Pre-analytical stability of the CEA, CYFRA 21.1, NSE, CA125 and HE4 tumor markers.

BACKGROUND: For lung cancer, circulating tumor markers (TM) are available to guide clinical treatment decisions. To ensure adequate accuracy, pre-analytical instabilities need to be known and addressed in the pre-analytical laboratory protocols. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the pre-analytical stability of CA125, CEA, CYFRA 21.1, HE4 and NSE for the following pre-analytical variables and procedures; i) whole blood stability, ii) serum freeze-thaw cycles, iii) electric vibration mixing and iv) serum storage at different temperatures. METHODS: Left-over patient samples were used and for every investigated variable six patient samples were used and analysed in duplicate. Acceptance criteria were based on analytical performance specifications based on biological variation and significant differences with baseline. RESULTS: Whole blood was stable for at least 6 hours for all TM except for NSE. Two freeze-thaw cycles were acceptable for all TM except CYFRA 21.1. Electric vibration mixing was allowed for all TM except for CYFRA 21.1. Serum stability at 4°C was 7 days for CEA, CA125, CYFRA 21.1 and HE4 and 4 hours for NSE. CONCLUSIONS: Critical pre-analytical processing step conditions were identified that, if not taken into account, will result in reporting of erroneous TM results.

Clinical Significance of the TK1-Specific Activity in the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cause of cancer death in women. One of the major concerns is almost two-thirds of cases are typically diagnosed in the late stage as the symptoms are unspecific in the early stage of ovarian cancer. It is known that the combination of TK1 protein with CA 125 or HE4 showed better performance than either of them alone. That is why, the aim of the study was to investigate whether the TK1-specific activity (TK1 SA) could function as a complement marker for early-stage diagnosis of ovarian cancer. METHODS: The study included a set of 198 sera consisting of 134 patients with ovarian tumors (72 benign and 62 malignant) and 64 healthy age-matched controls. The TK1 SA was determined using TK1 activity by TK-Liaison and TK1 protein by AroCell TK 210 ELISA. Further, CA 125, HE4, as well as risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm index were also determined in the same set of clinical samples. RESULTS: The TK1 SA was significantly different between healthy compared to ovarian cancer patients (p < 0.0001). Strikingly, TK1 SA has higher sensitivity (55%) compared to other biomarkers in the detection of benign ovarian tumors. Further, the highest sensitivity was achieved by the combination of TK1 SA with CA 125 and HE4 for the detection of benign tumors as well as malignant ovarian tumors (72.2% and 88.7%). In addition, TK1 SA could significantly differentiate FIGO stage I/II from stage III/IV malignancies (p = 0.026). Follow-up of patients after surgery and chemotherapy showed a significant difference compared to TK1 SA at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that TK1 SA is a promising blood-based biomarker that could complement CA 125 and HE4 for the detection of early stages of ovarian cancer.

Prognostic value of HE4 in advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer: Analysis of HE4 kinetics during NACT, predicting surgical outcome and recurrence in comparison to CA125.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic value of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) kinetics during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) cycles compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), in predicting the surgical outcomes of interval debulking surgery (IDS) in patients with advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Severance Hospital in Seoul, South Korea and involved 123 women with high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who were diagnosed between April 2015 and July 2020. Three outcomes were considered: the chemotherapy response score (CRS) by omentum, residual disease after IDS, and recurrence. Other clinical, imaging, and biological parameters at baseline, during NACT cycles, and pre- and postoperative time were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: We observed a substantial and gradual decrease in both CA-125 level (median from 1612 to 85.55 U/mL; p < 0.001) and HE4 level (514.7 to 87.7 pmol/L; p < 0.001) during NACT cycles, while pre-to-postoperative reduction was only significant for HE4 (median from 77.3 to 62.0 pmol/L (p < 0.001)). Of the total patients, 4.1% showed no response to NACT (chemoresistance) and 65.9% had a partial response. Residual disease was observed in 55 (44.7%) patients. Recurrence occurred in 90 patients (73.2%), with a median progression-free survival of 15.28 months. The percent reduction in CA-125 level- but not HE4 - during NACT was significantly associated with CRS (by omentum); the reduction in CA-125 during NACT cycles was higher when the CRS was found to be 3 and 2 (median = 96.4 [IQR = 8.3] and 93.7 [12.2] respectively) compared to score 1 (68.3 [34.1]), and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.004). However, no significant association was observed between the percent reduction in CA-125 or HE4 levels during NACT and residual disease or recurrence. The normalization of HE4 - but not CA-125 - before surgery was predictive for surgery outcome; that is, an abnormal preop HE4 level was associated with a residual disease risk ratio of 2.72 (95% CI = 1.27-5.79). CONCLUSION: Monitoring HE4 or CA-125 levels has low prognostic value in patients with advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who are treated with NACT followed by IDS. However, the preoperative level of the HE4 biomarker may be useful in identifying patients at higher risk for suboptimal cytoreductive surgery or who may require more extensive surgery. Further prospective studies are warranted to explore the prognostic utility of eventual combinations of clinical, radiological, and biological parameters, notably by using artificial intelligence-based models.

