the cases, 52% had were managed surgically. CONCLUSION: The elderly population is growing and the risk of falls increases with advancing age. Recurrent falls are an important cause of morbidity, and mortality rates oscillate from 6 to 18%. Elderly patients have longer rehabilitation times, incur more expenses, and have greater levels of disability. This study provides a platform for future epidemiological studies to help develop strategies for the prevention of traumatic brain injury in older adults.

Gender-Based Frailty in Multiple Orthopedic Fractures.

The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been used as a prognostic tool to identify patients at higher risk for complications and mortality but has not been used to assess the relationship between frailty and extent of injury following ground-level falls. The aim of this study was to determine if mFI-5 is associated with increased risk for combined femur-humerus fractures compared to isolated femur fractures in geriatric patients. A retrospective analysis of 2017-2018 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) data identified 190 836 patients with femur fractures and 5054 patients with combined femur-humerus fractures. In multivariate analysis, gender was the only statistically significant predictor for risk of combined vs isolated fractures (OR 1.69, 95% CI [1.65, 1.74], P < .001). While outcome data for the mFI-5 repeatedly shows increased risk for adverse events, this tool may over-estimate the disease specific risk factors rather than the overall frailty state of the patient and diminish its predictive power.

Compliance Prediction of a Novel Head Protection Device for Elderly Patients With Fall Risk.

Brain injury from ground level falls (GLF) is common and has substantial morbidity. We identified a potential head protection device (HPD). This report describes predicted future compliance. 21 elderly patients were provided a HPD and were evaluated on admission and after discharge. Compliance, ease of use, and comfort were evaluated. Differences between categorical variables (gender, race, age group1, 55-77 years; group2, 78+) and compliance were tested using the chi-squared statistic. HPD compliance at baseline was 90% with 85% at follow-up (P = .33). No difference with HPD interaction (P = .72), ease of use (P = .57), and comfort (P = .77). Weight was a concern on follow-up (P = .001). Age group1 was more compliant (P=.05). At two months, patients were compliant with no falls recorded. The identified HPD with modifications has a high predicted compliance in this population. After the device is modified, effectiveness will be assessed.

Understanding the Impact of Trauma Admissions to Nonsurgical Services.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) delineates trauma center standards, one of which limits the number of injured patients admitted to nonsurgical services. Performance improvement review of nonsurgical admissions (NSAs), particularly those with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 9, is required. OBJECTIVE: To examine trauma patients with NSA for appropriateness of admission and any potential clinical effect as a result of NSA. METHODS: All trauma patients presenting to our ACS COT-verified level 1 trauma center in Southern California (05/2021-04/2022) were retrospectively screened. Nonsurgical admissions with ISS > 9 were included without exclusions. Appropriateness and clinical impact of NSA were assessed by the Trauma Medical Director (TMD) and Associate TMD. RESULTS: Forty patients met study criteria, with a mean age of 54 years (range 5 d-99 y). The mean ISS was 19 (range 10-30). Nonsurgical admissions most commonly sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI) (n = 27, 68%) after ground level falls (GLF) (n = 32, 80%). All NSAs were evaluated by ≥1 surgical service, commonly neurosurgery (n = 33, 83%) and trauma surgery (n = 13, 33%). Sixteen patients (40%) died, 75% (n = 12) of which were secondary to catastrophic TBI. Upon detailed review, all NSAs were deemed appropriate and without potential clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: All NSAs in this study were appropriate admissions without clinical effect from lack of surgical admission. Nonsurgical admissions were typically elderly patients with head injuries after GLF. With the anticipated increase in geriatric trauma due to our aging population, NSA with surgical consultation may be an important way to manage trauma admissions without compromising care of injured patients.

