RESUMO
The ventral tegmental area (VTA) contains dopamine neurons intermixed with GABA-releasing (expressing vesicular GABA transporter, VGaT), glutamate-releasing (expressing vesicular glutamate transporter 2, VGluT2), and glutamate-GABA co-releasing (co-expressing VGluT2 and VGaT) neurons. By delivering INTRSECT viral vectors into the VTA of double vglut2-Cre/vgat-Flp transgenic mice, we targeted specific VTA cell populations for ex vivo recordings. We found that VGluT2+ VGaT- and VGluT2+ VGaT+ neurons on average had relatively hyperpolarized resting membrane potential, greater rheobase, and lower spontaneous firing frequency compared to VGluT2- VGaT+ neurons, suggesting that VTA glutamate-releasing and glutamate-GABA co-releasing neurons require stronger excitatory drive to fire than GABA-releasing neurons. In addition, we detected expression of Oprm1mRNA (encoding µ opioid receptors, MOR) in VGluT2+ VGaT- and VGluT2- VGaT+ neurons, and that the MOR agonist DAMGO hyperpolarized neurons with these phenotypes. Collectively, we demonstrate the utility of the double transgenic mouse to access VTA glutamate, glutamate-GABA, and GABA neurons to determine their electrophysiological properties. SIGNIFICANT STATEMENT: Some physiological properties of VTA glutamate-releasing and glutamate-GABA co-releasing neurons are distinct from those of VTA GABA-releasing neurons. µ-opioid receptor activation hyperpolarizes some VTA glutamate-releasing and some GABA-releasing neurons.
RESUMO
In recent years, hazardous chemical incidents have occurred frequently, resulting in significant human casualties, property damage, and environmental pollution due to human or natural factors. Accurately mining the lessons learned from accumulating incident reports and constructing the knowledge graph for hazardous chemical incident management can assist managers in identifying patterns and analyzing common attributes, thereby preventing the recurrence of similar incidents. This article addresses the challenges of dispersed textual information, specialized vocabulary, and data formats in hazardous chemical incidents. We propose a novel entity-relation extraction model called CPBA-CLIM (content-position-based attention-cross-label intersect matching) to provide an accurate data foundation for constructing the hazardous chemical incident knowledge graph. The content-position-based attention module, based on content-position attention, incorporates contextual semantic information into the combined encoding of bidirectional encoder representations from the transformer's content and position to obtain dynamic word vectors that align with the thematic context of the text. Additionally, the cross-label intersect matching strategy evaluates the rationality of entity-relation interactions in sets containing potential overlaps, reducing the impact of entity-relation overlap on triplet extraction accuracy. Comparative experimental results on public datasets demonstrate the model's outstanding performance in overlapping triplets. Qualitative experiments on a self-constructed dataset integrate our model with ontology construction techniques, successfully establishing a knowledge graph for managing hazardous chemical incidents. This research effectively enhances the degree of automation and efficiency in knowledge graph construction, thus offering support and decision-making foundations for hazardous chemical safety management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, the SIOP-RTSG developed a highly-conformal flank target volume definition for children with renal tumors. The aims of this study were to evaluate the inter-clinician delineation variation of this new target volume definition in an international multicenter setting and to explore the necessity of quality assurance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six pediatric renal cancer cases were transferred to ten radiation oncologists from seven European countries ('participants'). These participants delineated the pre- and postoperative Gross Tumor Volume (GTVpre/post), and Clinical Target Volume (CTV) during two test phases (case 1-2 and 3-4), followed by guideline refinement and a quality assurance phase (case 5-6). Reference target volumes (TVref) were established by three experienced radiation oncologists. The Dice Similarity Coefficient between the reference and participants (DSCref/part) was calculated per case. Delineations of case 5-6 were graded by four independent reviewers as 'per protocol' (0-4 mm), 'minor deviation' (5-9 mm) or 'major deviation' (≥10 mm) from the delineation guideline using 18 standardized criteria. Also, a major deviation resulting in underestimation of the CTVref was regarded as an unacceptable variation. RESULTS: A total of 57/60 delineation sets were completed. The median DSCref/part for the CTV was 0.55 without improvement after sequential cases (case 3-4 vs. case 5-6: p = 0.15). For case 5-6, a major deviation was found for 5/18, 12/17, 18/18 and 4/9 collected delineations of the GTVpre, GTVpost, CTV-T and CTV-N, respectively. An unacceptable variation from the CTVref was found for 7/9 participants for case 5 and 6/9 participants for case 6. CONCLUSION: This international multicenter delineation exercise demonstrates that the new consensus for highly-conformal postoperative flank target volume delineation leads to geometrical variation among participants. Moreover, standardized review showed an unacceptable delineation variation in the majority of the participants. These findings strongly suggest the need for additional training and centralized pre-treatment review when this target volume delineation approach is implemented on a larger scale.