A predictive and prognostic model for surgical outcome and prognosis in ovarian cancer computed by clinico-pathological and serological parameters (CA125, HE4, mesothelin).

OBJECTIVES: Numerous prognostic models have been proposed for ovarian cancer, extending from single serological factors to complex gene-expression signatures. Nonetheless, these models have not been routinely translated into clinical practice. We constructed a robust and readily calculable model for predicting surgical outcome and prognosis of ovarian cancer patients by exploiting commonly available clinico-pathological factors and three selected serum parameters. METHODS: Serum CA125, human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and mesothelin (MSL) were quantified by Lumipulse® G chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Fujirebio) in a total of 342 serum samples from 190 ovarian cancer patients, including 152 paired pre- and post-operative samples. RESULTS: Detection of pre-operative HE4 and CA125 was the optimal marker combination for blood-based prediction of surgical outcome (AUC=0.86). We constructed a prognostic model, computed by serum levels of pre-operative CA125, post-operative HE4, post-operative MSL and surgical outcome. Prognostic performance of our model was superior to any of these parameters alone and was independent from BRCA1/2 mutational status. We subsequently transformed our model into a prognostic risk index, stratifying patients as "lower risk" or "higher risk". In "higher risk" patients, relapse or death was predicted with an AUC of 0.89 and they had a significantly shorter progression free survival (HR: 9.74; 95 % CI: 5.95-15.93; p<0.0001) and overall survival (HR: 5.62; 95 % CI: 3.16-9.99; p<0.0001) compared to "lower risk" patients. CONCLUSIONS: We present a robust predictive/prognostic model for ovarian cancer, which could readily be implemented into routine diagnostics in order to identify ovarian cancer patients at high risk of recurrence.

Possible role of HE4 level elevation in the pathogenesis of TH2-high asthma.

OBJECTIVES: As a heterogeneous disease, asthma is characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness, airway inflammation, and airway mucus hypersecretion. According to the pathological changes, symptoms, preventive and treatment methods, asthma can be divided into TH2-high and TH2-low asthma. We show that the expression of the tumor biomarker human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) was significantly increased in TH2-high asthma group, while there was no marked difference in its expression between TH2-low asthma and healthy control groups. HE4 levels were significantly increased in plasma, induced sputum, and alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples and airway epithelial cells from TH2-high asthma group, showing that HE4 has a possible role in the pathogenesis of TH2-high asthma. METHODS: Using RT-qPCR, ELISA, Western blot (WB), and immunohistochemistry, we assessed differences in HE4 expression in plasma, induced sputum, BALF, and airway epithelial cells among patients with the TH2-related asthma subtypes and healthy controls. To explore the role of HE4 in TH2-high asthma, we conducted a correlation analysis between HE4 levels in plasma, induced sputum, BALF, and airway epithelial cells and multiple indicators of airway eosinophilic inflammation, airway mucus secretion, and airway remodeling. CONCLUSION: We found for the first time that HE4 was differentially expressed in the TH2-related asthma subtypes. In TH2-high asthma, HE4 levels were markedly elevated in airway epithelial cells, plasma, induced sputum, and BALF. HE4 may play an important role in various pathogenic mechanisms of asthma, such as airway eosinophilic inflammation, airway mucus secretion, and airway remodeling. HE4 in plasma may be a clinically biomarker for differentiating TH2-related asthma subtypes.