Utilization of torso computed tomography for the evaluation of ground level falls: More imaging does not equal better care.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) of the chest (CTC), abdomen, and pelvis (CTAP) is common when assessing trauma patients in the emergency department. However, unnecessary imaging can expose patients to unneeded radiation and increase healthcare costs. Here, we characterize the use of torso CT imaging for the evaluation of ground level falls (GLF) at a single level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients ≥18 years old presenting to a single level 1 trauma center with a GLF (1m or less) in 2015-2019. Data were obtained through chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors leading to patients obtaining torso CT imaging. The utility of CT imaging in identifying injuries that changed management was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 1,195 patients captured during the study period, 492 patients had a positive torso physical exam (PE), and 703 had a negative torso PE. Of patients with a negative torso PE, 127 CTC and 142 CTAP were obtained, with only 5.5% CTC identifying traumatic injuries not previously diagnosed on chest radiograph (CXR), and only 0.7% CTAP identifying new injuries not identified on pelvic radiograph (PXR). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that only a positive PE was significantly associated with the identification of abnormal imaging findings on torso CT. A negative PE, CXR, and PXR have a negative predictive value of 98%. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that patients with a negative PE, even if intoxicated, intubated, or with a decreased GCS, are highly unlikely to have new, clinically relevant findings on torso CT imaging. CONCLUSION: Using PE, CXR, and PXR as a screening tool in patients sustaining GLF, which if negative close to obviates the need for torso CT, may reduce healthcare costs and radiation exposure without compromising patient care.

Increase in trauma volume as compared to emergency department volume during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During the months between April through June 2020 when we experienced the largest number of COVID-19 patients in our hospital, the volume of patients in the Emergency Department (ED) was decreased by more than 30%. In contrast to most early reports we did not notice a decrease in trauma volume during this time period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared trauma patients presenting to our Level III Trauma Center, between April 2019 through June 2019 to those presenting from April 2020 through June 2020, the initial surge in COVID-19 patients. We compared ground level falls (GLF), motor vehicle crashes (MVC), bicycle and skateboard crashes, assault, and other. RESULTS: There was a 13% increase in trauma patients presenting during the study period in 2020 as compared to 2019, and the total number of trauma patients as a percentage of total ED patients also increased 269/9235 (2.9%) to 308/6216 (5.0%), P < 0.0001. There was no significant difference in demographics or outcome data between the trauma patients presenting during the two time periods. Although traffic decreased by more than 40%, the number of MVC's was similar. CONCLUSION: The volume of patients presenting to our Trauma Center as compared to the total ED volume increased during the time period from April through June 2020 versus the year just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the fact that the total traffic volume decreased more than 40 percent between these two time periods, the actual number of motor vehicle crashes remained similar.

Emergency readmissions following geriatric ground-level falls: How does frailty factor in?

BACKGROUND: Ground-level falls (GLFs) in older adults are increasing as life expectancy increases, and more patients are being discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for continuity of care. However, GLF patients are not a homogenous cohort, and the role of frailty remains to be assessed. Thus, the aim of this study is to examine the impact of frailty on the in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of GLF patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cohort analysis from the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2017. Geriatric (age ≥65 years) trauma patients presenting following GLFs were identified and grouped based on their frailty status. The associations between frailty and 30-day mortality and emergency readmission were examined by multivariate regression analyses adjusting for patient demographics and injury characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 100,850 geriatric GLF patients were identified (frail: 41% vs. non-frail: 59%). Frail GLF patients were younger (81[74-87] vs. 83[76-89] years; p<0.001) and less severely injured-Injury Severity Score [ISS] (4[1-9] vs. 5[2-9]; p<0.001). Frail patients had a higher index mortality (2.9% vs. 1.9%; p<0.001) and higher 30-day readmissions (14.0% vs. 9.8%; p<0.001). Readmission mortality was also higher in the frail group (15.2% vs. 10.9%; p<0.001), with 75.2% of those patients readmitted from an SNF. On multivariate analysis, frailty was associated with 30-day mortality (OR 1.75; p<0.001) and 30-day readmission (OR 1.49; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Frail geriatric patients are at 75% higher odds of mortality and 49% higher odds of readmission following GLFs. Of those readmitted on an emergency basis, more than one in seven patients died, 75% of whom were readmitted from an SNF. This underscores the need for optimization plans that extend to the post-discharge period to reduce readmissions and subsequent high-impact consequences.

