RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Facial aging involves ptosis, adipose atrophy, and skeletal resorption. Depletion of adipose tissue primarily affects the deep facial fat compartment, leading to facial depression or ptosis, accompanied by atrophy of the superficial compartment. Restoring volume in the deep fat compartment is crucial for facial rejuvenation, while enhancing its supportive properties is also important. The superficial fat compartment contains small-sized adipocytes, and autologous fat grafting is a popular approach. However, variability in fat retention, homogeneity, and processing methods can impact outcomes, necessitating careful selection of a suitable fat processing material for precise facial fat grafting. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted on 50 patients who underwent facial augmentation using combined transplantation of high-density fat (HDF) and condensed low-density fat (CLDF) and 25 patients who underwent conventional Coleman fat grafting. Coleman fat was harvested by standard technique and the adipose tissue was divided into HDF and CLDF fractions through centrifugation. Subsequently, the low-density fat fraction was subjected to a process involving physical disruption followed by additional centrifugation to obtain CLDF. The CLDF fraction was consequently injected into the pre-SMAS subcutaneous layer of the superficial fat compartments. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a typical Likert scale. Photographs were taken and imageological examinations were performed before and after treatment. RESULT: The CLDF+HDF grafting group demonstrated a significantly shorter duration of swelling (6.0 ± 1.2 to 12.6 ± 3.3 days) and higher level of patient satisfaction when compared to the Coleman fat group. No serious complications were observed among all the patients who received the injections. CONCLUSION: The use of this new treatment approach allows for precise fat transplantation in facial regions. The use of high-concentration fat filling for deep facial layers and CLDF filling for superficial layers is a safe and effective treatment plan for facial rejuvenation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo , Rejuvenescimento , Humanos , Rejuvenescimento/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Adulto , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Satisfação do Paciente , Técnicas Cosméticas , Envelhecimento da Pele , Estudos de Coortes , Face/cirurgia , EstéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although autologous fat grafting is a useful adjunct for breast reconstruction, its indications remain limited as large-volume fat grafting results in high absorption and complication rates. Low-density fat includes small numbers of viable cells and considerable oil, resulting in nodules and oil cysts. This study evaluated the volumization effect and complications with combined fat grafting of condense low-density fat and high-density fat. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included 25 patients who underwent combined grafting of condensed low-density fat and high-density fat (CLDF + HDF) and 20 patients who underwent conventional Coleman fat grafting for breast reconstruction from December 2017 to January 2022. Retention rates and complications were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound rates. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a typical Likert scale. Photographs were taken and imageological examinations were performed before and after treatment. OUTCOMES: Graft retention rate was higher in patients who underwent CLDF + HDF than Coleman fat grafting for breast reconstruction (38.40 ± 4.41% vs. 31.43 ± 5.43%, p <0.05). One patient in the CLDF + HDF grafting group, compared with twelve in the Coleman fat grafting group, developed oil cysts exceeding 1 cm. Patient satisfaction rate was higher in the CLDF + HDF grafting group. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical processes can concentrate the cellular content of LDF and remove oil, condensing LDF to the level of HDF. Combined grafting of CLDF optimized by mechanical processing and HDF is effective for breast reconstruction, with a higher retention rate and a lower incidence of complications than conventional Coleman fat grafting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Assuntos
Cistos , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Resultado do Tratamento , Mamoplastia/métodos , Cistos/etiologia , Fenômenos MecânicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Autologous fat transplantation is limited by the uncertainty of graft retention, impeding its application. Among the current strategies for processing lipoaspirates, high-density fat (HDF) is recommended owing to the enrichment of stem cells and washing before cotton concentration for simplicity of operation. Poloxamer 188 (P188) washing has been shown to repair the membranes of damaged cells. This study aimed to investigate the effect of P188-washing on fat graft survival and identify the best technique for processing lipoaspirates. METHODS: Lipoaspirates were prepared using centrifugation to obtain HDF, which was then washed with saline or P188 followed by cotton concentration. Tissue integrity, adipocytic activity, and viability of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in the samples from the 3 groups were assessed. Samples were sequenced in vitro using high-throughput RNA-seq, and differentially expressed genes were validated using qPCR and western blotting (WB). After transplantation under the dorsum of nude mice for 8 weeks, the grafts were extracted and examined for residual volume, histologic characteristics, and vascularization. RESULTS: The HDF and P188 groups showed a higher survival rate of SVF, more Ki67-positive cells, intact tissue structure, and lesser fibrosis than the saline group. There were no significant differences in the density of SVF and residual volume of grafts. HDF showed significantly improved vascularization during 8 weeks. Through RNA-seq and bioinformatic analysis, notable changes in several related genes after transplantation were observed. CONCLUSIONS: P188 treatment can prevent cells from apoptosis and preserve tissue viability, thereby improving graft quality. HDF contains large amounts of SVF and can be regarded as an excellent grafting material.