Response surface methodology, and artificial neural network model for removal of textile dye Reactive Yellow 105 from wastewater using Zeolitic Imidazolate-67 modified by Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

The applicability of Zeolitic Imidazolate-67, Modified by Fe3O4 Nanoparticles, was studied for removing textile dye Reactive yellow 105 from wastewater by adsorption method using response surface methodology (RSM). For the adsorption characterization of the adsorbent used in HE-4G dye adsorption, BET, FTIR, XRD, and SEM analyses were performed. The impacts of variables, including initial HE-4G dye concentration (X1), pH (X2), adsorbent dosage (X3), and sonication time (X4), the highest removal efficiency as 98%, 10 mg/L initial concentration, pH 6, 0.025 g adsorbent dosage, and 6.0 min time respectively. Adsorption equilibrium and kinetic data it, that data were for the Langmuir isotherm, pseudo-second-order kinetics, and maximum adsorption capacity (105.0 mg/g), respectively. Thermodynamic parameters indicated HE-4G dye adsorption is feasible, spontaneous and exothermic. Promising treatment capabilities of the ZIF-67-Fe3O4NPs have been during the comparative adsorption removal of HE-4G dye from DI water against spiked natural water samples and synthetic Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ solutions. The observed outcome is the suitability of the artificial neural network model as a tool for mean square error, (MSEANN = 0.53, and R2 = 0.9926) for removing HE-4G dye. Results that ZIF-67-Fe3O4NPs, like being recyclable, and cost-efficient made it a promising absorbent for wastewater.

Diagnostic Utility of Selected Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-11, MMP-26), HE4, CA125 and ROMA Algorithm in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.

Ovarian cancer (OC) has an unfavorable prognosis. Due to the lack of effective screening tests, new diagnostic methods are being sought to detect OC earlier. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concentration and diagnostic utility of selected matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) as OC markers in comparison with HE4, CA125 and the ROMA algorithm. The study group consisted of 120 patients with OC; the comparison group consisted of 70 patients with benign lesions and 50 healthy women. MMPs were determined via the ELISA method, HE4 and CA125 by CMIA. Patients with OC had elevated levels of MMP-3 and MMP-11, similar to HE4, CA125 and ROMA values. The highest SE, SP, NPV and PPV values were found for MMP-26, CA125 and ROMA in OC patients. Performing combined analyses of ROMA with selected MMPs increased the values of diagnostic parameters. The topmost diagnostic power of the test was obtained for MMP-26, CA125, HE4 and ROMA and performing combined analyses of MMPs and ROMA enhanced the diagnostic power of the test. The obtained results indicate that the tested MMPs do not show potential as stand-alone OC biomarkers, but can be considered as additional tests to raise the diagnostic utility of the ROMA algorithm.

Potential Diagnostic Value of Salivary Tumor Markers in Breast, Lung and Ovarian Cancer: A Preliminary Study.

The aim of the study was to determine the content of tumor markers for breast, lung and ovarian cancer in saliva, as well as for benign diseases of the corresponding organs and in the control group, and to evaluate their diagnostic significance. Strictly before the start of treatment, saliva samples were obtained and the concentrations of tumor markers (AFP, NSE, HE4, CA15-3, CA72-4, CA125 and CEA) were determined using an enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). CA125 and HE4 were simultaneously determined to be in the blood serum of patients with ovarian cancer. The concentrations of salivary CEA, NSE, CA15-3, CA72-4 and CA125 of the control group were significantly lower than in oncological diseases; however, these tumor markers also increased in saliva with benign diseases. The content of tumor markers depends on the stage of cancer, and the presence of lymph node metastasis; however, the identified patterns are statistically unreliable. The determination of HE4 and AFP in saliva was not informative. In general, the area of potential use of tumor markers in saliva is extremely narrow. Thus, CEA may be diagnostic for breast and lung cancer, but not for ovarian cancer. CA72-4 is most informative for ovarian mucinous carcinoma. None of the markers showed significant differences between malignant and non-malignant pathologies.