Association of Body Mass Index on Injuries and Outcomes After Ground-Level Falls.

BACKGROUND: The impact of body mass index (BMI) on trauma severity after ground-level falls (GLF) is currently unclear. This study aimed to examine the associations between BMI, injuries, and outcomes after GLF. STUDY DESIGN: All patients ≥16 years of age injured by GLF were queried from the TQIP database (2013-2017). Exclusions were transfers, emergency department death, AIS 6 in any region, and missing data. Body mass index defined study groups: Underweight (BMI<18.5), Normal (BMI 18.5-24.9), Overweight (25.0-29.9), and Obese (≥30). RESULTS: After exclusions, 131 570 patients remained for analysis. Most patients had a normal BMI (n = 58 503, 44%). Median ISS was 9 [IQR 9-10] in all groups. The Obese group had significantly lower rates of fractures than the Normal group, particularly femur fractures (53% vs. 64%, P < .001), but required orthopedic surgical intervention more frequently (45% vs. 41%, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, being overweight was protective against mortality (OR .881, P = .005), while obesity was not associated with mortality (OR 1.012, P = .821). CONCLUSION: Increasing BMI may be protective against both fracture risk and mortality after GLF. However, obese patients require operative fixation more frequently. Particularly as fracture diagnosis may be more challenging in the obese, special care should be taken during their tertiary surveys after GLF to ensure injuries are not missed.

Facial Fractures After Geriatric Ground-Level Falls Are a Marker of Functional Decline and Warrant Trauma Center Admission.

Ground-level falls (GLFs) are a frequent source of injury in the geriatric population. Facial fractures (FFs) are one subsequent injury that can occur and may be an important marker of functional decline. We conducted a retrospective analysis over a 6-year period of patients 65 years and older sustaining one or more FFs due to a GLF (n = 28). Demographics, comorbidities, FF patterns, concomitant injuries, procedures, and outcomes were analyzed. The mean age was 80.0 ± 8.2 years, 64% were male, 12 patients (43%) were on oral anticoagulants prior to injury, and mean injury severity score was 8.3 ± 7.0. Five patients (18%) had LeFort fractures (1 with LeFort I, 4 with LeFort II), and 5 (18%) had isolated mandible fractures (2 were bilateral). Nearly half of all patients suffered neurological injury (concussion: 18%, intracranial hemorrhage: 29%). Average hospital length of stay (LOS) was 4.0 ± 2.9 days. Eight patients (29%) required intensive care unit (ICU) admission with an average ICU-LOS of 2.8 ± 1.2 days. Surgical management was required in 4 patients (14%). More than half of the patients returned home (54%), 25% were discharged to a skilled nursing facility, 4% to rehabilitation, 7% to hospice, and 7% expired. Nearly one-third of patients required discharge to a higher level of care facility than their location prior to injury. GLF-induced FFs are often associated with significant injuries and serve as an indicator of functional decline. These injuries warrant trauma center admission for comprehensive evaluation and management.

Thoracolumbar spinal fractures associated with ground level falls in the elderly: An analysis of 254,486 emergency department visits.