Point-of-care testing: a disposable label-free electrochemical CA125 and HE4 immunosensors for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) are critical biomarkers for ovarian cancer diagnosis and progression monitoring; therefore, sensitive determination of their levels in body fluids is crucial. In recent study, label-free CA125 and HE4 immunosensors were prepared using disposable screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with reduced graphene oxide, polythionine, and gold nanoparticles for the sensitive, fast, and practical determination of CA125 and HE4. Differential pulse voltammetry, square wave voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy methods were used for the electrochemical determination of antigens in four different linear ranges (1-100 pg mL- 1, 0.01-10 ng mL- 1, 10-50 ng mL- 1, and 50-500 ng mL- 1). High sensitivity, low limit of detection, and limit of quantification were obtained for each linear range with a correlation coefficient above 0.99. The application stability of CA125 and HE4 immunosensors was determined as 60 days, and the storage stability was determined as 16 weeks. Immunosensors showed high selectivity in nine different antigen mixtures. The reusability of the immunosensors has been tested up to 9 cycles. The Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm score% values were calculated using the concentration of CA125 and HE4 in the blood serum and evaluated in terms of ovarian cancer risk. For the point-of-care testing, CA125 and HE4 levels at pg mL- 1 concentration were measured in blood serum samples using the developed immunosensors and a hand-held electrochemical reader in approximately 20-30 s, and high recoveries were obtained. These disposable label-free immunosensors are user-friendly and can be used in point-of-care tests for rapid and practical detection of CA125 and HE4 with high selectivity, sensitivity, and repeatability.

Serum HE4 predicts progestin treatment response in endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: A prognostic study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate serum human epididymis-4 (HE4) as a predictive biomarker of intrauterine progestin response in endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). DESIGN: Prospective prognostic factor study. SETTING: Consecutive sample of women attending a tertiary gynaecological oncology centre in northwest England. POPULATION: Women with AEH or early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer who were unfit for or declined primary surgical management. METHODS: A total of 76 women, 32 with AEH and 44 with endometrial cancer, were treated with a levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for 12 months. Endometrial biopsies and imaging were performed to assess treatment response. Pretreatment serum HE4 was analysed by chemiluminescence immunoassay and diagnostic accuracy and logistic regression analyses were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progestin response at 12 months defined by histology and imaging. RESULTS: The median age and body mass index (BMI) of the final cohort were 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 33-62 years) and 46 kg/m2 (IQR 38-54 kg/m2 ), respectively. Baseline serum HE4 was significantly higher in non-responders than responders (119.2 pmol/L, IQR 94.0-208.4 pmol/L versus 71.8 pmol/L, IQR 56.1-84.2 pmol/L, p < 0.001). Older age (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99, p = 0.02), baseline serum HE4 (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p = 0.001) and endometrial cancer histology (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.72-0.68, p = 0.009) were associated with a lower likelihood of progestin treatment response. Serum HE4 remained independently associated with progestin treatment failure when adjusted for age and histology (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Serum HE4 shows promise as a predictive biomarker of progestin treatment response in endometrial cancer and AEH.

Biological variation of CA 15-3, CA 125 and HE 4 on lithium heparinate plasma in apparently healthy Caucasian volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Tumor markers are well-known for being important tools in the support of diagnosis, monitoring of treatment efficacy and follow-up of cancers. CA 125, CA 15-3 and HE 4 have demonstrated potential efficacy in other clinical indications. The main objective was to evaluate the biological variation of these glycoproteins using two different immunoassays in an apparently healthy Caucasian population. METHODS: Nineteen healthy volunteers including 11 women and 8 men were sampled weekly for 5 consecutive weeks. Samples were analyzed in duplicate on Lumipulse® G600II (Fujirebio) and on the Cobas e602 (Roche Diagnostics) analyzers. After assessment of normality, exclusion of outliers and analysis of homogeneity of variance, analytical variation (CVA), within-subject biological variation (CVI) and between-subject biological variation (CVG) were determined using a nested ANOVA. RESULTS: CVA, CVI and CVG were determined on both analyzers and both genders. For CA 125, the CVA ranges from 1.0 to 3.4%, the CVI from 5.7 to 13.8% and the CVG from 32.2 to 42.9%. For CA 15-3, the CVA is between 1.1 and 3.4%, the CVI between 3.9 and 6.5% and the CVG between 43.7 and 196.9%. Lastly, HE 4 has CVA values between 1.4 and 2.4%, CVI between 5.1 and 10.5% and CVG between 7.1 and 12.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided updated data on the biological variation of CA 125, HE 4 and CA 15-3. These data allow to improve the clinical interpretation and thus the management of the patient.

A label-free dual immunosensor for the simultaneous electrochemical determination of CA125 and HE4 biomarkers for the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

The blood levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymal secretory protein 4 (HE4) are measured in the diagnosis and progression monitoring of ovarian cancer (OC), and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) score% values are calculated for cancer risk assessment. For the first time, disposable dual screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with reduced graphene oxide, polythionine, and gold nanoparticles were used to fabricate label-free electrochemical dual CA125-HE4 immunosensors for the sensitive, fast, and practical simultaneous determination of CA125 and HE4. DPV and SWV methods were used to simultaneously determine antigens in two different linear ranges (1-100 pg mL-1 and 1-50 ng mL-1). High sensitivity, low LOD, and LOQ were obtained for two linear ranges with a correlation coefficient above 0.99. The application stability of the dual CA125-HE4 immunosensors was determined as 60 days, and the storage stability was determined as 16 weeks. The dual immunosensors exhibited high selectivity in eight different antigen mixtures. The reusability of the dual immunosensors has been tested up to 9 cycles. ROMA score% values for pre-menopausal and post-menopausal status were calculated using the concentration of CA125 and HE4 in the blood serum and assessing OC risk. The disposable dual immunosensors can be used in point-of-care tests for rapid and practical simultaneous determination of CA125 and HE4 with high selectivity, sensitivity, and repeatability.

Elevated level of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) predicts disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analyzed serum level of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a pulmonary inflammatory biomarker in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in association with disease severity and outcome. METHODS: Ninety-nine (40 critically ill, 40 severe and 19 mild) COVID-19 patients and as controls 25 age- and sex-matched non-COVID-19 bacterial sepsis subjects were included. Serum HE4 was measured by an immunoassay (Architect® i1000SR, Abbott) in the baseline samples of all study participants obtained at intensive care unit (ICU) admission or during outpatient clinic visit and follow-up sera were available in case of 30 COVID-19 subjects with life-threating conditions. Associations were studied between serum HE4, routinely available laboratory parameters, clinical characteristics, and disease progression. RESULTS: Baseline HE4 level was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in critically ill (524.7 [300.1-1153.0] pmol/L) than severe COVID-19 subjects (157.4 [85.2-336.9] pmol/L) and in mild SARS-CoV-2 infection (46.7 [39.1-57.2] pmol/L). Similarly increased HE4 concentrations were found in bacterial sepsis (1118.0 [418.3-1953.0] pmol/L, P = 0.056) compared to critically ill COVID-19 individuals. Serum HE4 levels significantly correlated with age, SOFA-score, inflammation-dependent biomarkers, and the degree of lung manifestation evaluated by chest CT examination in ICU COVID-19 individuals. Based on ROC-AUC curve analysis, baseline HE4 independently indicated the severity of COVID-19 with an AUC value of 0.816 (95% CI [0.723-0.908]; P < 0.0001), while binary logistic regression test found HE4 as an independent prognostic parameter for death (OR: 10.618 [2.331-48.354]; P = 0.002). Furthermore, COVID-19 non-survivors showed much higher baseline HE4 levels without a substantial change under treatment vs. survivors (P < 0.0001). Finally, pre-treatment HE4 level of ≥ 331.7 pmol/L effectively predicted a larger risk for mortality (Log-Rank P < 0.0001) due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Elevated serum HE4 level at ICU admission highly correlates with COVID-19 severity and predicts disease outcome.

Ancient helium and tungsten isotopic signatures preserved in mantle domains least modified by crustal recycling.

Rare high-3He/4He signatures in ocean island basalts (OIB) erupted at volcanic hotspots derive from deep-seated domains preserved in Earth's interior. Only high-3He/4He OIB exhibit anomalous 182W-an isotopic signature inherited during the earliest history of Earth-supporting an ancient origin of high 3He/4He. However, it is not understood why some OIB host anomalous 182W while others do not. We provide geochemical data for the highest-3He/4He lavas from Iceland (up to 42.9 times atmospheric) with anomalous 182W and examine how Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotopic variations-useful for tracing subducted, recycled crust-relate to high 3He/4He and anomalous 182W. These data, together with data on global OIB, show that the highest-3He/4He and the largest-magnitude 182W anomalies are found only in geochemically depleted mantle domains-with high 143Nd/144Nd and low 206Pb/204Pb-lacking strong signatures of recycled materials. In contrast, OIB with the strongest signatures associated with recycled materials have low 3He/4He and lack anomalous 182W. These observations provide important clues regarding the survival of the ancient He and W signatures in Earth's mantle. We show that high-3He/4He mantle domains with anomalous 182W have low W and 4He concentrations compared to recycled materials and are therefore highly susceptible to being overprinted with low 3He/4He and normal (not anomalous) 182W characteristic of subducted crust. Thus, high 3He/4He and anomalous 182W are preserved exclusively in mantle domains least modified by recycled crust. This model places the long-term preservation of ancient high 3He/4He and anomalous 182W in the geodynamic context of crustal subduction and recycling and informs on survival of other early-formed heterogeneities in Earth's interior.