STUDY DESIGN: retrospective. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the epidemiology of elderly (age ≥65 years) patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) in the United States with thoracolumbar (TL) fractures after ground level falls. METHODS: Using the National Emergency Department Sample database, we queried all ED visits in the United States from 2009 through 2012 of elderly patients who presented after ground level falls. We identified patients who sustained TL fractures with and without neurological injury. Resulting data was used to analyze the fracture prevalence, ED and patient characteristics, associated injuries, treatment patterns, inpatient mortality, and hospital charges. RESULTS: Of the 6,654,526 ED visits in the elderly for ground level falls, 254,486 (3.8%) were associated with a diagnosis of TL fracture. 39% patients had multiple injuries, and upper extremity fractures were the most common associated injuries. Overall, 55.6% were admitted to the hospital. Of those, 77.7% were treated non-operatively, 20.4% were treated with cement augmentation alone, 1.5% were treated with spinal fusion surgery, and 0.4% were treated with spinal decompression alone. The overall rate of inpatient mortality was 2.14%. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation evaluated the epidemiology of elderly patients who presented to the ED in the United States with TL fractures after ground level falls. The study demonstrated a rather high incidence of TL fractures in this patient cohort. As a result, it is important for ED physicians and orthopaedic surgeons to be highly suspicious of TL fractures in elderly patients who sustain low energy trauma. With the continued aging of the population and rising health care costs, future effort ought to focus on fall prevention and increased surveillance for TL injuries in the elderly.

Effect of Height of Fall on Mortality in Patients with Fall Accidents: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Accidental falls are a common cause of injury and deaths. Both ground-level falls (GLF) and non-GLF may lead to significant morbidity or mortality. This study aimed to explore the relationship between height of falls and mortality. METHOD: This is a retrospective study based on the data from a registered trauma database and included 8699 adult patients who were hospitalized between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2017 for the treatment of fall-related injuries. Study subjects were divided into three groups of two categories based on the height of fall: GLF (group I: < 1 m) and non-GLF (group II: 1-6 m and group III: > 6 m). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of mortality adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities with or without an injury severity score (ISS) was calculated using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 7001 patients in group I, 1588 in group II, and 110 in group III, patients in the GLF group were older, predominantly female, had less intentional injuries, and had more pre-existing comorbidities than those in the non-GLF group. The patients in the non-GLF group had a significantly lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), a higher injury severity score (ISS), worse physiological responses, and required more procedures performed in the emergency department. The mortality rate for the patients in group I, II, and III were 2.5%, 3.5%, and 5.5%, respectively. After adjustment by age, sex, and comorbidities, group II and group III patients had significantly higher adjusted odds of mortality than group I patients (AOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.64-2.89, p < 0.001 and AOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.84-3.38, p < 0.001, respectively). With additional adjustment by ISS, group II did not have significantly higher adjusted odds of mortality than group I patients (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 0.95-2.22, p = 0.082), but group III patients still had significantly higher adjusted odds of mortality than group I patients (AOR 10.0, 95% CI 2.22-33.33, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that patients who sustained GLF and non-GLF were distinct groups of patients, and the height of fall did have an impact on mortality in patients of fall accidents. A significantly higher adjusted odds of mortality was found in the GLF group than in the non-GLF group after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities.

Torso injuries after fall from standing-empiric abdominal or thoracic CT imaging is not indicated.

PURPOSE: Falls from standing (FFS) have become the most common mechanism of injury at many trauma centers. Liberal imaging of low energy trauma has questionable value. We hypothesize that torso trauma intervention is rare in the FFS population, and physical examination sufficiently screens for torso injuries needing intervention. METHODS: We queried our ACS-verified Level 1 trauma center registry for falls from standing from 1/1/14 to 12/31/16. Exclusion criteria were: falls from height, falls associated with penetrating trauma, lack of an abdominal or chest CT, a Glasgow Coma Scale Score (GCS) less than 15, and surgical intervention at another facility prior to arrival at our center. Demographics, historical details, hemodynamics, injuries, injury severity, procedures, initial vital signs, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: 1,654 patients had a FFS during our study period. 728 had an abdominal or chest CT and a GCS of 15 and comprised the evaluable population. Mean age was 56.5 years. 55.8% were female. The mortality rate was 8%. There were 179 chest injuries in 121 patients, and 54 abdominal injuries in 43 patients. 379 patients had a GCS of 15 and underwent thoracic CT, yet only 11 (3%) underwent intervention. The negative predictive value for physical exam was 100% for chest intervention. 349 patients had a GCS of 15 and abdominal CT, yet only 13 (3.7%) underwent procedural intervention. Abdominal physical exam had a negative predictive value of 99.7% for intervention, but when combined with vital signs, the value was 100%. CONCLUSION: Torso injuries in FFS are rare. Of our study population, 13 abdominal injuries underwent intervention, and 11 chest injuries underwent intervention. Screening patients by physical examination and vital signs is sufficient and safely allows for the use of selective abdominal and chest CT.