Association between serum HE4 and poor periodontal health in adult women.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to explore the association between serum human epididymal protein (HE4) levels and poor periodontal health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data used in our study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2002 and Gene Expression Omnibus database (GSE10334 and GSE16134). Periodontitis category was defined by the 2017 classification scheme based on clinical periodontal parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between serum HE4 levels and the risk of periodontitis. GSEA analysis was performed to investigate the function of HE4. RESULTS: A total of 1715 adult women over the age of 30 were included in our study. Compared with the lowest tertile, individuals in the highest tertile of HE4 levels were more likely to be Stage III/IV periodontitis (ORtertile3vs1 = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.35-4.21). The association was still significant in populations who were less than 60 years old, non-Hispanic white, high school graduate, 1.3 < PI ≤ 3.5, non-smoker, current smoker, non-obese, obese, and who had not diabetes mellitus or had not hypertension. In addition, HE4 expression was upregulated in diseased gingival tissues and involved in cell proliferation and immunity. CONCLUSIONS: Serum HE4 is positively associated with poor periodontal health in adult women. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients with high serum HE4 levels are more likely to have Stage III/IV periodontitis. HE4 has the potential to be used as a biomarker to predict the severity of periodontitis.

Recent Insight about HE4 Role in Ovarian Cancer Oncogenesis.

Currently, ovarian cancer (OC) is a target of intense biomarkers research because of its frequent late diagnosis and poor prognosis. Serum determination of Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a very important early detection test. Most interestingly, HE4 plays a unique role in OC as it has been implicated not only in OC diagnosis but also in the prognosis and recurrence of this lethal neoplasm, actually acting as a clinical biomarker. There are several evidence about the predictive power of HE4 clinically, conversely less has been described concerning its role in OC oncogenesis. Based on these considerations, the main goal of this review is to clarify the role of HE4 in OC proliferation, angiogenesis, metastatization, immune response and also in the development of targeted therapy. Through a deeper understanding of its functions as a key molecule in the oncogenetic processes underlying OC, HE4 could be possibly considered as an essential resource not only for diagnosis but also for prognosis and therapy choice.

HE4 and CA125 serum biomarker monitoring in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: CA125 is the gold standard serum biomarker for monitoring patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) is a novel serum biomarker for EOC patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this trial was to examine the utility of measuring serum HE4 levels for monitoring EOC patients and to compare HE4 performance parameters to serum CA125. METHODS: A retrospective trial using residual longitudinal serum samples drawn during treatment and monitoring from EOC patients. Serum CA125 and HE4 levels were analyzed at each time point, and a velocity of change was calculated and correlated with clinical status. The null hypothesis was that HE4 is inferior to CA125, and this was tested using concordance and two-sided Fisher's exact testing. McNemar's test was used to assess the overall agreement of the two assays with the clinical status. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with 272 separate clinical periods and 1739 events (serum samples) were evaluated. Using a 25% change in serum biomarker levels to indicate change in disease status, the accuracy and NPV determined for HE4 versus CA125 were 81.8% versus 82.6% (p = 0.846) and 87.4% versus 89.7% (p = 0.082), respectively. Concordance comparison of HE4 accuracy / CA125 accuracy was 0.990, indicating HE4 was not inferior to CA125 (McNemar's test p-value = 0.522). Performing a velocity of change analysis, the accuracy and NPV determined for HE4 versus CA125 were 78.3% versus 78.6% (p = 0.995) and 74.9% versus 76.3% (p = 0.815), respectively. Concordance comparison of HE4 velocity accuracy / CA125 velocity accuracy was 0.996, again indicating HE4 was not inferior to CA125 (McNemar's test p-value = 0.884). The combination of HE4 and CA125 velocity changes showed a similar accuracy of 81.3% (p = 0.797 compared to HE4 and CA125 alone) and NPV of 81.1% (p≥0.172 compared to HE4 and CA125 alone), and an increased sensitivity of 70.5% (p≤0.070 compared to HE4 and CA125 alone). CONCLUSION: HE4 is equivalent to CA125 for monitoring of EOC patients. The combination of CA125 and HE4 velocities is superior to either marker alone.

CT imaging phenotypes linked to CA125 and HE4 biomarkers are highly predictive in discriminating between hereditary and sporadic ovarian cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary ovarian cancers (HOC) represent about 23% of ovarian cancer (OC) cases: they are most frequently related to germline mutations in the BRCA genes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare CA125/HE4 serum levels and Computed Tomography (CT) features at time of ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis in two populations: BRCA mutant and BRCA wild-type (WT) OC, and to investigate the relationship between this laboratory and radiological biomarker and BRCA mutation status. METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 newly diagnosed OC patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV disease, tested for BRCA1/2 germline mutation status of which preoperative CT scan and serum tumor marker assay were available. RESULTS: The median level of CA125 (708 U/mL) was significantly higher (p < 0.002) in BRCA1/2 mutated patients than in WT patients (176 U/mL), whereas the median level of HE4 (492 pmol/L) was significantly higher (p < 0.002) in WT than in BRCA-mutated patients (252 pmol/L). BRCA mutation carriers showed a higher incidence of bilateral ovarian masses (p = 0.0303) characterized by solid structures (p < 0.00001), higher peritoneal tumor load, macronodular implants >2 cm (p = 0.000099), increased frequency of lymphadenopathies (p = 0.019), and metastasis (p = 0.052) compared to patients with BRCA WT. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor markers and CT patterns may help in identifying BRCA mutation status in OC directing patients towards a personalized treatment.

HE4 as a serum biomarker for the diagnosis of pelvic masses: a prospective, multicenter study in 965 patients.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of adding human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to ultrasound for detecting ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Patients aged > 18 years who were scheduled to undergo surgery for a suspicious pelvic mass had CA125 and HE4 levels measured prior to surgery, in addition to a routine transvaginal ultrasound scan. The diagnostic performance of CA125, HE4 and ROMA for distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of 965 evaluable patients, 804 were diagnosed with benign tumors and 161 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer. In late-stage ovarian cancer, CA125, HE4 and ROMA all had an excellent diagnostic performance (AUC > 0.92), whereas in stage I and II, diagnostic performance of all three biomarkers was less adequate (AUC < 0.77). In the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer and endometriosis, ROMA and HE4 performed better than CA125 with 99 and 98.1% versus 75.0% sensitivity, respectively, at 75.4% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: ROMA and HE4 could be valuable biomarkers to help with the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in premenopausal patients in order to differentiate from endometriosis, whereas CA125 may be more adequate for postmenopausal patients.

Can serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) support the decision to refer a patient with an ovarian mass to an oncology hospital?

INTRODUCTION: The value of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in guiding referral decisions in patients with an ovarian mass remains unclear, because the majority of studies investigating HE4 were performed in oncology hospitals. However, the decision to refer is made at general hospitals with a low ovarian cancer prevalence. We assessed accuracies of HE4 in differentiating benign or borderline from malignant tumors in patients presenting with an ovarian mass at general hospitals. METHOD: Patients with an ovarian mass were prospectively included between 2017 and 2021 in nine general hospitals. HE4 and CA125 were preoperatively measured and the risk of malignancy index (RMI) was calculated. Histological diagnosis was the reference standard. RESULTS: We included 316 patients, of whom 195 had a benign, 39 had a borderline and 82 had a malignant ovarian mass. HE4 had the highest AUC of 0.80 (95%CI 0.74-0.86), followed by RMI (0.71, 95%CI 0.64-0.78) and CA125 (0.69, 95%CI 0.62-0.75). Clinical setting significantly influenced biomarker performances. Applying age-dependent cut-off values for HE4 resulted in a better performance than one cut-off. Addition of HE4 to RMI resulted in a 32% decrease of unnecessary referred patients, while the number of correctly referred patients remained the same. CONCLUSION: HE4 is superior to RMI in predicting malignancy in patients with an ovarian mass from general hospitals. The addition of HE4 to the RMI improved HE4 alone. Although, there is still room for improvement, HE4 can guide referral decisions in patients with an ovarian mass to an oncology hospital.