The Aachen Mobility and Balance Index to measure physiological falls risk: a comparison with the Tinetti POMA Scale.

PURPOSE: The most commonly used mobility assessments for screening risk of falls among older adults are rating scales such as the Tinetti performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA). However, its correlation with falls is not always predictable and disadvantages of the scale include difficulty to assess many of the items on a 3-point scale and poor specificity. The purpose of this study was to describe the ability of the new Aachen Mobility and Balance Index (AMBI) to discriminate between subjects with a fall history and subjects without such events in comparison to the Tinetti POMA Scale. METHODS: For this prospective cohort study, 24 participants in the study group and 10 in the control group were selected from a population of patients in our hospital who had met the stringent inclusion criteria. Both groups completed the Tinetti POMA Scale (gait and balance component) and the AMBI (tandem stance, tandem walk, ten-meter-walk-test, sit-to-stand with five repetitions, 360° turns, timed-up-and-go-test and measurement of the dominant hand grip strength). A history of falls and hospitalization in the past year were evaluated retrospectively. The relationships among the mobility tests were examined with Bland-Altmananalysis. Receiver-operated characteristics curves, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: The study showed a strong negative correlation between the AMBI (17 points max., highest fall risk) and Tinetti POMA Scale (28 points max., lowest fall risk; r = -0.78, p < 0.001) with an excellent discrimination between community-dwelling older people and a younger control group. However, there were no differences in any of the mobility and balance measurements between participants with and without a fall history with equal characteristics in test comparison (AMBI vs. Tinetti POMA Scale: AUC 0.570 vs. 0.598; p = 0.762). The Tinetti POMA Scale (cut-off <20 points) showed a sensitivity of 0.45 and a specificity of 0.69, the AMBI a sensitivity of 0.64 and a specificity of 0.46 (cut-off >5 points). CONCLUSION: The AMBI comprises mobility and balance tasks with increasing difficulty as well as a measurement of the dominant hand-grip strength. Its ability to identify fallers was comparable to the Tinetti POMA Scale. However, both measurement sets showed shortcomings in discrimination between fallers and non-fallers based on a self-reported retrospective falls-status.

Managing older adults with ground-level falls admitted to a trauma service: the effect of frailty.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether frail elderly adults are at greater risk of fracture after a ground-level fall (GLF) than those who are not frail. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: All elderly (≥65) adults presenting after a GLF over 1 year (N = 110; mean age ± SD 79.5 ± 8.3, 54% male). MEASUREMENT: A Frailty Index (FI) was calculated using 50 preadmission frailty variables. Participants with a FI of 0.25 or greater were considered to be frail. The primary outcome measure was a new fracture; 40.1% (n = 45) of participants presented with a new fracture. The secondary outcome was discharge to an institutional facility (rehabilitation center or skilled nursing facility). Multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Forty-three (38.2%) participants were frail. The median Injury Severity Score was 14 (range 9-17), and the mean FI was 0.20 ± 0.12. Frail participants were more likely than those who were not frail to have fractures (odds ratio (OR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-2.3, P = .01). Thirty-six (32.7%) participants were discharged to an institutional facility. Frail participants were more likely to be discharged to an institutional facility (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.08-3.09, P = .03) after a GLF. CONCLUSION: Frail individuals have a higher likelihood of fractures and discharge to an institutional facility after a GLF than those who are not frail. The FI may be used as an adjunct for decision-making when developing a discharge plan for an elderly adult after a GLF.